The BLACK PIT of NEGATIVE EXPECTATIONS Comment Count

Brian

[Patrick Barron]

9/1/2018 – Michigan 17, Notre Dame 24 – 0-1

Ah so it's this bit again. The bit where some people pick up on a factoid and yell about it a lot and other people yell at them about it. The bit where everyone's mad and trying to take it out on someone.

I mean, I get it. Any properly scientific assessment of which football program it is the least fun to be a fan of will find a way to exclude Kansas for not actually being a football program and stick Michigan at the top. Nobody got into this to fight about the level of doomed we are every 3-4 years, never beat anyone of consequence, etc.

But I don't want to do it again. I've done this three times before, once per coaching era this blog has seen the end of, and I've done all the stuff already: preaching patience, gallows humor, being legitimately angry, calling for various heads, writing about mattresses. I don't really feel like doing it all over again. I don't care to evaluate the precise moment at which a person should be fired, or to point out that people are being ridiculous for wanting a person to be fired, or to create big lists of the next person to get fired. Neither do I want to sagely counsel the fanbase from the Tower Of Reasonability. This is not content it feels worthwhile to produce.

If you're mad, fine. If you're mad at the people who are mad, fine. I'm not going to argue with you.

---------------------------------------

Let's talk about the

BLACK PIT of NEGATIVE EXPECTATIONS

The BPONE is a state of mind in which no part of a football game is enjoyable because it is merely a prelude to some pratfall made more embarrassing and or painful by whatever minimal, temporary successes are experienced prior to the pratfall. Thus a kick return touchdown—that rarest butterfly, one the game is steadily trying to erase—during which your author's only reaction was internal and, I quote, "whoop-de-damn-do."

Going down 14-0 more or less immediately by blowing coverages on third down, getting beat over the top by battleship WRs, and having a shoulda-been interception ripped away by a 5'10" guy immediately puts you in the pit. The general shape of the offense provides a steady stream of pit reinforcement, to the point where my Twitter timeline's reaction to Michigan providing a vague sense of hope at the end of the game was "I hate myself for having this hope." This feeling of cynical dread was vindicated by the sack/strip that had to have been coming and did indeed come.

The more time one spends in the BPONE, the more permeable its membrane. Last year large swathes of the Michigan fanbase descended into it after Michigan had an extra point blocked. At the time Michigan led 20-14. Scoring the rest of the way was 17-0 Ohio State. When entering the BPONE is clearly a good choice, future opportunities to mitigate emotional harm by being miserable in the present are more likely to be taken.

The flaw in BPONE operations is of course the impossibility of mining any enjoyment out of your experience. BPONE sufferers assume a football game is a negative emotional event and spread those negative emotions out more broadly. Only if the team should actually come back and win will any regret be felt, and pffffffffft. I'm in the pit, baby! I know for a stone cold fact that a punt snap will somehow lodge itself in the facemask of the punter. I feel it in my bones that the one time we jump a route in this game the ensuing interception will bang off the defensive back's hands and lodge itself in the facemask of the opposition 50 yards downfield.

Tweeting from the BPONE is inadvisable and very, very difficult to avoid.

Checking your mentions will significantly deepen the pit and is likely to lead to BPONE-influenced tweeting, which is inadvisable. In fact, communicating in any form from the BPONE is inadvisable.

Alcohol will not improve anything but will be consumed in quantity anyway.

At some point repeated defeats will create an OMINPRESENT BLACK PIT of NEGATIVE EXPECTATIONS. OBPONE is a severe condition with consequences such as writer's block, writer's block, and writer's block. The only cure for OBPONE is a new season, but yo-yo-ing in and out of OBPONE makes individual occurrences of BPONE more severe.

Escaping this cycle of cynicism and recrimination requires John Beilein, who is not available for football purposes.

[After THE JUMP: some stuff]

AWARDS

Known Friends And Trusted Agents Of The Week

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Chase Winovich. Winovich looked like Michigan was trying to block him for most of the day, picking up 3.5 TFLs and a sack. He also forced the errant throw on Brandon Watson's interception. His roughing the passer call was weak at best.

