The BLACK PIT of NEGATIVE EXPECTATIONS Comment Count

Brian

[Patrick Barron]

9/1/2018 – Michigan 17, Notre Dame 24 – 0-1

Ah so it's this bit again. The bit where some people pick up on a factoid and yell about it a lot and other people yell at them about it. The bit where everyone's mad and trying to take it out on someone.

I mean, I get it. Any properly scientific assessment of which football program it is the least fun to be a fan of will find a way to exclude Kansas for not actually being a football program and stick Michigan at the top. Nobody got into this to fight about the level of doomed we are every 3-4 years, never beat anyone of consequence, etc.

But I don't want to do it again. I've done this three times before, once per coaching era this blog has seen the end of, and I've done all the stuff already: preaching patience, gallows humor, being legitimately angry, calling for various heads, writing about mattresses. I don't really feel like doing it all over again. I don't care to evaluate the precise moment at which a person should be fired, or to point out that people are being ridiculous for wanting a person to be fired, or to create big lists of the next person to get fired. Neither do I want to sagely counsel the fanbase from the Tower Of Reasonability. This is not content it feels worthwhile to produce.

If you're mad, fine. If you're mad at the people who are mad, fine. I'm not going to argue with you.

---------------------------------------

Let's talk about the

BLACK PIT of NEGATIVE EXPECTATIONS

The BPONE is a state of mind in which no part of a football game is enjoyable because it is merely a prelude to some pratfall made more embarrassing and or painful by whatever minimal, temporary successes are experienced prior to the pratfall. Thus a kick return touchdown—that rarest butterfly, one the game is steadily trying to erase—during which your author's only reaction was internal and, I quote, "whoop-de-damn-do."

Going down 14-0 more or less immediately by blowing coverages on third down, getting beat over the top by battleship WRs, and having a shoulda-been interception ripped away by a 5'10" guy immediately puts you in the pit. The general shape of the offense provides a steady stream of pit reinforcement, to the point where my Twitter timeline's reaction to Michigan providing a vague sense of hope at the end of the game was "I hate myself for having this hope." This feeling of cynical dread was vindicated by the sack/strip that had to have been coming and did indeed come.

The more time one spends in the BPONE, the more permeable its membrane. Last year large swathes of the Michigan fanbase descended into it after Michigan had an extra point blocked. At the time Michigan led 20-14. Scoring the rest of the way was 17-0 Ohio State. When entering the BPONE is clearly a good choice, future opportunities to mitigate emotional harm by being miserable in the present are more likely to be taken.

The flaw in BPONE operations is of course the impossibility of mining any enjoyment out of your experience. BPONE sufferers assume a football game is a negative emotional event and spread those negative emotions out more broadly. Only if the team should actually come back and win will any regret be felt, and pffffffffft. I'm in the pit, baby! I know for a stone cold fact that a punt snap will somehow lodge itself in the facemask of the punter. I feel it in my bones that the one time we jump a route in this game the ensuing interception will bang off the defensive back's hands and lodge itself in the facemask of the opposition 50 yards downfield.

Tweeting from the BPONE is inadvisable and very, very difficult to avoid.

Checking your mentions will significantly deepen the pit and is likely to lead to BPONE-influenced tweeting, which is inadvisable. In fact, communicating in any form from the BPONE is inadvisable.

Alcohol will not improve anything but will be consumed in quantity anyway.

At some point repeated defeats will create an OMINPRESENT BLACK PIT of NEGATIVE EXPECTATIONS. OBPONE is a severe condition with consequences such as writer's block, writer's block, and writer's block. The only cure for OBPONE is a new season, but yo-yo-ing in and out of OBPONE makes individual occurrences of BPONE more severe.

Escaping this cycle of cynicism and recrimination requires John Beilein, who is not available for football purposes.

[After THE JUMP: some stuff]

AWARDS

Known Friends And Trusted Agents Of The Week

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Chase Winovich. Winovich looked like Michigan was trying to block him for most of the day, picking up 3.5 TFLs and a sack. He also forced the errant throw on Brandon Watson's interception. His roughing the passer call was weak at best.

#2 Ambry Thomas. Touchdowns are precious.

