Nassar Sentence: 40-175

Submitted by stephenrjking on

The judge brings the hammer.

Judge sentences Nassar to 40-175 years. "I just signed your death warrant. You don't get it. You're a danger."

— Stewart Mandel (@slmandel) January 24, 2018

I believe a C-ya is in order.

ST3

January 24th, 2018 at 12:57 PM ^

and sorry for bringing up God, but it's the Founders' belief "that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights" that inspired the Constitution. So, let me rephrase, thank the Creator, whoever he, she, or it may be.

McDoomButt

January 24th, 2018 at 1:30 PM ^

Thank you!

I was starting to get upset that we had forgotten Odin slaying the demi-gods and forming the land of their flesh and the clouds of their brain matter.

UM Fan from Sydney

January 24th, 2018 at 1:25 PM ^

I cannot imagine they don't put him in solitary confinement. Either way, he won't be in prison for long because his life will end very soon. It will be similar to the guy from Cleveland who detained those women for ten years. The guy was in prison for a short time before he took the cowardly route and killed himself.

Stay.Classy.An…

January 24th, 2018 at 1:33 PM ^

not sure what the hang up is about saying "gen pop". That is pretty well known terminology for the "general population", I don't understand the ball busting here. Since we are on the subject, he is probably going to go into PC in a cell by himself. I imagine they will also place him on suicide watch, which will limit what he is allowed to have.

bluesalt

January 24th, 2018 at 1:03 PM ^

Firstly, he abused hundreds of girls over a period of decades at their most formative years physically, psychologically, and emotionally. I know a victim. Abused at 12, she still isn’t able to come forward at 28. It triggered an eating disorder which she has unsuccessfully fought for 15 years. Being in and out of inpatient treatment throughout her teens and twenties has irrevocably disrupted her life. The anorexia damaged her heart and caused four heart attacks by her 21st birthday. It is unusual when she her sleep is not interrupted by nightmares. Even with him in jail her panic has not abated. He’s not going to get abused way worse. Secondly, and this isn’t only to you, but I detect something resembling glee in the attitude of some posters regarding this issue. Knowing a victim, it’s off-putting to say the least.

Wolverine Devotee

January 24th, 2018 at 2:27 PM ^

I guess I worded that poorly and it came off poorly and for that I'm sorry but I just want the fucker to suffer. And all those who enabled him will have their day in courts too.

xtramelanin

January 24th, 2018 at 12:49 PM ^

the upper term was already set.  he won't be paroled.

and as much as we all agree the guy needs to go away, the judge's comment about the 'death warrant' was totally inappropriate for a judge.  we can say that all we might want, but the judge needs to be above that type of unprovoked chatter.  she turned the sentencing into a circus and let it get out of hand, not unlike judge Ito in the OJ trial.   

carolina blue

January 24th, 2018 at 12:52 PM ^

Why should judges be unfeeling robots? Sure, when it comes to the law, interpret without bias and/or emotion. But when sentencing and giving justification for sentencing, this is exactly the language I like to hear. People, in general, like to think the law and it’s system exists in an emotionless vacuum. That’s just simply not the case.

kehnonymous

January 24th, 2018 at 1:05 PM ^

I see your point re: the judge and it's certainly not how you want most trials to go, but given the extraordinary circumstances and the potential for a nationwide sea change of result of assault survivors now feeling empowered to come forward and speak truth to justice, a media circus is not only a small price to pay but a necessary catalyst to change our national conversation.

ijohnb

January 24th, 2018 at 1:07 PM ^

disagree Melanin.  In particular, the comparison to Ito doesn't even make any sense. 

And what she said would only be inappropriate if it could have any impact on an appeal of his sentence and there was a sentencing agreement in this case, so good luck with that.  Judge's don't have to be robots, and I have seen Judges (as I am sure you have) go far beyond that.  It's her courtroom.  He is an admitted sexual abuser of children.  She can say what she wants to him.

xtramelanin

January 24th, 2018 at 1:17 PM ^

doesn't make it helpful or wise.  she allowed the defense attorneys to be verbally abused by the victims - totally inapprpropriate and she may have a JTC complaint filed about that.  and my comparison to Ito had to do with the lack of control, albeit for different reasons.  Ito looked over his head, my understanding of this judge is that it was a media frenzy she helped whip up.  

for sex cases the sentencing can be a helpful and catharctic time for the victims, and that is a very good thing.  but the TV coverage (she could've prevented or limited that) and the inflammatory language and circus atmosphere have turned what should be a clean, efficient sentencing into the jerry springer show.  i blame the court and definitely not the victims for that.  thus my comments.  

ijohnb

January 24th, 2018 at 1:26 PM ^

have some good points here.  Frankly, due to the very detailed coverage on this blog, I haven't had occassion or need to watch a lot of the sentencing or the impact statements.  I was just responding to the "signed your death warrant" statement.  That, by itself, isn't problematic to me. 

I didn't see any of the victims insult or direct their statements to defense counsel.  You are very correct, that is wholly inappropriate and should not be allowed.  I just also read Everyone Murders post above about her grandstanding also and her extensive discussion about herself before passing sentence.  That really has no place either.

xtramelanin

January 24th, 2018 at 1:45 PM ^

like everybody here i think nassar is a monster and am very glad he'll never be free, all of that.  my point only has to do wth the judge:  she is/was the referee.  the referee doesn't spike the football, pat the buckeye on the behind (remember 2016!), or jump around when one or the other team wins the game at the last second in some exceptional fashion.  they call balls and strikes, and go on to the next game.  

leave the show-boating for the parties, their attorneys, the media types, even the grand and bold statements of our fellow mgobloggers, the sentiments many of which we share.  but not the judge.  

ijohnb

January 24th, 2018 at 1:52 PM ^

we are splitting hairs here, but I think they need to be split.  If a Judge is going on and on about themselves and the very act of sentencing the defendant becomes about the Judge, then yes, things have gone awry and the Judge is not handling the case in a professional way.

But a Judge is not merely a "referee."  Whether it is reality or not, Judges hold a position of legal and moral authority within the justice system.  When a defendant is convicted and it is time for him to face the music, it is not inappropriate for a Judge to "feel" a certain way about a particular crime or defendant and for them to express that during sentencing.

Year of Revenge II

January 24th, 2018 at 1:22 PM ^

Yes, she can say what she wants, but hopefully it would be related to one of the purposes of a sentencing.  I do not have a major problem with what she said; however, I am not going to disagree with Melanin from an intellectual point of view.  He is right.

And I believe his comparison to Ito was allowing the courtroom to be the venue for agendas other than for that which the courtroom was intended.

As far as other judges go...

Q. What do you call an attorney with a low I.Q.?

A. Your honor.

On the whole though, I would say Aquilina did a professional job in this case from what I have read.

tjl7386

January 24th, 2018 at 1:08 PM ^

Really? Maybe it's time for all the "proper" ways to act get re-assessed. 

Two thumbs way up for her to come out and make sure he 100% understood that he doesn't deserve to breath one more breath of fresh air as a free man. 

The only thing that was inappropriate was his treatment of the hundreds of victims that have come forward. Now he can pay with his life. 

 

Sopwith

January 24th, 2018 at 1:18 PM ^

(See? We agree sometimes)

While I like the humanity with which the judge treated the victims, it's not her place to be an advocate for either side. The "death warrant" comment was totally improper, much though it might have summed up how everyone not named Larry Nassar feels about it.