If you can see Patrick you can see endzone. [Patrick Barron]

Neck Sharpies: I Want More from Edwards Comment Count

Seth December 5th, 2023 at 12:00 PM

There's not a lot to gripe about when Michigan has played thirteen games, won thirteen games, and is the #1 seed in the Playoff. But we're going to find a way to do it anyways, because the usage of Donovan Edwards this season has been a consistent annoyance. As good as Harbaugh and his assistants have been about finding ways to crack defenses with tight ends, it's hard to get over the thought that they're wasting a five-star tool in Edwards who could be so much more. This was a point Brian made in the game column:

What are we doing with Donovan Edwards? There were a number of plays on which Iowa showed man-to-man coverage with Edwards split out. Edwards invariably motioned back into the backfield when this happened. They never took a shot at Edwards, or even looked him up on a slant.

Even more frustrating were times when Iowa would show and run man coverage and Edwards would leak out of the backfield and sit down in front of a linebacker. One angle route there and Edwards is running for a million yards. I don't know; it just seems like something is off with him. And the coaches.

He's barely been used in the pass game. #1 must fix before the 'Bama game. Alabama has lockdown corners; Edwards needs to be a factor.

So I thought we'd use this space to talk about this play and some others that have us questioning how Michigan deploys this backfield weapon, and how they could probably do a better job of using his actual skills.

[After THE JUMP: Two gripes.]

WHAT EDWARDS DOES WELL

Well it's not actually playing running back in Michigan's current system, as we've discussed at length. As a ball-carrier, Edwards has good burst and acceleration. What he lacks is that Corum-esque sense of how to get a defender's attention and get him to go in the wrong spot. Edwards is fast and can engage that extra gear to wipe players off the board. This was why he was so lethal at the end of the season last year, as Michigan's superior offensive line put him in positions where that burst and speed could shine, and the gap was the only one.

With Corum taking the bulk of carries, the OL taking a step back, and opponents sanely using safeties as the gods intended, there haven't been as many opportunities for Edwards to jet for all the yards. The moments instead often come from play design and getting him to the edge. He's also been pushing it. This looked more dangerous than it ended up being, and when you go back to look at why you notice he never used AJ Barner's block at all. The yards it gets are the yards he beat #34, Iowa's excellent linebacker Jay Higgins, by in a footrace.

Here's a more bog standard Donovan Edwards run for 4 yards.

Michigan has an RPO read (or a fake one) that holds the field safety in case of a bubble to Morris, but Iowa still has a free hitter in the box, which ends up being the WLB standing on the "V" of the midfield sponsor logo.

image

Edwards finds the guy he needs to beat easily enough.

image

And starts to give him a little shimmy. Meanwhile the DE on the top is losing contain to Henderson, and the LB is realizing he's going to have to make that right. Edwards correctly uses that to give the LB a little shimmy, ready to pop outside if needed. The DE is definitely losing that outside contain too. If Edwards sells this he's to the safety, who's just now starting to react to the handoff.

image

The LB doesn't bite, so Edwards gets closer to the line of scrimmage, but still where he can pop out. The DE is coming inside. The safety is moving down to cover the C-gap. The other MLB has flipped sides on Nugent and is getting to the B gap as well.

image

And in the end it's B.

image

Contrast this with Mullings running the same thing, except the threat to the safety is just a McCarthy keeper that he doesn't buy.

Or this other cut by Mullings.

Edwards also is just okay when it comes to bowling guys over. Edwards does have good burst, which shines best on zone reads when the DE is shading inside. Even if the QB misses a keep read, the margin the edge has to get over in time once Edwards has possession is really slim.

But if we were just deciding on a running back to do running back things, Mullings is the far superior player.

HE'S A FANTASTIC DECOY

Of course, that's not the end of what Edwards does. We've seen him play receiver as well as any college regular wideout, and he's too fast for linebackers to carry in man. We all remember the one time Purdue was misaligned and sent "#47" out on him.

