Where and what is to blame? Not Jon Runyan Jr.

Submitted by SkyPanther on

It's become clear that blame, by some individuals, has been put on Jon Runyan Jr. for the loss on Saturday Night.


But, that's just wrong. And wrong in more ways than one.


Look at the big picture: the team didn't come out on fire. Notre Dame DID come out o fire! And they knocked Michigan back on their heels. I was stunned watching it. There just  looked like there was no fire in the team. Who's to blame for that? That's on the coaching, not the players. The coaches needed to get the players in the right frame of mind to come out firing on all eight, with hot fire, in all areas of the game, going into the first moment of the game.


It's true Runyan could have done better. I bet he would say it himself. But Michigan didn't lose because of him. There were things throughout the coaching staff, and team, that could have been better. No one can say they did the best they could have in all areas. Everyone, coaches and players, can look at their overall game, and see things they could have done better.


If you want to look at the offensive line for how it played, you have to look first at the coaching, not the players. And by coaches, I mean Jim Harbaugh and Ed Warinner. Like Jim Harbaugh said in his message to Braylon Edwards, "Come after me." And he's right. It starts with the coaches. Ed Warinner is new to the job. This game is his biggest piece of proving ground he'll probably have all year. He probably won't learn as much from any game for the rest of the season as he will from this one. Things are not going to be the same from now on. Ed Warinner will change things. He is the kind of guy who will not let things stay the same. And Jim Harbaugh is not the kind of guy to let things stay the same either. Together, they, and the rest of the coaches, WILL make the team better.


I am looking forward to improvement in all areas from now on. I especially want to see the offense have cadence, modulation, eleven players looking like a team with focus. That firstly, to me, will give a real spark of hope that the team is heading upward, like they say, that "the arrow is up!" Will I see it?

 

coaches.jpg

Photos:    Mike Mulholland/MLive                                              Brandon Brown

 

unWavering

September 4th, 2018 at 9:16 PM ^

"the team did not look like they were on fire" is meaningless. It's lazy crap that people say whenever we lose.

FSU looked pretty "pumped up" when the game started against VT. Look how that turned out for them. I can agree that some things need to be corrected with coaching, but please stop saying the "players didn't want to be there" or weren't jacked up enough or any variation of that lazy trope.

I can pretty much guarantee you the team was pumped up for a night game against a rival in week 1.

SkyPanther

September 4th, 2018 at 10:35 PM ^

He's probably criticizing himself.

But there are some blaming him for the loss. What about the botched FG? What about the missed batted down pass that was a ND TD. What about the high praise the interior defensive players got the past few weeks, who in an actual game, were pushed around? Where was the chaos in the ND backfield that the Michigan defense is known for? The team was not prepared. That is on the coaching.

The only moments in the game that looked promising, were when Dylan McCaffrey was in. There was crispness in the whole offense. And he looked great.

Barn Animal

September 4th, 2018 at 10:29 PM ^

Not the length, the content. 

But to answer the question I like my posts like Goldilocks: not to long, not too short but just right.

Ok my twisted mind just interpreted that comment in a whole new way. But I’ll post it anyway... I hate myself sometimes

Jimmyisgod

September 4th, 2018 at 9:19 PM ^

Did people really think Warriner would turn thing around in one off season?  As the season goes on we’ll get better on the O Line, but next year and the year after is when Warriner will really start making a difference with a dominant Line. 

Durham Blue

September 4th, 2018 at 9:19 PM ^

That game was one of those instances where home field advantage and good breaks went together.  ND got some breaks, mainly from Michigan taking bad penalties early on.  Then 14-0 was apparently too much to overcome.  The overcoming part is what needs to change from this point forward.  The offense needs to bail the team out every once in, umm, 10 years.

UMForLife

September 4th, 2018 at 9:21 PM ^

I actually think the opposite. The DL over pursued or aggressive on so many plays early that they took stupid penalties and let key 3rd down conversions happen. I say the coaches over hyped it and should have cooled their heels in the 1st qtr. 

markusr2007

September 4th, 2018 at 9:30 PM ^

You're making it worse dude.

The offensive tackle situation is dire. 

Yes, this weakness in the Michigan Death Star can be mitigated more directly and aggressively in games going forward. But a few more quarterbacks will have to die in the process.

This is a recruiting and injury issue. Not enough bodies. Lack of competition and just youth.

It's not going to get better this season.

If Newsome were healthy, the issue would be less stark. But we are Michigan fans, so even with a healthy Newsome back at LT, we'd find something else to complain and wave our fists at the sky about.

 

 

 

chunkums

September 4th, 2018 at 11:37 PM ^

I still think it can get better, but probably not good. If Warriner can get the mental breakdowns mostly eliminated, we can live with the physical limitations as long as we have a good running game. It's also possible that at least one of the freshmen could become viable by the end of the season. 

