The BLACK PIT of NEGATIVE EXPECTATIONS Comment Count

Brian

[Patrick Barron]

9/1/2018 – Michigan 17, Notre Dame 24 – 0-1

Ah so it's this bit again. The bit where some people pick up on a factoid and yell about it a lot and other people yell at them about it. The bit where everyone's mad and trying to take it out on someone.

I mean, I get it. Any properly scientific assessment of which football program it is the least fun to be a fan of will find a way to exclude Kansas for not actually being a football program and stick Michigan at the top. Nobody got into this to fight about the level of doomed we are every 3-4 years, never beat anyone of consequence, etc.

But I don't want to do it again. I've done this three times before, once per coaching era this blog has seen the end of, and I've done all the stuff already: preaching patience, gallows humor, being legitimately angry, calling for various heads, writing about mattresses. I don't really feel like doing it all over again. I don't care to evaluate the precise moment at which a person should be fired, or to point out that people are being ridiculous for wanting a person to be fired, or to create big lists of the next person to get fired. Neither do I want to sagely counsel the fanbase from the Tower Of Reasonability. This is not content it feels worthwhile to produce.

If you're mad, fine. If you're mad at the people who are mad, fine. I'm not going to argue with you.

---------------------------------------

Let's talk about the

BLACK PIT of NEGATIVE EXPECTATIONS

The BPONE is a state of mind in which no part of a football game is enjoyable because it is merely a prelude to some pratfall made more embarrassing and or painful by whatever minimal, temporary successes are experienced prior to the pratfall. Thus a kick return touchdown—that rarest butterfly, one the game is steadily trying to erase—during which your author's only reaction was internal and, I quote, "whoop-de-damn-do."

Going down 14-0 more or less immediately by blowing coverages on third down, getting beat over the top by battleship WRs, and having a shoulda-been interception ripped away by a 5'10" guy immediately puts you in the pit. The general shape of the offense provides a steady stream of pit reinforcement, to the point where my Twitter timeline's reaction to Michigan providing a vague sense of hope at the end of the game was "I hate myself for having this hope." This feeling of cynical dread was vindicated by the sack/strip that had to have been coming and did indeed come.

The more time one spends in the BPONE, the more permeable its membrane. Last year large swathes of the Michigan fanbase descended into it after Michigan had an extra point blocked. At the time Michigan led 20-14. Scoring the rest of the way was 17-0 Ohio State. When entering the BPONE is clearly a good choice, future opportunities to mitigate emotional harm by being miserable in the present are more likely to be taken.

The flaw in BPONE operations is of course the impossibility of mining any enjoyment out of your experience. BPONE sufferers assume a football game is a negative emotional event and spread those negative emotions out more broadly. Only if the team should actually come back and win will any regret be felt, and pffffffffft. I'm in the pit, baby! I know for a stone cold fact that a punt snap will somehow lodge itself in the facemask of the punter. I feel it in my bones that the one time we jump a route in this game the ensuing interception will bang off the defensive back's hands and lodge itself in the facemask of the opposition 50 yards downfield.

Tweeting from the BPONE is inadvisable and very, very difficult to avoid.

Checking your mentions will significantly deepen the pit and is likely to lead to BPONE-influenced tweeting, which is inadvisable. In fact, communicating in any form from the BPONE is inadvisable.

Alcohol will not improve anything but will be consumed in quantity anyway.

At some point repeated defeats will create an OMINPRESENT BLACK PIT of NEGATIVE EXPECTATIONS. OBPONE is a severe condition with consequences such as writer's block, writer's block, and writer's block. The only cure for OBPONE is a new season, but yo-yo-ing in and out of OBPONE makes individual occurrences of BPONE more severe.

Escaping this cycle of cynicism and recrimination requires John Beilein, who is not available for football purposes.

[After THE JUMP: some stuff]

AWARDS

Known Friends And Trusted Agents Of The Week

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Chase Winovich. Winovich looked like Michigan was trying to block him for most of the day, picking up 3.5 TFLs and a sack. He also forced the errant throw on Brandon Watson's interception. His roughing the passer call was weak at best.

#2 Ambry Thomas. Touchdowns are precious.

#3 Devin Bush. Displayed his sideline to sideline ability with frequency and had another rabid squirrel sack. Maybe at fault on a Wimbush scramble.

Honorable mention: The receivers were pretty good.

KFaTAotW Standings.

Who's Got It Better Than Us Of The Week

Kickoff return was kind of sweet though. 

Honorable mention: Uh. Winovich things?

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Every pass blocking incident.

Honorable mention: Hawkins gets the ball yoinked; Hill gets beat over the top. Many incidents where the DEs got around the edge but the DTs did little to nothing. Dropped FG hold.