Michigan's passing game has incorporated this threat somewhat. Purdue mostly matched him with a safety all game, which made the rest of their coverages predictable and exploitable as Michigan found ways of putting them in footraces with their receivers. Other teams are going to play a lot more zone however. Ohio State and Iowa are both excellent zone passing defenses, and both got a little over-extended trying to account for Edwards when he went a-wheelin'. The TE delay when Zinter was hurt was one such play.

Watch the MLB, "1st team all-Big Ten" Tommy Eichenberg as he turns his back on Loveland to help a cornerback already on top of Edwards.

image

A similar thing happened against Iowa, though Higgins is a much better linebacker than the defender Michigan was picking on a week earlier. Even a little step outside to worry about Edwards coming into his zone is enough to get Loveland across #34's face.

Michigan's become so used to defenses having a guy come down on Edwards that I believe Iowa was able to scout this and exploit it, which led to some Edwards dump-off opportunities being screamingly open in the first half.

I plan to get into JJ's progressions later this week with Demorest, but one major disconnect between fans and the people who play and coach the game is the concept of "Oh that guy was WIDE OPEN!" The fact of passing games—and the reason they're so effective when run by excellent pros—is that there's almost always somebody with leverage, because you don't have enough defenders to bracket every receiver and still get enough pass rush for it to matter.

Quarterbacks can't have eyes everywhere, however. They use patterns, read progressions, and defensive clues to figure out where they want the ball to go. When facing a primarily zone team, that means identifying the coverage, finding the guy stretched between two zones, and fitting the ball where it needs to go. Much of Michigan's passing offense in this game was using motion to identify Iowa's coverages and zinging it into quick outs near the sideline where Iowa's zone defenders were out-leveraged. If JJ caught one of those, he was going for the five-yard out and never looked to see whether they were backing way off Edwards the other way. But they were.

Here's an early from Michigan's first drive.

JJ ends up zinging it over Loveland's head, and Edwards ended up being open for a dump-down that probably gets 7-8 yards, and fans like me end up yelling "dump it to Edwards GAWD!" when that happens.

But from JJ's perspective he sees the SAM (#37) widening when they motion Bredeson across,

image

…which is a cue that the SAM is going to be pulled wide of the hash mark and Loveland will find a spot to sit down between that guy and #34 Higgins.

image

When Loveland cuts behind Higgins, the window is there and he throws it.

imageimage

It's an inaccurate pass, yes. But I'm not sure you can call it a bad read when the LB he was reading wasn't getting there. You can when you consider that SAM should have been on Edwards, and there was quite a lot of room for a catch and run to the running back.

This is Complaint #1:

HE'S NOT A PRIORITY IN JJ's DECISION-TREE.

The passing concepts are there to create reads for McCarthy to hit NFL windows to other future NFL players like Loveland and Wilson. But Edwards is a future NFL player himself, and if you get the ball to him in that kind of space against Iowa's 5'11"/233 walk-on OLB Kyler Fisher, I'm sorry, but your chances of success are higher than trying to fit it into Loveland in that window.

This was true on the rollout that ended up getting Trente Jones flagged for a pathetically weak holding call.

The read is to field side—Edwards's side—but JJ never makes it to the checkdown. Michigan had a couple of motions here that were supposed to reveal Iowa's setup, but Iowa's nickel gave them a sim pressure, looking for all the world like he was going to be blitzing. Michigan also has a man-beater—scissors—route combo to that side. When the nickel and safety drop into coverage, JJ keeps watching them hoping to see everybody drop out of the way of Loveland's dig route.

