Help Me Understand Mo Hurst's Draft Ranking

Submitted by mvp on

So, the first round is in the books.  3 DTs taken, and on ESPN's "best available" Mo is listed as the 5th best remaining DT available.  He won't even be the first Hurst drafted!

I know those rankings aren't gospel, but why is he ranked where he is?

As this site has pointed out many times, not only is he one of the highest rated players according to Pro Football Focus at his position, he's one of the highest rated players ever.

What's the disconnect?  Is the enlarged heart at play?  Something else?  Seems like his combination of size, power, first step, and proven experience would put him in first round territory.

ak47

April 27th, 2018 at 9:15 AM ^

He is undersized, with a potential medical issue, and his pro day results were just fine.  I think the NFL is wrong but its not that surprising.

Nobody Likes a…

April 27th, 2018 at 9:20 AM ^

The nfl suffers from a lot of confirmation bias. Very few GM’s and coaches are willing to go against orthodoxy because it puts them in a greater chance of losing their spot. As spots are few and ambition to reach the perceived pinnacle is high you get an echo chamber. Look at some of the stupid shit that comes out of combine interviews. Questions that don’t reveal demeanor or intent but make “good football guys” get asked.

The nfl is a play-doh extruder of conventional wisdom. The bills moved up to take josh allen when everyone with a pulse and a working pair of eyes knows Rosen is the better QB. Why? Because Rosen is outspoken politically and socially and doesn’t fall in line with what ownership considers to be important. Granted this is buffalo and their owners are morons so winning has never been a priority. But that the bills aren’t being completely pilloried for taking the less good option and over paying for it because they didn’t like that Rosen is an atheist, tells you everything you need to know about nfl thought culture. Don’t try to innovate, don’t be different. It’s a league with tall poppy syndrome.

 

NowTameInThe603

April 27th, 2018 at 9:24 AM ^

I would have liked the Patriots to take him at 31. How many teams run more than pass in the league? 5? Mo is a guy who fits as a DT in this NFL. Now if he really falls I understand the Pats waiting for value.

Broken Brilliance

April 27th, 2018 at 9:29 AM ^

Mo will get his chance. I know its a blow to the ego for some of us to have no Michigan guys go in the first (especially when there were two buckeyes who are generally horrible people) but don't let it get you down. The 8-5 record from last year was a way bigger detriment to recruiting. Let's get it in 2019.

mvp

April 27th, 2018 at 1:35 PM ^

Eh.  No issue with my ego.  

For me, it is the fact that a dude that has dominated his position, done things the right way, and was seemingly recognized by impartial sources as "elite" fell relative to what I'm sure his hope was.

Your larger point, though, is well taken.  He will get drafted and have the chance to prove everyone wrong on the field.

4roses

April 27th, 2018 at 9:33 AM ^

Sometimes the simplest answer is the correct one. 

 

One additional thing to point out is that we really don't have a lot of information on what the "heart issue" is. All that we actually know is that he was held out of the NFL combine for an irregular EKG and that this was similar to testing done before he ever played at Michigan. This could have affected his draft status, but without knowing the details for sure it is hard to say for certain that it did.  

dinsdale613

April 27th, 2018 at 9:40 AM ^

It’s also a lot about how the draft falls. I live in Atlanta and the talk has been about how the Falcons would take a DT in the first round, either Taven Bryan or Hurst. Then, the best WR in the draft, who wasn’t expected to be there, fell to them. Sometimes it just happens because teams get lucky and other teams reach.

JonnyHintz

April 27th, 2018 at 9:43 AM ^

The heart condition is part of it. But what you have to realize is that NFL teams do not draft based on production. They look at measurables like height, weight, arm length, hand size, 40 times, bench press, broad jump. Fact is, Mo Hurst is undersized to be a 4-3 DT. He lacks the speed to be a DE. His power and his motor got him a lot of production at the college level, but it won’t work nearly as well in the NFL. He has the potential to be a pretty good DT in the NFL, but let’s drop the bias here. He’s not going to come in and be Ndamukong Suh or anything.

