What are realistic expectations for the freshman receivers?

Submitted by WhoopinStick on
Michigan has an incredible freshman receiving class filled with talent and a diverse skill set.  But historically most freshman receivers at Michigan have not put up great numbers.  Below is a list of Michigan’s top 10 receivers (based on career receiving yards) followed by the number of catches, receiving yards, and touchdowns that each had in their freshman year.
 
1.  Braylon Edwards    3 catches, 38 yards, 0 touchdowns
2.  Anthony Carter    17 catches, 462 yards, 7 touchdowns
3.  Jeremy Gallon    4 catches, 49 yards, 1 touchdown
4.  Amani Toomer    16 catches, 238 yards, 1 touchdown
5.  David Terrell    14 catches, 149 yards, 2 touchdowns
6.  Mario Manningham    27 catches, 433 yards, 6 touchdowns
7.  Roy Roundtree    32 catches, 434 yards, 3 touchdowns
8.  Tai Streets    5 catches, 43 yards, 0 touchdowns
9.  Marquis Walker    4 catches, 31 yards, 0 touchdowns
10. Jason Avant    2 catches, 21 yards, 0 touchdowns
 
Five of these receivers  had less than 100 yards receiving during their entire freshman season,  only 3 totaled more than 240 yards receiving, and all had less than 470 yards.  Only 2 had more than 20 catches for the season.
 
History would lend one to believe that Crawford, Perry, or McDoom will lead the team in receiving this year.  But Michigan has never had a freshman receiving class like this one.  
 
What is a realistic expectation for any of the freshman receivers?  Will any of the freshman number above be broken - 32 catches, 462 yards, or 7 touchdowns?   

KennyGfanLMAO

September 1st, 2017 at 12:03 PM ^

Like some mentioned, a lot of these freshman were playing behind seasoned starters. That should be taken into consideration when looking at these stats. DPJ and Black look like they will be given more opportunities than most, if not all, of the receivers you listed. If one of our WR's don't break the record, I'd be very surprised. 

HimJarbaugh

September 1st, 2017 at 12:03 PM ^

I think one or both of DPJ or Black will end up with 400-600 yards and the rest of the bulk of the yards will go to Bunting, TWjr, Perry, Crawford, Evans, and Hill. I think if we see both of those guys in that range then we are in for really good things next year. 

Jalm

September 1st, 2017 at 11:44 AM ^

Depends how fast they can learn the system and run it full speed. I personally expect more from Black year 1 and think DPJs athletic ability will carry him through year 1 and he will have a break out year in year 2.

PapabearBlue

September 1st, 2017 at 11:44 AM ^

This was covered in the WR preview. Basically, HS ball has gotten better so receivers are coming out a little "more" ready to produce and that's "kind of" shown itself with the higher rated recruits.

 

So, the trend is that there's a pretty good chance they'll do alright. Especially considering we have no one else to catch the ball.

 

PopeLando

September 1st, 2017 at 11:45 AM ^

Didn't Odoms break the freshman receiving record? Even though he didn't end up being one of the greatest, he was a godsend that one year. He did that out of necessity, and we'll need it again. Look for a new freshman receiving record this year. My guess: Crawford starts hot, but by game 5 someone has overtaken him. Perry re-establishes himself, because our NFL level coaching staff values hard work and precise routes. 500 yards each for two freshman receivers.

markusr2007

September 1st, 2017 at 11:59 AM ^

will be come more pass centric with these young WR talents, with Pep Hamilton at PGCoordinator and a returning starting RS Jr. QB in Speight.

The reality is that Michigan's strength and experience in 2017 is now concentrated in the backfield.

The talented freshman WRs this year will also have to split potential receptions with Chris Evans, Higdon, Ty Isaac and even  Kareen Walker on screens, and with some talented TEs as well.

I look at things from the opposing defense perspective. Even if UM's young wide receivers have the dropsies on occasion, they are almost all lethally fast and homerun threats for six. So defenses HAVE to account for them and the TEs and the RBs running routes out of the backfield.

This opens a world of pain from Michigan's rushing attack, in my view, which despite the questions along the OL this year, might be one of the Big Ten's most underrated this fall.

Harbaugh loves him some fullback as well, so can't ignore those dudes as potential receivers also.

I'm not too worried about WR productivity and yardage as long as Michigan is getting first downs and scoring TDs, nobody is going to care.

Second, I think QB experience matters a lot in terms of freshman WR performance.

