|07/12/2018 - 5:12pm||Joined date says 12/19/2017…||
Joined date says 12/19/2017. Were you here as an unregistered alien before that?
|07/12/2018 - 5:08pm||No politics, please. The…||
No politics, please. The argument that the executive can implicitly encourage specific behaviors from others is supported by only one party.
|07/12/2018 - 4:54pm||That's a political solution,…||
That's a political solution, not a legal remedy.
|07/12/2018 - 4:50pm||No politics, please. Your …||
No politics, please. Your "agenda" is only supported by one party.
|07/12/2018 - 4:46pm||No politics please. Keep…||
No politics please. Keep your Domino Theory out of my blog.
|07/12/2018 - 11:25am||This is a blog of people,…||
This is a blog of people, not rules. Our Founding Father set it up this way for a reason.
MGoBlog, love it or leave it!
I was here before you, so I own it more. I am an mgoblogger, you're a reader of some other blog and will always remain so. You think you can come through our porous registration page and insidiously change our blog!? Go back to your own blog!
|07/12/2018 - 11:18am||Irrelevant to the issue. If…||
Irrelevant to the issue. If discussing what should be done now, you're either for the policy or against it.
People who bring this up seem to want to downplay people's concerns (why are they complaining now but weren't complaining then?) while simultaneously explaining exactly why (they didn't know). They set up two bogeymen (media and fake outragers) and don't realize that they can't both be true in any one individual.
The corollary is, of course, if you defend the policy now, do you also retroactively defend the previous administration? Somehow, I think if this became public in 2014, the people defending it as strong border control would have had a problem.
There is a discussion to be had about the media's treatment of this, but that's tangential to the issue of "should the United States have a policy of removing children from their parents?"
|07/12/2018 - 10:58am||I know how you feel. I've…||
I know how you feel. I've been less active since you got rid of your sexy bits avatar.
|07/12/2018 - 10:54am||Of course, he's likely to…||
Of course, he's likely to gain readers of his political persuasion as he loses others. Or gain more readers interested in discussing politics as "stick to sports" guys leave.
Have faith in the market. He'll be fine.
|07/12/2018 - 9:30am||I guess you could say there…||
I guess you could say there are no moderates anymore.
|07/11/2018 - 10:46pm||Brian owns the site. He can…||
Brian owns the site. He can't be liable for anything when he simply exercises his rights as an owner. That's an interpretation you can get behind, no?
|07/11/2018 - 10:40pm||The problem with life is…||
The problem with life is that it's also too short to support bad policy.
|07/11/2018 - 9:45pm||Gorbachev sounds like Urban…||
Gorbachev sounds like Urban Meyer.
|07/11/2018 - 9:37pm||Brian endorsed someone the…||
Brian endorsed someone the OP would not vote for. And if that wasn't enough, someone disparaged the memory of Adolf Alois Hitler in a board thread.
|07/11/2018 - 9:29pm||What are you, some kind of…||
What are you, some kind of communist? Am I supposed to help you? Pull yourself up by your bootstraps and stop political commentary on your own!
|07/11/2018 - 9:08pm||We're living in a very…||
We're living in a very unique time, politically. Can't fault people for having it on the mind, and letting it slip into non-political forums.
But I do fault everyone who hold different beliefs than I do. They are bad people.
|07/11/2018 - 9:05pm||Commenters interjecting…||
Commenters interjecting politics very liberally lately.
|07/11/2018 - 9:04pm||Want to conserve the status…||
Want to conserve the status quo, do you?
|06/20/2018 - 8:35am||I wasn’t knocking Gary,…||
I wasn’t knocking Gary, either. He was very good last year. But I can’t, in good conscience, compare him to Steele. Not yet.
I take the rest of your points. Just wanted to point out how great All-Americas are. Even a rampant Gary doesn’t sniff one of those teams.
|06/19/2018 - 10:26pm||Steele >>> Gary. That could…||
Steele >>> Gary. That could change this year, but even comparing the two is offensive to Steele, who was an All-America. Want to know how impressive that is? Really good players like Gary don’t make those teams, that’s how impressive it is.
Either offensive line would be great, but Runyan and Jansen at tackles makes that line unfathomably tough.
|06/01/2018 - 11:00am||I agree that Americans should||
I agree that Americans should buy more American cars, especially since we’re making pretty good ones nowadays.
But government employees “bleeding their salaries off of the American tax payer” is a terrible way of thinking about it, or any economic transaction.
|05/30/2018 - 9:48am||Well, he had Borges, the best||
Well, he had Borges, the best passing game coordinator Michigan has ever had.
|05/24/2018 - 11:09pm||Being mauled by bears is also||
Being mauled by bears is also common in nature.
Being common in nature does not mean it’s good or desirable or wise to build human society around.