#2 Ambry Thomas. Touchdowns are precious.

#3 Devin Bush. Displayed his sideline to sideline ability with frequency and had another rabid squirrel sack. Maybe at fault on a Wimbush scramble.

Honorable mention: The receivers were pretty good.

KFaTAotW Standings.

Who's Got It Better Than Us Of The Week

Kickoff return was kind of sweet though. 

Honorable mention: Uh. Winovich things?

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Every pass blocking incident.

Honorable mention: Hawkins gets the ball yoinked; Hill gets beat over the top. Many incidents where the DEs got around the edge but the DTs did little to nothing. Dropped FG hold.

[After THE JUMP: why]

OFFENSE

 

30569943218_91290573fb_k

[Fuller]

What were you doing in practice? Was it football? I feel like it couldn't have been football if Jon Runyan Jr told the media that he was able to win 8 of 10 times against Rashan Gary and Chase Winovich. Runyan won approximately 0 of 10 times against DEs against Notre Dame, once giving up a sack by letting a DL by him to the left when the line was sliding to the left.

I thought this was going to be bad—the tackles got a 1 in the season preview—but even I am shocked by how bad it was in the cold light of morning. Runyan looked so bad it boggles the mind that any amount of practice would not have turned up a better player more or less immediately. It boggles the mind that Michigan was so desperate to replace him last year that they played Nolan Ulizio and Juwann Bushell-Beatty over him and he was still the locked-in left tackle starter since the beginning of fall camp, and a locked-in starter at right tackle even before that. It boggles the mind that Michigan didn't even think of trying Ben Bredeson at tackle, that James Hudson didn't blow past Runyan in spring, that Jalen Mayfield didn't do so in fall.

Maybe Runyan just had the worst three hours of his life at the wrong time and it'll get better. I can't imagine that actually being the case. Runyan is a redshirt junior. He's done most of his developing already. That performance was the equivalent of John O'Korn's start against Indiana in 2016. He's got too far to go, no reason to expect he'll get there, and not enough time left for a fashion makeover.

He'll start next week. We'll see how long that lasts.

Under the circumstances. Patterson's first start went about as well as possible given his pass protection. I don't know where this stat comes from but it feels about right:

Patterson wasn't able to go deep except once, hit that, and completed two-thirds of his passes for 7.6 YPA. The interception wasn't great but we've seen enough assaulted QBs for one lifetime; in terms of bad decisions per angry person trying to kill you Patterson did well.

Dylan McCaffrey's cameo was fine. There was a palpable difference in arm strength between McCaffrey and Patterson, and one of that seemed like it would be relevant if McCaffrey needed to throw anything more than ten yards, which IIRC he did not. Harbaugh mentioned that he was still growing into his frame and needed time to build that velocity. That was apparent.

Where is Chris Evans? Apparently healthy but got two carries to Karan Higdon's 21. I thought Higdon did about as well as could be expected save for one cutback he made but not quite fast enough to escape the last linebacker before he hit the safety level; I still thought we'd see something closer to parity.

Wide receivers looked pretty good, at least. Nico Collins straight up went by one of ND's touted outside corners on his long reception; Grant Perry was his usual self when people remembered to throw it to him; DPJ was able to get open pretty frequently.

DEFENSE

44415747321_bfddfdd115_k

[Fuller]

FFS. A shut-down second half brought the defense's performance up to acceptable-ish if you flip one event: Brad Hawkins losing out on an armpunt to a guy named "Finke," which has to be up there for least intimidating WR names in history. Even with that ND didn't get over 300 yards by much (they were at 339); what they did get was mostly Wimbush scrambling around and those deep thunks to tall guys.

Wimbush scrambling around. Michigan started this game with Lawrence Marshall and Bryan Mone, which set two solid years of Mike Dwumfour hype on fire. He and Solomon rotated in but it felt like the former two were starters in both name and snaps, and that's a whole different world. Specifically in this game it was a world where when one of Michigan's DEs came around the corner there was a big gap between said DE and the DT to his side of the line, allowing Wimbush to step up and either run or throw.