#3 Devin Bush. Displayed his sideline to sideline ability with frequency and had another rabid squirrel sack. Maybe at fault on a Wimbush scramble.

Honorable mention: The receivers were pretty good.

KFaTAotW Standings.

Who's Got It Better Than Us Of The Week

Kickoff return was kind of sweet though. 

Honorable mention: Uh. Winovich things?

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Every pass blocking incident.

Honorable mention: Hawkins gets the ball yoinked; Hill gets beat over the top. Many incidents where the DEs got around the edge but the DTs did little to nothing. Dropped FG hold.

[After THE JUMP: why]

OFFENSE

 

30569943218_91290573fb_k

[Fuller]

What were you doing in practice? Was it football? I feel like it couldn't have been football if Jon Runyan Jr told the media that he was able to win 8 of 10 times against Rashan Gary and Chase Winovich. Runyan won approximately 0 of 10 times against DEs against Notre Dame, once giving up a sack by letting a DL by him to the left when the line was sliding to the left.

I thought this was going to be bad—the tackles got a 1 in the season preview—but even I am shocked by how bad it was in the cold light of morning. Runyan looked so bad it boggles the mind that any amount of practice would not have turned up a better player more or less immediately. It boggles the mind that Michigan was so desperate to replace him last year that they played Nolan Ulizio and Juwann Bushell-Beatty over him and he was still the locked-in left tackle starter since the beginning of fall camp, and a locked-in starter at right tackle even before that. It boggles the mind that Michigan didn't even think of trying Ben Bredeson at tackle, that James Hudson didn't blow past Runyan in spring, that Jalen Mayfield didn't do so in fall.

Maybe Runyan just had the worst three hours of his life at the wrong time and it'll get better. I can't imagine that actually being the case. Runyan is a redshirt junior. He's done most of his developing already. That performance was the equivalent of John O'Korn's start against Indiana in 2016. He's got too far to go, no reason to expect he'll get there, and not enough time left for a fashion makeover.

He'll start next week. We'll see how long that lasts.

Under the circumstances. Patterson's first start went about as well as possible given his pass protection. I don't know where this stat comes from but it feels about right:

Patterson wasn't able to go deep except once, hit that, and completed two-thirds of his passes for 7.6 YPA. The interception wasn't great but we've seen enough assaulted QBs for one lifetime; in terms of bad decisions per angry person trying to kill you Patterson did well.

Dylan McCaffrey's cameo was fine. There was a palpable difference in arm strength between McCaffrey and Patterson, and one of that seemed like it would be relevant if McCaffrey needed to throw anything more than ten yards, which IIRC he did not. Harbaugh mentioned that he was still growing into his frame and needed time to build that velocity. That was apparent.

Where is Chris Evans? Apparently healthy but got two carries to Karan Higdon's 21. I thought Higdon did about as well as could be expected save for one cutback he made but not quite fast enough to escape the last linebacker before he hit the safety level; I still thought we'd see something closer to parity.

Wide receivers looked pretty good, at least. Nico Collins straight up went by one of ND's touted outside corners on his long reception; Grant Perry was his usual self when people remembered to throw it to him; DPJ was able to get open pretty frequently.

DEFENSE

44415747321_bfddfdd115_k

[Fuller]

FFS. A shut-down second half brought the defense's performance up to acceptable-ish if you flip one event: Brad Hawkins losing out on an armpunt to a guy named "Finke," which has to be up there for least intimidating WR names in history. Even with that ND didn't get over 300 yards by much (they were at 339); what they did get was mostly Wimbush scrambling around and those deep thunks to tall guys.

Wimbush scrambling around. Michigan started this game with Lawrence Marshall and Bryan Mone, which set two solid years of Mike Dwumfour hype on fire. He and Solomon rotated in but it felt like the former two were starters in both name and snaps, and that's a whole different world. Specifically in this game it was a world where when one of Michigan's DEs came around the corner there was a big gap between said DE and the DT to his side of the line, allowing Wimbush to step up and either run or throw.

If the DEs were getting around at ten yards that's on the DEs. If they were getting around at 7 or 8 that's on the DTs. It felt like it was almost all on the DTs. You don't expect much pass rush from them; you do expect them to at least push the pocket closed so that those easy broken field plays don't occur.

