We Have To Talk About How Attending Games Kinda Sucks Now Comment Count

Brian

obvious thing preceded and followed by eons of nothing [Eric Upchurch]

9/15/2018 – Michigan 45, SMU 20 – 2-1

The sequence that really, truly broke me was in the middle of the second quarter. For some reason, Sonny Dykes thought that if his team was prepared it could stop a Michigan fullback dive. So he called timeout. Then he saw Michigan had cannily lined up in the exact same way they had before the timeout. Sensing a trap, he called timeout again. This became the dreaded Full Media Timeout.

In the stands, I baked. Because Michigan has made no attempt to improve connectivity in the stadium I held up my phone as it told me it could not retrieve tweets. The clock ticked down.

Michigan took the field again and lined up in the exact same way, but Dykes could not respond—he'd used all his timeouts. Ben Mason scored from the one-inch line, extra point... Full Media Timeout.

I baked further. It sucked. It was hot and boring and also hot and also boring.

Because I was so bored I started counting commercial breaks, finally giving up when the number hit a staggering eight in the first 22 minutes of game clock. There are eight commercial breaks in the entirety of a 40-minute basketball game, plus some timeout-induced ones. And that frequently feels excessive; a couple of years ago the problem seemed so severe the NCAA even stripped coaches of one of their precious timeouts. Football is now throwing up timeouts at almost twice the rate of basketball, a sport where the clock only runs if something is actually happening.

This is close to intolerable when it's nice outside. When it is not, and when there is a steady stream of baffling penalties from the part-time refs from a podunk league, and replays to fix some of the baffling issues the part-time refs are creating, and many more stoppages for injuries—one of which takes a long time and then gets a Full Media Timeout appended to the end of it—you wonder why you're doing this instead of sitting at home with air conditioning and connectivity. Several years ago I probably would have yammered about the students leaving early. Now I just envy anyone with the common sense to bail when they are so clearly being told to bail.

Falling attendance is a nationwide problem often blamed on The Youngs for being addicted to their phones, but the folks behind us show up maybe twice a year and sell their other tickets for whatever they can get. There's a noticeable variance in section density between the many garbage games (hi, division-mates Rutgers and Maryland) on the schedule and the actually worthwhile ones, and there are no students where I'm at. When the Wall Street Journal FOIAed actual ticket scans they found that 21%(!) of Michigan's announced attendance was fictional, tickets that sold but did not scan. This is actually pretty good in the wider context of college football, which says somethin' about somethin'.

It says that college football used to be a great bargain. Tickets were relatively inexpensive, games were fun and not largely spent watching people have conferences. Great fanbases sprung up around the teams starting in the 1960s, when Don Canham was packing bands into the stadium so it would be sort of full, and lasted more or less through 2000 without being seriously impinged upon. Ticket prices were absurdly stable. Television was more of a boon than a hindrance because its proliferation allowed you to watch more road games; breaks were relatively rare and tolerable.

Then things got monetized. Ticket prices approximately tripled in 13 years and have kept going up since. The commercial breaks have proliferated madly. Unsatisfied with their massive uplift in revenue, the athletic department has continued to nickel and dime the fanbase even after the departure of Dave Brandon. And for what? For who? For the benefit of ever more absurdly over-compensated coaches, staffers, and especially executives. Every commercial break is Jim Delany—the man who ruined the conference—giving me the middle finger while he dumps another gold brick on the Big Ten's grave.

Delany and his fellow parasites have latched onto the great oilbeds men like Canham laid down and are sucking them dry without regard to what happens after they're done. They don't care. They'll be dead. Michigan will still be playing Rutgers.

I dunno man. This would certainly be more tolerable if Michigan had won some more games over the past ten years. But probably not that much more. There's nothing I can do, really, but I'll tell you one thing: I'm never buying any fucking Rotel again. Until there's a cap on the number of ad breaks, every single college football TV advertiser can die in a fire for all I care. I've had it.

HIGHLIGHTS

AWARDS

Known Friends And Trusted Agents Of The Week

43988670894_01c735f480_k

[Upchurch]

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1(t) Donovan Peoples-Jones and Zach Gentry. Gentry had a drop but also rescued a ball that would have been an IN if thrown at anyone else. Four catches for 95 yards from a nominal tight end is a thing and if anything Patterson didn't take full advantage of his height to make his other catches indefensible. DPJ scored three touchdowns, completely imploding that stat. Two were relatively simple, sure. The fade was not. DPJ and Gentry get two points each because they're made up and don't matter.

#2 Josh Metellus. INT and weaving TD return were the difference between a relatively comfortable second half and a full on terror-dome. PI on him was iffy; he had another PBU and seven tackles; did get hit a bit on those slants but Kinnel was SMU's preferred target.

#3 Chase Winovich. Ten tackles, three for loss. Had a really impressive track-back on a third and long screen that looked set up for the first down. Also knocked down another screen on third down earlier in the game. Now the subject of a hilarious meme.

Honorable mention: Will Hart added two more 50-yard punts to his collection. Bryan Mone and Carlo Kemp made SMU runs up the middle, which were oddly frequent, entirely futile. Devin Bush exists and is still Devin Bush. Tru Wilson had some more lethal blitz pickups.

