Jumpman Football uniforms (PHOTO)

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on

I woke up to a nice surprise this morning. Someone tweeted this and it was brought to my attention.

 

ORIGINAL TWEET:

@mgoblog @michiganinsider @umichWD @SamWebb77 pic.twitter.com/NzWfGbhPVn

— Justin E Harkelroad (@jharkelroad1) July 29, 2016

 

The font we're using is NBA Bulls. The first change to the font in almost 50 years. The classic #2 worn by Woodson is gone.

michgoblue

July 29th, 2016 at 10:32 AM ^

I get that the logo is of a man dunking a ball.  But, that logo has become so commonplace in sports, and in particular sports apparel, that I (and, I suspect, many others) don't even look at it as anything more than a logo.  Nobody complained that the jumpman looked stupid when it was on Jeter's batting gloves or Charles Woodon's NFL cleats.

 

wildbackdunesman

July 29th, 2016 at 10:55 AM ^

True, but individual players wearing it on gloves or shoes is not as prominant as every player wearing it on the front of their jersey.

I am 100% fine with it, but I do think it looks unusual.  I bet by the end of this season I will be fully acclimated to it.

ijohnb

July 29th, 2016 at 10:09 AM ^

get this.  I thought his Hall of Fame speech was misguided.  Aside from that, I don't understand why many people have so much of a problem with him.  I mean, I get it, he had some issues.  He clearly had a gambling problem and turned out to be (gasp) a famous NBA basketball player who was not entirely faithful to his wife. 

But what annoys you specifically?  He is well educated, well spoken, often gracious, has never had any issues with the law, avoids political involvement like the plague, never really seeks attention (contrast with Barkley or Shaq) and largely stays completely out of the news in every regard.  What is it about him that you don't like?

Hail-Storm

July 29th, 2016 at 12:53 PM ^

Jordan dethroned the Pistons before making his historic run with the Bulls and was responsible for Thomas getting snubbed for the dream team. 

That said, I don't hate the guy, and fully admit he was the greatest, if not all time, of my time. Can never say I was rooting for him or the bulls while he was playing though. 

Goggles Paisano

July 29th, 2016 at 10:31 AM ^

I don't like him because he kept Isiah off the Dream Team. Great player but kind of a dick move IMO.  

The logo itself on the uni's doesn't bother me.  It's a great logo, but I'm personally not a fan of Jordan.  

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

July 29th, 2016 at 11:23 AM ^

"Gracious" isn't a word usually used to describe Michael Jordan.  Much of what you've said is true and all good things, but not the "gracious" part.  Maybe more so of late, but not at all during his playing days.

ijohnb

July 29th, 2016 at 11:44 AM ^

he was an extremely competitive person, but he was never amatuerish in defeat(contrast with Zeke).  He was always available to the media and gave contrite, actual answers to questions.  He remained loyal to one franchise for nearly his entire (effective) playing career and commanded fierce loyalty from his teammates (whom he always defended).  He had good relationships with many other players including many he played against.  If by "not gracious" you mean he would punch Reggie Miller, Dennis Rodman, Charles Smith, Xavier McDaniel et. al. in the face if they asked for it, I agree, but I always viewed that as a breath of fresh air.

Yeah, he used his leverage to keep Isiah off the Dream Team, but frankly, Isiah was kind of dick who was far less liked and/or admired by other players than Jordan was.  Being a "bad boy" had its consequences and that was one of them.   Perhaps he should have shook hands instead of ducking and running after Game 4 and he would have made the trip to Barcelona.

HAIL-YEA

July 29th, 2016 at 12:39 PM ^

was a crybaby bitch as a player who got his own father killed by not paying a gambling debt. It is fitting that his main legacy right now is being a crybaby biitch internet meme.

The FannMan

July 29th, 2016 at 1:21 PM ^

You can't have it both ways.  Jordan's non-stop whinning and crying, trash talk and (alleged) gambling problem is being  extremely "competitive?"  But, Zeke's refusal to kiss Jordan's ass is being a "dick" which deserved his being kept off of the Dream Team?  That's just laughable.

I am fine if you want to say both teams hated each other and that hatred resulted in dickish behavior on both sides.  But then you'd have to admit that Jordan is not a very nice person (and may have some other issues).  

