What can we take away from the Nebraska game?
I'm taking away another awesome performance from Will Hart, Ben Mason (!) smacking dudes, and a good aggressive performance on both sides of the ball from us.
Also taking away that half the Nebraska team is quitting on Frost already. Several of our guys, starting with Metallus and Winovich, stated after the game that Nebraska basically quit playing hard after our first score.
And for that last reason, my main takeaway is this was a solid win, but not nearly as impressive as we may have thought prior to the game being played or the final score. I don't know if it says a lot about where we are today. Still, a good performance, and we have to step it up a notch next week.
Or is this too Debbie Downerish? What does the board think?
September 23rd, 2018 at 10:57 AM ^
I was thinking about that too regarding Turner. The scouting report was that he needed to add some bulk, which he still needs to do, but he makes one cut and goooooes. He’ll break off a 50+ TD soon.
September 23rd, 2018 at 1:32 PM ^
If you look at Alabama RB's they are all bowling balls that run through bad tackles/arm tackles and are fast as hell. Turner looks to me like he comes from that same mold.
September 23rd, 2018 at 10:43 AM ^
my main takeaway is this was a solid win, but not nearly as impressive as we may have thought prior to the game being played or the final score.
NU may not be as good as we thought, but this scoreline is favorable to them, if anything. They had about 50 yards of offense entering the fourth quarter.
September 23rd, 2018 at 10:45 AM ^
Maybe but in past years we would have screwed this up with unforced errors like penalties and turnovers to make the game closer than it should be. I like that we are finally seeing improvement week after week. It used to sound like a tired cliche from Harbaugh about improving daily but I think they finally have the talent and depth to make it real.
September 23rd, 2018 at 10:52 AM ^
NU got a ton of favorable calls from the refs. That's how they got 10 points.
September 23rd, 2018 at 7:30 PM ^
And three non-calls when Nebraska DBs interfered with M receivers may have taken M points off the board.
September 23rd, 2018 at 1:19 PM ^
It's Higdon - 1 "g".
September 23rd, 2018 at 1:20 PM ^
I like your take on Ambry Thomas. The dude can fly. He's just a little raw right now. The deep pass to him should've been a TD. Announcers claimed good Nebraska defense but Thomas didn't adjust under the ball properly. He had his guy by a step. Collins or DPJ would've hauled that in. More practice and game reps and I think we have ourselves another great WR.
It's very encouraging that our WR's all have the speed to torch opposing CB's.
And it is so nice to have a backup QB that is an obvious heir apparent.
September 23rd, 2018 at 10:52 AM ^
We held their running backs to 28 yards on the ground...though I’m not even sure if NU has anything at the RB spot.
September 23rd, 2018 at 1:17 PM ^
Martinez has wheels and he is part of their rushing attack so yes their 28 yards rushing was an impressive stat for the Michigan D.
September 23rd, 2018 at 10:56 AM ^
Reading the comments is just pure Michigan.
Before the game most people were a little nervous. Almost all thought the spread was too big. Michigan comes out and absolutely destroys the opponent and the takeaways are "well opponent sucks who knows".
Please enjoy the performance. The fans have a smaller celebration window than the actual coaches and we don't do shit other than bitch. Please look around college football. It's a week to week crazy, weird game...unless your Alabama.
September 23rd, 2018 at 1:31 PM ^
Plus, it's Nebraska. They may be down, but they are still better than SMU and WMU. Plus they have a mobile QB that was nearly fully operational and Michigan crushed him repeatedly. He had 2 long escapes and that was it. I'll take that any day versus what we do against most mobile QB's
September 23rd, 2018 at 10:59 AM ^
Nebraska was the #46 team per S&P before this game. It's early for S&P and the missed game made it worse, but this is pretty encouraging.
Texas was #43, Ole Miss was #50, Texas Tech was #51. I'm cherry picking of course, but if we'd obliterated those teams to the same level it would be bigger news. This could be a very positive signal.
September 23rd, 2018 at 11:01 AM ^
I think that if we played the Notre Dame game this week the outcome would be very different.
September 23rd, 2018 at 11:04 AM ^
Nothing...we need to win November
September 23rd, 2018 at 11:06 AM ^
Good teams destroy bad teams. Yesterday was really encouraging.
September 23rd, 2018 at 11:12 AM ^
Even at home, we don’t get blatant pass interference (Nico Collins, DPJ, Oliver Martin, etc.) and holding (Hutchinson, etc.) calls.