KFaTAotW Standings.

4: Chase Winovich (#1 ND, #3 SMU)
3: Karan Higdon (#1 WMU)
2: Ambry Thomas (#2 ND), Rashan Gary(#2 WMU), Donovan Peoples-Jones(T1 SMU), Zach Genty(T1 SMU), Josh Metellus(#2 SMU).
1: Devin Bush(#3 ND), Shea Patterson(#3 WMU)

Who's Got It Better Than Us(?) Of The Week

Metellus's TD return.

Honorable mention: Shea Patterson hits DPJ for TD, Shea Patterson hits DPJ for TD, Shea Patterson hits DPJ for TD.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

Patterson is intercepted near the goal line to keep the score at 0-0 and seriously threaten One Of Those Games again.

Honorable mention: Almost everything Patterson did prior to that (and nothing afterwards). Coverage mixup gives James Proche an opportunity to score, which he takes.

[After THE JUMP: Tru Wilson has blocked you from seeing this content]

OFFENSE

42908968160_c8f28d686a_k (1)

[Barron]

Down and then up. Patterson's final numbers—14/18, 13 YPA, 3 TD-1 INT—look a lot like his other outings but getting there was a rollercoaster. One that starts at the bottom and then goes up, so... not a rollercoaster. A set of stairs.

Anyway, Patterson's start was downright awful. He turfed a deep crossing route to Perry from a clean pocket on his first attempt; an improv throw to Martin was a BRX that should have been intercepted; a number of early dropbacks saw him sit in the pocket forever without finding anyone downfield, and the interception was the capper. I was mentally composing the "WHY DOESN'T ANYTHING THAT HAPPENED BEFORE MATTER AT ALL" spittle-flecked rant at that juncture.

Patterson was close to flawless the rest of the way, because people are weird and football is weirder. I dunno. Maybe it's because he started to...

43797617095_4960373e86_k

git on up [Upchurch]

THROW IT TO THE ENT. Patterson's first big downfield completion looked like it was about to be a foot over his target's head, and then the target turned out to be Gentry and it was not. One Tacopants reception(!) later it felt like Gentry had truly opened his 2018 account. He finished with 95 yards on four catches, two of them seam routes down the middle of the field on which Patterson didn't take full advantage of his height (to be fair he was getting obliterated on one of them). It didn't matter because in addition to being 6'8" he is able to run away from people.

Gentry did drop a slightly low throw in the second half, continuing a slight trend. He will dorf the occasional pass. That doesn't offset his crazy catching radius and ability to move that radius at speed across the landscape.

Or throw it to DPJ, that also seems to work. Donovan Peoples-Jones had three touchdowns, one on a crossing route that Michigan RPSed well, one on a beauty back-shoulder throw, and one on an... uh... dead-simple 40-yard TD. His body control on the back shoulder was impressive, as was Patterson's placement. There's nothing any DB can do if those guys are going to execute that so well.

Both the other TDs were open due to SMU guys being out of position. DPJ finished both off, which isn't nothing. Also folks tend to get out of position against DPJ because his position changes so rapidly. Because of his incredible athleticism the most important thing for him might actually be proving that he doesn't have Braylon Disease, with the ability to smoothly bring in a back-shoulder throw and make other difficult catches a few steps behind. Because there are going to be a lot of people a few steps behind DPJ.

Also note that Patterson's 40-yard strike was bang on and this adds to our growing pile of evidence that if he finds someone downfield and doesn't get disrupted on the throw he's going to hit him.

The unfortunate bit. Michigan eventually got up to 197 rushing yards but took 41 carries to get there and only suffered three yards worth of sacks. A 5.0 sack-adjusted YPC is a hair below the national average. That's not what you want when you're taking on an AAC tomato can. Compounding the bad feeling was the distribution of those yards. Evans, Wilson and O'Maury Samuels turned in big chunk runs in the fourth quarter; performance before that was in the sub-3.0-YPC range.

Part of this was tactical. Michigan largely failed to exploit SMU's very blitzball LBs and ran a lot of basic spread stuff on which Patterson was not a threat to run. I don't think any of Patterson's 5 carries were intentional. When you're running spread stuff without the threat of a QB run it's a lot harder to run away from the guy on the backside, and Michigan suffered the consequences.

The one thing I'd say in the run game's defense is that SMU was playing a high risk system and when Michigan did get through it for what should have been a back-breaker Chris Evans had the misfortune to come up lame. Tack on another 50 yards and the stats here look a lot more encouraging.

Evans vs Wilson pass pro. Tru Wilson laid out the case for his playing time as neatly as possible by obliterating an unblocked linebacker up the gut. From the stands I was ready to see that guy pop back up and pressure but he just never did. A few plays earlier Chris Evans had drawn the same assignment and almost whiffed entirely, allowing a pressure. I'm also suspicious that a couple other pressures up the gut might have been Evans's deal—on one he went after a linebacker who showed pressure pre-snap and then did not come as the MLB flew up the middle. That could have been Ruiz's deal; I'll have to check in more detail.