[After THE JUMP: why]

OFFENSE

 

30569943218_91290573fb_k

[Fuller]

What were you doing in practice? Was it football? I feel like it couldn't have been football if Jon Runyan Jr told the media that he was able to win 8 of 10 times against Rashan Gary and Chase Winovich. Runyan won approximately 0 of 10 times against DEs against Notre Dame, once giving up a sack by letting a DL by him to the left when the line was sliding to the left.

I thought this was going to be bad—the tackles got a 1 in the season preview—but even I am shocked by how bad it was in the cold light of morning. Runyan looked so bad it boggles the mind that any amount of practice would not have turned up a better player more or less immediately. It boggles the mind that Michigan was so desperate to replace him last year that they played Nolan Ulizio and Juwann Bushell-Beatty over him and he was still the locked-in left tackle starter since the beginning of fall camp, and a locked-in starter at right tackle even before that. It boggles the mind that Michigan didn't even think of trying Ben Bredeson at tackle, that James Hudson didn't blow past Runyan in spring, that Jalen Mayfield didn't do so in fall.

Maybe Runyan just had the worst three hours of his life at the wrong time and it'll get better. I can't imagine that actually being the case. Runyan is a redshirt junior. He's done most of his developing already. That performance was the equivalent of John O'Korn's start against Indiana in 2016. He's got too far to go, no reason to expect he'll get there, and not enough time left for a fashion makeover.

He'll start next week. We'll see how long that lasts.

Under the circumstances. Patterson's first start went about as well as possible given his pass protection. I don't know where this stat comes from but it feels about right:

Patterson wasn't able to go deep except once, hit that, and completed two-thirds of his passes for 7.6 YPA. The interception wasn't great but we've seen enough assaulted QBs for one lifetime; in terms of bad decisions per angry person trying to kill you Patterson did well.

Dylan McCaffrey's cameo was fine. There was a palpable difference in arm strength between McCaffrey and Patterson, and one of that seemed like it would be relevant if McCaffrey needed to throw anything more than ten yards, which IIRC he did not. Harbaugh mentioned that he was still growing into his frame and needed time to build that velocity. That was apparent.

Where is Chris Evans? Apparently healthy but got two carries to Karan Higdon's 21. I thought Higdon did about as well as could be expected save for one cutback he made but not quite fast enough to escape the last linebacker before he hit the safety level; I still thought we'd see something closer to parity.

Wide receivers looked pretty good, at least. Nico Collins straight up went by one of ND's touted outside corners on his long reception; Grant Perry was his usual self when people remembered to throw it to him; DPJ was able to get open pretty frequently.

DEFENSE

44415747321_bfddfdd115_k

[Fuller]

FFS. A shut-down second half brought the defense's performance up to acceptable-ish if you flip one event: Brad Hawkins losing out on an armpunt to a guy named "Finke," which has to be up there for least intimidating WR names in history. Even with that ND didn't get over 300 yards by much (they were at 339); what they did get was mostly Wimbush scrambling around and those deep thunks to tall guys.

Wimbush scrambling around. Michigan started this game with Lawrence Marshall and Bryan Mone, which set two solid years of Mike Dwumfour hype on fire. He and Solomon rotated in but it felt like the former two were starters in both name and snaps, and that's a whole different world. Specifically in this game it was a world where when one of Michigan's DEs came around the corner there was a big gap between said DE and the DT to his side of the line, allowing Wimbush to step up and either run or throw.

If the DEs were getting around at ten yards that's on the DEs. If they were getting around at 7 or 8 that's on the DTs. It felt like it was almost all on the DTs. You don't expect much pass rush from them; you do expect them to at least push the pocket closed so that those easy broken field plays don't occur.

Deep thunks to tall guys. There were only two, actually, chunks of 26 and 28 yards, one over Hill. Hill's was a little alarming. He was beaten clean in a way we didn't see all of last year and was interfering in a 15-is-better-than-TD way. It didn't happen again, at least.

 43697578554_cf1307e7dc_k

[Bryan Fuller]

Why? The other deep thunk saw Noah Furbush in one on one coverage 30 yards downfield against a WR on third and nine. This is getting far too cute when you have the CB depth Michigan does and can expect organic pass rush from your ends.

Targeting roulette N/A. Not even targeting roulette could help Josh Metellus, who was deservedly booted for a helmet to helmet hit on a defenseless WR. Would he have made the Finke play? Probably not—BPODE—but maybe!

A genuine battle. Devin Gil and Josh Ross both played a bunch of snaps, so that was not balderdash about a tight position battle. Ross managed to out-tackle Gil 5-3, FWIW.