September 23rd, 2018 at 11:29 AM ^
The officiating was typical Big Ten, ignore offensive holding until you can't (because a Nebraska lineman did a complete takedown on a end around play) and not call pass interference unless you feel absolutely compelled by pitchfork protestation from more than 100K souls to protect weaker defenses.
I have no other explanation for the blatant misses on two plainly obvious pass interference calls yesterday. But that crew was not only objectively bad, it was technically bad. I mean it failed two rules calls situations that had to be corrected by the booth.
John O'Neil's crew didn't get the safety call right until the booth buzzed the field and corrected his initial ruling.
That crew would have blown the face mask call in the middle of the field that thousands in the crowd saw but all the striped shirts missed, if replay didn't force their hand. That would have been grounds for impeachment. As it was, they sucked.
And you always know that in a game like that, make-up calls will go against the stronger team to balance things out.
So, in the second half, two defensive fouls are called on Michigan on a single play after the white hat announces separate offenses on each team. The alleged roughing the passer call is apparently a new technical safety measure preventing a tackler from taking a quarterback down below the knees. The tackle wasn't overly aggressive or a foul on its face. It was just called. The other call on that play wasn't identified so who knows what happened there. O'Neil had a miserable day.
September 23rd, 2018 at 7:36 PM ^
I had forgotten about that roughing call when the M guy did nothing but wrap the QB’s legs up. That was terrible.
September 23rd, 2018 at 11:23 AM ^
The offensive line is getting much better, our QB problem is solved...not ready to grade out until after Wisconsin.
September 23rd, 2018 at 11:55 AM ^
The total 180 we've done in 24 hours is pretty funny. Read Brian's preview again.
Now consider . . . 56-10. And it could have easily been worse. Suddenly everyone is rushing to proclaim that they knew all along that Nebraska was the worst team ever.
I get that we all have PTSD from past seasons, and I'm not predicting championships, but I think we can say that we have a good football team. Whether it's a great team remains to be seen.
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:16 PM ^
Before the game everyone was saying the 18 point spread was way too high and this would be a tight game. I'm with you. This season feels different than the first 3 under Harbaugh. I think the ceiling is higher than 2016 because we have a real QB at last
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:53 PM ^
I was genuinely worried about this game. Brian's preview hints at some level of worry. Nebraska came in as a legit B1G opponent with a good coach and Michigan annihilated them. Simple as that. Michigan made Nebraska look bad because Michigan is a good football team and deserves the credit for being so.
I'm kicking myself for not taking -18. I took the fucking under 50 because I listened to so called betting experts. Going with my heart instead of my head for the rest of the season.
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:11 PM ^
Well, it's easy in hindsight to say Nebraska quit, they're a mess etc..but I'm sure they stepped on the field yesterday with the intention of winning the game. It's not like they got blown out in their 2 previous games. They quit because everything went against them, and a lot of the credit for that rests with Michigan.
Nebraska is obviously not a very good team at the moment, but we've looked way worse against 'not very good teams'. Michigan's strength is part of what made Nebraska look so bad. We probably would have won this game last year too but it wouldn't have been this kind of demolition by any means.
I am encouraged by this game. I think we can win 7 of the last 8 without needing any sort of 'miracle'. Doesn't mean we will, but we can.
September 24th, 2018 at 12:06 AM ^
This is a good point. A team giving up is the result of their opponent taking their will to win. That’s exactly what Michigan did and that’s what good teams do lesser competition
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:11 PM ^
We’ve done (mostly) what we were supposed to do against three garbage teams and played poorly against the only legit team so far
Last three games were glorified practices. We needed them (the wins and the practice) badly, but each is worth about a half a W.
Our effective record is 1.5-1, a little above .500. Talk to me when we beat a real opponent.
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:51 PM ^
And when (if) we beat MSU you'll still be saying that
September 23rd, 2018 at 1:57 PM ^
Why? MSU is a legit team. If we beat them, it'll be a full win.
Simple math.
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:15 PM ^
We didn't manhandle any big ten opponent last year the way we beat up on Nebraska yesterday, not even Rutgers or Minnesota. Nebraska is not good, but we looked terrific. We are staying relatively healthy, I didn't see anyone who looked like they had a serious injury yesterday. Obviously hope we can get solomon back.
But we are on a roll and getting better each game. This team could be 10-2.
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:39 PM ^
That McCaffrey will be the next Michigan QB when Patterson leaves.
