Member for

8 years 2 months
Points
9998.00

Recent Comments

Date Title Body
07/17/2018 - 11:46am Maybe Mark Richt contributed…

Maybe Mark Richt contributed to the article?

07/16/2018 - 7:25pm Off the field behavior will…

Off the field behavior will be the reason given.

07/16/2018 - 9:05am What do you call a deer with…

What do you call a deer with no eyes and no legs?

 

Still no eye deer.

07/16/2018 - 9:04am What do you call a deer with…

What do you call a deer with no eyes?

 

No eye deer.

07/12/2018 - 12:34pm Yes it was.  I meant Denard…

Yes it was.  I meant Denard throwing to the wearer of the invisibility cloak (Gallon).

07/11/2018 - 9:07pm Jehu Chesson knocking down 3…

Jehu Chesson knocking down 3 ND tacklers.  Speaking of ND Denard last second come back UTL using invisibility cloak.  My favorite part of that is the ND announcer's tone.

07/11/2018 - 9:00pm Manningham to score against…

Manningham to score against PSU with very little time left.

07/11/2018 - 8:59pm Memory failing me.  Was it…

Memory failing me.  Was it Smith that magically popped out of a mass of humanity to score a longish td?

07/11/2018 - 2:44pm It obviously depends on what…

It obviously depends on what was meant by "great" in the phrase "great leader".  One could argue that unifying a bunch of folks to do something, even if it is wrong, shows that person has influence and power which are definitions of leadership. But being someone who leads other people is not the same a being a good person.  That being said, why would you use someone pretty universally viewed as evil as an example?

07/11/2018 - 2:29pm I would think the dislike…

I would think the dislike might even extend beyond folks who associate themselves with the two major parties.

07/10/2018 - 11:19am I think Beckmann made some…

I think Beckmann made some politically insensitive remarks.

07/03/2018 - 12:30pm You hit on my biggest issue…

You hit on my biggest issue with the game - really tough to knock someone out.  Maybe some type of strength multiplier based on the number of territories held.

Might also be interesting to "connect" Hawaii and PR and Alaska and Maine.  Would be harder to hide out in a "corner" and wouldn't give an advantage to teams who happen to start near a corner.

07/01/2018 - 9:27am Seems self serving for user …

Seems self serving for user "I'm Batman" to mention Batman as honorable mention.

06/22/2018 - 12:05pm Wisky, wounded but not yet…

Wisky, wounded but not yet dead.  Lets finish 'em off.

06/21/2018 - 1:35pm So as to bring an end to the…

So as to bring an end to the game, the definition of "winning the game" is having the most territories on July 4.  Since winning criteria was made AFTER the game started and feels pretty arbitrary, I'd much rather pursue the original objective of eliminating other teams.  Both W and OSU are trapped behind our alliance's lines, I'd say lets squeeze them into tighter and tighter spaces and finally push them off the board.  That'd be a lot more fun/gratifying then trying for the most territories on July 4.

06/20/2018 - 3:48pm I can't believe we've taken…

I can't believe we've taken 2 two 2020 commits and neither is an OL.  We're doomed.

06/20/2018 - 3:06pm I was torn between whether…

I was torn between whether it was as you described or whether he was actually complaining. 

06/20/2018 - 3:04pm Not with the size of this…

Not with the size of this avalanche.

06/20/2018 - 10:53am Does that mean the user who …

Does that mean the user who "won" 200 points the other day for being a Reddit CFB risk MVP really got nothing?

06/20/2018 - 10:52am Thanks for the effort…

Thanks for the effort despite JDon's spiteful counter attempt.

06/20/2018 - 8:25am Osu and Wisky are both…

Osu and Wisky are both isolated in the NE.  Hopefully our alliance can keep them trapped and slowly push them east and eventually eliminate them.

06/18/2018 - 2:54pm Clemson is occupying some…

Clemson is occupying some resources from OSU and Wisky, which is a good thing.

06/15/2018 - 3:37pm Could be the ally is not…

Could be the ally is not strong enough to hold it and the anticipation is that an enemy force will attack the territory.  So, while you're attacking an ally, you're really trying to prevent an enemy from taking the territory.

06/15/2018 - 3:27pm Game ends on July 4, whether…

Game ends on July 4, whether or not someone has taken over.  Winner is declared as team with most territories.  Without this hard stop, it would probably go on a very long time. 

06/15/2018 - 1:40pm Your order is to attack a…

Your order is to attack a territory, not a team.  So, if you were given an order to attack Wyoming, you would attack the territory defined as Wyoming even though the team Wyoming is no longer in the game.  

06/15/2018 - 11:14am My orders don't seem to make…

My orders don't seem to make strategic sense, but maybe that is just the life of a foot soldier who doesn't have the benefit of the larger strategy.

06/14/2018 - 1:50pm Wait, I thought when we lost…

Wait, I thought when we lost Toledo we gained the UP.

06/14/2018 - 1:49pm I don't know the mechanics…

I don't know the mechanics of the game well, but it seems really hard to knock a team out.  Once they get down to a very few territories, all their star power gets concentrated.  While an attacking team with lots of territories has a lot to defend. 