30833389748_51a5ca0723_k

Wilson tracking towards Kovacs Memorial status [Barron]

Meanwhile while carrying the ball. Evans got shoehorned into roles he's never going to be good at—third and one, a lot of power—as it seemed like Higdon's absence was not gameplanned around. If he hadn't pulled up lame on what had a good chance to be an 85-yard touchdown he would have redeemed many of those missed tackles he didn't force because he's not that kind of back; unfortunately he did.

Evans did have a couple of nice runs even in the manball context he was frequently deployed in. Once he slashed to the backside of a power play; another time Michigan blocked power well enough to deliver him downfield in a phonebooth's worth of space and he deployed his usual set of ankle-breaking jukes before the third guy got him down. He does need that sliver, though, and Michigan wasn't able to give it to him enough.

Wilson meanwhile, did break tackles. His ability to grind out three or four Hart-like yards on one first down run could have been a fluke but since that (and another play where he ran over a safety) had already happened his late touchdown—which saw him run through a safety tackle while someone else was already hanging off him—was an eye-opener. Maybe he is the same size as Higdon but is made of Onwenu material and is therefore just denser? I dunno.

Right now he has the feel of early Glasgow/Kovacs, when concern that the walk-on is that high up the depth chart gives way to the realization that the walk-on in question is legit good. The knock on him as a recruit was his size. But if he's breaking tackles and obliterating guys on blitz pickups, that size issue doesn't matter and you're left with a guy who everyone said would be a big time recruit if he was two inches taller.

O'Maury Samuels did look good and SPARQ-champion-esque on his late opportunity.

Tackle situation. Patterson had great gobs of time for big chunks of the afternoon and most of the pressure he got seemed to come from the linebacker level. That's good—I guess—but everyone's waiting for the other shoe to drop when Michigan sees various intimidating DEs of the Big Ten. (The Gaz looms.) The nature of the game made it hard to rotate in the backups, if that was even on the docket to start. It seems like it wasn't.

DEFENSE

43798890985_17db6a1994_k

11 catches for 166 yards [Barron]

Proche'd. In the preview I said that if SMU was going to get yards it was probably going to be James Proche getting them. Check. A true downfield threat out of the slot put Michigan's safeties under the microscope and they did not do so hot. Proche's touchdown appeared to be a miscommunication between Long and Hawkins; that's one thing. A young safety still acclimating to live-fire snaps busting isn't a huge worry. He'll get better. He's not even a starter.

The repeated, easy slants are more of a concern. Seemingly half of SMU's yards outside of the big play were slot receivers—usually but not always Proche—catching slants in front of Michigan safeties who could do nothing but tackle on the catch. One incident where they tried it against Brandon Watson stood out because Watson harassed his man into an incompletion. Metellus and Kinnel could not manage that, especially Kinnel.

It was tough for Michigan to match up a corner against Proche because they've moved to a system where motion across the formation brings the free safety down to cover the guy in motion. They did this to limit their exposure to jet sweeps and other plays that take advantage of the positional deficit you naturally get when your cover guy is a lateral yard or two behind the motion man. The downside was just made clear: the defense can get a really good slot receiver matched up on a safety just by motioning him.

Opponents will continue attempting to exploit this. Michigan will need to come up with a response. A zone changeup out of their single high look seems most feasible.

44669270332_14ab8d760a_k

one out of 650 ain't bad [Barron]

The other part of SMU's offense. That would be dubious-to-insane PI calls, JANE. I don't know if these Sun Belt guys have never seen someone jam someone else but they repeatedly made pass interference calls so boggling that when my cousin pointed the one on Hill out I thought he was joking. He was not. The refs repeatedly called Michigan players for successfully jamming WRs and winning over the top, calls that I have never seen any remotely competent crew make. The crowning glory was the call on Kinnel, who won over the top on ball that landed five yards out of bounds.

The Metellus call right before the INT might have been defensible as Metellus was grabbing at the guy before the ball got there but that was extremely weak at best; given the context that also looks terrible. Ross's was probably legit though, so they've got that going for them.

As a bonus this was the second time in three weeks that Michigan suffered a spot so bad that it was not only reviewed but overturned. Any ref who misses a spot so badly that it actually gets overturned should evaporate in shame.

A hold! After this parade of dubious flags the stadium was incensed when Rashan Gary was edged. He was equally incensed, theatrically stopping his attempt to get off the block, and that finally induced a very late flag from the referee. So it can happen. If that's what it takes to get a call on the edge when the opposition OL has his arms outside your shoulder pads that might be the play: if you can't get to the guy on the edge because of a hold playing it up to get a long yardage down seems like a better decision than trying to fight through on a sideline run that your hampered pursuit isn't likely to make much of a difference on.

42898295590_6220353fdd_k

Mone was active [Barron]

DT encouragement again. This was Bryan Mone's best game of the season. He repeatedly shed guys to make plays. Carlo Kemp seemed to follow up on his performance from last week at more or less the same level. Necessary but not sufficient as the DL approaches more intimidating outfits; still nice to see.

Mike Dwumfour seemed to settle into a pass-rush only role until late. He did chuck a guy past him to bottle up a run as well. If and when Solomon and Marshall get back this could develop into the strength it looked like going into the season.