Deep thunks to tall guys. There were only two, actually, chunks of 26 and 28 yards, one over Hill. Hill's was a little alarming. He was beaten clean in a way we didn't see all of last year and was interfering in a 15-is-better-than-TD way. It didn't happen again, at least.

 43697578554_cf1307e7dc_k

[Bryan Fuller]

Why? The other deep thunk saw Noah Furbush in one on one coverage 30 yards downfield against a WR on third and nine. This is getting far too cute when you have the CB depth Michigan does and can expect organic pass rush from your ends.

Targeting roulette N/A. Not even targeting roulette could help Josh Metellus, who was deservedly booted for a helmet to helmet hit on a defenseless WR. Would he have made the Finke play? Probably not—BPODE—but maybe!

A genuine battle. Devin Gil and Josh Ross both played a bunch of snaps, so that was not balderdash about a tight position battle. Ross managed to out-tackle Gil 5-3, FWIW.

MISCELLANEOUS

Don't make me think about Hoke. Michigan's fourth quarter in this game was mostly spent down two touchdowns and mostly spent without any urgency whatsoever. The inability to get plays off with more than ten seconds on the playclock with under eight minutes left in the game is extremely disturbing and, yes, Hoke-ish. It speaks to a lack of organization.

Comments

Reader71

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:57 PM ^

Well, same idea holds for Runyan and the young guys. Game reps are the best way to improve, so if he can handle the less talented ends, he might work his way up to serviceable against the better ones. He’s never going to outmatch the defenders, but hopefully he isn’t outmatched like this again.

But you’re also putting the cart in front of the horse — if we can’t block against those guys, there’s no guarantee we can win those games, either.

TrueBlue2003

September 4th, 2018 at 1:00 AM ^

I trust your opinion about linemen more than anyone on this blog, so I hope you're correct that reps can improve him at this point (and of course they can improve him some, the question is how much, because it seems like he has a long way to go).

But to others points, he is certainly not the most physically talented OT on the roster. So it seems like you get the younger, higher ceiling guys those reps and hope they work their way up their steep learning curves enough to actually be good; something that Runyan is unlikely to ever be given his physical limitations.  I hope I'm wrong about that though.

Fezzik

September 3rd, 2018 at 8:03 PM ^

I was there with you. Runyan tested as the most athletic offensive linemen at Michigan's camp/practice last year and I read multiple times he is supposed to be the most athletic OL we have to back that up. A year older and a new position coach...I really thought he would become not good, but serviceable at tackle. 

DY

September 4th, 2018 at 10:08 AM ^

I feel like that is usually the case. How often do sons of famous athletes exceed the accomplishments of their fathers? Steph Curry, Ken Griffey Jr, Cal Ripkin Jr, and Clay Matthews come to mind but there are hundreds (thousands?) that don't measure up: Jeffery Jordan, Jordan Dumars, Mark Harmon. I think it's pretty safe to say that the odds are long that Tom Brady's kid wins a Super Bowl and one of Desmond Howard's sons wins a Heisman. Tyrone Wheatley Jr just left the program.

Reader71

September 3rd, 2018 at 5:39 PM ^

Again, the key word was relatively. I have hopes that Runyan can have a Huyge-like season. That’s faint praise, but praise nonetheless considering I don’t think any other tackle on the roster could even reach that level. Of course, I’ve never even seen the true freshmen take a practice rep.

Why? Before the ND game, I thought his pass sets were decent and, most importantly, consistent. Compare them to JBB, for example, who you can never guess where his feet will take him off the snap or how long after the snap it will take him to move.

After the ND game, I share your same concerns. He didn’t use his hands well and he couldn’t handle change of direction at all, and when he was beaten with speed, he showed no ability to save the block. 

Michiganfaninb…

September 3rd, 2018 at 7:22 PM ^

I remember one particular play in the 2nd qtr I believe where JBB was beaten badly by a LB. The LB faked inside and then popped to JBB’s outside (his right side) and JBB never even got his right arm and  hand up, simply getting his arm back up would have pushed the guy outside the pocket. It will be a long season for him out there. 

Reader71

September 3rd, 2018 at 10:39 PM ^

In most instances, yes. But without knowing the particular protection called on the play, it’s impossible to give a definitive answer. But generally, yes, you at least want to be aware of the heightened probability. 