If the DEs were getting around at ten yards that's on the DEs. If they were getting around at 7 or 8 that's on the DTs. It felt like it was almost all on the DTs. You don't expect much pass rush from them; you do expect them to at least push the pocket closed so that those easy broken field plays don't occur.

Deep thunks to tall guys. There were only two, actually, chunks of 26 and 28 yards, one over Hill. Hill's was a little alarming. He was beaten clean in a way we didn't see all of last year and was interfering in a 15-is-better-than-TD way. It didn't happen again, at least.

 43697578554_cf1307e7dc_k

[Bryan Fuller]

Why? The other deep thunk saw Noah Furbush in one on one coverage 30 yards downfield against a WR on third and nine. This is getting far too cute when you have the CB depth Michigan does and can expect organic pass rush from your ends.

Targeting roulette N/A. Not even targeting roulette could help Josh Metellus, who was deservedly booted for a helmet to helmet hit on a defenseless WR. Would he have made the Finke play? Probably not—BPODE—but maybe!

A genuine battle. Devin Gil and Josh Ross both played a bunch of snaps, so that was not balderdash about a tight position battle. Ross managed to out-tackle Gil 5-3, FWIW.

MISCELLANEOUS

Don't make me think about Hoke. Michigan's fourth quarter in this game was mostly spent down two touchdowns and mostly spent without any urgency whatsoever. The inability to get plays off with more than ten seconds on the playclock with under eight minutes left in the game is extremely disturbing and, yes, Hoke-ish. It speaks to a lack of organization.

Comments

budz

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:37 PM ^

I'm losing faith in Harbaugh's ability to do anything creative on offense. If Ambry Thomas doesn't start getting touches, on an offense with a depleted receiving corps, and no home run threats, I will cry. 

shags

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:40 PM ^

Black Pit of Negative Expectations.  This is a fantastic article.  That's exactly how I feel watching Michigan football now.  It's just not fun.

Ron Utah

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:40 PM ^

Great write up. I was tempted to do a diary that statistically points out:

  1. A close loss in a night road game to a quality non-conference team is not that big of a deal. 
  2. Notre Dame is basically 2017 PSU with a much better defense but no Saquon Barkley. They are likely a 10 win team and this loss will not ruin UM’s playoff hopes. 
  3. Despite the BPONE, the QB, WR, and even the RB and play has improved. 
  4. Lots of coaching transitions and adjustments on offense means we will need a bit of time to calibrate the offense. 

OTOH:

  • Wimbush faces similar pressure all night and still got deep throws off by arm punting. We have Nico and DPJ and Gentry. Not arm punting feels like we are avoiding it because JH feels like it’s not honorable. 
  • Did we practice jump balls at all? On offense (Gentry) and defense (Hill, Hawkins) we simply got outworked.  That is an easy drill to practice (and fun). Do it. 
  • The offense still feels stiff and predictable. 
  • I would like to see Collins/Perry, DPJ, Gentry/McKeon, Evans (H slot) and Higdon OR DPJ/Collins/Perry, Gentry, McKeon, Evans (H slot) and Higdon more. Evans and Higdon are two of our best 11. While it’s fun to see Oliver Martin catch some passes and Nico and DPJ do some damage on bubble screens, I have to wonder what Evans could have done with some of those passes. 

TrueBlue2003

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:59 PM ^

We did arm punt a couple times.  It's just that our guys don't make plays.  Gentry is 6'8 and we arm punted to him but he couldn't box out a safety that was 8 inches shorter and 50 lbs lighter to come down with it.

31 yards from the TEs.  All hype, no production.  They do not make plays.  McKeon had an opportunity on an arm punt too and didn't make the play.

Rabbit21

September 4th, 2018 at 9:55 AM ^

Great point, who do we point to as the playmaker who's going to make shit happen?  There is not one on the entire roster, there are a ton of good and effective role players, but there is no Alpha dog who wants the big moment, and there hasn't been one for a LONG time, again speaks to something deeper going on in Ann Arbor vs. just disorganized coaching, it may just be that we're fucked until it somehow gets turned around.  Unless it doesn't and I'm starting to think it doesn't.