06/14/2018 - 10:40am Looks like a front (being…

Looks like a front (being roughly defined by the Ohio river and the Mississippi River south of Kentucky) is forming.  Would be great to kick out the Red teams out of territories behind that front so our Alliance could push west without worrying about having to defend/attack territories behind the front.

 

06/13/2018 - 8:21pm This gets said often, but…

This gets said often, but from a football perspective, why does that make sense?  If a player is going into their fourth year is buried on the depth chart and will graduate, they can stick around another year or they can transfer.  Either way they don't play in games, but can practice.  The advantage of transferring is that they can spend the year learning the new team's system so the following year the can better compete for playing time.

Obviously, if they're that close to graduating it probably makes sense to get the degree.

 

06/13/2018 - 8:12pm Obviously the occasional…

Obviously the occasional walk on passes a scholarship player.  But that is not the same as getting passed by 26 walk-ons.

06/09/2018 - 5:25pm How do you ever knock…

How do you ever knock someone out of the game?  Doesn't fewer territories just mean that that team's collective star power is more concentrated and therefore that team is more likely to win battles to/from their few held territories?

06/08/2018 - 4:19pm This seems like a pretty…

This seems like a pretty unimaginative way to end the game.  Would have been better if they started giving a bonus multiplier for the number of territories you hold, with that multiplier exponentially increasing over time (for a given number of territories held).

06/08/2018 - 8:59am It could absolutely make…

It could absolutely make sense for him to transfer after next year even if he is not ready to graduate.  

Scenario 1, he is second on the depth chart (or worse he is below 2nd) and he doesn't want to play a backup role in his fourth year.  So transfers to new school where he'd sit out the first year and could play the second.  But he gets to learn the new school's system while he waits.  Seems like he'd be better off learning the new system so he be ready to play in his last year.  The risk is that he misses some backup role game snaps (would could be meaningful if the starter goes down for any extended period of time).  Of course, if he is 3rd string or lower, then that risk is lower (bus not impossible as we saw last year).

Scenario 2, he is not on track to graduate after 4 years.  If he stays for his fourth year at Michigan and does not graduate before the 5 season, he can't graduate transfer.  So, either he stays at Michigan for year 5 or calls it a college career.

Scenario 3, The rules change to make transfers not have to sit out a year.

Scenario 4, he just wants out for whatever reason.

Scenario 5, I'm not sure exactly how this one works, but if he is willing to pay his own pay (ie not be on scholarship at the new school, does he have to sit out a year?

 

06/06/2018 - 9:48pm Just sent a few karma points…

Just sent a few karma points your way.  

06/06/2018 - 9:19pm Then wipe out Chaos first. …

Then wipe out Chaos first.  Seems like the only way to make progress would be to reduce the numbers against which we are fighting.

06/02/2018 - 10:40pm Not sure I get the advantage

Not sure I get the advantage that Neb would gain by turning on someone in their alliance.  Being the strongest team in that alliance, it woud seem to be to Nebraska;s favor to keep that alliance going to knock out strong teams in the other alliance.  Then, since Nebraska is the strongest, they'd have a leg up when the in-fighting in their alliance begins.

05/31/2018 - 4:53pm Throwing the other side a

Throwing the other side a bone. I was definitely not told to attack Oregon.

05/30/2018 - 8:02pm Not sure how to do it, but

Not sure how to do it, but Chaos needs to be eliminated.

05/29/2018 - 9:35pm The west push seems like a

The west push seems like a good approach, but first we most solidify the alliance by eliminating chaos and OSU from behind the front.

05/29/2018 - 9:33pm Red team has lots of members

Red team has lots of members with territories several (many) turns away from the alliance. The alliance needs to eliminate chaos, set a front, and eliminate the rogue states in our midst. Seems to me that is a lot to ask but if chaos and OSU continue to control territories in the east, it is a matter of time.

Each of the territories Texas controls borders at least one red team territory, so they could theoretically be eliminated in one turn. GT and Clemson are one day away from being in the same spot.

05/29/2018 - 9:28pm The west push seems like a

The west push seems like a good approach, but first we most solidify the alliance by eliminating chaos and OSU from behind the front.

05/27/2018 - 12:55pm Knocking out chaos would be

Knocking out chaos would be nice.

05/27/2018 - 12:51pm Looks like you're now over 50

Looks like you're now over 50 karma, so you should have earned that second star!

Seems like a long way to get 500 karma for that next star, but one good snarky comment can net hundreds of karma.

05/25/2018 - 3:23pm My strategy was to run around

My strategy was to run around in circles and flip OSU the bird.  Do I need to keep that quiet?

05/24/2018 - 9:47pm How do you find users on

How do you find users on Reddit to upvote them?

05/24/2018 - 1:24pm Hopefully we can take Kent

Hopefully we can take Kent without giving up another surrounding territory to Ohio.  That would give us a clear front.  Then Clemson and Michigan can march south to try and clear out VT, OSU and chaos and help fortify the Alliance.  

05/23/2018 - 2:50pm Team Chaos and particularly

Team Chaos and particularly adding players from schools that were knocked out into Team Chaos was a poorly thought out concept.  So, when we knock out OSU, they get added into Team Chaos and we have to continue to fend them off.

05/19/2018 - 7:07pm Pretty easy to see how

Pretty easy to see how someone could cross those names.

05/19/2018 - 7:01pm You and MSU.

You and MSU.