We Have To Talk About How Attending Games Kinda Sucks Now Comment Count

Brian

obvious thing preceded and followed by eons of nothing [Eric Upchurch]

9/15/2018 – Michigan 45, SMU 20 – 2-1

The sequence that really, truly broke me was in the middle of the second quarter. For some reason, Sonny Dykes thought that if his team was prepared it could stop a Michigan fullback dive. So he called timeout. Then he saw Michigan had cannily lined up in the exact same way they had before the timeout. Sensing a trap, he called timeout again. This became the dreaded Full Media Timeout.

In the stands, I baked. Because Michigan has made no attempt to improve connectivity in the stadium I held up my phone as it told me it could not retrieve tweets. The clock ticked down.

Michigan took the field again and lined up in the exact same way, but Dykes could not respond—he'd used all his timeouts. Ben Mason scored from the one-inch line, extra point... Full Media Timeout.

I baked further. It sucked. It was hot and boring and also hot and also boring.

Because I was so bored I started counting commercial breaks, finally giving up when the number hit a staggering eight in the first 22 minutes of game clock. There are eight commercial breaks in the entirety of a 40-minute basketball game, plus some timeout-induced ones. And that frequently feels excessive; a couple of years ago the problem seemed so severe the NCAA even stripped coaches of one of their precious timeouts. Football is now throwing up timeouts at almost twice the rate of basketball, a sport where the clock only runs if something is actually happening.

This is close to intolerable when it's nice outside. When it is not, and when there is a steady stream of baffling penalties from the part-time refs from a podunk league, and replays to fix some of the baffling issues the part-time refs are creating, and many more stoppages for injuries—one of which takes a long time and then gets a Full Media Timeout appended to the end of it—you wonder why you're doing this instead of sitting at home with air conditioning and connectivity. Several years ago I probably would have yammered about the students leaving early. Now I just envy anyone with the common sense to bail when they are so clearly being told to bail.

Falling attendance is a nationwide problem often blamed on The Youngs for being addicted to their phones, but the folks behind us show up maybe twice a year and sell their other tickets for whatever they can get. There's a noticeable variance in section density between the many garbage games (hi, division-mates Rutgers and Maryland) on the schedule and the actually worthwhile ones, and there are no students where I'm at. When the Wall Street Journal FOIAed actual ticket scans they found that 21%(!) of Michigan's announced attendance was fictional, tickets that sold but did not scan. This is actually pretty good in the wider context of college football, which says somethin' about somethin'.

It says that college football used to be a great bargain. Tickets were relatively inexpensive, games were fun and not largely spent watching people have conferences. Great fanbases sprung up around the teams starting in the 1960s, when Don Canham was packing bands into the stadium so it would be sort of full, and lasted more or less through 2000 without being seriously impinged upon. Ticket prices were absurdly stable. Television was more of a boon than a hindrance because its proliferation allowed you to watch more road games; breaks were relatively rare and tolerable.

Then things got monetized. Ticket prices approximately tripled in 13 years and have kept going up since. The commercial breaks have proliferated madly. Unsatisfied with their massive uplift in revenue, the athletic department has continued to nickel and dime the fanbase even after the departure of Dave Brandon. And for what? For who? For the benefit of ever more absurdly over-compensated coaches, staffers, and especially executives. Every commercial break is Jim Delany—the man who ruined the conference—giving me the middle finger while he dumps another gold brick on the Big Ten's grave.

Delany and his fellow parasites have latched onto the great oilbeds men like Canham laid down and are sucking them dry without regard to what happens after they're done. They don't care. They'll be dead. Michigan will still be playing Rutgers.

I dunno man. This would certainly be more tolerable if Michigan had won some more games over the past ten years. But probably not that much more. There's nothing I can do, really, but I'll tell you one thing: I'm never buying any fucking Rotel again. Until there's a cap on the number of ad breaks, every single college football TV advertiser can die in a fire for all I care. I've had it.

HIGHLIGHTS

AWARDS

Known Friends And Trusted Agents Of The Week

43988670894_01c735f480_k

[Upchurch]

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1(t) Donovan Peoples-Jones and Zach Gentry. Gentry had a drop but also rescued a ball that would have been an IN if thrown at anyone else. Four catches for 95 yards from a nominal tight end is a thing and if anything Patterson didn't take full advantage of his height to make his other catches indefensible. DPJ scored three touchdowns, completely imploding that stat. Two were relatively simple, sure. The fade was not. DPJ and Gentry get two points each because they're made up and don't matter.

#2 Josh Metellus. INT and weaving TD return were the difference between a relatively comfortable second half and a full on terror-dome. PI on him was iffy; he had another PBU and seven tackles; did get hit a bit on those slants but Kinnel was SMU's preferred target.

#3 Chase Winovich. Ten tackles, three for loss. Had a really impressive track-back on a third and long screen that looked set up for the first down. Also knocked down another screen on third down earlier in the game. Now the subject of a hilarious meme.

Honorable mention: Will Hart added two more 50-yard punts to his collection. Bryan Mone and Carlo Kemp made SMU runs up the middle, which were oddly frequent, entirely futile. Devin Bush exists and is still Devin Bush. Tru Wilson had some more lethal blitz pickups.