I drew this one up because the route combos get off-screen quickly. Remember how we talked about the Dagger route combo and how Michigan was chewing up their early season opponents with it? That's the combo in the middle that McCarthy is reading between Morris's post and Loveland's dig but with a slot fade to Johnson that should spring open if Iowa switches to man coverage. That means for the first few second's the quarterback's eyes are going to be on that left seam.

image

I color-coded McCarthy's reads from hot to cold to emphasize the issue. Against a soft cover 2 team like Iowa you should be coaching McCarthy to look for that checkdown to Edwards when he's reading the scissors on the left.

image

You want him to be reading the nickel's deep drop and hit Edwards under that. But J.J. really likes that Dig route.

image

J.J. takes a couple more bounces, looks at Edwards for like…A FRAME (he's open)…and then his timer goes off and he starts rolling, finding Barner underneath. Edwards just isn't a priority. This became an issue that Iowa was able to exploit. They got a BS holding call out of the one above.

Iowa kept leaving Edwards so open underneath that Michigan finally got word down and dumped it to him for a chunk:

Iowa adjusted to this, bringing the nickel down next time they ran one of these coverages, and that opened up space behind the nickel for what should have been a huge play.

Watch #30, the boundary safety, who starts at the 50 yard line.

This brings us to Complaint #2

WHEN YOU GET HIM IN MAN YOU HAVE TO EXPLOIT IT.

I think there's been a major disconnect at Michigan between what Edwards is actually good at, and what they want him to be good at. What they envision is the sort of good-in-traffic jitterbug that Semaj Morgan has demonstrated himself to be. They scheme up end-arounds and bubble screens for him. Not only are these a huge tell whenever they're doing it, but Edwards has not shown himself particularly adept at turning those opportunities into yards. As a runner he is impatient, and doesn't have a great feel for setting up his blocks. When those blocks are wide receivers against safeties, the margins are smaller.

This got into brain-melting levels of frustrating against Iowa, because sometimes they would get Edwards matched on a linebacker when they went five-wide and motioned him to the backfield.

If you're going five-wide and motioning your running back into the box, and you see something like this, you should have an automatic check, a tag, or at least an audible set up that uses this to your advantage. You have Edwards in man coverage! The gods have given you a gift! If they're going to give that to you, and you keep Edwards in to block, you're getting a chip and that's it. McCarthy winds up motioning for Loveland to convert his route to a wheel before his protection breaks down. Guess what they could have had at the snap? A wheel.

This doesn't happen at the playcalling level. It needs to be installed, practiced, prepared. The reason we're talking about it now is because they went into the season knowing Edwards was one of their best weapons on offense, and thirteen games later this stuff isn't installed, practiced, or prepared. Unless they're saving it.

Michigan isn't completely blind, and they do have some things planned for when they get an Edwards-in-man read. But again, the ways they are getting him the ball don't emphasize his skills. The first drive of the 2nd half they went back to the empty 5-wide look.

image

And when they motion, sure enough, Higgins is in man.

image

And there is much pointing.

image

Huzzah! We do have a check for this. But look what they're running:

This isn't a "Let Edwards be fast" play other than the motion, which is not in a particular hurry. Bubble screens are about setting up the blocks and then jitterbugging through them. Edwards's acceleration should help, but only if he has the vision, and his receivers have the blocking, and the linebacker doesn't see exactly what's happening and use the "not in a particular hurry" part of the play to make up all the ground he Edwards might have gained from speed.

image

If that's Semaj Morgan, whee, we're in business. All that space is deadly. It is exactly why NFL teams like to use motions from empty sets to exploit LB vs RB matchups, and why they're also all drafting safetyish linebackers regardless of whether those guys can read a gap. This particular run gets beat because Loveland loses to the nickel, Castro, but that's not the intended gap. The intention of this play design is to get the space you see above and let a space player do something with it.

That isn't Edwards. Edwards is the guy who does this to linebackers.

Not the guy who Semaj Morgans his way around them.

There were other opportunities of a similar vein, when Michigan was in a passing down and a more creative use of Edwards's ability to flatly outrun the athletes they assign to him was never used. Iowa got a sack out of this one:

This is man coverage with a five-man pressure. Edwards is covered by the safety who's down in the box on the left hash. Iowa gave a Cover 1 read and Michigan got Cover 1. Loveland is going to come open on the drag and follow if the protection is good. And if not…

image

See all the space to the right? Edwards, looking into the backfield, knowing the direction of the coverage, should be off like a cannon to the right.