Where can you hit a QB then? Aidan Hutchinson's roughing call was the college version of this:

"Driving into the ground" penalties are always garbage. But they're garbage in the rulebook.

SPECIAL TEAMS

what

Good from 75. Quinn Nordin hit a 45 yarder that went over the goalposts. It went over the net. It is probably the only 45-yard field goal in the history of Michigan Stadium that an endzone got to hurl over the edge. Just kick 'em straight and Nordin's an all-timer. (Please kick 'em straight.)

Kickoffs: now more boring but that's fine. The kickoff fair catch rule hasn't been used much so far, in Michigan games or otherwise, but it does seem to have gotten M to abandon their pop-it-up-to-the-1 strategy in favor of just blasting touchbacks. Jake Moody's been capable of that, with 13 in 19 opportunities. Meanwhile those few returns are going nowhere: opponents are averaging just 14 yards on the few KOs they do return.

Slightly more data. Will Hart hit two more punts exactly 50 yards each, maintaining his season average of... uh... 50 yards. The opposition got to return both, gaining back a total of 16 yards, but a 42-yard net will do.

Slight hint of Peppers. DPJ didn't have many opportunities to actually return a punt but did have a couple of incidents where he was able to catch a ball that landed a long way from his starting position to save Michigan some roll yards.

Squib. Squibbing the ball in the current kickoff environment is insane, Sonny Dykes.

MISCELLANEOUS

This is quite a playcard. Let's make everybody mad!

30833391478_451db2e96e_k

[Barron]

Sonny Dykes, WYD. Sonny triggered some of the bad old Hokefeelings in this game by admitting defeat and then pretending he had not done so. With eight minutes left, SMU gets the ball down 18. Victory is a distant possibility indeed at that moment, but it's happened before. SMU doesn't go up-tempo, runs twice, fails on third down, and then punts. That's waving the white flag. I might be a bit annoyed with that if I'm an SMU fan, but it almost certainly didn't matter.

Dykes then got the ball back with under 2 minutes left down 25 and ran a two-minute drill that exposed his quarterbacks to a series of brutal hits... why? For the practice? If you wanted to practice being down a bunch and trying to score late you could have done that with eight minutes left. For the dignity? Nah. In a futile attempt to make the final score look a little better? Maybe. To get over 300 yards of offense for the first time all year? Ah. Yes. That.

HERE

Ethan Sears:

Michigan got some massive help with Dykes blowing all of his timeouts for no reason, and randomly sacrificing field position with a squib kick, and picking up a 15-yard penalty for protesting a call he probably could’ve gotten reviewed had he not blown all his timeouts minutes earlier, and forgetting how onside kicks work, and — sorry, that was supposed to be a different column.

Best and Worst:

Shea Patterson is pretty good at football, apparently. Even having played the #5 defense nationally per S&P+ (Notre Dame), he currently sports a 6:2 TD:INT ratio, 9.1 ypa, 71% completion, and has started to unleash Michigan's downfield passing game for what feels like a half-decade of slumber. Of note, Michigan has 3 completions this year of over 40 yards; last year they had 5 total, and they haven't gotten to play defenses like Nebraska (351 yards passing to Colorado), Rutgers (354 yards to OSU), and MSU (319 yards to Utah St., 380 yards to an Arizona State that couldn't 130 against San Diego St.). He has re-introduced Michigan's vertical threats, and because of that he's helped taken some pressure off a Michigan offense that last year had to just grind for touchdowns. Last year Michigan's average play was 5.18 yards; this year, it's up to 6.58, and so Michigan is able to strike faster and more efficiently, which lessens the exposure Patterson has behind this still-developing offensive line while also letting more guys get comfortable in the expanding playbook.

ELSEWHERE

I agree with TTB's take on the targeting call:

[rulebook stuff] What matters is that defender B79 hit him with the crown of his helmet, which has been redefined from the past as being the part of the helmet above the facemask and encircling 360 degrees of the helmet.

In Michigan’s game against SMU, Brown was not defenseless. He was not in the grasp of defenders. His forward progress had not been stopped. Hudson was guilty of targeting Brown because – and only because – he made forcible contact with the crown of his helmet. Football used to call this “spearing” but spearing is no longer in the rulebook. Spearing doesn’t exist anymore, as it has been replaced under the umbrella of “targeting.” If Hudson had lowered his head to initiate contact with the crown of his helmet to Brown’s chest or midsection, it could still be targeting because of the orientation of Hudson’s helmet.

Hudson is using his helmet as a weapon and does make first contact with his helmet and his head down:

 

That kind of tackle is being removed from the game.

MGoFish:

Like pretty much every team besides Alabama, Michigan still has plenty of question marks as it heads into conference play next week. But one thing that isn’t a question mark is the quarterback position. The Wolverines have lacked a true playmaker at the position since Denard Robinson and Shea Patterson looks like he could be just that.

Sap's Decals:

OFFENSIVE CHAMPION – I thought TE Zach Gentry had a very good game, and he did have a career best performance, but when Donovan Peoples-Jones scores three TD’s, you gotta give the WR some love – and a helmet sticker!  After going almost an entire calendar year without a touchdown by a wide receiver, it looks like number 9 is getting more comfortable with his QB & improving each week – that bodes well for the Michigan offense.