KFaTAotW Standings.

4: Chase Winovich (#1 ND, #3 SMU)
3: Karan Higdon (#1 WMU)
2: Ambry Thomas (#2 ND), Rashan Gary(#2 WMU), Donovan Peoples-Jones(T1 SMU), Zach Genty(T1 SMU), Josh Metellus(#2 SMU).
1: Devin Bush(#3 ND), Shea Patterson(#3 WMU)

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

Metellus's TD return.

Honorable mention: Shea Patterson hits DPJ for TD, Shea Patterson hits DPJ for TD, Shea Patterson hits DPJ for TD.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Patterson is intercepted near the goal line to keep the score at 0-0 and seriously threaten One Of Those Games again.

Honorable mention: Almost everything Patterson did prior to that (and nothing afterwards). Coverage mixup gives James Proche an opportunity to score, which he takes.

[After THE JUMP: Tru Wilson has blocked you from seeing this content]

OFFENSE

42908968160_c8f28d686a_k (1)

[Barron]

Down and then up. Patterson's final numbers—14/18, 13 YPA, 3 TD-1 INT—look a lot like his other outings but getting there was a rollercoaster. One that starts at the bottom and then goes up, so... not a rollercoaster. A set of stairs.

Anyway, Patterson's start was downright awful. He turfed a deep crossing route to Perry from a clean pocket on his first attempt; an improv throw to Martin was a BRX that should have been intercepted; a number of early dropbacks saw him sit in the pocket forever without finding anyone downfield, and the interception was the capper. I was mentally composing the "WHY DOESN'T ANYTHING THAT HAPPENED BEFORE MATTER AT ALL" spittle-flecked rant at that juncture.

Patterson was close to flawless the rest of the way, because people are weird and football is weirder. I dunno. Maybe it's because he started to...

43797617095_4960373e86_k

git on up [Upchurch]

THROW IT TO THE ENT. Patterson's first big downfield completion looked like it was about to be a foot over his target's head, and then the target turned out to be Gentry and it was not. One Tacopants reception(!) later it felt like Gentry had truly opened his 2018 account. He finished with 95 yards on four catches, two of them seam routes down the middle of the field on which Patterson didn't take full advantage of his height (to be fair he was getting obliterated on one of them). It didn't matter because in addition to being 6'8" he is able to run away from people.

Gentry did drop a slightly low throw in the second half, continuing a slight trend. He will dorf the occasional pass. That doesn't offset his crazy catching radius and ability to move that radius at speed across the landscape.

Or throw it to DPJ, that also seems to work. Donovan Peoples-Jones had three touchdowns, one on a crossing route that Michigan RPSed well, one on a beauty back-shoulder throw, and one on an... uh... dead-simple 40-yard TD. His body control on the back shoulder was impressive, as was Patterson's placement. There's nothing any DB can do if those guys are going to execute that so well.

Both the other TDs were open due to SMU guys being out of position. DPJ finished both off, which isn't nothing. Also folks tend to get out of position against DPJ because his position changes so rapidly. Because of his incredible athleticism the most important thing for him might actually be proving that he doesn't have Braylon Disease, with the ability to smoothly bring in a back-shoulder throw and make other difficult catches a few steps behind. Because there are going to be a lot of people a few steps behind DPJ.

Also note that Patterson's 40-yard strike was bang on and this adds to our growing pile of evidence that if he finds someone downfield and doesn't get disrupted on the throw he's going to hit him.

The unfortunate bit. Michigan eventually got up to 197 rushing yards but took 41 carries to get there and only suffered three yards worth of sacks. A 5.0 sack-adjusted YPC is a hair below the national average. That's not what you want when you're taking on an AAC tomato can. Compounding the bad feeling was the distribution of those yards. Evans, Wilson and O'Maury Samuels turned in big chunk runs in the fourth quarter; performance before that was in the sub-3.0-YPC range.

Part of this was tactical. Michigan largely failed to exploit SMU's very blitzball LBs and ran a lot of basic spread stuff on which Patterson was not a threat to run. I don't think any of Patterson's 5 carries were intentional. When you're running spread stuff without the threat of a QB run it's a lot harder to run away from the guy on the backside, and Michigan suffered the consequences.

The one thing I'd say in the run game's defense is that SMU was playing a high risk system and when Michigan did get through it for what should have been a back-breaker Chris Evans had the misfortune to come up lame. Tack on another 50 yards and the stats here look a lot more encouraging.

Evans vs Wilson pass pro. Tru Wilson laid out the case for his playing time as neatly as possible by obliterating an unblocked linebacker up the gut. From the stands I was ready to see that guy pop back up and pressure but he just never did. A few plays earlier Chris Evans had drawn the same assignment and almost whiffed entirely, allowing a pressure. I'm also suspicious that a couple other pressures up the gut might have been Evans's deal—on one he went after a linebacker who showed pressure pre-snap and then did not come as the MLB flew up the middle. That could have been Ruiz's deal; I'll have to check in more detail.

30833389748_51a5ca0723_k

Wilson tracking towards Kovacs Memorial status [Barron]

Meanwhile while carrying the ball. Evans got shoehorned into roles he's never going to be good at—third and one, a lot of power—as it seemed like Higdon's absence was not gameplanned around. If he hadn't pulled up lame on what had a good chance to be an 85-yard touchdown he would have redeemed many of those missed tackles he didn't force because he's not that kind of back; unfortunately he did.

