First Look: 2017 Offense Comment Count

Brian

DEPARTURES IN ORDER OF SIGNIFICANCE.

31619736520_7df2bf9ecd_z

[Bryan Fuller]

  1. TE Jake Butt. Mackey win might have been a career award but it was warranted in that context. Sure handed, huge catching radius threat. Blocking indifferent. Butt will be missed by more than last name aficionados. 69% catch rate is nuts. He's off to the second round of the draft unless people are spooked by a bowl-game ACL tear.
  2. WR Amara Darboh. Delivered on Jim Harbaugh's assertions that he was Michigan's best receiver with an All Big Ten year. Still left you wanting a bit more, though, as he had multiple opportunities to bail Wilton Speight out of iffy throws and took few of them during Michigan's unfortunate finish.
  3. RT Erik Magnuson. Quiet, steady performer at tackle. Was never a star and I'm a little dubious of people projecting him on day two in the draft, but if Michigan had five Erik Magnusons the year ends very differently. Alas.
  4. WR Jehu Chesson. Never recaptured his stellar late 2015 form as a senior. Still moderately productive, but only that. Speed did not translate into downfield production, or even many targets. Those went to Darboh, with iffy success.
  5. RB De'Veon Smith. Workhorse back had solid season. Detractors will point to middling YPC (4.7) relative to the rest of the platoon; this is unfair since Smith got all the short yardage work and was often making yards on his own just to get to that number. Pass protection dipped in senior year.
  6. LT Ben Braden. Pressed into service at left tackle after Grant Newsome's injury, where he was neither as bad as expected nor actually good. Reduced his tendency to lean on guys as his career went on but never fully excised that from his game. Draft chatter minimal, understandably.
  7. RG Kyle Kalis. Promising start to senior season submarined by a recurrence of mental errors and then just straight up getting crushed by top-level interior pass rushers. Extravagantly whipped by Jaleel Johnson, Nick Bosa, and DeMarcus Walker in Michigan's losses. I will never say "it can't get worse" in reference to a Michigan offensive line again, but Kalis seems eminently replaceable.
  8. RB/QB Jabrill Peppers. Offensive output was minimal after wildcat QB business was diagnosed. Effective decoy mostly.
  9. QB Shane Morris. Never found playing time and is taking a grad transfer.
  10. OL David Dawson. Announced a grad transfer even before spring practice, further emphasizing how thin Michigan was on the OL this year: either he or the coaches didn't think he had any shot at a job this fall.

WHAT'S LEFT

 

31850102172_e8ce77240f_z

[Fuller]

  1. OL Mason Cole. Move to center went relatively well, though I was less into him than PFF was. Had difficulty moving large nose tackle types and didn't get to do much operating in space, oddly. Pass protection was very good once he was removed from edge types, and I might be expecting to much. He had an NFL decision to make at a spot that usually doesn't see a ton of guys go.
  2. QB Wilton Speight. Debut season was solid statistically: 7.7 YPA, 62% completions, 18-7 TD-INT, third in the Big Ten in passer rating, 29th passing O in S&P+. Michigan's sack rate allowed was pretty good (27th) largely because of Speight's excellent pocket presence. Late wobbles leave the door open a crack for Brandon Peters.
  3. The rest of the running back platoon. Chris Evans will headline after the bowl game touchdown; Ty Isaac and Karan Higdon also had their moments. Evans is a jittery speedster who promises to hit the home runs Smith could not. Higdon will probably pick up most of the mooseback work since he's a low-to-the-ground guy who runs behinds his pads, as they say. Isaac's never had it click, really, but played well in relatively limited opportunities last year.
  4. OL Ben Bredeson. Flat out bad most of the year, because he was a true freshman. Should get a lot better, whether it's at guard or tackle. Honestly we should just forget about this season entirely when it comes to projecting him down the road.
  5. FBs Henry Poggi and Khalid Hill. FB duo was quite a dichotomy. Hill led the team in touchdowns and paved various players on spectacular edge two-for-one blocks while catching 89% of the balls that came his way. Poggi was not the threat as a receiver or runner and was substantially below average as a blocker. Despite this the two FBs split time about down the middle.
  6. Kaiju. Devin Asiasi and Tyrone Wheatley Jr were mostly blockers. Both were up and down, as freshmen tend to be, flashing A+ power while occasionally falling off dudes. They were not targeted often but made the most of their opportunities. With Butt's absence Michigan will rely more heavily on both; the potential for a Leap from one or both entices.
  7. TE Ian Bunting. Looked like Butt 2.0 on a slick seam catch in the bowl game, and also looked like Butt 2.0 when he gave up a comically easy sack a few plays later. Previous bullet makes his role in the offense somewhat in question
  8. (Probably) WR Grant Perry. Legal troubles probably get pled down to misdemeanors and allow him to stay on the team. Slippery slot receiver will have a role if still around.
  9. RB Drake Johnson. Star-crossed running back lost last season to a forklift accident and will apply for a sixth year. Fast straight-line runner who will find a role.
  10. OL Juwann Bushell-Beatty. Temporarily the LT after Newsome left. Displaced after struggling mightily.