Hoover Street:

It feels wrong to complain about a win on a day when so many Big Ten teams fell, including Wisconsin and Nebraska.  There are no style points.  Many of the voters in the polls are going to see 45-20 and not big any deeper.  Michigan won by 25 at home against a G5 opponent.  But I will say, this game was one of the least, if not the least, enjoyable Michigan Stadium experiences I have had where the end result was a victory. (Advisory note: I was not at Cincinnati or Air Force last year, because I can already hear you "ahem"-ing me.)  It was just a joyless, superheated slog that would not seem to end.

M wasn't gameplanning for Proche:

"We knew he was a big-play guy for them," Metellus said. "We knew he was the No. 1 guy, and we didn't do a great job of playing to that. Didn't do a great job knowing he was going to get the ball, like putting double coverage on him or make sure we watch him. I just think we have to go into next week against Nebraska knowing who is the big-play guy."

Tru items. Metellus INT details. RB status. Maize and Blue Nation.

Comments

andrewgr

September 17th, 2018 at 3:13 PM ^

As a fan of a team that has done a great deal of winning the last decade, I can say with certainty that TV timeouts have made even those games unwatchable.

I spent from 9:00 AM until 10:30 PM (Pacific Time) doing nothing but watching football this last Saturday.  I ate on the couch.  I love college football, but at the end of that day, I decided I'm not doing it again next week.  And the sole driver of that decision was how boring the games were because of TV timeouts.  Even the TCU-OSU game, with both teams running up tempo offices and scoring almost 70 points with trick plays and defensive scores and 1000+ yards rushing was boring.   Every time I started to get into it, there was a 3+ minute break.  Absolutely interminable.

They've destroyed what was once a very enjoyable part of my life.  

J. Lichty

September 17th, 2018 at 3:13 PM ^

I DVRd the game and forgot to add my customary hour of additional taping time.  With 3 hours of taping time I made it to the 14:20 mark (not hockey counting - that's 14:20 left on the clock in Q4).  

KC Wolve

September 17th, 2018 at 3:17 PM ^

Great piece. I will disagree with one thing though. It really isn't much better watching at home. Sure I am connected and can do other things, but that is the problem. They are driving me to do these other things. I am watching less and less each year. I try and watch the first quarter or so of the lesser games, but I just don't enjoy sitting through a 3.5 hour commercial break against a lesser team. It is really sad what they have done to the games. At least when I'm in the stadium, I am captive, I don't know why that is better, it probably isn't but I guess I made the effort to get there so it seems so. There has to be a tipping point somewhere, but I just don't sit it coming any time soon. A lot of people still watch and apparently by Buicks, but not me.

Ballislife

September 17th, 2018 at 3:18 PM ^

One could argue that DPJ’s 40-yarder was the “Who’s Got It Better Than Us?” for this week. I mean:

“Also note that Patterson's 40-yard strike was bang on and this adds to our growing pile of evidence that if he finds someone downfield and doesn't get disrupted on the throw he's going to hit him.”

We haven’t seen anyone hit a receiver in stride like that since the Darboh TD against Wisconsin, and then before that? That’s pretty exciting if that type of play can come out consistently, and I think it can considering DPJ’s athleticism and Shea’s knack for throwing well when not getting pummeled. 

BlueMk1690

September 17th, 2018 at 3:19 PM ^

I find this post a bit odd. While those observations have some merit, surely this isn't the first time you've noticed excessive TV commercial breaks during football games. Maybe it's the first time you observed it during a game featuring the following elements:

- Relentless hot, sunny and humid weather conditions without access to shade.

- An uninspiring opponent who means nothing to you and who you assumed we'd beat by about 7 TDs.

- A supposedly completely outmatched opponent who was resisting stubbornly and was doing a bit more damage than you had anticipated. And dragged out the game while doing so.

- A Michigan offensive system that is dreadfully boring and predictable. Often seems to opt for the easily defended option even if the successful rare use of something a bit more interesting indicates that might be a way of getting better results.

I was bored and felt cheated out of my time sitting at home watching it on TV and it had nothing to do with the commercials..though they certainly could be a convenient scapegoat.

Regarding the weather..imagine being an SEC fan and it always being like that..or a baseball fan for that matter. Michigan Stadium could use a roof for the crowd, both for hot days and rainy or snowy days..but that concept seems to be largely limited to European soccer stadiums.

username03

September 17th, 2018 at 3:19 PM ^

It really is a little strange how many companies/entities seem so intent on killing, in the form of blatant disregard for customers, the goose that lays golden eggs.

markusr2007

September 17th, 2018 at 3:22 PM ^

College football officiating remains pretty damn bad, make no mistake.

This is becoming a serious problem, one not isolated to Michigan games.

The NCAA needs to get its shit together, bite the bullet, and mandate full-time professional, certified referees for all major college football games.  This part time business is OK for high school games, but not college/NFL.

The players are getting screwed over, and so are the fans.

ca_prophet

September 17th, 2018 at 4:57 PM ^

I am all for better referees.  The problem is how we get there, and who pays.  The NCAA/conferences won't do it because a) it makes their amateur model harder to defend and b) they likely wouldn't pay enough for anyone to do this full time.  And that's before getting into the thankless nature of the job.