Anthony Carter was still the fastest, and most lethal WR Michigan ever had.  If Michigan had Dan Marino or John Elway on the roster in 1979, then holy shit.

But Michigan was enamored with that Option I offense, and having BJ Dickey and John Wangler operate it.  Not that Dickey and Wangler couldn't throw. Both were highly touted recruits for UM in the 1970s. But Bo's option offense philosophy and three yards and cloud of dust took time to modify, and put the brakes on Anthony Carter's final freshman WR stats at Michigan.

Still, Christ, ever two catches by Anthony Carter in 1979 resulted in his patented high knees dance and clockarm low-five touchdown celebration with his teammates. That's terrifying.

Speight's experience and poise will probably enhance the freshman WR performance this year.

 

LandryHD

September 1st, 2017 at 11:52 AM ^

I don't think any of the freshman WRs will have huge numbers. I also don't expect Crawford or Perry to have huge numbers. I think the ball will be evenly distributed.

The Bos of Me

September 1st, 2017 at 12:44 PM ^

Good post OP, data based arguments are the most interesting. The 500 yard threshold seems about right to me too, given the talent, the offense, and them being freshmen. My only concern with these guys is how quickly hey can become reliable factors against collegiate competition. I expect them, individually, to be up and down a bit at first, but collectively to be a strong and developing factor for opposing D's.

Quail2theVict0r

September 1st, 2017 at 11:57 AM ^

It would be interesting to look, but I'm guessing that most of those guys also had some upperclassman playing alongside them at the other receiver spot. It sounds to me like Michigan might have two freshman WR's on the field as starters, which I can't imagine has happened very often. 

chad

September 1st, 2017 at 12:03 PM ^

People's-Jones and Black are early enrollees. Michigan lost 2 senior starter WR's and starting TE so those numbers will be replaced. I don't think any of the above scenarios involved so much productivity that will be replaced.

Ghost of Fritz…

September 1st, 2017 at 12:09 PM ^

at MSU seems like a fair comparison.  Blue chip recruit playing as a freshman B/C of depth, etc.

He had about 450 years last year as a freshman, but was playing on a struggling offense with worse QB play.

Michigan's best freshman WRs are a bit above Corley in terms of raw talent.  But Corley was a sought after recruit.

So, given that M has a decent QB and is not dysfynctional on offense, why not 700 yards for which ever Michigan Fr WR ends up as the top producer?

It also depends on what sort of offense M runs.  Pep Hamilton might end up really spreading around the ball to different receivers even more than last year.  OTOH he might pass the ball more than last year. 

Perkis-Size Me

September 1st, 2017 at 12:12 PM ^

Either DPJ or Black will have more than any of the guys on this list. Not because they're that much better but because of necessity.

If we want to have any semblance of a passing game those throws are going to have to go somewhere besides to Crawford.

JonnyHintz

September 1st, 2017 at 1:33 PM ^

Idk about that. We aren't a team that airs it out. Look at our team receiving stats last year. Darboh led the way with 862, Chesson had 546 and Butt had 500. Then a bunch of guys 100 or below. So realistically we had three passing targets. This year we have Crawford, DPJ, Black, you have to figure they're going to get Martin involved, Perry is probably going to see an increased role, McDoom might get some run, and then you have 2-3 TEs that are going to get their names in there as well. It appears there's more mouths to feed as far as receiving options this year as compared to last. Which could ultimately affect the numbers

stephenrjking

September 1st, 2017 at 12:15 PM ^

They're going to be really good.

It's hard to tell who will break out and who will remain quiet, but I expect serious flashes from Black and DPJ and maybe Martin as well. Black seems to be the most ready, and I anticipate that he will start. I expect him to be reliable from the get-go. 

DPJ came in without knowing all of the routes. Learning the system will take time; he'll be in packages, but there will be times where they need Black just because there will be things Black will know that DPJ doesn't. But DPJ will, hopefully, do a couple of things so magical this year that we'll replay them forever.

And I wouldn't be surprised if, after both of those two had impressive moments tomorrow, Oliver Martin takes a quick pass to the house and people start talking about the receiver class nationally.

We'll see.

TheBlueAbides

September 1st, 2017 at 12:27 PM ^

Passing game is much different now than even 10 years ago. High schools pass the ball so these WR have a touch more experience actually catching passes. It's still a very hard position to contribute right away, but imo one of these 4 guys will be a factor if not multiple.

stephenrjking

September 1st, 2017 at 12:34 PM ^

BTW, the proper frame of reference for comparison is not other Michigan receivers at this point; it's other highly rated receivers throughout college football. The comprehensive rundown of 5-star receiver production from a few months ago was fantastic and helpful.