Stunts work because they mess with the assignment (who blocks who) but also because they mess with the technique (how to block who). Runyan struggled with changing direction all game.

If you’re beaten around the edge, you naturally try to take a faster set, maybe deeper, and your instinct is to turn your shoulders outside. But then, bam, the defender slants inside, and your first instinct is to drop your post foot back (this is a no-no, but happens all the time, even in the NFL, where line play is an absolute shambles) and turn your body right in order to stay in front. But when you turn your body, you’re in no position to then pick up the stunting tackle to your left.

The remedy to all of it is better sets, keeping your shoulders parallel to the line of scrimmage, having your head on a swivel, and having quick feet. Against ND, he didn’t seem to have quick feet or a tendency to stay square. Technique-wise, that can be fixed. But if you just don’t have the foot-speed, you’ll never be able to use the perfect technique, because you’ll need to cheat yourself just to get to the right spot. We will see if our guys have the ability.

mgoblue98

September 4th, 2018 at 12:35 AM ^

I guess my thought was that he appeared to engage the DE on every occurrence of the stunt, which necessarily meant he was turning to his right.  I agree that line calls matter, as does whether or not a TE is ligned up next to him for help; but it honestly didn't look like he ever adjusted to the fact that a stunt or blitz might be coming.

Also, footwork is the most important aspect of any sport, not just football, so that's a great point.

I pray that we find at least two guys who can get the job done.

Reader71

September 4th, 2018 at 8:49 AM ^

He has to engage with the end, in order to slow the end and safely pass him off to the guard next to him. Otherwise, that end kills the QB instead of the looping tackle.

From what I saw, his problem wasn’t that he engaged the end, but that he engaged him poorly and left himself no chance to adjust to a stunt, because he turned his body inside.

Take that for what it’s worth, which isn’t a whole lot because I’ve only seen the game once, and was druuuuuuunk. Not willing to bet any lemons, but that was what jumped out at me.

Alumnus93

September 3rd, 2018 at 8:11 PM ^

Year 4 and we have a guard in Runyan, playing LT.... and a RT who shouldn't be...

Harbaugh must have put all faith in landing Isiah Wilson and Hamilton... in fact after whiffing on those two it seems they had no backup plan... I'd figure theyd have a list of guys they could go to, with the right body type...  instead... MORE GUARDS like Stewart, Paea, Honigford….

what harbaugh I don't think appreciates is what he had set up for him when he played here.. they address the OL better than anyone, so he took it for granted... and thought could get by with guards and kick them out... good programs get tackles and kick them inside..

THe sad part is everyone here was watching it in slow motion, not sure if they should believe, what they were seeing....  I know I was told to give the staff the benefit of doubt.... well.... every other position is solid, what a shame...

PasadenaFan

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:18 PM ^

I'd say this is beyond analytics.  This is about playing UP a level and getting jacked up and performing.  The only way to beat nervousness is through aggression.  The team needs to tighten up their jock straps and perform.  Should have won the game.  Shame on the gameplan from the MICH coaches on both sides of the ball.  They said this QB was a 50% passer.   Well, he looked a lot fucking better than that Son!

SpilledMilk

September 3rd, 2018 at 6:11 PM ^

Wimbush was one of the worst passers that we will face all season... Unfortunately, JT Barret finally ran out of eligibility (ive been saying for years that I wish he could have unlimited eligibility). His replacement is an actual QB and that sucks. Lewerke is ok-ish I guess (better than wombash) and honniker is alright too.

stephenrjking

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:19 PM ^

There were some flukey or toss-up things that went against Michigan that could've made things better, even winnable. But the offense needs to be good enough to overcome that stuff and it wasn't.

Runyan was really, really a problem. Not the only one, but the main one. 

I guess I am curiously lonely here in this position: The pass play on which Hill got beat was weird--they called PI, but I thought it was a clear push-off on the ND receiver and should have been called the other way. 

EDIT: BTW, this post and the predictable meltdown throughout Michigan fandom after the game is the main reason why this game was important. Good teams lost tight games on the road to other good teams occasionally; this is one of those situations. ND might be really good this year, who knows?