MISCELLANEOUS

Don't make me think about Hoke. Michigan's fourth quarter in this game was mostly spent down two touchdowns and mostly spent without any urgency whatsoever. The inability to get plays off with more than ten seconds on the playclock with under eight minutes left in the game is extremely disturbing and, yes, Hoke-ish. It speaks to a lack of organization.

Comments

lilpenny1316

September 3rd, 2018 at 4:22 PM ^

Good teams do lose tight games on the road to other good teams.  The problem is that we didn't look good.  Our offense scored 10 points.  Our holder botched a FG attempt that would've made it a one-score game.  The Winovich personal foul cost us at least 4 points.  Our clock management was poor.

Good teams do not make those mistakes.  We are currently a good team in theory only until the on-field product improves. 

mitchewr

September 3rd, 2018 at 7:51 PM ^

You know, everyone keeps talking about “fluke plays” that just didn’t go our way. Well I’m done leaning on that crutch. 

“Fluke Plays” haven’t been going our way for ages. It’s time we cut the bullshit and call it like it is. Other teams are prepared to play and go out and make big plays happen...we don’t. From the punt block by MSU to the missed interceptions in this game. These aren’t flukes. It’s just us playing crap football while all our opponents step it up. 

schreibee

September 3rd, 2018 at 9:56 PM ^

One small problem with your otherwise admirable "stop making excuses about flukes" attitude-

Msu didn't block the punt - our punter flat out dropped the ball and then tried to play aussie rules football with the loose ball.

That's a real potential drawback of the booming aussie kickers.

LSU led the trend I think in bringing them over, and I remember one of their really good ones made a similar mistake on the rules differences between the 2 games once. Tried to lateral a loose ball or something & the other team scored. 

?‍♂️ 

blue90

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:21 PM ^

So what do we make of it? I was actually impressed that we were somewhat close at the end, there were one or two things that needed to go right in that second half for us to be completely in the game.  If we didn't go down two TDs immediately this would have been a close, close game somehow. I think the offense is just wayyyy to complicated and Pep needs to go.  There is no reason he should be here, everything else I'm fine with I guess except the o-line.

mitchewr

September 4th, 2018 at 9:14 AM ^

Because every time this program is asked who runs the offense they all say they give their input and then Jim has the final say. And they say it's always been like this. Maybe Jedd brought a bit more creative suggestions but everyone from our coaching staff to national "experts" all say that Harbaugh is an offensive coach and he runs the offense, leaving the defense up to Durkin and now Brown.

I'll posit another possibility: Perhaps Harbaugh has simply changed his offensive philosophy and is no longer doing what he did in 2015? I mean we saw Brady Hoke run mostly spread in 2011 with Rich Rod's offense and win 11 games. The next three years Hoke stopped running RR's offense and ran his own power game and the offensive output plummeted. Why? Same guy, but purposefully different direction.

PasadenaFan

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:22 PM ^

"The inability to get plays off with more than ten seconds on the playclock with under eight minutes left in the game is extremely disturbing and, yes, Hoke-ish. It speaks to a lack of organization."  Probably cause there is no Off Coordinator!

ぼりヴぃあから帰って来た物

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:25 PM ^

Didn't Brian predict a fairly easy UM win?

Most of the factoids point to a poorly coached  team IMO and that's hard to fix.

ぼりヴぃあから帰って来た物

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:31 PM ^

IIRC his prediction was 24-17 or something like that which flies right in the face of the team's performance over the last four games.

The ND game was simply another episode of the comedy of errors.

I find it stunning that most seem to be missing the core issues at play her and seem to want to write them off as being aberrations. 

ぼりヴぃあから帰って来た物

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:44 PM ^

Any way you wanna slice things, though, it was way off.

People are really underestimating the coaching shit show at Schembechler Hall. That is the heart of the problem. 

It's foolish to continue to write off recurring poor execution and coaching as happening by chance. For example, saying that ND's long TD pass was due to a safety allowing the WR to grab the pass ignores that there was double coverage but Kinnel got totally turned around and was a non-factor in the play.

He's a 5th year senior, right? 

Alumnus93

September 3rd, 2018 at 8:30 PM ^

a lot of fluff, and hype videos.... cannot stand any of it...

if Bo were alive, believe me, he'd be ripping them all down, because it makes everyone weak....  inflating their importance prior to any achievement.

all Runyans fluff in interviews, would have NEVER happened under Bo...  jim lets it go...

1VaBlue1

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:29 PM ^

Can't really argue with the assessment here... The tackles straight up sucked.  I'm not down on the offensive game plan, though.  I do have to wonder where Evans was.  Short, quick throws to the flat are a good way to protect weak OT's, as is running behind the strength of the line - the interior. But completely forgetting to throw the ball to Chris Fucking Evans?  Dumb.  The lack of tempo was dumb.