No, it's not in the playbook. Edwards is doing what he's supposed to in this offense. It is a tag you see all the time in the NFL, and most college teams don't bother with, because it's kind of complicated, and usually any safety is going to be a match for your running back. The reason you see it happen in the NFL however is because they've gone with backs who can function as wide receivers. The route that Edwards is running here makes sense in college if you don't have a particularly dangerous threat—if they blitz their brains out you can dump it to him. But if you have a real weapon there, you want him running an angle route opposite the direction of the play.

You can also put it in the playbook as an angle route. Michigan used to run these in 2021 and they looked frightening every time. For some reason since JJ became the quarterback, Edwards angle routes are out of the offense.

Or are they? Because near the end of the 3rd quarter we got this silly play that Brian highlighted.

Michigan is in a trips 4-wide formation, which spreads out the coverage and has Edward for a chunk if he's running, you know, the typical route that West Coast offenses use when they have a good running back. Instead he stops at the umpire then ducks. I don't know where he was supposed to be—I have a guess—but it's probably not where he ended up.

So I agree with Brian. Something is off, either with Edwards, or Michigan's offensive brain trust not being sure what to do with him. Unless they've been saving all the good stuff for "Georgia", there should be time before the Rose Bowl to rent some recently released OC as an analyst, and put him in charge of gaming up ways to attack Alabama with Edwards. It's just two things I want to see: Move Edwards up JJ's priority tree, and attack players who can't match his speed, acceleration, and catching ability in man coverage.

Comments

ross03

December 5th, 2023 at 12:25 PM ^

On that last awful looking play it looks like maybe Edwards was either hurting or felt like his knee was going to give on the cut.  That step at the cut just looks off like he's worried his knee is giving out.  The fact that he didn't really look engaged going into the cut makes me wonder if he had tweaked it before that but not enough to ask out - maybe thinking he'd be able to run through it?  

leftrare

December 5th, 2023 at 1:07 PM ^

I saw it differently.  Not that Edwards pulled up gimpy, but that either the Umpire or CJ (or both) charged into his space and he flinched.

I've never spent much time watching the officials movements, but that one, on that particular play seems not ideal and is taking up space that Edwards and CJ intend to be occupying.

mgolf4

December 5th, 2023 at 12:25 PM ^

image

Totally agree on the angle route here. But another interesting thing on this play is that you could justify throwing it to any of those guys besides DE and he doesn't let it rip to any of them. I'm not sure of the progression but he looks to be reading Roman and Loveland more than CJ or Morris, but it is surprising that JJ doesn't let it rip with a single high safety and coverage at this moment of the screenshot. Is that more the Iowa "mindset" where you just want to avoid turnovers and you win? Because based on pre-snap alignment and post snap coverage (and previous throws: Loveland TD against MSU and Roman against OSU) I am surprised he doesn't attempt a throw. He could back shoulder CJ, the guy covering Roman isn't looking and Roman will have outside leverage, Loveland has inside leverage and that safety won't get to the ball to impact the catch, and Morris won to the outside and has steps on his guy. 

jmblue

December 5th, 2023 at 12:26 PM ^

JJ certainly could have gone to Edwards on the first play, and it would be a fine decision, but I can't really fault the choice to go to Loveland there.  JJ has shown a number of times that he can fit throws into windows like that, including against OSU.  And Loveland - this game notwithstanding - has fantastic hands.