JonnyHintz

April 27th, 2018 at 8:15 PM ^

We’re talking strictly playing ability. Mo was an excellent college player. He could be a pretty good pro. But what made him so dominant at the college level isn’t something that will translate to dominance in the NFL. That doesn’t mean he can’t be good, but simply that he won’t turn heads. He doesn’t have the size/strength/speed combination to do that against NFL caliber offensive linemen. A high motor only gets you so far.

Jimmyisgod

April 27th, 2018 at 9:55 AM ^

First of all, Pro Football Focus is not even a point of reference for NFL teams, no NFL GM takes it seriously.

Mo is an undersized DT and a lot of teams are going to 3-4 where there is simply no role for a 280 lb DT who doesn't have the length to play DE.  His heart questions didn't help.  He was likely a late 1st round pick before his heart issues came up, but even then could have slid into the 2nd.  I think he'll go in the 1st half of the 2nd, but it would not surprise me if he drops further.  NFL GMs are followers and if other teams have questions about Hurst, they don't want to be the ones to take the chance.

mgobrooklyn

April 27th, 2018 at 10:02 AM ^

I listened to a Ringer podcast this week with Mike Lombardi where he said that despite the medical "clearance" that Mo recieved, he heard a number of teams still had concerns and had taken him off their boards completely. Doesn't mean they're right, but in the risk averse world of NFL front offices this stuff happens. It was for different reasons, but remember when La'el Collins fell out of the draft completely despite being a 1st round talent because his ex-girlfriend had been murdered? You would have thought that in the 6th or 7th round someone would have said, "screw it, I'm taking him, if turns out to be a murderer we'll just cut him"....and of course he ended up being completely cleared a few days after the draft. 

bronxblue

April 27th, 2018 at 10:09 AM ^

I assume at this point that Mike Lombardi's continued relevance as a talent evaluator is because Bill Simmons has a hard-on for a guy who takes in the same empty platitudes and meaniongless analogies Simmons loves.  I highly doubt NFL teams removed a possible 1st-round talent because of a cleared medical condition.  There being a chance you murdered your girlfriend is a much better reason to run away from someone.

bronxblue

April 27th, 2018 at 10:07 AM ^

It could also be that NFL GMs aren't always the best at drafting guys, as evidenced by the fact that Cleveland took Mayfield and the Giants took Barkley, two players they absolutely didn't need at those spots.  Oh, and the less said about ESPN's truly atrocious draft coverage, the better.

Hurst is a very good DT; I can see an argument that he isn't a first-rounder because of his relatively smaller size.  But my guess is a smart GM picks him up in the second round and he tears guys apart.

BJNavarre

April 27th, 2018 at 10:14 AM ^

He has too much potential as a game changing pass rusher to not be taken in the 2nd round, even with legitimate concerns about his size and health. I guess we'll see if NFL GMs agree with that assessment today.

markusr2007

April 27th, 2018 at 10:18 AM ^

You need to lower your expectations by a lot. 

These dolts are ignorant of demonstrated talent and motor like Michigan's Maurice Hurst.

Understand that NFL scouts and staff are all desperately seeking another Johnny Manziel or Jamarcus Russell.

 

Rug Dog

April 27th, 2018 at 11:30 AM ^

Yes the best of the best football scouts are dolts because you say so.  

How about take the Maize colored glasses off for a bit.  Hurst is good but with the health issues and his size, he's not 1st round material unfortunately.  

With that being said, I'm hoping he falls into my teams lap.  We need a DL and I'd love to have Mo.

MGoStrength

April 27th, 2018 at 10:24 AM ^

The same process happens in both recruiting HS kids and drafting college guys.  They chose players based on potential rather than productivity.  This leads them to value physical attributes over mental ones.  They tend to rank/draft higher guys that have the desired height, weight, speed, athleticism, etc.  They tend to undervalue their actual production playing games.  This is why guys like Kyle Kalis, Shane Morris, Brian Cole, RJS, etc. get ranked high but don't produce very much.  They have the height, weight, speed, strength, and athleticism and coaches assume they can teach them how to play.  On the other end you have guys like JMFR, Hurst, Brady, Gallon, etc. who clearly out perform their ranking or what you might expect them to be able to do based on their lack of height, weight, speed, and athleticism. 