Evans did have a couple of nice runs even in the manball context he was frequently deployed in. Once he slashed to the backside of a power play; another time Michigan blocked power well enough to deliver him downfield in a phonebooth's worth of space and he deployed his usual set of ankle-breaking jukes before the third guy got him down. He does need that sliver, though, and Michigan wasn't able to give it to him enough.

Wilson meanwhile, did break tackles. His ability to grind out three or four Hart-like yards on one first down run could have been a fluke but since that (and another play where he ran over a safety) had already happened his late touchdown—which saw him run through a safety tackle while someone else was already hanging off him—was an eye-opener. Maybe he is the same size as Higdon but is made of Onwenu material and is therefore just denser? I dunno.

Right now he has the feel of early Glasgow/Kovacs, when concern that the walk-on is that high up the depth chart gives way to the realization that the walk-on in question is legit good. The knock on him as a recruit was his size. But if he's breaking tackles and obliterating guys on blitz pickups, that size issue doesn't matter and you're left with a guy who everyone said would be a big time recruit if he was two inches taller.

O'Maury Samuels did look good and SPARQ-champion-esque on his late opportunity.

Tackle situation. Patterson had great gobs of time for big chunks of the afternoon and most of the pressure he got seemed to come from the linebacker level. That's good—I guess—but everyone's waiting for the other shoe to drop when Michigan sees various intimidating DEs of the Big Ten. (The Gaz looms.) The nature of the game made it hard to rotate in the backups, if that was even on the docket to start. It seems like it wasn't.

DEFENSE

43798890985_17db6a1994_k

11 catches for 166 yards [Barron]

Proche'd. In the preview I said that if SMU was going to get yards it was probably going to be James Proche getting them. Check. A true downfield threat out of the slot put Michigan's safeties under the microscope and they did not do so hot. Proche's touchdown appeared to be a miscommunication between Long and Hawkins; that's one thing. A young safety still acclimating to live-fire snaps busting isn't a huge worry. He'll get better. He's not even a starter.

The repeated, easy slants are more of a concern. Seemingly half of SMU's yards outside of the big play were slot receivers—usually but not always Proche—catching slants in front of Michigan safeties who could do nothing but tackle on the catch. One incident where they tried it against Brandon Watson stood out because Watson harassed his man into an incompletion. Metellus and Kinnel could not manage that, especially Kinnel.

It was tough for Michigan to match up a corner against Proche because they've moved to a system where motion across the formation brings the free safety down to cover the guy in motion. They did this to limit their exposure to jet sweeps and other plays that take advantage of the positional deficit you naturally get when your cover guy is a lateral yard or two behind the motion man. The downside was just made clear: the defense can get a really good slot receiver matched up on a safety just by motioning him.

Opponents will continue attempting to exploit this. Michigan will need to come up with a response. A zone changeup out of their single high look seems most feasible.

44669270332_14ab8d760a_k

one out of 650 ain't bad [Barron]

The other part of SMU's offense. That would be dubious-to-insane PI calls, JANE. I don't know if these Sun Belt guys have never seen someone jam someone else but they repeatedly made pass interference calls so boggling that when my cousin pointed the one on Hill out I thought he was joking. He was not. The refs repeatedly called Michigan players for successfully jamming WRs and winning over the top, calls that I have never seen any remotely competent crew make. The crowning glory was the call on Kinnel, who won over the top on ball that landed five yards out of bounds.

The Metellus call right before the INT might have been defensible as Metellus was grabbing at the guy before the ball got there but that was extremely weak at best; given the context that also looks terrible. Ross's was probably legit though, so they've got that going for them.

As a bonus this was the second time in three weeks that Michigan suffered a spot so bad that it was not only reviewed but overturned. Any ref who misses a spot so badly that it actually gets overturned should evaporate in shame.

A hold! After this parade of dubious flags the stadium was incensed when Rashan Gary was edged. He was equally incensed, theatrically stopping his attempt to get off the block, and that finally induced a very late flag from the referee. So it can happen. If that's what it takes to get a call on the edge when the opposition OL has his arms outside your shoulder pads that might be the play: if you can't get to the guy on the edge because of a hold playing it up to get a long yardage down seems like a better decision than trying to fight through on a sideline run that your hampered pursuit isn't likely to make much of a difference on.

42898295590_6220353fdd_k

Mone was active [Barron]

DT encouragement again. This was Bryan Mone's best game of the season. He repeatedly shed guys to make plays. Carlo Kemp seemed to follow up on his performance from last week at more or less the same level. Necessary but not sufficient as the DL approaches more intimidating outfits; still nice to see.

Mike Dwumfour seemed to settle into a pass-rush only role until late. He did chuck a guy past him to bottle up a run as well. If and when Solomon and Marshall get back this could develop into the strength it looked like going into the season.

Where can you hit a QB then? Aidan Hutchinson's roughing call was the college version of this:

"Driving into the ground" penalties are always garbage. But they're garbage in the rulebook.