I am fine if you want to buy "jumpman" suff.  I hope Nike charges you a nice premium for it.  Just don't act all outraged that a number of people don't share your opinion.

ijohnb

July 29th, 2016 at 1:49 PM ^

own one piece of Jumpman apparel and won't start now.  I have two kids draining my pocket book and can't afford all that.  I just don't really have any reason to believe that he is a bad person.  I certainly don't have any evidence that his dad got killed because of a gambling debt, which is pretty much the biggest bullshit rumor taken for truth out there today.

The FannMan

July 29th, 2016 at 4:01 PM ^

I didn't say anything about his father.  But hey, if you can't win an arguement, change the topic, right?

Edit - I saw that the comment above mine brought that up, Maybe you replied to the wrong person. 

ijohnb

July 29th, 2016 at 4:10 PM ^

kind of responding to both.  I just hear a lot of people talk about him like he is the very essence of evil and I don't know why that is.  He was not a bright, shining perfect role model and had some notable issues, but I don't get why he is targeted as such a bad dude all the time.  Outside of competition on the basketball floor, I have never seen the guy disrespect anybody or even be short with reporters, media, etc.  I don't get the hate.

mgobaran

July 29th, 2016 at 11:14 AM ^

This is false. Jordan has been making football cleats since the Mid 2000s....

 

During the early to mid-2000s, it felt like Jordan Brand had just as many football players as basketball players. Warren Sapp, Eddie George, Owens and Jason Taylor were all favoring the Jumpman at the time, but it was Charles Woodson who was just a class above the rest. Whether he was a Wolverine (only defensive player to win the Heisman Trophy), a Raider (multiple Pro Bowls) or a Packer (Super Bowl champion), Woodson let his accomplishments do the talking...).

bamf16

July 29th, 2016 at 10:17 AM ^

I couldn't agree with you more.  When I first posted last spring that I sincerely hoped the Jumpman logo didn't appear on the football gear, I was met with a promise from someone that they would stay off my lawn.  

I'm struggling to understand how a fan base so hateful of "piping" would embrace a font change and a basketball player's image showing up on their proud football uniforms.

We wanted Nike, and Nike's what we got.

Heptarch

July 29th, 2016 at 1:04 PM ^

I'm guessing they're more forgiving of the Jumpman thing for one simple reason:  Unlike Adidas' piping, which was purely a question of aesthetics, being the only college football team with the Jumpman brand actually gives our team a better chance of winning than not having it.  

By all accounts, the kids we are recruiting absolutely love Jumpman gear.  It is an honest-to-god recruiting boon.  That means we will presumably be better (even if only marginally) because of the brand.

For the record, I think having a basketball logo on a football uniform is silly and looks weird... but if it helps us recruit, I'll happily swallow the scorn and smile as we win.

Trader Jack

July 29th, 2016 at 9:13 AM ^

I'm torn. I think the road unis look great, but I miss the maize pants too. I wonder if they're ever coming back. Also wish the Jumpman logo wasn't so close to the numbers.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

dipshit moron

July 29th, 2016 at 12:27 PM ^

how old are you? things do change. the maize pants where gone from the road uniforms in the  mid seventies for three years, and i think they came back. and like the guy said they aren`t sleepers, they could be mixed and matched.

ijohnb

July 29th, 2016 at 9:13 AM ^

who has been an avid supporter of the move to Jumpman, I do have to confess that the logo on the uniform looks a little bit stranger than I envisioned in my head.  Perhaps it is because I expected only one logo, on the pants or the jersey, but not on both.  I don't hate them and the uniforms themselves look excellent, but we do kind of look like the University of Michael Jordon more than I expected.

maizenbluedevil

July 29th, 2016 at 4:00 PM ^

Yep.

Fuck.
This.
Shit.

No joke I want adidas back.

Jump man logo on football uni - ok fine. But put 2 of them on AND change the font?? No. As someone above said, we now look like the University of Michael Jordan.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

ijohnb

July 29th, 2016 at 9:18 AM ^

not get carried away here.  Adidas turned us into a clown show for close to ten years and we collectively pined for change.  These are not perfect as I have opined above but they look good.  They are nice, crisp uniforms with a classic feel (aside from the logo).  It could be a lot worse, and in fact has been for a number of years.

Crootin

July 29th, 2016 at 9:22 AM ^

Just because Adidas was a total disaster doesn't make this good.  Why couldn't they keep the classic font?  Why is a North Carolina basketball player on the front of a Michigan football jersey?  Why didn't jumpman stick to shoes if we wanted it so bad?

 

Bring on the downvotes.

 

edit: just noticed that a dunking basketball player will be on the front of the jersey, and the pants, and the shoes.  DUMB.