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:42 PM ^
I believe it's a cop out to say several players are or have "quit" on Scott Frost. Announcers talked about that several times yesterday. Fucking prove it then. Do you think Nebraska players in their post-game presser would say Michigan made Nebraska look like shit because they quit on their team? No, it's a new coach, new set of rules, new game plan, etc. I believe growing pains but to say players aren't buying in and putting in an effort to win the game is total bullshit.
I don't like it. It really minimizes Michigan's effort and how well we played. Sure, Nebraska would've kept it close if some players didn't quit on the team. Uh huh.
September 23rd, 2018 at 4:42 PM ^
Michigan's players said this.
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:46 PM ^
Kudos to the OL. they have been bashed mercilessly on and off the field, including by me. they appear to improving each week. hope it continues. if so, great chance at a special year.
also, this blowout allowed a lot of young guys to play. holy crap, it appears we have a lot of fast and skilled WRs, a stable of RBs, and no worries at QB depth.
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:48 PM ^
It tells me that the ship is steering in the right direction. We've seen improvements in every aspect of the team so far; offense, defense, special teams, AND coaching. Have they arrived yet? Don't know, too early. Yesterday, i saw Michigan beat a team down that they were supposed to beat down. In a fashion that they were supposed to. This week will be a good test, on the road against a not horrible team. Should be a little tougher than nebraska. Would like to see a command of the game from start to finish "on the road".
September 23rd, 2018 at 12:49 PM ^
That was domination all around. Nebraska is bad, yes, but it’s obvious this team is improving each week. They are light years ahead of last years team at this time in the season. Remember Purdue to start B1G play last year? O’korn pulled a miracle out of his ass but other than that, M was not good. This team feels much closer to 2016 than to 2017.
September 23rd, 2018 at 1:08 PM ^
Nebraska was awful, but it was refreshing to see us get off to a fast start. We hit 'em early and often, and the outcome was never in doubt beyond the first two drives. Beautiful!
September 23rd, 2018 at 1:22 PM ^
That Josh Metellus, the player everyone on the board wanted to cut after last season's OSU dropped INT, has really come into his own and is playing great defense. Yes, I was one of those "bench Metellus" people too. Glad I'm not the coach. He's really stepped it up
September 23rd, 2018 at 1:45 PM ^
We demolished Nebraska. They have 5 yards rushing through 3 quarters. Average teams don’t do that, and it’s important for these starters to experience their ability to outright dominate an opponent so they realize what they should be doing every week. The big things I’ve noticed this year are the speed/effort on both sides of the ball, the good ball security by the RBs, and the excellent tackling on this team. Rarely is a guy not stopped by the first man in, which was a huge problem a few years back. Sure we have breakdowns and mental mistakes, but they’re paired with phenomenal play by amazing athletes at every position. This team is very good and ND was a fluke. We should never have opened on the road at ND.
September 23rd, 2018 at 1:58 PM ^
"the good ball security by the RBs" Good observation, in comparison with problems last year. Now I hope you didn't jinx it.
September 24th, 2018 at 12:58 PM ^
Good ball security shouldn't be the type of thing that gets jinxed. It's not luck. It's positioning the ball and your arms, protecting the ball, and strength. Either you have it or you don't.
September 23rd, 2018 at 2:30 PM ^
I take away how lucky we are to have the coach we do, both retroactively to the first three games of his tenure and now, with his ability to calmly hold together the team over the last 18 months and build them to this point.
How do you think this fan base would've reacted to an 0-3 Harbaugh?
And now that all our three star heroes have grown up, Coach can push them hard and ride them straight into Columbus.
O and I'm really glad the Harbaughffence doesn't rely on a running QB, those dudes are getting kilt out there.
September 23rd, 2018 at 3:35 PM ^
"O and I'm really glad the Harbaughffence doesn't rely on a running QB, those dudes are getting kilt out there."
It doesn't "depend" on one in the same manner that a Meyer/Rodriguez zone read does, but it does use one when needed. Harbaugh does not want pocket statues; his QBs at least have to be able to scramble to get a fast five yards if needed. He won't run a QB like OSU runs Haskins or Nebraska runs Martinez, but he does want that ability to be there when the play (or breakdown thereof) calls for it.
September 23rd, 2018 at 4:16 PM ^
Exactly.
September 23rd, 2018 at 3:32 PM ^
Still need some rough edges smoothed out, particularly penalties on defense.
O-line, while definitely better, still needs to show they can perform like this against a stronger opponent.
BUT... all that being said, there is improvement, and the team is growing. A far better thing to see than in the Hoke years where the O seemed to regress every game, particularly in his last two seasons.
September 23rd, 2018 at 3:48 PM ^
Higdon is much better than we give him credit for.