SPECIAL TEAMS

what

Good from 75. Quinn Nordin hit a 45 yarder that went over the goalposts. It went over the net. It is probably the only 45-yard field goal in the history of Michigan Stadium that an endzone got to hurl over the edge. Just kick 'em straight and Nordin's an all-timer. (Please kick 'em straight.)

Kickoffs: now more boring but that's fine. The kickoff fair catch rule hasn't been used much so far, in Michigan games or otherwise, but it does seem to have gotten M to abandon their pop-it-up-to-the-1 strategy in favor of just blasting touchbacks. Jake Moody's been capable of that, with 13 in 19 opportunities. Meanwhile those few returns are going nowhere: opponents are averaging just 14 yards on the few KOs they do return.

Slightly more data. Will Hart hit two more punts exactly 50 yards each, maintaining his season average of... uh... 50 yards. The opposition got to return both, gaining back a total of 16 yards, but a 42-yard net will do.

Slight hint of Peppers. DPJ didn't have many opportunities to actually return a punt but did have a couple of incidents where he was able to catch a ball that landed a long way from his starting position to save Michigan some roll yards.

Squib. Squibbing the ball in the current kickoff environment is insane, Sonny Dykes.

MISCELLANEOUS

This is quite a playcard. Let's make everybody mad!

30833391478_451db2e96e_k

[Barron]

Sonny Dykes, WYD. Sonny triggered some of the bad old Hokefeelings in this game by admitting defeat and then pretending he had not done so. With eight minutes left, SMU gets the ball down 18. Victory is a distant possibility indeed at that moment, but it's happened before. SMU doesn't go up-tempo, runs twice, fails on third down, and then punts. That's waving the white flag. I might be a bit annoyed with that if I'm an SMU fan, but it almost certainly didn't matter.

Dykes then got the ball back with under 2 minutes left down 25 and ran a two-minute drill that exposed his quarterbacks to a series of brutal hits... why? For the practice? If you wanted to practice being down a bunch and trying to score late you could have done that with eight minutes left. For the dignity? Nah. In a futile attempt to make the final score look a little better? Maybe. To get over 300 yards of offense for the first time all year? Ah. Yes. That.

HERE

Ethan Sears:

Michigan got some massive help with Dykes blowing all of his timeouts for no reason, and randomly sacrificing field position with a squib kick, and picking up a 15-yard penalty for protesting a call he probably could’ve gotten reviewed had he not blown all his timeouts minutes earlier, and forgetting how onside kicks work, and — sorry, that was supposed to be a different column.

Best and Worst:

Shea Patterson is pretty good at football, apparently. Even having played the #5 defense nationally per S&P+ (Notre Dame), he currently sports a 6:2 TD:INT ratio, 9.1 ypa, 71% completion, and has started to unleash Michigan's downfield passing game for what feels like a half-decade of slumber. Of note, Michigan has 3 completions this year of over 40 yards; last year they had 5 total, and they haven't gotten to play defenses like Nebraska (351 yards passing to Colorado), Rutgers (354 yards to OSU), and MSU (319 yards to Utah St., 380 yards to an Arizona State that couldn't 130 against San Diego St.). He has re-introduced Michigan's vertical threats, and because of that he's helped taken some pressure off a Michigan offense that last year had to just grind for touchdowns. Last year Michigan's average play was 5.18 yards; this year, it's up to 6.58, and so Michigan is able to strike faster and more efficiently, which lessens the exposure Patterson has behind this still-developing offensive line while also letting more guys get comfortable in the expanding playbook.

ELSEWHERE

I agree with TTB's take on the targeting call:

[rulebook stuff] What matters is that defender B79 hit him with the crown of his helmet, which has been redefined from the past as being the part of the helmet above the facemask and encircling 360 degrees of the helmet.

In Michigan’s game against SMU, Brown was not defenseless. He was not in the grasp of defenders. His forward progress had not been stopped. Hudson was guilty of targeting Brown because – and only because – he made forcible contact with the crown of his helmet. Football used to call this “spearing” but spearing is no longer in the rulebook. Spearing doesn’t exist anymore, as it has been replaced under the umbrella of “targeting.” If Hudson had lowered his head to initiate contact with the crown of his helmet to Brown’s chest or midsection, it could still be targeting because of the orientation of Hudson’s helmet.

Hudson is using his helmet as a weapon and does make first contact with his helmet and his head down:

 

That kind of tackle is being removed from the game.

MGoFish:

Like pretty much every team besides Alabama, Michigan still has plenty of question marks as it heads into conference play next week. But one thing that isn’t a question mark is the quarterback position. The Wolverines have lacked a true playmaker at the position since Denard Robinson and Shea Patterson looks like he could be just that.

Sap's Decals:

OFFENSIVE CHAMPION – I thought TE Zach Gentry had a very good game, and he did have a career best performance, but when Donovan Peoples-Jones scores three TD’s, you gotta give the WR some love – and a helmet sticker!  After going almost an entire calendar year without a touchdown by a wide receiver, it looks like number 9 is getting more comfortable with his QB & improving each week – that bodes well for the Michigan offense.

