Very OT: What are the lamest sports moments/feats that other fanbases think are huge?

Submitted by othernel on

Since we're in the slowest part of the year, I was thinking back to a conversation with some Rutgers fans where they kept talking about "the Upset", as if I was supposed to know what that was. When I finally asked, they were referring to when they beat us in 2014 during the Brady Hoke farewell/GTFO tour. They legitimately acted as if this was a big deal and talked about how it was a wakeup call to all the Big Ten that Rutgers was for real. There was even a big banner this past season on the side of the arena commemorating it.

It made me proud to root for a team that has actual accomplishments that people outside of the fanbase are actually aware of.


Any other stories of lame accomplishments?

Tuebor

June 19th, 2017 at 11:40 AM ^

If an 8-5 Rutgers team beating a 5-7 Michigan team at home by 2 points is an "upset" I'll let them have it.  

 

Everybody beat us that year and all that game showed was that Michigan was broken, not that Rutgers had arrived.

xxxxNateDaGreat

June 19th, 2017 at 12:41 PM ^

Eh, I'd say the Minnesota game before it was the one that sealed the deal. Losing is bad enough, but when you are so inept that you choose to send a clearly concussed and injured kid back out there rather than call a timeout or, you know, have the backup prepared, you might as well freshen up that resume. I mean, I'm still genuinely surprised we didn't fire him a any point during that week following the game.

xxxxNateDaGreat

June 19th, 2017 at 12:41 PM ^

Eh, I'd say the Minnesota game before it was the one that sealed the deal. Losing is bad enough, but when you are so inept that you choose to send a clearly concussed and injured kid back out there rather than call a timeout or, you know, have the backup prepared, you might as well freshen up that resume. I mean, I'm still genuinely surprised we didn't fire him a any point during that week following the game.

grumbler

June 19th, 2017 at 2:08 PM ^

Except that he not only wasn't "clearly concussed," he may nnot have been concussed at all.  His problem was his ankle (that's why he staggered around, according to him), and he still wanted to play.

The concussion covfefe was caused by Hoke not seeming to know what Morris's status was during and after the game.

NittanyFan

June 19th, 2017 at 1:24 PM ^

a bellwether of what?  A bellwether that they would lose by 7 touchdowns to Ohio State in their very next game?

The 2013 PSU win over U-M was just like the 2010 win.  A game that was entertaining in a way given it was a good crowd, good atmosphere, and competitive game with quite a few points scored.

But ultimately a win by an average team over an equally average team.

Now, all the 409th victory and 400th victory and those "milestones" from the 2010-2011 era.  THOSE are overrated by much of the PSU fanbase.

saveferris

June 19th, 2017 at 11:42 AM ^

I think Spartan football fans touting their "streak" of five 11 win seasons in six years, in an era of 13-14 game seasons that only extends back about 10-15 years is pretty stupid.

saveferris

June 19th, 2017 at 11:53 AM ^

That's the part upon which they SHOULD focus; but I can't tell you how many times I've heard or read Spartan fans proclaiming their winning a minimum of 11 games 5 out of 6 seasons, something Michigan's never done, being an accomplishment in and of itself.  A boast which ignores the changing arithmetic of the college football season in the 21st century.

mgoblueben

June 19th, 2017 at 11:44 AM ^

Rutgers ever beating Michigan is a goddamn shame. Indiana hasn't beaten us in 30 years! so yea we can beat them 78-0 for the next 20 years but they still did something indiana couldn't

Seth

June 19th, 2017 at 11:45 AM ^

Ohio State fans think it was just punishment to have to live through a year kf Fickell between Jim Tressel and Urban Meyer.

ijohnb

June 19th, 2017 at 1:11 PM ^

have less of an issue with them propping up the character ("Norman Dale," was a 24 year old second year coach with almost no coaching history in real life and was hired without much fan fare or interest, good or bad) than I do with Sean Astin's portrayel of him.  He seriously took every steretype of a Notre Dame superfan and combined them into the most unrealistic, punchable character ever played in a movie, and never came close to believable as a football player, even a bad one.  Despite my general disgust for Notre Dame football, there was a good movie in Rudy somewhere, but Astin played the role like he was in a cartoon. 

In reply to by ijohnb

MGoBlueMyself

June 19th, 2017 at 4:39 PM ^

Since we are now Inside the Actors Studio, curious as to why you think it never came close to believeable as a football player? The true Norman Dale sounds more unbelieveable than the actual Hoosiers story, as you mentioned, so how is Astin's portreyal more unbelievable? 

ijohnb

June 19th, 2017 at 8:28 PM ^

was played as basically a flawless human being, devoid of any pure self-interest. The idea that this kid did everything he did "for Notre Dame" is not believable on its face. There were no layers to the character. He functioned as little more than a prop. Ok, "like a football player" was probably a misguided criticism, but did you ever get the feeling that you were watching an actual person in that movie? Not me. It could be writing as much as acting, but he certainly was not the guy to turn that into a character remotely interesting to anybody but the most die hard ND fan, and it is probably stretching it for most of them as well.

Blueblood2991

June 19th, 2017 at 11:51 AM ^

The best part is that Rutgers might have to vacate that win against us because Kyle Flood played ineligible players. Yes I know our loss doesn't go away, but goodbye to their crowning achievement.