Right now the referees are people who love the game and do it as a hobby, so you can pay them poorly; they get rewards elsewhere.  How many of them would give up their primary job at all?  How many would do so only if they didn't have to take a pay cut in total?

At the 30K-foot-level, this is a job where the best you can hope for is to go unnoticed, and the worst is having people hunt you down for bodily mayhem even when you did your job well.  You have to really love it to sign up for that, and if it's your livelihood, you better get paid that way.

 

Real Tackles Wear 77

September 17th, 2018 at 3:24 PM ^

It is so frustrating to hear people complaining about the game day experience. I am an alum who lives further away now. I get to go to one home page per year *max* and would love the ability to go to every one. I would rather sit for hours in 90 degree heat than listen to BTN commentators and watch their camera angles that often miss a piece of the action.

dcmaizeandblue

September 17th, 2018 at 3:34 PM ^

Yep that mentality makes zero sense to me. Tailgating, watching the band warmup, walking in with the band, seeing warmups in person, the band taking the field, singing the fight song with 100,000 people, the wave (when we're lucky). These experiences are almost entirely outside the game itself and are the things that make being at the game such a special experience. 

The breaks suck but believing it's made it "unwatchable" is just missing the point. Being at the stadium for the '09 ND game, '11 ND game, '02 PSU, '05 PSU game, '04 MSU game, '03 OSU game, '11 OSU game, '01 Washington game, hell even the '08 Wisconsin game and numerous others are all the more special because I was there. That's not something I'll ever get watching it at home.

gbdub

September 17th, 2018 at 10:43 PM ^

Let’s say I love the Grand Canyon and live close to it. Every year few times a year I can go gaze in wonder. 

This year, a dude comes every day and takes a huge shit right I front if my favorite viewpoint. It’s still a beautiful place. You’d still be in awe at the overall experience. Should I therefore not complain about the dump in my view?

The problem with these crappy additions to the experience is that they make things legitimately worse, and there is no reason they are necessary. They ought to be fixed, even if the overall experience is still positive.

Honestly it’s tough because our very love for the team and the overall experience is what makes us tolerate the crap... and exactly what lets Delany get away with the bullshit. 

Brhino

September 17th, 2018 at 3:24 PM ^

For me the worst was SMU's first scoring drive in the third quarter:

Pass interference call prolongs drive after 3rd and 10 incompletion in spite of ball being clearly uncatchable out of bounds.

Targetting call on Hudson (which BTW the play by play guys praised as a good hit before the stoppage), but only after whistling the next play dead and going to review.

Kinnel goes out with an injury

Pass interference on Hill (more like legal jam at line + run of the mill handfighting)

SMU timeout to avoid Delay of Game (full media time out)

End zone fade ruled incomplete, reviewed, upheld 

Finally, SMU touchdown.  Real world time: approximately 20 minutes.  

 

And then we get the ball back and score in two plays.

mgobaran

September 17th, 2018 at 4:02 PM ^

I never noticed how long/often commercials were until last years Cincinnati game. But at that point Brian had already planted the seed of "commercial breaks suck" into my mind. It still didn't bother me at all. That was my girlfriends 2nd ever game, and even I only get to 2 games every 3 or 4 years. 

Indiana Blue

September 18th, 2018 at 9:11 AM ^

The score boards now show a media timeout clock.  So in the stadium you know how long the break is ... a FULL media break is 2:20.  I find this very useful.  They did this at Notre Dame too, so maybe this is done at all stadiums ?   Are there too many breaks ... absolutely.  But I'm at the game for football, so it is just part of the game now ... and unfortunately the bad calls are too.

Go Blue!

DougoBlue

September 17th, 2018 at 3:27 PM ^

I had season tickets for something like 28 years, but could no longer stand it way back in 2007 and gave mine up. Every single game I've watched on TV since has made me thankful I bailed when I did. Money is the only thing they care about and the product (college football on TV) has become almost as un-watchable as the NFL... but what do they care, their coffer is getting more full. For now.

kingmoose

September 17th, 2018 at 3:31 PM ^

I DVR every game and wait at least  2 hrs.   I can get some work done and enjoy the game. I feel for the fans at the game.  This also saves me from the lame analysis.  I didn't know how bad and shallow it was until I started reading this blog.  Now its not even worth listening to.

 

kingmoose

September 17th, 2018 at 3:31 PM ^

I DVR every game and wait at least  2 hrs.   I can get some work done and enjoy the game. I feel for the fans at the game.  This also saves me from the lame analysis.  I didn't know how bad and shallow it was until I started reading this blog.  Now its not even worth listening to.

oops double post

antidaily

September 17th, 2018 at 3:32 PM ^

I was sitting behind you, Brian. The sun was brutal (especially in jeans and black tshirt??). My small son couldn't take it coupled with boring-ass first half; we left after halftime.