Hoover Street:

It feels wrong to complain about a win on a day when so many Big Ten teams fell, including Wisconsin and Nebraska.  There are no style points.  Many of the voters in the polls are going to see 45-20 and not big any deeper.  Michigan won by 25 at home against a G5 opponent.  But I will say, this game was one of the least, if not the least, enjoyable Michigan Stadium experiences I have had where the end result was a victory. (Advisory note: I was not at Cincinnati or Air Force last year, because I can already hear you "ahem"-ing me.)  It was just a joyless, superheated slog that would not seem to end.

M wasn't gameplanning for Proche:

"We knew he was a big-play guy for them," Metellus said. "We knew he was the No. 1 guy, and we didn't do a great job of playing to that. Didn't do a great job knowing he was going to get the ball, like putting double coverage on him or make sure we watch him. I just think we have to go into next week against Nebraska knowing who is the big-play guy."

Tru items. Metellus INT details. RB status. Maize and Blue Nation.

Comments

Zeke21

September 17th, 2018 at 2:30 PM ^

Commercials, penalties, replays, Timeouts. Studio refs explanations.

There is more No Play time, then playing time now.

I no longer watch NFL, I no longer watch college football EXCEPT M. Unless I tape a game.

Sports is now unwatchable.  

yossarians tree

September 17th, 2018 at 4:38 PM ^

I can usually put up with it all for a Michigan game, but I did turn down free tickets for SMU because my general rule is I don't go to September games for the exact scenario that went down Saturday. When it's super hot and muggy like that it is just too miserable inside that bowl for a 4-hour TV commercial. But I'll be there for homecoming!

As for Lions games, I refuse to be a part of that mob. Things move a little bit faster but you are surrounded by so many morons that it is actually embarrassing for me to be there.

NateVolk

September 17th, 2018 at 2:31 PM ^

If the tickets are totally free, it's not a night game, it's a great opponent, and the weather looks comfortable, I'll go. 

TV breaks have all but destroyed the experience at the game.

mGrowOld

September 17th, 2018 at 2:33 PM ^

1988-2014 held season tickets and seldom missed a game. Gave them up when the Hoke/Brandon combo package basically broke me emotionally.  Since then I've been to one game (OSU last year) and I dont miss it a bit.  The view, the adult beverages, the food and most definitely the bathroom is better here in Medina, Ohio than being there. 

Interestingly enough I now seldom even watch the game live unless it's a really big game.  I record them, turn my phone off and watch them without commercials, half-time bullshit and other stoppages of play.  Saturday's game, for example, I watched at about 10:00 pm (took about 90 minutes) and then watched the OSU game the same way.

God speed season ticket holders.

 

ak47

September 17th, 2018 at 3:01 PM ^

I don't understand this. The joy of sports is the unpredictability and camraderie of it. So either you are turning yourself off from all media updates or already know the outcome ruining the game. Plus you don't get to watch with other people and enjoy being with them. Just defeats the entire purpose of sports to me but to each his own I guess.

To me complaining about going to a game is like when people complain a Zingermans sandwich is too expensive. When attending a football game the actual product on the field is only a portion of the experience. Its about being in Ann Arbor on a gameday and feeling the excitement and buzz of the crowd. Being with friends on the golf course and walking down Hoover with tens of thousands of people, its about being in the stadium and being part of the atmosphere of the game etc. I have a large number of friends who give zero fucks about sports except for Michigan football because of those pieces of the experience. Living out of of state I'm lucky to make it back for 1 game and am incredibly envious of those who get to go to more. I get it that a game or two can suck experience wise but its only because you also get to go to the 5 or 6 where it doesn't. 

LJ

September 17th, 2018 at 3:11 PM ^

This is so spot on to me.  It’s michigan football (fergodsakes).  Media timeouts are a little annoying.  It’s still really, really awesome to be in Michigan Stadium.  For all the consternation about piped in music and tv timeouts, at worst it takes the experience from a 100 to a 95 for me.

I think (perhaps unconsciously) people just have zero tolerance for anything these days because the games themselves have been so frustrating for 15 years. 

Blarvey

September 17th, 2018 at 3:54 PM ^

Your last point may have something to do with it. For me, I only have so many hours in a day to watch games and the technology is there to avoid the dead time between plays, commercials, time outs, etc. 

If I lived closer to Ann Arbor then it may be different, though I can still see the whole thing being prohibitively expensive for a whole year for the family. 

ijohnb

September 17th, 2018 at 3:11 PM ^

Two things here:

1) If you are talking about watching games in "the bubble," it really is the way to go if you cannot dedicate your entire afternoon to a four hour TV event without the ability to manage the stoppages and dead air in terms suitable to you.  Noon games for sure, and even 3:30 games to a certain extent, work best for me if my entire family makes plans throughout the day with a low chance of encountering the score and then turn on the game around 5:00 PM.  It's grilling time by then, it's a sensible time to start drinking beer, we can pause the game as much as we want to get the kids into "pajama time" and get them winding down.  The Michigan game will then kind of seamlessly transition into me watching the night games. 

Unless it is a huge game (OSU, MSU) where I am often watching with friends, etc, I watch on DVR a lot, and probably will for about 3 or 4 more games this year.  There is nothing worse than planning your entire day around watching a game, get all drunk and sit around, and then have the game suck or lose, or both.  I now try to be dad of the year and as productive as possible at all times leading up to (often recorded) Michigan games so that the day is not a bust if the game is not ideal.  That is kind of why I am starting to like night games as a TV viewer, the game doesn't impact my day at all and is in fact its own entity disconnected from the rest of the day.