Mannix

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:41 PM ^

BPONE. Has a nice ring to it.

Well, things have got to get better, and probably will. In the meantime, I hope there's a decent menu at the BPONE as I'll be there awhile and will get hungry. 

DualThreat

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:47 PM ^

I think the reason it's hardest to be a Michigan fan is because we are the "winningest program of all time" (TM).  Take that away, and my personal emotional investment into each and every game wouldn't nearly be so high.  Like a weight lifted off one's shoulders, I would probably enjoy Michigan football more.

Let me give a few different takes than the O-line one that's been discussed already.  I'm not a football X's and O's junkie by any means, so these are just layman opinions...

> Harbaugh should absolutely stay until he's ready to retire.  He's not the best coach in America.  He's not even the right coach for Michigan IMO.  But he's the best fit for what Michigan wants to be.

> I'll get right to it:  I believe the best coach for Michigan would be one that runs a full spread offense like Ohio State's.  Rich Rod had the right idea, but was just the wrong person with an unfortunate defense.  Pair someone with RR's offensive philosophy with Don Brown's defenses and now you're cooking.

> Harbaugh just seems to me like someone who's stuck playing 1980s football.  The game has evolved since that time but Michigan just hasn't evolved with it.  (Or when they tried, with RR, they just get unlucky with defense, abandoned it, and reverted back to Neanderthal Ball.)  Heck, even the likes of Alabama and Notre Dame have incorporated major spread components into their offenses.  Michigan just dabbles with pseudo-mobile QBs and tries to win championships with outdated power formations - without the talent gap it enjoyed in the 80s and 90s no less.

> Spread offenses go for chunks of yards or TDs on every play.  When they fail, the next play tries the same.  Power offenses (at least the variety Michigan seems to employ) seem to rely on getting 4 yards a play to move the chains.  So when you miss one, the whole machine breaks down and you're forced to punt.  This goes along with Brian's notion of "very large percentages" he mentioned last week.  Rely on 80% success enough times, and it's just doomed to failure unless you happen to get lucky.

> Ending on a lighter note, I find it ironic that a team with the motto "The Team. The Team. The Team." is one of the few in college football that wear helmet stickers to highlight individual accomplishments.  I'd rather the clean look of the best helmet in college football.  :-)

TL/DR - I think Michigan's want to be a power football team has been the single biggest problem for the larger part of the past 10 years.  We need to evolve to the spread n' shred.  Also, get rid of helmet stickers.

 

abertain

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:01 PM ^

I mean, I really enjoy what Oklahoma does on offense, but it seems pretty unlikely that Michigan will move in that direction. The 2016 offense, pre-Iowa, was very good. They incorporated a lot of downfield passing as well as some misdirection to compliment the running game. I'd like to see more run fakes to hopefully hold back the pass rush and give Patterson an option to swing the ball out to the guy in motion if he gets in trouble. Or they could go to the package you saw at the end of the game where Evans is frequently used out of the backfield to help alleviate some pressure. Whether it's misdirection, an outlet receiver, or focusing more on option routes to Perry, it's clear that Michigan needs to find something to alleviate how bad the line is at OT. I don't think they are entirely screwed, but this particular game plan, coupled with the players, won't be enough to beat the best teams left on their schedule. 

I wish the defense had played better. I agree with some people that Michigan would have benefited from laying off Wimbush a bit. He does struggle to throw short passes accurately but Michigan didn't really force him to early. The DT were the second biggest disappointment after the OT. I think Winovich was pretty damn great. I'm projecting 8-4 now, but I'd love to be proved wrong. As I said in another thread, I think this team is more like 2015 than 2017. They have room to grow. 

CR

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:33 PM ^

Completely agree on the helmet stickers. Ugly. Stupid. Leave them for TOSU.