RoseInBlue

September 17th, 2018 at 3:38 PM ^

I'll be honest.  As a football fan, I much prefer sitting on my own couch, eating and drinking when I want to without waiting in line, and checking in on other games during the seemingly endless media timeouts.  But this has been true since I graduated.  Once I was no longer on campus, getting into Ann Arbor and then back out of Ann Arbor was a nightmare I decided to only experience once a year.  And I've managed to do that.  Each year, I pick a home game and go for the experience.  Because as a Michigan fan, there's nothing quite like being in the Big House watching Michigan football. 

Yes, it was hot this weekend and I had to pay $4.50 for a bottle of water (Why is the Hydration Station no longer free?), and I had to sit through whatever that Vote Now halftime show was.  But during the moments of actual football happening, there's nothing better in the world. But yeah, the "noise" surrounding the game is starting to get to be more and more of a hassle. 

evenyoubrutus

September 17th, 2018 at 3:46 PM ^

I waited in line for at least 40 minutes just for a bottled water. I had gotten up before the last play of the 1st quarter, and didn't return to my seat until under 7 minutes in the 2nd. During that time I had to move out of the way SIX different times for ambulances to come through with people who were presumably suffering from heat exhaustion. I also witnessed two others who had collapsed and were waiting to be picked up. It felt like I was waiting in line for rations at a 3rd world country refugee camp. Oh, and the person running the cash register was a twelve year old. I thought he was only 9 or 10 but he confirmed 12 when I asked him. 

CRISPed in the DIAG

September 17th, 2018 at 3:48 PM ^

I spend 60+ hours/week at work staring at screens. And the 45 minutes/night that I'm awake at home, I'm watching TV. The fuck do I want to stay at home and watch more screens or worry about following twitterface at the stadium or somesuch? I mean, I will watch games at home. But it's not my first preference. 

If anyone cares, I gladly waste one entire weekend each season traveling up from NC to spend way too much money on 1) Zingerman's; 2) overpriced IPA's at the brewpub dujour; 3) uneaten food for the tailgate; 4) an RV (gas, parking, etc); 5) tickets - at least one that never gets used or resold (yet somehow I'm jammed next someone that doesn't hold my unused ticket) ; 6) surged Uber's getting to and from brewpubs and Zingermans. And so on. I love going to games. It beats not going to games. 

ST3

September 17th, 2018 at 3:56 PM ^

My son is a freshman in high school. He's playing trumpet in the band. I've been to 2 of their games so far. I, for the most part, enjoyed the games. Yes, I did spend the 3rd quarter reading MGoBlog during one of the games, but that's besides the point. I do like watching football.

I've watched all three Michigan games this year on TV. I turned the ND game off with 10 minutes left in the 4th quarter. I don't think I've ever done that before. I did watch the rest of the game the next day. The Western game was fun. This SMU game was a slog. I stopped watching the live action and watched the end of the Wisconsin game. Again, I don't think that's something I've ever done before.

It may be that I'm getting older and don't want to put up with bullshit anymore just because of "tradition." My dad went through a similar phase, but I think he was in his late 50's when he gave up his season tickets. The games should be fun, but too often lately they seem like a chore. I even think this team is really good, but we're not going to know anything until Wisconsin and more likely the @MSU game. Can this team win on the road against a ranked opponent?

I also wonder if the dreaded "expectations" are conspiring to suck the joy out of the game. When I read all week, from multiple sources, that SMU sucks, they're S&P+ > 100 or whatever, and we should win 62-5, when we don't, that sucks. Yes, a 25 point win is great. But when you expect to win by 50, that's a 25 point move to the wrong side of things.

So why were the high school games better to watch?

1. I got great seats (minus the light towers that are inexplicably placed between the stands and the field.)

2. NO TV TIMEOUTS!!! I can't stress this enough. The game moves along at a reasonable pace. (Also no replay reviews. I would seriously limit a replay review to 30 seconds. If it's not clear in 30 seconds, you're better off just letting it stand and moving on, because if it's not clear, it's just going to be argued by whichever side lost the review.)

3. Zero expectations. I have no idea what's going to happen or what should happen and so every play is interesting to see what does happen.

4. I hesitate to add this one, but here goes. The game was in the evening. I didn't have to suffer through 4 hours of direct sunlight. I was invited to a UCLA game a couple weeks ago, and my first thought was, hell no. I'm not sitting for 4 hours in the daytime (and 100 degree temperature) in Pasadena for any reason.

Gitback

September 17th, 2018 at 3:57 PM ^

I left.  End of the third quarter.  Just left.  I haven't done that since my wife was pregnant (2004) and she was getting too uncomfortable to stay.  Since then, every game I've attended I've stayed until the bitter end.  Not Saturday.  

Saturday, I looked at my buddy as the fourth quarter started and I said "I'm ready to bail, you?"  and he, who also never leaves, was like "yeah."  That's it, just "yeah."  No discussion, we didn't think twice.  First time in 14 years and it wasn't even a thought.

Everything Brian said... all of it.  That's what we said too.  When we finally felt like discussing it, the "why," after all these years, we left THIS game, we said the same thing.  It just wasn't fun.  It was less than "not fun."  It sucked.  Ya, it was hot, but I've sat through that before.  The refs, the media timeouts, the replays, ZERO connectivity so that I could find out what the hell happened to Wisconsin... it just sucked the enjoyment out of the whole thing.  