“Widely accepted in nature” is an insane construction.
|05/18/2018 - 3:41pm||Didn't mean to imply you were||
Didn't mean to imply you were trashing Speight. Only that "didn't play well" is my default negative comment.
I don't want to go back and forth too much on Speight's hypothetical last half of the season, so I'll say again that your position is reasonable. He might not have been able to play as well as he did in 2016 because of the changes in personnel around him. But it's also reasonable to expect a senior to improve his own game over his junior self, and mitigate the losses of the skill guys.
Maybe he would have, maybe not.
|05/17/2018 - 10:01pm||This is why I could never get||
This is why I could never get along with communists -- no sense of humor.
|05/17/2018 - 9:57pm||Not playing well is an||
Not playing well is an understatement, by design. I'm not big on trashing Michigan players. Not playing well is strictly accurate and does not include any personal knock.
Why would I expect him to play great? I wouldn't. I think he could have played better than OKorn and Peters. Not a particularly high bar. And why would I expect that? Because he had already shown the ability to play at that level, both in his starts in 2016 and in his winning the job over both of them in 2017.
Regarding the similarity of the logic: not similar. OKorn had some success, but in a different system. He also lost his job. Speight had success in the same system, and did not lose his job. He also beat OKorn out twice.
I take your point, and your position is reasonable. But your arguments are way overstated and/or strawmen and/or uncharitable readings of my post and/or wrong.
|05/17/2018 - 9:30am||The criticism of Carr’s||
The criticism of Carr’s coaching tree is fair, but the conclusion isn’t. It sort of presupposes that Carr’s lack of a decent heir led inexorably to Coach Rod, who led to Hoke.
They could have hired anyone else, and I’d argue that even somebody like Hoke or Debord would not possibly have done substantially worse. Their eras would have still ended in mediocrity, but those are the worst case hires from Lloyd’s tree, and I don’t imagine them doing any worse than Coach Rod. And of course, they could have hired someone that won.
|05/17/2018 - 9:07am||Sometimes damages are awarded||
Sometimes damages are awarded as a deterrent. Other places will be leery about making false accusations. That’s not f’ed up.
|05/17/2018 - 9:00am||I agree. Speight was not||
I agree. Speight was not playing well, and there’s no guarantee he would turn it around. But we’ve seen that Speight is capable of playing well, whereas we never saw that from OKorn and haven’t seen it yet from Peters.
I’m of the belief that there was a chance that Speight would have kicked into gear, much like he did the year before and how Rudock did in 2015. Could be wrong, of course, but it’s not unreasonable to expect improvement during the season, especially from a guy who had displayed the ability to play better.
|05/16/2018 - 8:54pm||Added to this, it’s not||
Added to this, it’s not likely that Peters didn’t know the playbook in the simplest sense of “know”. I’m sure he could run any play they called. It’s much more likely he didn’t “know” the intricacies of things like route concepts, protections, or how a certain play is tailored to a certain defense. It’s knowledge in a deeper sense.
As to why a guy in his class still didn’t have that knowledge — he was third on the depth chart. There are only so many reps to go around.
People point out that we see freshmen excel every year. This is true, but it’s the wrong comparison to make. He was third on the depth chart. Compared to other 3rd stringers, he did pretty well. Had Speight not played well in 2016, maybe Peters is rushed along, getting more reps, maybe even some starts as a freshman.
|05/16/2018 - 3:18pm||Have you heard about these||
Have you heard about these fidget spinners?
|05/16/2018 - 11:48am||I don’t think we should talk||
I don’t think we should talk about jet sweep pin and pulls until we beat MSU and OSU.
|05/16/2018 - 11:46am||I do this all the time for my||
I do this all the time for my clients. I don’t bother them with every little thing.
|05/11/2018 - 2:32pm||Moeller coached All||
Moeller coached All Conference players
All but Bihl and Henige were 1st team All-Conference by coaches or media. Moeller coached a minimum of two first team All-Conference players per season, had 4 seasons of 3 All-Conference players, had 2 All-Americas in his 5 seasons, sent a lot of guys into the league for at least a cup of coffee, won a ton of games, never fielded a line half as bad as every line we’ve seen since 2007 (excepting 2011).
Moeller is far and away the best line coach we’ve had in two decades.
|05/10/2018 - 4:33pm||Billions of people, and||
Billions of people, and millions who are likely to be interested in this story, including his new employers, were unaware or the indictment until today. That is new information.
Your mentality is becoming more and more mysterious to me.
|05/10/2018 - 11:55am||The last sentence does not||
The last sentence does not follow from the previous ones.
It can be both meant to damage Patricia and the Lions by someone with an axe to grind and also a legitimate story. It might be less important because he wasn’t charged and it’s 22 years old, but it’s still a story.