 

One thing many evaluaters IMO undervalue is motor control.  A smaller, slower, weaker player who understands how to read and react to plays quickly will more times than not outperform their larger, faster, stronger counterpart that is slower to read and react.  This is kind of a combination of physical/mental abilities, but is one of the more underrated skills in these sorts of evaluations.  At the highest level you want both, but many times it's easy to fall in love with the physical tools and assume the player has more potential.

copacetic

April 27th, 2018 at 10:32 AM ^

So Michigan doctors cleared him to play all season and he reportedly has known about it since his freshman year. After it was brought up at the combine he was once again cleared by doctors from Michigan and Harvard... and yet this seems to be the reason he fell out of the first (and possibly more). Gotta be frustrating for Mo.

Something you've known about for years, the experts say it's not an issue, but it's still enough to scare some GMs. Oh well, some team is gonna get a steal. 

taistreetsmyhero

April 27th, 2018 at 10:43 AM ^

NFL values measurables above all else and Hurst isn’t the ideal size for an NFL DT. That makes him limited (at least in the eyes of GMs) to playing in certain defensive schemes, which pretty much automatically takes him off many teams’ boards entirely. I think people on this blog (a college sports site) fail to appreciate this year in and year out. And with respect to the heart condition...Star Lotulelei had a similar situation before the draft and still went in the first round after being cleared. If Mo had first round grades in the eyes of GMs, he would have been picked already.

Magnus

April 27th, 2018 at 10:46 AM ^

I'm not an NFL GM - obviously - but I wouldn't spend a 1st round pick on a guy with heart issues. It's not just about Hurst - it's about the guy you could have instead of Hurst. If you whiff on a draft, that can be the difference between keeping/losing your job, and it can be the difference between continuity and a rebuild.

Teams are better off waiting until later rounds for a guy like Hurst, because the fan base/ownership won't crucify the GM for getting a 3rd round pick who ends up quitting football due to health issues.

Ali G Bomaye

April 27th, 2018 at 10:56 AM ^

The problem with that reasoning is that there's no such thing as a "sure thing." Yes, if you develop Hurst and he eventually can't play, you missed on a pick. But there are all kinds of ways to miss on picks anyway.

Look at the last ten picks of the first round (approximately the range where Hurst was expected to go) from four years ago - the guys who just completed their rookie contracts:

  • 23 - Dee Ford
  • 24 - Darqueze Dennard
  • 25 - Jason Verrett
  • 26 - Marcus Smith
  • 27 - Deone Bucannon
  • 28 - Kelvin Benjamin
  • 29 - Dominique Easley
  • 30 - Jimmie Ward
  • 31 - Bradley Roby
  • 32 - Teddy Bridgewater

There are some pretty good players in there (Ford, Verrett, Bucannon, Bridgewater pre-injury). But there are also some complete busts (Dennard, Smith, Easley, Ward). There isn't any way to avoid busts in the draft, so why not draft a guy who might be an All-Pro?

Magnus

April 27th, 2018 at 11:29 AM ^

There are a bunch of reasons to bust - getting out of shape, wrong system, wrong coach, football-related health issues, non-football-related health issues, drug use, poor mental approach, being overwhelmed physically, etc. When you go into it with an additional risk factor, that's significant.

Hurst might be an All-Pro despite the heart condition, but the guy you draft instead of him might be an All-Pro without a heart condition.

Rug Dog

April 27th, 2018 at 11:42 AM ^

You're right, there is no such thing as a sure thing.  But that doesn't mean you shouldn't increase your odds of a sure thing, especially if your job rides on it.  Mo has a known medical condition, people won't put their job on the line for a kid they don't even know.  Some people on this board live in a maize colored world, but if it were me, I wouldn't jeopardize my job either.  And like Magnus said, thats a first round pick, you have a chance of getting an All-Pro without a medical condition to boot.

AMazinBlue

April 27th, 2018 at 10:56 AM ^

LB in the NFL like Woodley did.  Not sure of Hurst's 40 time or his comparison size-wise to Woodley.  Woodley played at 6-2 and 260+. Hurst is 6-1 and 290