Mr Miggle

August 3rd, 2018 at 5:34 PM ^

I'm confused. If the issue is whether Meyer reported the 2015 incident, surely he told OSU this before he was put on leave and they went through the process of appointing an investigating committee. Even OSU isn't enough of a clown show to do all that without asking such a basic question. Nor I can see Meyer not volunteering it.

So what is this investigation about? Are the records missing and they don't believe Meyer? They haven't announcing anyone else has been put on leave.

Or are they questioning his judgment for not firing Smith sooner? Or about lying at media days? I don't know why that requires an investigation if there's no dispute of the facts. Something doesn't add up.

 

 

Caesar

August 3rd, 2018 at 7:15 PM ^

I think it's buying time for due diligence and checking to see what other skeletons are in the closet. For the former, even taking Meyer at face value, they'd need to verify that a report was filed in a timely manner, etc. I have no idea how or where they'd get started on the latter. I always assumed Ohio State is a dirty program, so it could take a while.

M-Dog

August 3rd, 2018 at 5:42 PM ^

 

What exactly does "report the incident" mean?

I'm skeptical.  Somebody at Ohio State will fall on their sword and collaborate some vague "reporting of the incident" story.  

Some well-connected alumni will then quietly take care of them later.

Ohio State was never going to fire Meyer over something like this if they could just maneuver around it.

He'll get a public-opinion slap on the wrist for only reporting it and then looking the other way while it still kept happening . . . but it won't be enough to get him fired.

Everyone will forget about this by September and move on to the next hot story du jour.

Well done, lawyers.

4roses

August 3rd, 2018 at 6:04 PM ^

First off, he is not in hot water because he failed to follow proper reporting procedure. He is in trouble because he was asked why he employed a serial abuser for 11 years and only fired him after it became public knowledge. He answered with "I didn't know about it until now" and it was shown he did know about it. 

Secondly, Joe Pa also claimed "but I reported it to the proper authorities". It was a bad excuse then and still is.  

ndekett

August 3rd, 2018 at 4:39 PM ^

So, he admits to lying and also implies that he reported the 2015 incident and somebody else covered it up... AND he kept Zach Smith on his staff until the 2018 reporting. His avoidance of any specifics says everything we need to know, just a vague "uh, I thought I did good".

M-Dog

August 3rd, 2018 at 7:31 PM ^

It says "Zach Smith was never charged with a domestic violence crime."

Urban is going to hide behind that.

We can all sit here and say "Well he should have fired him anyway", but Meyer can say that both the police and Ohio State knew and did nothing about it even with all of their lawyers and counselors and psychologists . . . so what expertise did he have to override all of that as just a guy that coaches football? 

We all know better, but he only needs plausible denial.

ndekett

August 3rd, 2018 at 4:55 PM ^

Yes! Your point is well-taken. Sometimes it gets lost what the implication of this behavior is. Urban Meyer, by doing nothing, enabled and facilitated an environment where a woman and her children were terrorized by a disgusting monster and the cult community surrounding them.

NittanyFan

August 3rd, 2018 at 5:15 PM ^

Pretty much, except for one (fairly big) difference:

Paterno never lied in 2011 about "I never knew about 2002 in 2002."

Urban lied last week (at B1G Media Days) about "I never knew about 2015 in 2015."

Urban still needs, IMO, to answer the question "so, why tell a bald-faced lie about this last week?"

MichiganFan1984

August 3rd, 2018 at 4:41 PM ^

Yea he’s trash and yea he ain’t goin anywhere. That’s fine, you showed your true colors Osu. We’re gonn smash them anyway. 

Wolverine91

August 3rd, 2018 at 4:41 PM ^

He's not goin anywhere. Maybe 2 or 3 game suspension just because. Nothing happened to dantonio nor izzo and Urbans situation is not as bad. Still bad but not "fire" worthy 

MichiganTeacher

August 3rd, 2018 at 4:42 PM ^

He is fighting this, obviously.

He also isn't afraid of a run-on sentence... or three.

Tone of that letter strikes me as coming from a man who thinks he has a reasonable shot at coming back from leave. He is trying to say that his only mistake was claiming to the media that he knew nothing about Zach, implying that in fact he did know at least something and responded and reported appropriately. I don't know how he plans to reconcile that story with him firing Zach only after the story broke in the media. 

And that last part where he tries to show that he doesn't hate or disrespect women is stomach-turning. Methinks UM doth protest too much.

 

BuckNekked

August 3rd, 2018 at 6:46 PM ^

I agree it makes him look worse and not just he alone. It makes it look like a monumental cover-up spanning at least three years with the entire AD and the media covering the team being complicit. Very Tressel like.

I also agree with others this statement is a veiled threat to ensure he doesnt get fired for cause enabling him to collect the entirety of his contract.

The Fan in Fargo

August 3rd, 2018 at 6:54 PM ^

Doubt it on the second part. If he believed there were a chance he would get fired, he wouldn't play that card of veiled threat. This is a cocky confidence letter telling the world I'm in the clear no matter what and I'll be back.