Rutgers offense
The Rutger offense is saving the school a ton on wad and saltpeter [Patrick Barron]

Fee Fi Foe Film: Rutgers 2018 Offense Comment Count

Seth November 8th, 2018 at 10:00 AM

Resources: My charting, RU game notes, RU roster, Bill C profile, CFBstats

I thought Chris Ash's first hire at Rutgers made a lot of sense. Coming from Ohio State, Chris Ash had access to Urban Meyer's offensive tree and plucked the nearly ripened slot bug zealot Drew Mehringer to run spread smurf Janarion Grant all over the place. But Mehringer left within a year to be Texas WRs coach, and Ash replaced him with Jerry Kill.

This made some sense. Kill was best known for his Minnesota offenses made out of meatball power-blocking linemen, a 6-5 running back at QB, and motioning slot receivers. Hang some muscle on whatever linemen are around, find a bowling ball for a running back (Rutgers is uniquely positioned to take advantage of the Every RB Rutgers Recruits is Good rule) and convince a tight end prospect he doesn't really have to give up QB, and the spread smurfs of the Northeast can fill in the blanks. But of course Kill couldn't last, nor make Gio Rescigno into a halfway competent FBS quarterback except for one slot fade against Tyree Kinnel that one time.

John McNulty? Uh… He's a… Well he's a former Penn State guy who cut his teeth as a Gary Moeller receivers GA at Michigan. He's spent the better part of his career as a WR (occasionally QBs) coach in the NFL. Really this 1990s pro-style offensive coach makes exactly one kind of sense: He was Schiano's OC at Rutgers.

The film: Maybe the most recent game against Wisconsin would be a better example of what they'd look like against Michigan, except Tom Allen's defense is better and more like Don Brown's. So: INDIANA! Also this is the only opponent they've faced since Texas State in which the Bill C postgame win expectancy (35% in this game) or the percentile performance (23%) for the offense climbed over 15%. Is that Michigan's next opponent? I didn't realize. One game at a time.

Personnel: So here's a good week to remind everyone that Foe Film is an exercise in relativity—dangermen and trouble spots are somewhat relative to the rest of the team. Anyway my diagram:

image

PDF Version, larger version (or click the image)

McNulty doesn't have much to work with, which isn't that surprising considering he's the ninth OC in the last nine years at Rutger (and the only two-termer). The closest thing to a top-250 composite player on the field is former Michigan target (and Ahmir Mitchell teammate) WR Bo Melton, who was 252nd and had even a Rutger-relative dangerman star far just out of his grasp like half the passes thrown his way. The rest of the receivers are freshmen collecting 5 yards per target or less. WR Shameen Jones is only object that at all resembles an outside receiver, and his 34% catch rate and 4.4 YPT could stand in for the whole team's downfield success rate. True freshman WR Eddie Lewis has better stats but 111 of his 173 yards came against Texas State, Kansas, Buffalo, and Illinois. The only consistent targets are the star running back, who doubles as a slot receiver, and senior TE Jerome Washington.

That running back though. RB/Slot Raheem Blackshear is the Rutger offense. Since he's tiny, returns kicks, and runs all over the field, grad transfer backup RB Jonathan Hilliman gets a lot of run, especially near the goal line. Hilliman had 2,000 yards as the plowhorse for Boston College before a certain Michigan decommit usurped his job. Third RB gets as many carries as #2; true freshman QB convert ATH Isaih Pacheco is a Chris Evans type right down to the listed weight that seems 15 pounds too high.

True freshman QB Artur Sitkowski started last year for IMG so he's more polished than your usual 18-year-old, but that's Rutger-relative: the guy has already thrown 15 picks this year and given how many balls he flung at defenders in this one he's insanely lucky that's not 20.

He's also standing behind that awful offensive line. Light-footed LT Tariq Cole is closer to a cyan than the NFL prospect PFF made him out to be a few years ago. RT Kamaal Seymour is still a some-run no-pass pro problem they're stuck with. Ditto C Michael Maietti, who's no better at line calls this year. RG Jonah Jackson is the only guy the Rutgers beat has any confidence in, and that confidence disappears after they're done talking about his run blocking.