I think it is more difficult than ever to be a power/pro passing team since few high schools do this. Most are in spread. That said, I think there is always some advantage in being an outlier if you can find the right parts. But, post Rich Rod, the coaching staff has had a difficult time distinguishing a tackle from a mackerel.

 

 

micheal honcho

September 3rd, 2018 at 5:42 PM ^

Spread and shred is the college equivalent of the high schools that run the winged T. 

It IS the single most effective offense in HS period. But that’s because of a few things.

1. It’s easy to teach throughout a football program at all levels. Starting in pee wee.

2. It hides talent deficiencies by using simple leverage based plays to overcome speed advantages you already know the opposing D has. 

3. It eats clock, keeping the other teams most talented players off the field.

But.. it is a system that virtually eliminates most of your players from next level consideration, especially your skill players. 

Is spread & shred the same thing but for CFB? I’d say no, except for one position. QB. 

So. Is our(M fan base) resistance to going full spread & shred rooted in that one thing? Wanting our QBs to look like the guys playing on Sunday? I’m starting to think that might just be the case. 

kevbo1

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:55 PM ^

The OL needs to master the art of holding without getting a penalty.  The rest of the BIG has seemingly practiced this for years.

Diagonal Blue

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:55 PM ^

My thoughts:

1) This game should have never been scheduled. At least not in the same year we have Wisconsin, PSU, MSU, and OSU on tap, and I would say the same thing if we had won. Until the CFP committee starts valuing strength of schedule there is simply no incentive to play these types of games.  Go look at the OOC schedule at schools like PSU, Wisconsin, MSU, and Georgia. Ohio State learned the hard way last year when they scheduled Oklahoma and got snubbed because they had two losses. When Jim Harbaugh was hired the goal immediately became CFP or bust, and future scheduling needs to take that into account. Instead of sitting here at 1-0 after playing Arkansas we are one loss away from the season being a bust. You’d think we would have learned from all the early OOC losses in the Lloyd Carr era to stop doing this to ourselves but, nope.​​​​​​​

2) That we are starting two tackles Brady Hoke recruited in year 4 of the Harbaugh era is almost unfathomable, but that’s the price you pay when you don’t recruit a single offensive tackle in your 2016 recruiting class and whiff on all your top targets in 2017. To a larger point, outside of Chase Winovich, the Brady Hoke recruited players still on the roster provide this team nothing. Mone, Marshall, Furbush, Kinnel, JBB, and Runyan are all liabilities and should not be playing let alone starting. I’m not trying to be mean but JBB and Runyan is the worst starting tackle combo I’ve seen in my lifetime of watching UM football.

3) The play calling was head scratching at times and the clock management was abhorrent. PA pass on 2nd and goal from the 2 yard line when you can’t pass pro? I don’t care if spider 2 is the easiest pass protection play in the playbook run the damn ball. And don’t get me started on why we were huddling at the end of that game. Do we not have hot routes in the offense? Where is our screen game? Where is the motion and misdirection in the offense? The route tree is garbage. We miss Jedd Fisch. We have no identity on offense. I don’t think it’s a coincidence the creativity and downfield passing game on offense went away the second Jedd Fisch left and Pep Hamilton came on board. Speaking of Pep, when has he ever had a good offense? He was fired in Indy. He was bad in Cleveland. He’s been bad here.  The offense feels like him and Harbaugh’s lovechild. Instead of hiring an up and comer like Urban did with Tom Herman and Ryan Day, Jim went out and hired guys who were fired for bad offenses in Pep and McElwain.  Yes, it’s hard to play offense when your tackles are continually getting blown back or blown by, but many teams with worse personnel than Michigan do more with less.