Catchafire

December 5th, 2023 at 12:27 PM ^

I thought at the beginning of the season that the offense would be the strength of this team...  I'm more than disappointed in the lack of creativity with Edwards and to an extent Wilson.  

bronxblue

December 5th, 2023 at 12:28 PM ^

I agree Edwards hasn't been optimally used but also, when asked to do stuff that's in the wheelhouse of a running back, he's struggled.  And then when asked to do stuff that's in the vicinity of a slot receiver, he's been fine but isn't more dangerous than the other guys out there.  Roman Wilson gets open against almost everybody.  Loveland and Barner typically catch anything thrown to them.  Semaj Morgan makes guys miss in space and also in a phone booth.  At some point the fact he's fast and can catch a ball is just not enough if the guys around him can do the same plus more and there's only one ball to go around.  

He's largely a really talented gadget guy this year, and that's fine because they're winning and he doesn't seem to be overtly bothered by it, at least in terms of effort.  But I don't really see the ROI on scheming up anything else for him considering he's not really cashing in the plays they have written up for him.  This isn't meant to drag him but if Michigan wants to install some new plays for a RB to maximize his effectiveness against Bama and beyond I'd much rather they spend that on Mullings.

funkifyfl

December 5th, 2023 at 2:37 PM ^

But isn't the point that he IS a matchup problem? So in those sets where he starts out wide and has a LB on him in man, well that's a matchup JJ should attack? If they put a safety out there, then the D is lighter in the box, so try to run him in those situations?

 

I mean, at some level you're absolutely right. We shouldn't complain about the O too much, when you look at our results and only see one game (OSU) when the result was ever really in question. OTOH, we're about to enter the playoffs where the opponent (and hopefully opponents!) are on a level we've only faced once (again, OSU) and we might need to generate more offense than we've needed throughout the season.

 

To me, it's more matchup specific. In other words, if we think Bama's LBs are weak in coverage, then we should absolutely be drilling plays that get Edwards in those situations. Sure, you can scheme those for the TEs too, but having a variety of ways to attack that weakness has to be a good thing. Especially when any scouting will show that JJ loves finding his TEs.

 

At the risk of belaboring the point, if I'm Bama, I try my best to take away Corum and Loveland, and make the rest of the skill players beat me. We should be ready for that.

Koop

December 5th, 2023 at 3:25 PM ^

Agree.

I haven't paid close attention to Bama yet this year. What I've heard about their defense is: 1st round pass rush edges, size at the DTs, excellent secondary. That sounds similar to Penn State. As I'm sure everyone remembers, Michigan had offensive issues against Penn State. And I don't want to have to rely on running the ball for 30+ consecutive plays against Bama!

Edwards could be part of the solution to that. On hot reads--give the man a quick angle/Texas route. Hell, if the ends are aggressively rushing upfield, give Edwards a delayed draw and let him rip a few.

But if the pass pro issues are resolved, and Edwards in motion draws man coverage--dude. Throw the man the damn ball. 

As the Iowa secondary in @Seth's thought bubbles might say, "I feel the need--the need for speed!"

bronxblue

December 5th, 2023 at 3:29 PM ^

I don't disagree that Edwards has the potential to be a mismatch but at the same time he's had all year to show he's a mismatch and hasn't really done so.  There are sparks here or there but never consistent, and while I'm sure Bama wants to take away Corum and Loveland they also have to take away Wilson and Johnson, plus Morgan and also Edwards.  My larger point is there are plays in the offense where Edwards already has a mismatch, his number has been called, and either they haven't quite worked or he gets exactly the number of yards the play affords him by scheme/blocking and that's it.  

Honestly, Michigan's going to beat Alabama because their best players outplay the Tide's, and if Edwards can be one of those players that's great but he's had the whole year to do it and he's just not gotten there.  I'd love to be wrong but this feels a bit like the talk we saw around Henning, Norfleet, etc. where the idea of the guy is greater than what he actually gives you on the field, with the annoying addition that 2022 Edwards was the guy we all want this year and just hasn't been able to replicate it.  

meeashagin

December 5th, 2023 at 5:48 PM ^

Anytime it's man coverage Roman Wilson is either open or getting held off the line. He needs to start throwing his arms up when he's being held because it's never called. The problem is unless JJ throws him the ball it's not a penalty because college allows holding until ball in the air.

