January 13th, 2017 at 11:50 AM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 12:29 PM ^
Nearly perfect response. Just add one word:
This one lists Michigan as a potential destination. Read the post. Dumbass
January 13th, 2017 at 11:53 AM ^
I think those were "transfer" posts, this is "grad transfer"
January 13th, 2017 at 11:49 AM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 12:30 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 13th, 2017 at 3:04 PM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 3:05 PM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 3:37 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 13th, 2017 at 11:52 AM ^
Per NCAA rules, is he allowed to grad transfer back to Michigan? If so, would be awesome!
January 13th, 2017 at 3:53 PM ^
Akron compliance office wouldn't list Michigan on the letter if he wasn't allowed to transfer there. But AD compliance depts have been known to not be the most competent. I'm sure the fact that he already attended Michigan does't preclude him from transferring back though.
January 13th, 2017 at 11:56 AM ^
If he can perform to the level that he looked like at the start of 2015 where he was the 6th OL, that could really help us. This could for sure keep Cole at his natural position of C.
January 13th, 2017 at 11:56 AM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 11:58 AM ^
I'm confused. LTT grad transfered to Washington State about this time last year with two years of eligibility remaining. So he's transfering again? Did he get a graduate degree at WSU so this would be a grad grad transfer?
From a football perspective he's a monster. A sorely missed monster the last couple years.
January 13th, 2017 at 12:14 PM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 4:02 PM ^
that yes, I think he is grad transferring for a second time. Not sure about all the details but he must have graduated before the start of the 2016 season (likely by taking summer classes as has been mentioned and why he was able to walk with Michigan in Dec), which made him a graduate student this fall and was the reason he didn't have to sit out. He still has another year of eligibility so I guess he's allowed to grad transfer again.
Whether that requires a change in grad program I'm not sure. I thought grad transfers were only allowed to not sit a year if a player enrolls in a program not offered at the original institution which would mean he was in a program at Akron not offered at M and he'd have to start a new program at M that isn't offered at Akron? Not sure if that's still a rule. Maybe not, but a lot going on here.
January 13th, 2017 at 12:11 PM ^
I think there are some PR hoops the university and the football program will have to jump through, but it's a move they may be willing to make given our OL situation.
Even if he does transfer to Michigan, he'll have to sit out a year right? It may helpful in 2018 but our OL woes in 2017 won't change.
January 13th, 2017 at 12:13 PM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 12:27 PM ^
Thanks for clearing that up!
January 13th, 2017 at 12:13 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 13th, 2017 at 12:15 PM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 1:11 PM ^
returning offensive linemen.
January 13th, 2017 at 12:16 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 13th, 2017 at 12:18 PM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 12:42 PM ^
I still get the two confused.
January 13th, 2017 at 1:14 PM ^
Five hyphenated last names, one hyphenated first name, and apostrophed first names. #mgopunctuated
January 13th, 2017 at 1:30 PM ^
going for him. And we could certainly use the immediate grad-transfer-ability (double hyphen!).
January 13th, 2017 at 12:20 PM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 12:23 PM ^
In the 21st century if you make even the smallest of errors you will be forever identified by that one thing.
January 13th, 2017 at 12:33 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 13th, 2017 at 3:29 PM ^
'till you died of dysentery or a minor infection, of course.
January 13th, 2017 at 4:30 PM ^
No risk, no reward. Muhahaha Life on the Oregon Trail
January 13th, 2017 at 12:36 PM ^
it's been 20 years and i'm still not allowed within 300 ft of a church or school
January 13th, 2017 at 12:47 PM ^
seperation of church & state anyway?
January 13th, 2017 at 12:51 PM ^
one or the other please
January 13th, 2017 at 12:48 PM ^
That was his sentence so it hasn't been served yet.
If the school doesn't want to admit LTT, that should be the end of it. Wouldn't surprise me if that's the case. If the school is willing to bring him back, then I have no problem if Harbaugh wants to as well. Also if he doesn't. He knows him better than we do.
Redemption stories are nice, but this might not be the right place or time for this one. I'll just wish LTT luck wherever he ends up. I appreciate that he does want to return and I'm sure he'll land somewhere.
January 13th, 2017 at 12:24 PM ^
and thanked Coach Harbaugh for helping him grow up or something to that effect when he left.
If Coaches want him back I trust them. On the other hand if Sam says it would be a no, probably not happening.
January 13th, 2017 at 12:31 PM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 12:38 PM ^
Mr. "I-dont-want-attention" played Sam and everyone else. You can't blame Sam for that.
January 13th, 2017 at 12:45 PM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 12:48 PM ^
Those are two different types of situations.
One is what the coaching staff thinks about a player/situation, which he probably knows.
The other is what a 17 year old wants to do, which no one knows.
January 13th, 2017 at 1:58 PM ^
Mr. "I-dont-want-attention" was committed to a school for years and... SURPRISE! he went there.
Any attention given to him was not his fault. He never decommitted from Alabama.
January 13th, 2017 at 3:05 PM ^
/s
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 13th, 2017 at 4:11 PM ^
and the recruiting process. If he said he was solid early in the process and honest about "not wanting attention" he would have said he was solid with Bama and don't bother me again, instead he played the game to keep himself in the national recruiting conversation. Had he not done this he might have dropped off the recruiting radar and fallen from the #1 position, that's the game. So there's the player and the game we can choose to hate or like both.
But who cares now, he has to prove himself on the field after he gets his knee surgery, #1 ain't mean nuttin at this point.
January 13th, 2017 at 12:31 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 13th, 2017 at 12:41 PM ^
Why would he come back somewhere that he'll have to go through all of the re-hashing of what happened? The Drevno difference?
January 13th, 2017 at 4:10 PM ^
there was enough good things about the team, coaching staff and institution that outweigh any negatives from this re-hashing you speak of. If he's a mature kid that has paid the consequences and made amends (hopefully with the young woman), he could/should be perfectly fine coming back. He obviously wants to at least explore the possibility if M is listed on that letter.
Whether the coaches would want him back is another story, of course.
January 13th, 2017 at 12:54 PM ^
Take that for what you will. I know it's a consider the source type of thing. But if we ever find out LTT has a cousin named Troy from downriver...
January 13th, 2017 at 1:16 PM ^
January 13th, 2017 at 1:59 PM ^
or down by the river? Big difference.