RockinLoud

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:08 PM ^

They are a master of none.

For once I agree with you in this thread. The level of complexity is just too much for a college program. We have nothing that we can really hang our hat on, just throwing shit out there from any/every style of offense to see what works then going away from it when it is working (see 2nd and goal when we could've made the score 7-14 but instead settled for a FG).

You Only Live Twice

September 3rd, 2018 at 10:33 PM ^

All I get from your comments (and your previous screen name as well) is that you have a major, major ax to grind when it comes to Jim Harbaugh and it dates back to the early 80s.  I don't, however, get the sense that you'd join the bandwagon if he was winning; it's more that each loss gives you an excuse to sharpen that ax and go after him... anonymously.

 

Blue Durham

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:33 PM ^

RE: the tweet of "nunya"  Bench Runyan.  Bench JBB. 

I just don't get it, who are you going to put in, the bench? 

Sometimes your cards are what they are.  Sometimes you just have to play Nick Sheridan. 

If that is all you have, bitching about it isn't going to change it.  And bitching about it becomes just shitting on the players.

mitchewr

September 3rd, 2018 at 8:03 PM ^

Nah that’s crazy talk. Why would anyone expect an $8 million dollar HC to put everything together by year four?

We’re obviously in year 4 of a 10year rebuild... or until Dantonio, Franklin,and Meyer all step down so we can finally win. Whichever comes first. 

Oh Deer

September 3rd, 2018 at 3:12 PM ^

It may be bad form to call out these college players by name. I'll let others argue the merits for and against doing that. The obvious question that is certainly fair game, is how is the situation on the OL soooooo bad that those two individuals are the starters? I say that with absolutely no malice towards the two young men, but come on, that is absolutely unacceptable in the 4th year of a coaching tenure. There is NO excuse. 

BornInAA

September 3rd, 2018 at 2:34 PM ^

Yes, I was BPONE last year and now it's back down in the pit I go...

I watch Michigan Football games now expecting the worst and surprised when they make a play.

It's the opposite with the basketball team, I expect them to win/be competitive and I am surprised if they look unprepared or mismanaged.

 

 

smwilliams

September 3rd, 2018 at 4:14 PM ^

Let’s put a little later.

February 2017:

Michigan loses at home to a trash OSU team and looks like they aren’t going to make the tournament. People think John Beilein should be fired.

Jim Harbaugh is coming off back-to-back 10 win seasons with 2016 ending up poorly after the team loses 3 games by 5 points with sketchiness or fate intervening in each. The future is bright. Harbaugh is the coach we’ve been waiting for. 

Can we just wait to see how things play out before chucking another coach to the curb because we lost a game? Maybe give him some more time. Hiring and firing coaches over and over is how you end up permanently crippling your program.

schreibee

September 3rd, 2018 at 10:11 PM ^

How long do you give Harbaugh?

How long a contract did JH sign?

Until there's only 1 year left. Then eat the last year. And be REALLY REALLY preparing for who would replace him, not a RichRod/Hoke scramble. 

There is NO, literally ZERO, candidate to replace JH at this time. And I can tell you how true this is - EVERY PERSON who bitches & means about him NEVER mention even a SINGLE name they'd like to see. 

Not ONE! Read this entire thread with many, many negative comments and not even the user whose name is Asian characters and says he's class of '84, with around 15 scathing posts in the thread, has named a single candidate to replace Harbaugh! 

So...prepare thyself first, swing the axe after!

AnthonyThomas

September 3rd, 2018 at 6:25 PM ^

This season is still pretty crucial. The basketball program has the advantage of not being a national blue blood. They don't get the sort of national narratives written about them (good or bad) that the football program receives. Increasingly, the football program is seen as permanently mismanaged, its players and coaches unable to perform in the most important games. As others have noted, fans can only put up with so many underwhelming performances before it all becomes too toxic to deal with. And we already saw this past year how quickly recruiting can degrade amidst even minor struggles. The time is now to exorcise these demons, and the team failed the first test in all of the ways we've seen before. 

Harbaugh won't be fired, but I'd bet money that if things won't improve he'll get to a point in the next year or two where he'll be compelled to leave for the NFL.

Alumnus93

September 3rd, 2018 at 8:57 PM ^

im not going in the pit... because I know if we put full sized tackles, at least they will build experience and get better... now... if they continue to play a small guard at LT, then I will.... because we cant get better that way.

the thing is... after the Hamilton whiff... where was plan B?     after the Isiah Wilson whiff...where was plan B?  There have to be a ton of recruits preferring M to the lower tier programs that would switch in a blink.