So, I beat the traffic and thought I would listen to the rest of the game on the way home in the car...  want to add insult to injury?  Leave the game and then be reminded that your "radio voice" is Jim Brandstatter.  He's SO BAD at play-by-play... so ridiculously HORRIBLY bad at it, that I couldn't bare it.  (I grew up with his color, but he is NOT a play-by-play guy) 

I put on an podcast about the fall of Rome.  I didn't watch any games the rest of the weekend.  The experience sapped any desire to even keep tabs on the sport for a few days.  Don't even know how my fantasy teams did.

Brian Griese

September 17th, 2018 at 3:58 PM ^

Did Hoover Street not go to the Akron game? That has to be the worst victory in Michigan Stadium history. I was at the game and there was no part overly enjoyable. That was also Dave Brandon skywriting day. 

His Dudeness

September 17th, 2018 at 4:11 PM ^

I drive roughly 6 hours one-way to nearly every home game so I can sit uncomfortably and watch a guy in a red hat stand around for 5 minutes every 5 minutes or so. I give up my entire weekend for these games. Not just 4 hours on a Saturday... 

I didnt go to this game. The second half was unwatchable at home. I can't imagine being there. The games are too damn long. I agree completely. Season tickets have become a chore. 

m_go_T

September 17th, 2018 at 4:16 PM ^

Small nitpick here: In the You're the man now point totals, if two players split first place they should wind up with more points than second place.  As it stands, they (DPJ and Gentry) got two points by splitting the honor and Mettelus got two points for finishing second.  This could have a major impact on the final season totals.

 

Wrt the targeting call, this is so dumb.  So the QB can lower his head and try to move the pile forward, and the defensive player can lead with his shoulder, but the defensive player is penalized because of H2H contact? Why not put in a scrub QB and have him run it head first straight into the other team's best player a couple of times to start the game (which would be about as effective as our opening drive current strategy as it stands)

Bando Calrissian

September 17th, 2018 at 4:22 PM ^

If not for the cloud cover that sort of blocked the sun for a bit, I probably wouldn't have made it past the second quarter.

Michigan Stadium is an objectively uncomfortable place to watch a football game.

It took me a few decades to realize it. But I believe it. And I'm growing tired of it. It used to be I could gut through it. There was enough to enjoy. Not anymore. It's loud for the sake of being loud, inconvenient, expensive, and most of all, cramped--and I'm not even overweight.

Having the most seats of any college football stadium means nothing to me. It sucks to be in one of them more often than not.

m_go_T

September 17th, 2018 at 4:28 PM ^

I couldn't agree with you more.  People are shocked when I tell them I don't go to games and turn down free tickets.  I can't stand sitting with my knees in someone's back and someone's knees in my back for four and a half hours.  They should give up the 112k capacity for more real seats (keep the student section the same).  Otherwise, the amount of empty seats will just continue to grow.  

M-jed

September 17th, 2018 at 6:15 PM ^

I mean, its any stadium with, um, stadium seating. I was in South Bend this year and same deal - the benches suck. Other stadiums are the same. Maybe you're saying this about football in general, but its not a Michigan thing.

That cloud saved the day for me, too, thats for sure. It came in around halftime and stayed through 3Q; I left with 1 min left in 3Q cause I ran out of time to be there that day. I never thought there would have been that much time left when I planned my day!

Bando Calrissian

September 17th, 2018 at 10:45 PM ^

When talking largest stadium, no one is ever talking square footage. They're talking seating capacity.

But the truth still holds that this is a stadium that shouldn't seat near that many people. Its infrastructure cannot support 110,000+, even with recent improvements. The instances of weather evacuations have shown us that in case of a real emergency, there will be catastrophic implications. The stadium capacity wars has emphasized trivia over fan safety and comfort, and it may be time to think about just how to fix that.

BlueinLansing

September 17th, 2018 at 4:45 PM ^

Pro Tip:

I record games and start watching about 30 minutes after kickoff, esp. BTN produced games.  By halftime I zip through at my leasure and am caught up with live action mid to late 3rd Q usually when the big games are getting good.

 

In game stadium experience is becoming intollerable from so many different angles.

WolverineAtl85

September 17th, 2018 at 4:49 PM ^

How else are we going to get a $7MM coach?  Do you know what the $21,000 we paid Bo in 1968 is now???  ($150,429)  The game should not stop for TV, ever.  It's like stopping a NASCAR race for a commercial.  Their's plenty of game time spent standing around as it is.

urbanachiever

September 17th, 2018 at 4:50 PM ^

Watching the game on TV is not much better.

I used to organize my whole Saturday around watching football games -- not just Michigan. Forget watching other games now, I barely have the ability to sit through a Michigan game.

At first I blamed by own dwindling attention span, but if this is happening to everyone .... well, fuck you NCAA/Jim Delaney/capitalism

Dorothy_ Mantooth

September 17th, 2018 at 5:30 PM ^

i agree, the godsend is the "previous" button on the remote - and hopefully a schedule of 'good games' on the other networks to jump to at every injury, just about every time-out and seemingly 5+ minutes of commercials even between quarters

the 3:30 start time usually have some other great matchups, whereas the noon kickoffs are usually don't provide a lot of other games worth watching