2) I think a lot of the gripes about the game day experience are coming from recency bias as to the SMU game.  It was a terrible opponent, it should have been a noon game, it was seriously 90 degrees and humid, the refs were terrible, there were an inordinate number of stoppages and injuries.  That's a lot of factors that contribute to a bad game experience. 

Let's face it, it doesn't matter if you watched it at the stadium, live, in the bubble, the SMU game was four hours of our lives that we are never going to get back.  It was just a really bad game.

CompleteLunacy

September 17th, 2018 at 3:36 PM ^

Can confirm: Watched on tv via the BTN app, and it was one of the more unenjoyable games I can ever remember watching. It was a slog, constant interruptions. Late in the game when it was over but not totally over, I remember sitting in my recliner staring blankly at the screen with my elbow propped on the arm of the chair and holding my head up, as yet another dubious flag was thrown by the refs. It was not fun to watch no matter where you were.

tubauberalles

September 17th, 2018 at 7:26 PM ^

Not sure if you had this same experience, but I also found the app to crash a ton - often coinciding with the commercial breaks, where the app was running different ads than the tv broadcast (I think).  With the frequency of the interruptions, that meant way too many re-boots.  It was a mystery to me, at the time, that I was still able to catch up to the real-time game.  So as frustrated as I was getting trying to stream the app to my tv, I can see it must have been a whole 'nother hell for folks in the stadium.

MH20

September 18th, 2018 at 8:37 AM ^

Don't use the BTN2Go app...it's a total piece of shit. Instead, use the FOX Sports GO app which has channels/games from the entire Fox network, including BTN. Everything about the FS GO app is far superior to the junk that BTN put out. This goes for phones/tablets, streaming devices, and the website version (foxsportsgo.com).

This has been your daily reminder that Big Ten Network is a complete joke run by idiots with high school level analysis and production quality.

Indiana Blue

September 18th, 2018 at 8:49 AM ^

Just holy shit ijohnb.   It was a just a really bad game ?  How about the recent Tigers game they lost 15 - 0 - that was a BAD game.  But it is sports - there is no way to predict what may happen - hence we go.  Michigan scores points on its last 6 straight possessions and I see fans complaining it was too hot ?  WTF .. then stay home.  I have season tickets because to me Michigan football games are a weekend off from "life".  Football Saturday's comprise pre and post game tailgating ... and we have made great relationships with other tailgaters around us.  The football game is always the unknown aspect, but if you attend a game in which Michigan is a 32 point favorite and then say it was a bad game ... then you only have yourself to blame, not the football game or the heat.

Go Blue! 

mGrowOld

September 17th, 2018 at 3:21 PM ^

Good points all (and I agree more than I disagree with you)

1. I love all the things you described: "Its about being in Ann Arbor on a gameday and feeling the excitement and buzz of the crowd. Being with friends on the golf course and walking down Hoover with tens of thousands of people, its about being in the stadium and being part of the atmosphere of the game etc"  I couldnt agree more.  Those things (plus the tailgate) were what kept me coming back year after year.

2. I watch the non critical games (like SMU) with my wife and she doesnt know the score either so we're both equally surprised at the outcome.  The big games I do watch live for the exact reasons you describe.

But remember attending a football game is a zero-sum-gain experience time wise.  If you're there, you're not someplace else doing something else.  And for almost 30 years I was there.  For a 3:30pm game I would leave my home in Medina at about 9:00am and get home around 11:00pm or so.  That was my entire day.

This past Saturday however while Brian was "enjoying" the game day experience in person I was on a jet ski with my wife and son on Lake Erie tubing and wake boarding.  And when that was done I grilled ribs, drank a few good beers, made a bonfire and looked out on an amazing sunset with my wife.  Then I watched the game.

I dont want to trade back.

ak47

September 17th, 2018 at 3:38 PM ^

Yeah I get that, and I don't think I would go to 8 games a year even if I lived in Ann Arbor but that is just about not prioritizing football over life and not a commentary on the gameday vs at home experience. Going to a Michigan bar for a 4 hour game is still most of my Saturday, if I wanted to go out on a jetski I wouldn't be watching the game at home either.  Outside of sever weather (and I count extreme heat as severe weather) I'd always rather watch the game at Michigan if I am choosing to watch the game.

It sounds like the SMU game sucked, it was extremely hot, a bad reffing crew, enough mistakes from the team to make it unejoyable, but still a rote win against a team nobody cares about. That is obviously a recipe for disaster but I wouldn't then expand that to all games at the stadium.

wolverinestuckinEL

September 17th, 2018 at 3:25 PM ^

I too only make it to one game a year, and this was the game because I have kids and really don't want to drop $150 a ticket for them to lose interest by halftime.  Being back in A2, the walk to the stadium, the pregame - thats what it is all about.  But this game fucking sucked.   We left after the third quarter because it was unbearable sitting there roasting while time out after time out and commercial after commercial stopped play.  The most unenjoyable live sporting experience of my life.  Maybe next year I'll do all the stuff I love and go watch the game at a bar.  It's sad for me that the game itself is ruining the game day experience.

harmon40

September 18th, 2018 at 11:23 AM ^

I hear you.  I have a teenage daughter and it is my dream to take her, just one time, to Michigan Stadium for a game. Then she will be able to say for the rest of her life that she has been to the Center of the Universe.