4) This defense will still be elite. On rewatch the defense played much better than I thought they did live. ND twice converted 3rd downs on pick plays that should have been called but weren’t. The roughing the passer that led to their third TD was bad but even worse was the no holding call on Lavert Hill where he literally got tackled. They were dominant in the 2nd half in only ceding 69 yards and 3 points. It’s disappointing to lose to a team whose entire offense is huck, chuck, and pray and broken QB runs. That said safety play has got to get better. Tyree Kinnel is not a power 5 caliber safety. Might be time to roll with Hawkins who showed good range and speed after Kinnel got burned for their 2nd TD but he has to come up with that pick in the end zone and on the screen pass. Once again plays were there to be made and we didn’t make them. Becoming a familiar theme. I also thought Uche> Furbush and Ross>Gil. And lets please find a way to get Ambry Thomas on the field more.

5) Recruiting rankings matter. All the strengths and liabilities on this team should prove that by now. The three stars we are taking save one or two aren’t outperforming their rankings. The coaching staff made a huge mistake at running back with AJ Dillion and Omaury Samuels. They made another with Higdon and Mike Weber. Higdon runs hard but has no vision or patience, can’t break a tackle, and his pass protection is atrocious. He would never see the field under Fred Jackson. In this offense you need a bell cow. I think enough has already been said about JBB and Runyan but it can’t be overstated how bad they were Saturday. Both of ND's starting DE's were from Michigan and Harbaugh didn't even recruit Daelin Hayes and could have had Kareem after he decommitted from Bama but passed for Ron Johnson. Are Tyrece Woods and Gabe Newburg going to come in here and be players? Doubtful. I bet Hinton and Mazi Smith are though. On the flip side you’re seeing the talent flash in guys like Nico and Ambry. Shea is a huge upgrade at QB. I think the interior of the OL did a decent job for the most part, although there were mistakes there too. Long and Hill are still shutdown corners. I don’t want to hear anything more about trusting the coaches when it comes to this. Recruiting rankings matter and that’s that.

6) Our TE’s are soft. Gentry and McKeon can’t block for crap and neither is making plays in the pass game. Huge disappointment on Saturday. We missed TJ Wheatley in pass pro.

7) In 2014 OSU won the national championship after starting the year giving up 300 rushing yards to Navy and losing by two TD’s at home to Virigina Tech in a game where the OSU offense averaged 2.7 YPC, gave up 7 sacks, and threw 3 INT’s. Bottom line there is still a whole season left and a lot of time to get better. After watching PSU and MSU this weekend no reason we can’t beat those teams.  OSU’s defense has major problems. Taking care of business against Wisconsin at home is more than doable. But they need to figure out offensive tackle and find a RB willing to pass pro. The margin for error is gone, but there is too much talent on this team to throw in the towel now.

TrueBlue2003

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:15 PM ^

Your first point is absolutely wrong. 

1) We like playing big games.  That's what makes football fun.  Don't give me more yawners. 

2) Also this game was essentially playing with house money. It will not keep M out of the CFP unless ND completely falls off a cliff which is possible but highly unlikely.  The stakes remain the same as if M played a cupcake: win the division with no more than one conference loss and win the title game and you're in the playoff.

They will go the playoff if they're 11-2 conference champs (again, unless ND totally bombs).

Diagonal Blue

September 3rd, 2018 at 4:11 PM ^

1) We play enough big games. Asking these kids to play six top 25 teams this year is not fair. No other team in the country is playing this type of schedule. Not Bama, not Clemson, not Georgia, not MSU, not PSU, not OU, not any program who wants to make the CFP. Only typical Michigan arrogance can defend this schedule. It's absurd.

2) This was not playing with house money. There has never been a team reach the CFP with two losses. We saw last year even when OSU had wins over MSU, PSU, Michigan, and Wisconsin it still wasn't enough to get them in over 1-loss Alabama who didn't even win its division and whose best win was, wait for it, over a 4 LSU team. Fortunately or unfortunately every game in college football matters. 

TrueBlue2003

September 4th, 2018 at 1:24 AM ^

You nailed it:

"No other team in the country is playing this type of schedule." and "There has never been a team reach the CFP with two losses."

Think about those two correct statements and that's precisely why scheduling this game doesn't hurt us.  No one has made the playoff with two losses because no one good enough to make it has bothered to play a schedule this difficult.  If they did and lost twice, but won a tough conference, they'd still make it.

