Bill Connelly: Michigan’s season has gone pretty much as expected

Submitted by Blue and Joe on

Bill Connelly has a nice read about how Michigan's season has basically gone how it was expected to go. S&P+ projected Michigan to win, on average, about 8.9 games in 2017. That would drop to around 8.5 if Speight being out for the season was considered.

https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2017/11/21/16683112/michigan-…

Red is Blue

November 21st, 2017 at 1:34 PM ^

ND is an early season OOC game.  Sure would be great to win to get some momentum and an elusive road/ranked opponent win, but I'm not seeing as "must win".  Unless you're talking about a CFP run, in which case essentially every game becomes "must win."

jgoblue11

November 21st, 2017 at 2:18 PM ^

Notre Dame is a must won . Harbaugh has to win a road game against a ranked rival team. Notre Dame is not Florida, or Arkansas. it's a rivalry game. so yea, it's a must win. Also, it's going to the biggest storyline of college football. All eyes will be on if Jim can win the "big" games. plus 31-0 stings still.

The Mad Hatter

November 21st, 2017 at 2:30 PM ^

But the main reason I miss playing ND in the OOC games is that they're usually a pretty damn good team.  If we beat the piss out of them, chances are we're going to have a pretty good year (unless they happen to suck and we don't know it yet, like Florida this year).  If they pound us, I get to adjust my expectations in September instead of waiting a month or two.

Guy Fawkes

November 21st, 2017 at 12:27 PM ^

uhhh.....no, thats the minimum. If everyone wants to play this game where they predicted 8 wins then fine, thats the minimum expectation. If Michigan was 7-4 right now that would be absolutely unacceptable, hence the 8 win minimum. Michigan is a team that usually gives you exactly what you expect, most times in a bad way. 

Guy Fawkes

November 21st, 2017 at 1:53 PM ^

Fuck your averages, anything to fit your agenda right? And I know exactly how they work and in this case the "average" win season for Michigan just happens to coincide with the minimum expectation. Anything less than 8 wins this year would have been horrible. 8 was the minimum and the average, this isn't hard.

CompleteLunacy

November 21st, 2017 at 12:27 PM ^

Five-win improvement over the previous year, and one miraculously unlucky play away from an 11th win. All games (except OSU) were competetive. All while starting a fricking grad transfer at QB.

So soon we forget.

But yeah sure, we're not exceeding expectations this year, I definitely agree. We might have failed to meet expectations last year, but they were still like one FG try or one inch away from the championship game, so it wasn't some massive underperformance. And every loss was by a razor thin margin. Shit happens...it's sports. The best coaches and players in the world sometimes lose games like that. Tom motherfucking Brady took an undefeated team into a superbowl and lost to Eli Manning. 

Thing is, you can't expect to always exceed expectations, because by that point your expectations aren't actually expected anymore. 

 

 

lhglrkwg

November 21st, 2017 at 11:43 AM ^

I think most hoped we'd get 1 out of 3 from PSU, Wisconsin, and OSU and everyone more or less banked on us losing another one in there unexpectedly (I think many circled IU, but it turned out to be MSU). Most were thinking 9-3 and probably more leaned toward 8-4 than 10-2

Don

November 21st, 2017 at 12:26 PM ^

Who's "most?" I don't know what you predicted, but it's already been proven that "most" people at MGoBlog were not thinking 3 or 4 losses but much more frequently 2 or fewer losses.

I looked at a late summer prediction thread and 22 people predicted 2 losses or fewer, and 10 predicted 3 or more losses.

And Yo_Blue did this look back and found basically the same thing in other threads:

http://mgoblog.com/diaries/what-did-you-expect-look-back

http://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/preseason-hot-takespredictionsquestions?pag…

BananaRepublic

November 21st, 2017 at 3:50 PM ^

is a "hot takes" thread. If you actually read through it, you'll see that a lot of the bullish comments are along the lines of "13-0 and speight for Heisman!" I think there's a big difference between reasonable expectations that people on this board were espousing and people having a good time in a hot takes thread.

CompleteLunacy

November 21st, 2017 at 12:30 PM ^

I thought 9-3 was optimistic but attainable. Just because random people on the internet "expected" 10-2 doesn't mean we should hold the coach accountable for failing to meet unrealistic expectations.

p.s. Go away, troll. Go root for Washington State.

swalburn

November 21st, 2017 at 11:38 AM ^

I think we will be better next season but that schedule is just brutal.  I had us at 8-4 at the start of the year, losing to Florida and beating MSU.  I hope we are healthy by our bowl, blow someone's doors off and have optimism for 2018.

lhglrkwg

November 21st, 2017 at 11:50 AM ^

because it probably means you lost to a terrible Florida team and someone else terrible like Minnesota or IU and then everyone would be up in arms about how the team can't execute against lower competition and why can't Harbaugh win the easy games

michgoblue

November 21st, 2017 at 12:01 PM ^

I get that the MSU game is frustrating, and I am as upset his season as anyone, but people need to keep in mind that he game was played with our backup QB (who, in retrospect, is really not serviceable) and in which the entire second half was played in a tornado. Sucks to lose that game but there are reasons other Jan "we suck".

Fezzik

November 21st, 2017 at 11:52 AM ^

Has Peters played his way into the starting job next year or will Speight beat him out in the off-season? Would Harbaugh consider a 2 QB system? Does Speight transfer if he doesn't think he'll start? This will be an interesting off-season.

Blueblood80

November 21st, 2017 at 11:53 AM ^

We are Michigan! We are entitled to undefeated seasons every year! No excuses! Fire the whole staff!
/s

I may be in the minority but I still see Coach is building something great. It’s painfully painful to be patient. But patience we must have. Or I guess you can jump off the bandwagon. Make room for the 2018 crowd.

KC Wolve

November 21st, 2017 at 12:15 PM ^

Only morons think Harbaugh should be gone. I also agree with other posters that having Harbaugh brings higher expectations. I’m not saying UM should be undefeated every year, but it is year 3 and aside from the OSU game last year which they lost, the team hasn’t looked good against tough teams. I don’t count bowl games. You never know what you are going to get in a non-playoff game with a significant layoff. Other than a grad transfer at QB, that position has been dreadful. I’m fully aboard the Harbaugh train, but some of these areas are surprisingly bad.