The problem is that the narrative around the program is really bad. People talk about 0-17 and stuff as if it's all Harbaugh's fault, wonder if the program is cursed, etc. Rank superstition. But the feeling is there.

Things will feel better if the team picks things up and wins some big games in October and November, but we need to win. It's going to be hard to attract recruits if this season winds up 8-4 with fans basically in open apathy. 

TrueBlue2003

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:53 PM ^

Eh, Wisconsin is the only game on the schedule left that isn't a must-win.  It means practically nothing.  It's not a divisional game. We would get a rematch in the title game if they do win the division.  Would likely still go to the CFP at 11-2 if that's the only game they lose the rest of the way.

I say use half that week of practice to work on MSU and focus on the more meaningful divisional game.

If, you know, we are actually practicing football which seems questionable at this point.

The Fugitive

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:09 PM ^

You are correct in terms of making it to Indy, but I'm looking at it from a confidence perspective.  I wouldn't expect Michigan to just be able to flip a switch coming off a loss then playing against a program that lives to hate their guts.

Build some confidence before another road (likely night) game against a ranked opponent.

TrueBlue2003

September 4th, 2018 at 1:14 AM ^

I just couldn't disagree more.  IF M wins their next five including a win at Northwestern and then loses to Wisconsin and loses confidence, there is something seriously wrong with them and the coaches.  They'd be 5-2 with two loses to top 10 teams.  No shame in that.  And everything still left to play for.

They'll be ready and confident and fired up going into MSU if they're 5-2. And remember, MSU barely beat Utah State.  They very likely could lose at ASU in a late game this weekend.  They play at PSU the week before they host M.  They also play Northwestern.  They'll probably also be 5-2.  M will not lack for confidence against MSU unless they're 4-3 or worse and at that point who cares?

Onas

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:54 PM ^

So true. Fans act like the team is "0-17" or "9-9" or whatever stat our detractors have carefully binned to make us feel the worst. This team is 0-1 after losing their first game of the year with a (functionally) new OL and QB on the road against a top 15 team... by 7 points.

Michigan Football is not about us.

ak47

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:59 PM ^

The ND receiver didn't push off until the very end, Hill was grabbing and interfering from the moment he got beat cleanly off the line. It was very much pass interference on Hill and he was doing to avoid giving up a 50 yard plus play.

The problem isn't that we lost to a good team on the road. Its that we looked like the exact same team from last year doing it. There was zero indication from that game that this is a team that is going to go on the road and beat a good OSU or MSU team or beat Wisconsin at home. If you think we win those games its because of leftover offseason hype hope, not anything we saw in that game.

Lakeyale13

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:31 PM ^

I think much of the frustration Michigan fans have (myself included) is that we keep on losing the pivotal game.  The game that has a chance to make a real statement.  To turn the tide.  We are Charlie Brown and Lucy is forever pulling the football out from under us.  

What Harbaugh has yet to do is win "That Game"...the game that will put us over the hump.  The game that can change the narrative of Michigan Football.  Thats what all of us expected...that Harbaugh would be bring results that would change the narrative of the last 10 years.  

Hasn't happened yet.  Maybe 4 years is too little time.  Maybe this is the best Michigan is gonna be

jbrandimore

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:46 PM ^

Good points, but I’m not sure “narrative” is the right word.

To me, narrative implies a common perception that while true, is debatable.

We are 0-17. It’s not a narrative, it’s a fact.

Yesterday one of my OSU friends saw a meme talking about 0-17 and asked me about it thinking there was no way it was true.

Sadly, I had to not only confirm it was true, but it can be said we haven’t beaten a top 20 team on the road since Bo died.

Changing the “narrative” either requires a win or a seance or perhaps both.

BrewCityBlue

September 3rd, 2018 at 11:30 PM ^

How many of those 17 games was Harbaugh coaching? How many were affected by coaching transition roster issues and cratered OL recruiting? The blocked punt game. The hometown refs terrible spot game. Mich has been incredibly unlucky and has not been good enough coaching, recruiting, scheduling, administering or playing football to overcome that bad luck. But cherry picking that worthless 17 game stat without context is very simple minded unless one is just trying to find a cute and concise way to say that things have generally sucked for M football for numerous messed up reasons over the last decade plus.