I'm much more concerned with our run game. Iowa's ability to keep both safeties back and stop our run has not happened in years. That's what we do to teams stop the run with 6v6. You have to be able to run teams out of 2 high or your pass game will struggle. At least ours does.

Can someone please tell me why 52 is still playing? Play El-Hadi or move 53 inside and put Hinton at right tackle. I get that Barnhart is good at pulling but he's not good at blocking. Also, 20 should get all of Edwards carries.

MichiganiaMan

December 5th, 2023 at 12:31 PM ^

Michigan seems to maintain an annual belief that the only real weapon we have is the offensive line. The conversation about Edwards rhymes with the conversations we had about Peppers. This is just how offensive weaponry works at Michigan. Grrrr.

bronxblue

December 5th, 2023 at 1:17 PM ^

Peppers was an elite safety/LB; you don't run that guy into the ground on offense because you really need him on defense.  But Edwards is a running back and when asked to do running back things he's been mediocre.  I feel like I'm attacking him too much here but he's averaging 3.5 ypc on 100 touches.  He's also got 30 catches and been targeted 50-60 times.  He's not being ignored out there as much as he's not being effective when given the ball.  Could he be used better?  Sure, but he could also break a tackle or hit the right hole once in a while and get more than the bare minimum yards the play gets him via blocking and design.

MichiganiaMan

December 5th, 2023 at 3:49 PM ^

Edwards’ stats are extremely misleading. A lot of those “catches” aren’t catches at all, because all those pitch plays that are fundamentally running plays get categorized like pass plays when JJ is tossing the ball forward. So he’s not as bad a runner as those numbers suggest, but also not so much an operationalized weapon in the passing game.

Watching From Afar

December 5th, 2023 at 2:02 PM ^

Yup. Nothing under Harbaugh should lead us to believe they will fully weaponize their skill positions.

Peppers at wildcat? Never threw the ball.

Collins and DPJ at WR? Threw 1 or 2 50/50 balls per game tops.

Edwards is a perfect hybrid slot/RB type? Misuse him like Corum or give him a go route literally 3 times in 3 years (21 UGA, some OOC game last year - CSU I think, and Purdue this year).

Just not who they are until proven otherwise.

Nickel

December 5th, 2023 at 12:33 PM ^

I keep hoping they're saving it for the playoffs, along with the (more frequent) use of JJ's legs in the running game, but 13 games in and barely a hint of Edwards in the passing game even when he has blindingly advantageous matchups doesn't exactly scream "just wait, you'll see" at this point.

I hope they prove me wrong and the offense is unstoppable the next 2 games by adding his receiving dimension, but it just doesn't seem like it's in their offensive DNA. It's also a big part of why I think Edwards is gone to the NFL for sure after this year - why come back for another year of not taking advantage of his best attribute.

MichiganiaMan

December 5th, 2023 at 3:59 PM ^

Everything requires reps. You can’t just prepare to do a thing in practice, ignore it for 12 games, and then immediately succeed at it in game 13. JJ rarely connects on deep passes in part because he throws so few of them in front of a live audience. There’s no muscle memory. There’s no game-to-game momentum. Bama’s QB is leagues better than the version of himself who got benched earlier this year and that’s obvious to anyone who’s watched them. Can we unequivocally argue that JJ today is a better QB than the version if himself that was dealing against Michigan State?

PopeLando

December 5th, 2023 at 12:42 PM ^

It’s not just Edwards: the amount of RB receiving yards has fallen steadily since 2021. Haskins and Corum both caught the ball relatively well that year too, and last year Corum was targeted more often as well.

As for Edwards’ step backward as a RB…is Michigan running a different OL scheme than last year? My distinct impression is that Edwards doesn’t have any idea what’s going on in front of him, which is why he 1) seems to run TOWARDS the nearest defender, and 2) seems to run AWAY from the pass rusher he’s supposed to pick up.