Asking these kids to play six, SIX (!!) tough opponents isn't fair?  Wow, dude.  You one single player on the roster would have rather wasted a week playing Delaware State instead of ND?  Big games are even more fun for players than fans, man.

McFate

September 4th, 2018 at 12:05 PM ^

If they did and lost twice, but won a tough conference, they'd still make it.

Like happened in 2016 (PSU) or 2017 (OSU)?  Both won the B1G, lost two games, and played in the B1G East when it was arguably stronger than it has looked so far this year.  Both lost out on playoff berths to one-loss teams that didn't even get to their conference title game.

The selection committee seems to give primary consideration to the loss column, and then uses toughness of schedule as a tiebreaker.  Playing a tough schedule will help you -- but only among teams with the same number of losses. 

This year, we have the added problem of failing to derail ND's own playoff aspirations when we had the chance.  ND faces four more decent teams (all ranked lower than they are) and they only need go 3-1 against them to lock up a playoff spot.  If they can split a pair of games vs. teams ranked around #15, and win two more against teams ranked around #20, they're in.  Any top ten team would be a heavy favorite to accomplish that much.

If the Irish get a playoff spot (on top of the SEC winner and Clemson being shoo-ins barring catastrophe)... that leaves only one slot for the B1G, Big XII, and Pac-12 combined.  Now you have to worry about not only SEC also-rans, but also getting aced out by an undefeated or one-loss Oklahoma.

stephenrjking

September 3rd, 2018 at 4:01 PM ^

You have some good points and some bad points. But wow is this wrong:

"They made another with Higdon and Mike Weber. Higdon runs hard but has no vision or patience, can’t break a tackle, and his pass protection is atrocious."

Higdon is an excellent runner and was decent Saturday. His pass protection was generally terrific and he was regularly manning up guys and beating them or neutralizing them. 

Weber is fine, he'd be fine here. Higdon is probably better, and if not, just as good. That's not a mistake. 

Diagonal Blue

September 3rd, 2018 at 5:27 PM ^

One too many. We need to stop making excuses for player who aren't making plays when they are there to be made. "One missed cutback" "One missed INT" "One missed TFL" it's always something with this team and program.

I dunno what game you watched he was terrible in pass pro. I don't have the energy to go thru all the specifics but on multiple rewatches I counted multiple times he wasn't getting the job done. He's not the caliber of back you need to succeed in this type of offense. He doesn't scare a single DC out there.

SpilledMilk

September 3rd, 2018 at 6:33 PM ^

Good post

Sounds like you're hoping that the UM offense will get better as the season goes on but OSU's defense will stay the same. I watched their game and most of the yardage they gave up was due to missed assignments by some young guys up front. They had already shut Bosa down for the afternoon and we're rotating in several freshman when Oregon State was able to rip off a few long runs... They'll have a good defense by November, hopefully our offense gets way better too.

Bando Calrissian

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:07 PM ^

What I keep coming back to is that this was another game that felt like one of those USC Rose Bowls (I think '04 was the best example) where Michigan was behind by a surmountable gap, had the time, maybe crawled back a little bit, got a few big plays here and there. But at no time did I feel in any way confident that they'd pull it off.

There's a complacency to anticipated failure in the BPONE, I think. You've surrendered to the void. It's warm in there, and there's beer and maybe some pizza or something. Just ride it out.

Don

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:21 PM ^

"this was another game that felt like one of those USC Rose Bowls..."

Complete with the standard irrationally exuberant optimism that our opponent isn't really very good and neither is their coach and they don't really like physical football blah blah blah all the same shit I've been hearing before big games for 40 years.

bo_lives

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:14 PM ^

The offensive line issues, dumb penalties, and clock management all just baffle me. Why didn’t Harbaugh have these problems at Stanford? How did he beat #1 USC at the Coliseum in his first year, while here we are in year 4 with no clear signature win?

Don

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:28 PM ^

"How did he beat #1 USC at the Coliseum in his first year, while here we are in year 4 with no clear signature win?"

