Peppers at 10, which seems low.
- Member for
- 3 years 9 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|4 days 2 hours ago||Seriously?||
Those results are not as favorable as I expected
1. Best helmet? Michigan by far, Maryland very low down
2. Yes, even once a season on UM
3. BTfav? OSU
4. Mascot? Purdue Pete
5. Loudest Stadium? Happy valley, but I've only been to UM, MSU, and PSU
6. N/A to NCAA '06 players such as myself
7. Harbaugh, then DJ Durkin
8. social media? Would be twitter, but I don't consider it much of a social media site anymore as much as a news source, so snapchat.
9. pre-game music? The legendary stylings of Rick Ross and/or Waka Flocka
10. Pokemon go? An embarassing amount
|6 days 7 hours ago||I'll try it||
1. Over, because great receiving and Harbaugh
3. Under, too much committee
4. Under, too many good receivers, plus blowouts benching him
5. Over, Don Brown brings more pressure plus we have an easier schedule
6. Over, more or less same reasons
7. Over, peppers chesson and lewis are all great returners
8. Over, easier schedule plus lots of returning starters
10. Over, because I'm a homer
|1 week 5 days ago||I see your point||
But Harbuagh only had one 10+ win season at Stanford, and two winning seasons. Dantonio has 5 in the last six years. I agree with your speculation about Stanford if Harbaugh stayed, but he didn't, and as such hasn't proved himself in the same way.
I'm definitely not saying Harbaugh won't prove to be the better coach, but what-ifs and Shaw wins don't outweigh Dantonio's actual direct success.
|1 week 5 days ago||Attempting to be honest||
I know that a good deal of homerism is to be expected on a UM board, but the fact remains that both our rivals have elite coaches who have proven more in CFB than ours, and have had a lot of success against us lately. Further, not giving our rivals their due as tough opponents lessens our accomplishments in past seasons and undermine the importance of wins against them this season.
I don't really understand the "we can't say anything until we beat x" crowd though, as its summer on a UM forum and all we really have to do is speculate.
|13 weeks 10 hours ago||huzzah!||
|15 weeks 2 days ago||Speaking as a 22 year old||
Speak for yourself
|23 weeks 1 day ago||To be fair||
It's a player who is going to be a redshirt senior, and is probably one of the top 3 players off the bench at his position. Not a big contributer, but definitely somebody who could see a decent amount of time on the field. He said he was speaking for a large portion of the team, as well. He also said though that while people were disappointed, they were not surprised or badly demoralized.
|23 weeks 1 day ago||For what its worth||
And I hope I don't get negged for this, but I heard from a senior on the team that the team was as a whole pretty disappointed they didn't get a spring break. I don't think its enough to call the whole trip unethical, but there is actually some truth to the argument that this isn't what the student atheletes want.
|30 weeks 5 days ago||Are you sure?||
what about 2008 Wisconsin, they were ranked #9
|30 weeks 5 days ago||I like the comment||
but paragraphs, wolfman!
|33 weeks 3 days ago||Cam Newton||
I believe it's Cam Newton's trademark celebration. He just does exactly what Harbaugh did, only more coordinated-like.
|34 weeks 3 days ago||Check the diaries||
or just site search
|35 weeks 4 days ago||Come on||
People refer to their sports team as 'we' all the time, you and I both know this. Don't be a smart-ass
|40 weeks 2 days ago||Hate to be that guy||
But doesn't this belong on the board?
|41 weeks 2 days ago||round 2||
Came back to post again?
|41 weeks 2 days ago||Generally civil||
I think people are generally nice to first time posters, but every now and then you see them get hit with something along the lines of "That's why we need to raise the points threshold" or "I wish he would post a comment so I could neg him to Bolivia"
|41 weeks 2 days ago||Embed?|
|41 weeks 3 days ago||I'm picking up what you're putting down||
Additionally, said statistical wizard could analyze which of these many different statistical models has been the most accurate year in and year out. Until that happens, we can just assume it's whichever model has us highest.
|41 weeks 3 days ago||Score predictions thread||
There's already an official score prediction thread every week, the guess the score and win stuff thread.
My non buzz-kill response? 31 - 10 M
|42 weeks 2 days ago||I'm going to go with a score that probably noone has taken||
16 - 0 GB
|42 weeks 3 days ago||/s?||
|42 weeks 3 days ago||/s?||
Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but if you're not, the data really doesn't back you up. According to NCAA.com, UM is tied for 17th in the nation in sacks allowed, tied for 11th in TFL's allowed, and tied for 94th in INT's allowed. Obviously the INT number is high, but to say that the norm is interceptions, sacks, and TFL's is extremely inaccurate.
|1 year 11 weeks ago||Stay-at-home||
Time moves slower for you the faster you travel, so stay at home feller gets it
|1 year 13 weeks ago||Frasiers and Charley's||
I tried Frasier's and Charley's and they both will not be having it, along with BDubs.
|1 year 22 weeks ago||Woosh||
|1 year 25 weeks ago||Congrats!||
I look forward to seeing him around North Campus
|1 year 25 weeks ago||This is why we have the||
This is why we have the upvote button
|1 year 25 weeks ago||and then i realized: this is||
and then i realized: this is why we have the downvote button
|1 year 25 weeks ago||thanks||
Understood, I'm glad either way because my snarky comment finally put me over the 100 point threshold
|1 year 25 weeks ago||Wrong thread||
Looks like you picked the wrong thread to IBD