My only theories are: Either he stopped thinking, or something about the scheme is confusing him.

UMVAFAN

December 5th, 2023 at 12:44 PM ^

The coaching staff needs to tell Edwards that he’s not a pure running back or a pure receiver. He is a hybrid and needs to be in a Deebo Samuel type role. If he went out and played like Deebo in the playoffs, he’d shoot up draft boards. If he stays as a pass catching running back, he’ll get drafted in the 2nd to 4th round, and teams will do so hoping that they can transform him into Deebo Samuel. If he shows that he already can play that role, he’s a top 10 pick. Just look at Deebo’s highlights from this past weekend and tell me Edwards can’t do this: https://www.49ers.com/video/deebo-samuel-s-best-plays-from-his-3-td-game-in-philadelphia-49ers-win (I tried to embed but it just kept spinning….sorry)

UMLaw1997

December 5th, 2023 at 1:33 PM ^

The Deebo Samuel parallel occurred to me too, as I watched that Niner game.  That isn't a fair comparison, perhaps, but it seems that that something could be learned from how they use Samuel.  Of course, there's surely lots to learn from a Shanahan offense...

Watching Niner games is also a pretty good way to watch Michigan NFLers, as Moody is constantly kicking PATs, Bell gets WR reps, and Thomas is now one of the primary CBs.

Guy Fawkes

December 5th, 2023 at 3:43 PM ^

Going to have to pop off for about 400 total yards in 2 games to merit "top 10" consideration. Which would almost be more yards than he has all season. If he remains status quo for rest of this season and leaves I think he falls to day 3. At some point you just have to have the film to back up your talent. And he does not have that this season. 

EDIT: I had to look and Deebo as a senior had 70 touches for 900 yards and 11 tds. Avg: 14 yards per touch, so yeah DE ain't Deebo

BlueBarron

December 5th, 2023 at 12:44 PM ^

If you can see Patrick you can see endzone. [Patrick Barron]

Sorry, my bad. I accidentally left my Tilly Hat at my dad's house over Thanksgiving so he couldn't see the beacon. Will be corrected in time for Pasadena.

reshp1

December 5th, 2023 at 12:45 PM ^

I mean, have we considered the possibility that he's just not very good? He hasn't done a lot this year that's really popped off the screen in the pass game, other than dusting some G5 LBs, and has seemed like he's running in wet cement when carrying the ball plus his normal vision/decision issues. 

b618

December 5th, 2023 at 10:06 PM ^

He is great.

He gets so open that even I spot him wide open during numerous plays.

He is very fast, accelerates very quickly, maneuvers wonderfully in the open field, and is great at catching passes.

Use him how this article explains, and he is an awesome weapon in Michigan's arsenal.

pdgoblue25

December 5th, 2023 at 12:54 PM ^

Good God this was a frustrating read, wow.  I'm sure things like this can be done for every team in every game, but low risk chunk plays that are just sitting there for the taking

andrew_

December 5th, 2023 at 1:12 PM ^

any chance that the coaching staff has been sandbagging and not showing their hand, similar to what they did with OSU last year?

it seems obvious that Edwards would be used like this, but he's not, which suggests that the staff isn't thinking comprehensively, or there's another motive

funkywolve

December 5th, 2023 at 2:23 PM ^

I get possibly sandbagging in the first 11 games, but the OSU game was tied in the 3rd quarter and a 3 point game for parts of the 4th quarter and I don't think we saw anything in that game.

I really hope it's not in the playbook and in the usual tradition of UM football, holding onto it until they are down a couple of scores.

RockinLoud

December 5th, 2023 at 2:29 PM ^

...or there's another motive

Yes, it's called the Michigan Arrogance™. Taking the free yards is the easy way, and UM is moar tuffer than that dagnabit! That's the Michigan way, been that way for 50 years and it's apparently not going to change any time soon. Go read what TCU said about UM after the game last season.