But yeah, the likelihood of the line becoming straight up good is low. 

1VaBlue1

September 4th, 2018 at 9:31 PM ^

I'm really tired of your hot takes.  You started out posting a bunch of relevant info, if it was a bit much, also.  But now?  Now, you're just another hot take pusher of feelings...

jjelliso

September 4th, 2018 at 9:34 PM ^

This team is probably going to be worse than last years team. They lost their best defensive player and their only decent offensive lineman, and it showed.  The only position they’re better at is QB but may not be enough to offset the regression elsewhere. 

LSAClassOf2000

September 4th, 2018 at 9:40 PM ^

The coaches needed to get the players in the right frame of mind to come out firing on all eight, with hot fire, in all areas of the game, going into the first moment of the game.

Firing on all eight what now? What if it is a four-banger?

UMfan21

September 4th, 2018 at 9:41 PM ^

I dont see many blaming Runyan.  I see most blaming tye coaches for poor recruiting at the OT position, and for placing Runyan in a position he could not adequately perform.

chunkums

September 4th, 2018 at 9:44 PM ^

O-lines usually take a long time to recruit and develop. Warriner has been here for what, 5 months? It's not his fault that the only non-freshman tackles on the roster are Ulizio, JBB, and Runyan (who doesn't have a tackle's build). A lot of that falls on Harbaugh and Drevno whiffing, some falls on dumb recruiting luck, and some falls on Hoke's final recruiting classes. 

SkyPanther

September 4th, 2018 at 10:08 PM ^

So you're not expecting any improvement from Ed Warinner's work this year, even though he said when he took over Ohio Sts offensive line, it was in bad condition, and he got great improvement in 1 year, even with converting a 3rd string TE to an OT?

chunkums

September 4th, 2018 at 10:33 PM ^

When did I say that? I expect Warriner to make a big impact this year, but it was literally the first game of the season. Warriner's 2014 OL got massacred by Virginia Tech before they were jamming the ball down Alabama's throats at the end of the year. Do I think we'll see that kind of improvement? Probably not, but we'll grow. I think blaming Warriner at this stage is moronic. 

Edit: I guess I didn't originally read your weird post closely. I see you're predicting the OL to improve under Warriner. I agree. 

Still, weird post. 

BBQJeff

September 5th, 2018 at 8:40 AM ^

Last year I was expecting improvement throughout the season because the team was young and the coaching staff was supposedly top tier.  We saw little if any improvement throughout the season.   

I am not expecting improvement as this season progresses because I've simply lost all faith in this coaching staff.   At times this game looked like Hoke 2.0.  

chunkums

September 5th, 2018 at 11:28 AM ^

But last year's line did get a lot better. We went from not being able to run on anyone to having a top-20 S&P rushing offense. Last year we had a freshman and Sheridan 2.0 throwing to freshmen and had the same problem at one of the tackle spots because there's only so much you can do with a dearth of tackles. There was the same cavernous gap at tackle on the depth chart, which is why we played our best interior lineman at tackle.

Seriously, Harbaugh/Drevno's early tackle recruiting is killing us right now, and that's compounded by poor recruiting at the end of the Hoke era and the misfortune of losing LTT and Newsome. We're recruiting plenty of tackles now, but they're all freshmen and high schoolers. 

Mongo

September 4th, 2018 at 9:45 PM ^

Weaknesses are well known - OL is below average, WRs are still developing, DTs are unknown but hyped (but not Mo Hurst), safeties are vulnerable up the middle and in coverage.  Positive is Shea is as billed and will get better.  Coaches need to develop better game plans as the season unfolds to emphasize strengths and minimize weaknesses.  Less stubborn stuff like last year and at ND.  Let's adapt to what we have and win f-ing ball games.

TVG_2.0

September 4th, 2018 at 9:51 PM ^

Coaching is by far and away #1. Nobody was prepared for this game. And quite frankly we’re lucky we didn’t get blown out. Harbaugh and Pep are 1A and 1B if we’re playing the blame game.

As far as who is second, it’s Runyan. That was one of, if not the worst performances I’ve ever seen from a starting Tackle. I’ve watched some gifs of him getting blown past and overpowered and it almost looks fake. The defender did it with such ease. You can lump(albeit to a lesser degree) the rest of the OL in with him. 

Third I’ll say the defense. Mostly the interior DL and DB. Only because they put our crappy offense in a major deficit early. Then again you can only blame them so much. ND only scored 24 points.

As much as I hate piling on the OL and especially the Tackles, I don’t really have a choice. Their poor play derailed our entire offense. Patterson had barely two seconds at most before ND was all over him. That essentially eliminates half the playbook. 

We can survive the third reason I gave. But the first two reasons must be fixed. Or we are in for another 7/8 win season.