But she just has no interest. I can’t burn a few hundred bucks to drag her somewhere she doesn’t want to be. And it sounds like what the live experience has become would probably not convince her.

Red is Blue

September 17th, 2018 at 4:16 PM ^

The joy of sports is the unpredictability and camraderie of it. So either you are turning yourself off from all media updates or already know the outcome ruining the game. Plus you don't get to watch with other people and enjoy being with them. 

 

As suggested, the unpredictability of it can be maintained by turning off media updates.  I really don't see a downside to that.  As far as the camraderie, that can also be maintained.  Just make sure those you watch the game with follow the turning off media update rule and you can enjoy together.

snarling wolverine

September 17th, 2018 at 4:17 PM ^

 I get it that a game or two can suck experience wise but its only because you also get to go to the 5 or 6 where it doesn't. 

It's not an either/or.  What we (season-ticketholders) see is a gradual erosion of the gameday experience in general, due above all to the constant delays in the action.  That's true even in great games. 

For example, I was at 2011 OSU and while it was a great game overall, I remember a long delay while the replay guys very, very slowly came to a conclusion that Toussaint hadn't scored (and Special K decided to drop "Sweet Caroline" on us during this time).  It killed the atmosphere.  That's what stands out in my mind from that game - that interminable delay, midway through the 4th quarter.  And we get delays like that in every game, good or bad.

The point is not that the Michigan football experience sucks.  But it now includes issues that didn't come up a generation ago, and those issues seem to be getting worse and worse.  If you only come to one game a year, you can probably put up with them.  But guys like you don't drive the bottom line.  The season-ticketholders do.   

ak47

September 17th, 2018 at 4:49 PM ^

I was at that game. If that is your takeaway that just feels like something to gripe about.

People always remember things more positively than they happened. Its part of the human experience. Its incredibly unlikely the game experience was some massively superior product in the 90's, you just remember it more fondly. Game length times have only increased like 15-20 minutes. Are you really telling me 15 minutes is the difference between a great experience and a shit one?

quercus99

September 17th, 2018 at 6:39 PM ^

It is not just the interminable media delays: It also hotter than in the 90's, it is also alot more frustrating to watch- something happened to the experience, and it is more than just the piped in music.  Maybe it is that I lived out of state for a decade and lost the community aspect of it.  I don't know how to explain it, but I feel it and I like going to games less and less.

My go to experience now is that I block off the game time from the family schedule.  I go hide in the basement and I grade the 48 labs that get handed in each week.  It takes about the entire game to grade both lab sections.  For a game like SMU, I am finished by the end of the third quarter.

There a nihilist aspect to it that Brian mentioned earlier in the season.  In the basement, I don't upset anybody.  Grading, I can at least do something proactive to keep my mind off of the sense of impending doom, the certainty that the football gods are going to screw over Michigan in some painful perverse way. 

GarMoe

September 18th, 2018 at 1:10 AM ^

ak47, I know you’ve been around here a long time, so have I (as a lurker) so I’ll cut you some slack but your comments are getting more and more defensive.  Lighten up, you don’t have to be “right” every time.  You can often tell the desperation when the argument becomes more “either or”.  The explanation you’ve been given is that games have crossed the line to the territory of unpleasant - no one said they were “shit” but you.

Gulogulo37

September 17th, 2018 at 10:27 PM ^

I find it bizarre that you find it bizarre. Of course it's great watching with other people but I don't like texting shit all the time during the game. If my friend somewhere else is watching he knows what's going on. I don't need to tell him some awesome play was awesome. I really don't care about media updates. I'm 34. When I first had season tickets I didn't even have a cell phone. And I never had a smartphone. It was totally fine. If you text and all, cool, but it's not worth 2 hours of commercials and interminable replays to me. 

Blue and Joe

September 17th, 2018 at 2:39 PM ^

As someone who lives 2 hours from Ann Arbor, I will probably always appreciate the few trips I take to Michigan Stadium. But I completely understand how awful it can be to be there sometimes. There are plenty of occasions where I have thought "I'm glad I'm watching this at home right now." It's unfortunate and it probably won't get better any time soon.

ehatch

September 17th, 2018 at 2:39 PM ^

Brian, I can assure you that game sucked even watching from home. A billion (bogus) penalties, reviews, injuries made the game near unwatchable. College football is becoming borderline unwatchable (I stopped watching the NFL years ago, because it was unwatchable, but College always had the advantage of multiple games/channels so I could always just find a different game during a commercial break). Later I was watching other games, one had a review for targeting, then commercial, another had an injury then commercial, this was during or shortly after TCU's meltdown, so I just turned off the TV and went to bed, wondering why I watch the sport. 

ijohnb

September 17th, 2018 at 3:21 PM ^

Frankly, there just haven't been that many good games this year, either.  I think it will get more interesting once the conference season starts, but a lot of times this year I have tried to surf other games only to find that there really aren't any games that I am that interested in.