The other guard spot has been a disaster. LG Mike Lonsdorf is a good enough guess if you're trying to peg the worst starter on a Power 5 team this year. Despite getting pulled all the time, DORF is unkillable due to the state of his backups. Top-150 sophomore Micah Clark is taking a redshirt after failing to solve the Seymour problem last year, preseason competition Sam Vretman is out for the season, and the starting career of Nick Krimin lasted one week in September. This week Rutgers will try OL Zach Venesky, who's fresh off getting owned by Wisconsin's DEs (remember them?) DORF is also the only guy they have if a tackle goes out.

[the rest of the breakdown, after THE JUMP]

--------------------------------

Spread, Pro-Style, or Hybrid? Pro-Style, and finally I'll allow you to take that phrase and imagine it like it's 1995. Sorta.

Formation   Personnel   Playcall
Down Type Gun Pistol Ace I-form Avg WRs Pass PA Run
Standard 15 2 10 6 2.42 16 1 16
Passing 24 1 1 2 2.93 23 2 3
Total 64% 5% 18% 13% 2.59 62% 5% 33%

The "I-form" always has the fullback motion, usually ending in an offset:

Those gun numbers are distorted by being down two scores in the 4th quarter. The real identity of this offense is pre-snap movement, though nowhere near Matt Canada levels. Old Harbaugh though definitely.

They do it less than they would like to, according to Glen Mason at least, because Sitkowski is more likely than the defenses to get confused by all of it.

Basketball on Grass or MANBALL? They're a mostly zone team with a smattering of Pin and Pull and Power.

Hurry it up or grind it out? They huddle. Bill C has them 94th which is national average, but when you're Rutger the endgame hurries begin early.

Quarterback Dilithium Level (Scale: 1 [Navarre] to 10 [Denard]): Sitkowski didn't run at all. He just took very big dropbacks and tried to draw roughing the passer penalties by throwing uncatchable things when he was about to get hit.

Zook Frames Janklin Factor: It's official. Also I need a week off after Franklin's in-game coaching decisions to recalibrate myself to what normal coaches do.

/remembers that Penn State is playing Wisconsin and Paul "Turtle" Chryst this Saturday

Maybe two weeks.

Dangerman: There is no other candidate, and there never has been since RB/Slot Raheem Blackshear lit up last year. He has twice as many carries as anyone else on the roster, ten more catches and 100 more yards than any other receiver. He's a slippery little bugger he is:

He's only getting 4.4 YPC this year because everyone knows he's their best chance to move the ball. His yards per target—just 9—have a lot of dumpoffs in them because that's often the best opportunity for yards:

But his receiver numbers should not be treated as screens and the like. He's also regularly lining up as an H-receiver and motioning out to the slot, running receiver routes:

Indiana's linebackers couldn't stay with him—they finally got him under control in the second half when "Husky" (#hybridspaceplayerterms) Marcelino Ball returned from a targeting sentence. The rest of IU's secondary is…

Sorry sorry. Here's more Blackshear:

HenneChart:

Artur Sitkowski Good   Neutral   Bad   Ovr
Opponent DO CA SCR   PR MA   BA TA IN BR   DSR PFF
Indiana 3 9(3) -   3 3   - 4(1) 8****(1) 4*   43%  48.5

It was harder to grade this because so many events could be filed into so many things, and I don't know all the rules. Do we count biffing screens against the QB's downfield success rating? What if he chucks it way high after waiting too long for a route to develop and is about to take a big hit?

Throwaway? Inaccurate-X? Batted?

The one thing I can say is the interceptions are absolutely earned. He's already throwing into coverage because his receivers can't get open. He's making it worse by being highly inaccurate, and not in the way you can get away with. He throws behind his drag routes and slants all the time, hitting defenders in trail position in the chest. Eventually the defenders start thinking of themselves as receivers and pick things off. Will that throw them off the rest of the year?

OVERVIEW:

This offense is statistically worse than the one from 2016. Michigan's defense just throttled three ranked teams in a row, the last headed by Trace McSorley. A pick-happy true freshman QB and a porous line with a new desperation starter on it are not things you want to bring to a battle with Don Brown, especially after your students put magnets on a field #revengetour.

There are three ways Rutgers might be able to move the ball on Michigan. One is connecting with Bo Melton downfield:

Melton isn't big but he's a handfighter in a league that doesn't call OPI unless you slam into a guy on a Mesh route. Those throws tend to fall harmlessly to the turf but you never know when a throw like the one above could turn into a long TD reception instead of a pick.