It's not that it's wrong to consider other Michigan receivers, but the world was different in the past. Sammy Watkins is a better indicator of what freshmen will do at Michigan than Anthony Carter.

Coach Carr Camp

September 1st, 2017 at 12:35 PM ^

Caveats obviously apply - we were a much less passing team in the days of these guys. Also, I believe most of them had a corp of veteran receivers ahead of them when they were freshmen.

More interesting comparisson - in recent years, what have other top ranked receivers around the country done in their freshman years? 

Ghost of Fritz…

September 1st, 2017 at 3:12 PM ^

possible that they will end up running a ton in the 2nd half in blowout wins.

But I think we are going to overall see a much higher percent of pass plays this year, just based on personnel, Pep Hamilton, and the fact that the o-line is on the agile but light side overall. 

If everything works well, this should mean fewer runs, but higher YPC on running plays. 

Defenses have to defend the whole field against a bunch of sets with combinations of 4 or 5 receivers (including TE and H-backs), which should clear out LBs and open running lanes. 

LSAClassOf2000

September 1st, 2017 at 2:16 PM ^

We talked about this a bit on "Wolverine Wanderings", but I am expecting a WR spread similar to that as well. I think we're deep enough here to spread the ball around and use a decent portion the entire cast of WRs on the roster. I am actually kind of intrigued by this component of the offense almost more than anything else, in fact.

jdemille9

September 1st, 2017 at 1:00 PM ^

Depends on how much they throw it around this year. It's not secret that there will be some spread concepts, and as Brian said in one of his previews (maybe 5 questions) this could be a college version of the Patriots.

Touched on by many is the fact that Kekoa Crawford is still here as are Grant Perry and Chris Evans, who should be in line for a bunch of receiving targets too. De'Veon Smith caught 16 balls last year, I could see Evans doubling that number. And while I don't think Crawford maintains his role as the #1 WR, he'll still be in line for 20-25 by season's end. 

If they do fling it around a lot more I could see Black doing something similar to Chesson last year, around 35 catches. I also expect him to have overtaken Crawford as the #1 WR midway through the season. 

DPJ is a tough one, his route tree is so limited that he probably won't see as many snaps as Black, but his athleticism is so crazy that he absolutely will see a good deal of snaps. 12-15 is where I think DPJ falls. 

I don't think we'll see one or two guys dominate the receptions this year, it should be fairly spread out among 5-6 targets, if not more. Overall I think the passing game will put up better numbers than last year, but we don't have any Darboh (57/862/7) or Butt (46/546/4) type individual numbers.

 

lilpenny1316

September 1st, 2017 at 1:16 PM ^

Sounds like Black is ready to start while DPJ will get a lot of snaps.  Braylon gave a very honest assestment of Detroit Public School football in the process.  Black is ahead of DPJ in terms of understanding the offense because he understands the WR position better.  He came from a system that taught route trees and other nuances of the passing game, while DPS programs focus more on running the ball and a simplistic passing game.  

Think about Donnie Corley.  He was supposed to be the man, but he was limited in what he could do.  It was probably due to the fact he was behind the learning curve on offense.

As Braylon put it, DPJ has 4.3 speed but not playing at 4.3 speed because he's thinking while playing.  Once he picks up the offense and the offense becomes more natural to him, he will then explode.

My guess is Black has his coming out party during the non-conference season.  DPJ hopefully starts playing at 4.3 speed by the PSU game.

JonnyHintz

September 1st, 2017 at 1:22 PM ^

Also have to factor in that historically, a true freshman WR hasn't really been thrust directly into the #2 WR role. DPJ and Black could both reasonably be in that 450 range. Possibly closer to 600 depending on how much of a threat the TEs are and how far ahead Crawford is.

MichiganStan

September 1st, 2017 at 4:02 PM ^

Did the WR you listed come in their freshman year knowing they were going to be top 4 WR on the team? Doubtful.

Tarik Black and DPJ are different. They are coming in knowing they are primary WRs from the get. Theyve been practicing with 1st team. Theyve been pushing each other.

Also, im going to doubt any of those guys on the list were as highly rated as the two especially DPJ who was obviously the #1 WR.

Nico Collins will be decent just purely because of his size.

Oliver Martin will be a non factor this season