Are you "outraged" about deflate-gate?
I just watched a report on the Today Show where 81% of viewers in a snap twitter poll said yes to the question "if guilty should the Patriots be banned from the Super Bowl?" Leaving aside the silliness of the question, which isn't on the table as a possibility, the rest of the discussion was about how there is "growing outrage" over this. Is there? I'm probably in the minority, but this is nothing but a yawner to me as a scandal. I'm shocked, shocked, that there is gambling in this establishment. Scuffing balls happens in baseball, as does stealing signs, as does trying to get any edge possible. You catch a guy or a team, you punish them under the rules, you move on.
But I could be wrong, what do you think?
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:05 AM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:09 AM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:10 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:15 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:12 AM ^
So, the ESPN guy who had the porn link in his tweet. Should we call that Porn-Gate?
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:14 AM ^
and , all hail brady!
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:15 AM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:15 AM ^
I don't really care, although I think they should get creative with the penalties for things like this. Like, the other team should get to supply New England's balls (to be checked by the refs within normal guidelines) for the next game, or for all of next season, or whatever. That'd be a good deterrent for the future, and also potentially really funny if other teams do it right. Can you imagine the Pats having to play with 6 highly inflated scuff-free balls and 6 underinflated superscuffed balls with the refs switching between them randomly all the time? Good luck with that.
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:24 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 22nd, 2015 at 7:39 PM ^
I'm not sure how this drums up interest, but its at least something to fill the space between now and the SB.
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:26 AM ^
Sorry no.
My "Outrage" is still squarely focused on the blatant fixing of the Lions/Cowboys game a few weeks ago by league officials when THIS was decided to not be PI once the officials realized calling it would fuck up the NFL's desired Ice Bowl II rematch....
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:12 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:50 AM ^
More amused than outraged
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:29 AM ^
Could not care less.
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:58 AM ^
Thank you for the "NOT" sir. One of my biggest pet peeves.
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:32 AM ^
But puzzled why they (apparently) do this nonesense.
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:37 AM ^
Somewhat perplexed at all the attention it's getting.
Yeah, they broke a rule. A pretty damn small one. Dock 'em some pay and move on. Ban them from the Super Bowl? Don't be ridiculous.
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:39 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:46 AM ^
Has anyone done the math with the ideal gas law to see if that could've accounted for the underinflation? From my experience, a 30 degree difference could result in a a 2 psi drop in pressure, so if the balls were tested at room temp (75ish), then the gametime sub-50 degree temperature would do it. I would not put it past the NFL to miss that.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:02 AM ^
Where were they retested? Outside or inside?
Do the refs actually test the balls pregame as they are supposed to?
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:46 AM ^
I'm not not even in the neighborhood of chagrined. I mean, a group of millionaire's might-have-tried-to-cheat-but-didn't-really-get-a-chance-because-the-cheaty-part-was-removed-from-the-2nd-half-of-the-game another group of millionaire's out of winning a football contest? Wow. That's just too much to handle.
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:48 AM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:50 AM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 9:56 AM ^
Such a non-issue that the media will talk about for a week, because there is nothing else out there. Wish they would spend more time on the NHL all star game this weekend...2nd favorite All Star game besides MLB.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:05 AM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:05 AM ^
It did not determine the outcome of the game. Period.
Fine them and be done.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:06 AM ^
I don’t care. It is stupid the NFL does not handle the balls anyways. There is an easy fix to it. Also the officials had their hands on the ball every play.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:06 AM ^
The one thing I don't understand is that there is a finite range of PSI that a football can be inflated between in which it is still functional as a football. I mean, if you have a football that is 6.5 PSI or something, it so malformed and non aerodynamic that it isn't usable, and if the inflation gets too extreme the ball will basically be a hard-to-hold blimp and won't act normally in the air. So just make the acceptable range that range and then you don't have to worry so damn much about how inflated a ball is, especially since each team plays on with its own balls.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:08 AM ^
The officiating in the Lions-Cowboys game was much more egregious and impactful on the outcome of the game than this nonsense, but that was merely a blip on the MSM's radar. I guess it wasn't as sexy and cool as once again announcing the Patriots as perennial cheaters.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:10 AM ^
when you let a team take control of the footballs. i've never really understood this philosophy. i remember in the past, maybe still true, that college teams could choose the type of ball to use. some used footballs with dimples while others used footballs with reverse dimples.
are you allowed to scuff footballs too?
all that said, it's a mountain out of a mole hill.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:10 AM ^
The extra week between conference championships and the Super Bowl lets the media over inflate every "story".
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:21 AM ^
I said it the other day, but as a Colts fan, the Pats whooped our behinds, and maybe the score is 28-7 not 45-7 if they were playing with the same inflated balls. The end result would have been a loss for the Colts because the Colts just aren't good enough yet. I have no problem with the Colts bringing this up as a point of contention, because rules are rules no matter how stupid one might think they are, and if an advantage was gained, then it is clearly cheating. To me, this just further adds to my disdain for Belichek. He is one of the greatest coaches ever, but the fact that this isn't the first time he has been caught cheating, really soils his rep. He is the Jose Mourinho of football coaches, great at what he does, but is a very petty, little man at the end of the day.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:23 AM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:29 AM ^
Some of the sports radio talking heads have been hilarious. I've heard claims that the Pats should be excluded from the draft this year and that Belichek should be banned for a year and fined a million dollars.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:31 AM ^
The NFL is a PR circus and I'm thinking Goddell and company are smirking in their boardroom. The free publicity leading up to the Super Bowl is great. This isn't the Ray Rice situation, just some minor stuff that occurred in a big blowout.
I'm sure the balls will be checked next week, so to speak...
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:35 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 22nd, 2015 at 1:17 PM ^
They couldn't stop him because he was carrying a lighter football which allowed for greater agility and acceleration.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:35 AM ^
My right knee is sore, though. Does that count?
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:47 AM ^
Get off your knees then.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:39 AM ^
Aaron Rogers and Peyton Manning have both talked about adjusting the pressure of footballs to get them to their liking. I am sure more teams in the league do this to some extent. This is only a story because it is Belichek and "spy-gate."
January 22nd, 2015 at 12:31 PM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:42 AM ^
If anything, I think the NFL should widen the acceptable range of PSI. It's more about preference on grip - not any true advantage one way or the other.
I doubt this is a rule that was given any real thought in the first place.
Sports Science: http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=12207314
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:43 AM ^
If Brady was 30-31 passing for 390 yads and six TDs and Luck was 5-20 for 139, maybe. Can't see that a pound or 2 of PSi would make enough difference to totally change the outcome. It's a waste of time to discuss, but wanted to get my .02 in.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:45 AM ^
He should be forced to repair all the damage at the ski resort himself.
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:54 AM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 10:56 AM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 11:26 AM ^
January 22nd, 2015 at 11:33 AM ^