The second is if the defense gets Blacksheared. IU started getting cocky later in this game, bringing safeties down to ABSOLUTE DISRESPECT range. Blackshear quickly shook loose; if Sitkowski doesn't leave this short…

The third is Harbaugh starts playing the offensive 3rd teamers on defense because he's out of travel roster. Peter Bush is no Devin Bush.

Comments

dragonchild

November 8th, 2018 at 11:37 AM ^

This.

I look forward to this as little as Molester State, for different reasons.  I hate it when M plays Sparty because it's a dirty, ugly game with lots of earth-scorching and intent to injure, not to mention it's a trash program with endemic corruption.

Rutgers as a program is kind of like a squeaky-voiced cartoon villain going "I'm invincible!" as he falls into his own trap.  They want to be evil, but they're not competent enough for their shenanigans to be relevant.  But it's still not going to be fun seeing them get destroyed.  Rutgers has some shady players but they can't be all bad, and some of them are going to be in a world of pain.  And even if we avoid that, it's going to be just crap football.  Either Michigan is going to get drunk the night before and puke all over the field (though I doubt Harbaugh will let that happen and these guys are way more responsible than I was in college), or if they're all business, Rutgers is going to pose so little challenge that it won't even serve as a glorified scrimmage.

It'll be fun until we start seeing 19-year-olds struggle to get up because they're bruised through.

LeCheezus

November 8th, 2018 at 10:52 AM ^

Is the "star down" for top 250 recruit based on the composite or highest ranking someone had?  Because neither Kemp nor Bush were top 250 composite guys.

markh100

November 8th, 2018 at 10:59 AM ^

Devin Bush Jr was 181, according to ESPN: 

http://www.espn.com/college-sports/football/recruiting/player/_/id/190611/devin-bush

and Carlo Kemp was 215 on Rivals: 

https://n.rivals.com/content/prospects/2016/carlo-kemp-20

Appears that top 250 on any of the recruiting services qualifies.

 

LeCheezus

November 8th, 2018 at 11:12 AM ^

Then Bo Melton should have a star down since he was #151 at 24/7.

The reason I asked is not to be a pain in the ass but to actually know if there is one method for the star down or if it is an "eh, close enough."  Either is fine, the diagram isn't some official document.  Also it seems hard to believe (at least for Bush anyways) that some of these guys were not top 250 recruits.

AZBlue

November 8th, 2018 at 12:31 PM ^

Heard on one of the WTKA shows this AM that M’s interest in Sitkowski diminished once he came in for a visit and threw for them.

Not bashing the kid - nobody deserves the beating he is going to get this weekend - but he probably isn’t a top P5 QB and certainly wasn’t going to be ready as a true Frosh in the B1G East.

mgobleu

November 8th, 2018 at 11:25 AM ^

How often do you get a matchup where the worst offense in the country has to go up against best defense in the country?

This reminds me of playing NCAA football on PlayStation when I was 13 where I would pump up all my players' skill levels, speed, height and weight to 99 and drop the other team to 50 and they'd never gain a yard. 

ClaudeTee

November 8th, 2018 at 12:28 PM ^

Looking at the crowd in those clips leads me to ask: what's the over/under for the percentage of the overall crowd at Saturday's game who will be Michigan fans? 

Rabbit21

November 8th, 2018 at 1:44 PM ^

I was in Thailand about fifteen years ago on a deployment and my friends and I headed on down to Pattaya Beach, we proceeded to drink A LOT, and later in the night in order to get back to our hotel we hired a baht bus and because we had a curfew we told the driver Lao! Lao!(fast).  He decided to do what he had to do and so we took off down the highway, with the bus rattling as if it was going to come apart at any moment, one of the guys decided to look inside the cab and started reading off the increasingly ludicrous speed numbers that the bus was going.  One of my buddies was rather drunk and so could only lean against the window and with a cigarette hanging out of his lips said what we were all thinking, "That's it, we're gonna die."

I tell you that story to tell you this story.  Rutgers is gonna die!

treetown

November 8th, 2018 at 2:41 PM ^

Nice as always.

For the running QB category

Quarterback Dilithium Level (Scale: 1 [Navarre] to 10 [Denard]): Sitkowski didn't run at all. 

So you are saying Rutgers is on impulse power?

AFWolverine

November 8th, 2018 at 2:50 PM ^

My favorite part of these FFFFs is seeing the guys on our team that have no star down but they do have a star up and/or a shield. The talent development has been great on defense, and now with Warriner, it will be great to see on offense as well.