Zenogias

September 17th, 2018 at 3:55 PM ^

Can confirm. One of the stupidest damn games I have ever seen from a viewing perspective. It wasn't that fun to watch, even from the comfort of my couch. It was *insane* how many stoppages there were. I did think this game was abnormally bad. I do wish we could put the cat back in the bag with respect to the overabundance of replays, commercials, and other nonsense, but since we can't, we can at least acknowledge that this game was bad even by modern standards.

JRell

September 17th, 2018 at 2:40 PM ^

I was expecting this to be about having to deal with the other miserable M fans at games. I don't have season tickets but have sat in the same section the last 2 games and it got to the point where it was unbearable. The moaning and complaining about every little thing has made me reconsider attending any more home games the rest of the season. I have been going to games for the last 10 years but am reaching the point where I'd rather just stay home or only attend away games.

bringthewood

September 17th, 2018 at 3:09 PM ^

I actually find the ignorance of surrounding fans can at times be funny, but sometimes they are just assholes. To me it seems like there are more casual fans attending and less hardcore season ticket holders.

I remember as a kid going with my parents and only bitching about the refs and opposing team.

jmblue

September 17th, 2018 at 2:41 PM ^

Watching the World Cup this past summer reinforced the sad state of American TV sports viewing.  Soccer - the world's most watched, most followed sport - manages to go without an ad break for an entire half, and fits 90 minutes of game time in less than two hours.   That is mind-blowing from our perspective, yet completely normal to people in the rest of the world.  And yes, the networks still bid top dollar (euro, pound, etc.) to broadcast pro and international soccer.  It is very much possible to make a profit while broadcasting entire halves without commercial breaks.  You just fit the ads around the game, not the other way around.  Crazy, I know. 

American TV networks couldn't have more contempt for their viewers.  It's ridiculous what they get away with.

 

jmblue

September 17th, 2018 at 2:56 PM ^

Again, no - revenue from those ads goes to the stadium.  

Anyway, U.S. stadiums are full of ad signage too - have you watched an NBA or NHL game?  Heck, watch MSU football and you'll see huge Muscle Milk ads behind the goal posts.  Michigan is one of the only schools in the country not to have advertising in the stadium.

The idea that TV networks need constant commercial breaks to make a profit is utter nonsense.  No one should defend that argument.  

Farnn

September 17th, 2018 at 3:10 PM ^

You're naive if you think the ad revenue only goes to the networks.  When they pay for the rights, they are calculating making that money back plus more.  So while the ad money goes to the networks, the networks already paid a higher price to the teams to carry the games.  And part of the reason we are seeing so many ads is because teams and leagues got greedy and only cared about the highest dollar amounts in selling their TV rights.  In doing so they gave up things like scheduling rights and setting the pace of the game.  The B1G doesn't want more media time outs, ESPN does, same with night games, and Thursday games.

This is all about ADs and other administrators getting greedy and sacrificing their players and fans to the altar of the almighty dollar.  And if soccer executives thought they could get away with quarters or other commercial breaks they would too.

mgobaran

September 17th, 2018 at 3:17 PM ^

Why can't you do that with football? Broadcast a wider aspect ratio, showing more field and give the top 10% of the screen to advertising. One commercial break during each quarter, one after 1st and 3rd quarters, and run an abbreviated halftime show with a bunch of commercials. 

The fact soccer and college basketball games gets done in 2 hours or less makes them very enjoyable. College Football doesn't need to be that short, but 2-1/2 hours should be reasonable. 

snarling wolverine

September 17th, 2018 at 3:33 PM ^

I'd be fine with that.  I'd rather have "Rotel" on the top of the screen during the action than have to watch a Rotel ad every change of possession.  It would be nice for most of the broadcast to actually be the game itself, rather than having the sense that I am watching four hours of commercials occasionally interrupted by football.  

 

zlionsfan

September 17th, 2018 at 3:05 PM ^

I have season tickets to both Indy Eleven (USL) and Purdue football, and while the USL is probably the equivalent of fourth- or fifth-tier English soccer it's still televised, and even as a second-tier team, we get replays on a big screen since they play in Lucas Oil ... but the matches go at the same speed as top-tier soccer, we're wrapped up right around two hours even if they give 8 minutes of added time in the second half.

Contrast that with the two night games in Ross-Ade so far this season; the Missouri game somehow finished in less than four hours (but not by much), and the Northwestern game topped that mark. The endless commercial breaks are bad enough (although in club seating it does give you more time to get refreshments, I'd prefer to have to miss game time for that), but the replay system seems to have gotten worse, and I'm not sure it's as effective as it used to be, especially since officials seem to be missing calls that aren't reviewable - if we need any more evidence that officials should be paid full-time and working on their craft full-time, I can't think what that might be.

dnak438

September 17th, 2018 at 3:10 PM ^

Soccer culture is obsessive about the fan-in-the-stadium experience, however. A couple of years ago a game in the English premier league was delayed because most of the visiting fans were late to the game because of a train delay. I was pretty impressed that they would do that. I have a hard time imagining an NFL game being delayed because of fans. (Although to be fair English fans are probably much more likely to riot if the game weren't delayed for them...)