It's not unusual for less-than-elite coaches to have one Black Swan game in their career where everything goes right for some reason against a significantly superior opponent, and my guess is that game at USC is Harbaugh's. There's no indication we'll see one at Michigan.

ScooterTooter

September 3rd, 2018 at 4:29 PM ^

Dude beat USC (conference champs) in 2007, Oregon (conference champs) in 2009 and Virginia Tech (conference champs) in 2010. 

I won't even get into his NFL career. 

His Michigan career has seen him beat two top 10 opponents in 2016, but the black pill brigade ignore that cause they weren't the right top ten opponents. And let's not even get into the abysmal bad luck that cost Michigan the 2015 MSU game or the 2016 Ohio State game that don't have anything to do with coaching. 

 

Don

September 3rd, 2018 at 5:15 PM ^

"the abysmal bad luck that cost Michigan the 2015 MSU game"

That abysmal bad luck in the MSU game was created by the coaching idiocy of having gunners go down the field to protect against a non-existent return when they should have been in max protect. Even if O'Neill handles the low snap cleanly MSU still was in danger of blocking the kick.

ぼりヴぃあから帰って来た物

September 3rd, 2018 at 5:43 PM ^

Totally agree.

Harbaugh should have either saved a TO for the punt or instructed his players to take a penalty after seeing the way State lined up.

We had an incredibly accurate punter who could have punted the ball out of bounds around MSU's 20 with time for one play left on the clock.

Don

September 3rd, 2018 at 5:27 PM ^

I described a Black Swan game as one where a lousy team beats an opponent that is significantly superior, which was the 2007 game. By 2009, Stanford was an 8-5 team and while beating Oregon at home in Palo Alto was a notable achievement, Harbaugh had closed the gap markedly between Stanford and the rest of the conference. In the Va Tech game, Stanford was #5 and VT #12, so while it was a good victory, it doesn't come anywhere close to being the huge upset that USC 2007 was.

Harbaugh is a good coach, and I think talk of firing him now is stupid, but at the collegiate level he has not shown he is elite. Maybe he will in time, but there's no hard evidence right now that Michigan is getting there soon.

TrueBlue2003

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:34 PM ^

He beat USC because football involves a lot of randomness.  Pretty much as simple as that as regards to that win.  USC had double the yardage of Stanford.  That was a total fluke.

Also, it's appearing more and more that David Shaw was likely the most responsible for Harbaugh's Stanford success on offense.  He's kept the program at an extremely high level, won PAC12 COY 4 times (!!!), and Harbaugh hasn't had a good offense at any level in nearly ten years since leaving Stanford.

BlueMan80

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:16 PM ^

I was deep in the BPONE during the 2008 season.  That was a killer.

I’m not there with this team at this time.  It’s one game.  ND had some good things happen for them.  We didn’t play well, especially the D in the first half.  Give Warinner time to coach up the line.  First game, road game at night may have forced some line up choices.  Let’s see how the younger guys play over the next 2 games.  Let’s see if adjustments are made.  

Lots of talent which is something I couldn’t say about the 2008 team.  There is hope.

Don

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:18 PM ^

"Michigan's fourth quarter in this game was mostly spent down two touchdowns and mostly spent without any urgency whatsoever. The inability to get plays off with more than ten seconds on the playclock with under eight minutes left in the game is extremely disturbing and, yes, Hoke-ish. It speaks to a lack of organization."

Considering that Jim Harbaugh acquired the name "Captain Comeback" in the NFL—which undoubtedly meant he was in hurry-up mode constantly—this inability to fashion a decent hurry-up regimen at Michigan is particularly mysterious.

Regardless of the reason, that falls squarely in Harbaugh's own lap.

SpilledMilk

September 3rd, 2018 at 6:43 PM ^

Harbaugh is better suited for coaching in the NFL. The college game is different (especially from an offensive perspective) and the head coach of a major D1 program needs to be a great recruiter and an elite CEO-like manager above all else. Not many college HC's try to run their own offense either. Jim is a great NFL coach but he's a mediocre college coach.