Why is this ever a reaction people have? Why would you want fewer stories? Are you incapable of reading a story, giving it the weight you think it deserves, and going about your life afterwards? Why do people not want to know things?
|05/10/2018 - 11:46am||When people refer to media||
When people refer to media trials, they’re usually worried about media influencing an actual trial. That’s a real concern. That’s not what’s happening here, as you admit in the next sentence, when calling this a quasi-trial.
Unless you mean the colloquial trial of public opinion. If so, you’re fighting a losing and nonsensical battle. Everyone makes judgments every day on everything. You can’t seriously ask people to not have opinions on a thing unless and until a legal verdict is reached.
I’d suggest that this is no sort of trial at all. I think it can better be understood as a feature of our incredible capitalist system — the invisible hand at work.
The Lions are a for-profit entity. The market is currently not bullish on people accused of sex crimes. Consumers voice their displeasure at the Lions offered product. The Lions will have to decide how they want to approach this market.
Same for Patricia. He is in no legal jeopardy. He is simply, like all of us, at the whim some market pressures. His job is in high demand. There is a fairly large supply of people qualified to take it. His employers face the market pressures mentioned above.
What we have is not legal, quasi-legal, or pseudolegal. It’s just the markets working as they should.
|05/04/2018 - 12:05am||It’s not a judgment of||
It’s not a judgment of Hurst’s character. NFL contracts are not guaranteed, creating a tremendous incentive for a player to put his health #2 on his priorities list.
|05/03/2018 - 11:14pm||Sure, but that only adds more||
Sure, but that only adds more evidence that being in the system isn’t dispositive.
|05/03/2018 - 11:07pm||Touché. I thought he only got||
Touché. I thought he only got honors as a Senior.
|05/03/2018 - 11:05pm||Michigan won quite a few||
Michigan won quite a few conference championships and a National championship calling long play names,
The benefit of the picture thing is quickness. You don’t need to huddle, you don’t need to substitute. There are certainly advantages to that.
But learning the play calls is not difficult. I’m fact, those pictures symbolize a play that is probably pronounced “Red right orbit Nebraska chili (leopard) on two.” So the players still have to learn the plays the same way. The only difference is the method of transmitting it from sideline to field.
|05/02/2018 - 10:43pm||I say this all the time, but||
I say this all the time, but I think this is the biggest reason why we haven’t been able to put together a good line in years. We haven’t had a returning all-conference player since Lewan, and he was the first since Long. But Long learned from guys like Baas and Pape, they learned from guys like Hutch, who learned from Janson, and on and on ad infinitum.
The young guys don’t have a guy who they can turn to in the offseason, someone to set the tone, someone they can look up to and model themselves after. They don’t know what a truly top-class guy does on a daily basis. There’s a missing osmosis.
|05/02/2018 - 10:36pm||Yeah but he’s gone and we all||
Yeah but he’s gone and we all want the offense to be better next year, so it has to be his fault.
|05/02/2018 - 10:34pm||I’ll never be able to||
I’ll never be able to pronounce it properly again.
|05/02/2018 - 5:42pm||I think that is his point,||
I think that is his point, and I think he’s right. Ruddock played a lot of football at Iowa, saw thousands of different defensive looks, etc. He was way ahead of OKorn in terms of understanding football, even if he was behind in knowing our scheme. But that football knowledge allowed him to catch up schemewise quickly.
We see this all the time; grad transfers tend to win jobs even if there are others who’ve been in the system longer.
|05/01/2018 - 12:16am||It's pronounced J-eye-nah. I||
It's pronounced J-eye-nah. I love Jeyenah.
|04/27/2018 - 1:14pm||Every position can be found||
Every position can be found in later rounds. I’d bet a lemon that first round centers tend to be better than most first round position groups, on average. Partly because of your bias — if a team drafts a center that high, they’re pretty sure he’s going to be good.
I get the market value arguments about the draft, but this wholesale disregard of certain positions in certain rounds is crazy. Maybe you don’t take a center in the top 10, because you can trade down in the 20s and get the center you want. But taking the arbitrary destination between 32-33 as some important marker is illogical.
Plus, if the kid is the next Mawae or Mangold, anyone who complains about his draft spot is wrong. What matters is if he’s good.
|04/27/2018 - 1:01pm||Ah, you’re a fan of those||
Ah, you’re a fan of those teams who want to get their starting QB hurt.
|04/27/2018 - 12:54pm||I thought it was worse that||
I thought it was worse that he seemed to argue against racist thought.
I think everyone would prefer that, but it’s not possible, and the thought-crime aspect is particularly dangerous.
The manageable problem is racist action. We can regulate actions. Not thought. I don’t care if someone is a klansman in spirit, so long as he doesn’t actually do racist things. If he does, he’ll pay a societal price.
|04/27/2018 - 8:44am||You remind me of myself in my||
You remind me of myself in my younger days — fighting the good fight, certain you had the solutions, out there trying to raise class consciousness in the proletariat. I used to hate it when the damn proles wouldn’t agree with me.