WHAT'S NEW, OR CLOSE ENOUGH, ANYWAY

30350541320_53f3c6e05f_z (1)

Bredeson is a returning starter, sort of[Fuller]

 

Basically the whole offensive line. For purposes of this bullet we're pretending freshman Ben Bredeson and not freshman Ben Bredeson are different people, because we need that to be the case. Michigan needs to replace three starters and get a transformation from the aforementioned; this is a lot of turnover. Mike Onwenu is penciled in at right guard and unlikely to be dislodged by anything short of a supernova; Bredeson will start somewhere. Cole exists. The other two spots are anyone's guess.

Ditto the receivers. Michigan got some good blocking, one bad drop, and one badass catch from Kekoa Crawford this year; Eddie McDoom took a bunch of jet sweeps and had one nice slant catch; Drake Harris was targeted deep several times, all of those incompletions except for one sweet catch invalidated by an unnecessary offensive pass interference call. That is the sum total of returning experience for the WR corps.

Tight ends in a post-Butt world. Ton of potential at the spot; probably fine; need to see that potential develop.

WHAT'S ROD STEWART 1977

31153398144_e07b9bfb84_z

[Fuller]

Probably Wilton Speight. Speight's 2016 did not have the clear takeoff narrative that Jake Rudock did. He was great for a couple games early, then bad, then indifferent, then awesome after the bye week until he turned into a pumpkin a third of the way through Iowa. He was terrific against Ohio State despite an injury that seemed to prevent him from throwing it downfield whatsoever... except for two turnovers 100% on him that lost the game. He gets an incomplete for the Orange Bowl since every time he dropped back he was beset by hounds instantly.

It would be much easier to draw an upward arrow if he'd packed the bad stuff in early and then got a lot better; unfortunately that is not the case. I'm still a Speight optimist for three reasons:

  1. Harbaugh. This should be self-explanatory but if you need a refresher here's the QB season preview.
  2. Speight seems to have the hardest thing down: pocket presence. His ability to turn garbage into first downs is exceptional for a guy his size.
  3. His good periods came after an opportunity to take a breather and focus on the things Harbaugh was coaching him to do. Speight was hot at the beginning of the season, after the bye, and after he missed the Indiana game. As we go along here he should be more that guy than the one who forgot and reverted to high school/Borges stuff when the heat got turned up.

Also, redshirt sophomores generally get better. It's not a big step from where he's currently at to an All Big Ten type season.

The three to five horsemen. I really like Chris Evans and Karan Higdon, and with Johnson, Isaac, Kareem Walker, and O'Maury Samuels also available this looks set to be a very deep and good running back crew. It may lack the out and out star that Najee Harris would have provided; I'm not stressing about the ballcarriers not getting what they should. All three returners graded significantly positively on PFF (relative to workload).

Blocky/catchy blocking. If one or both Kaiju takes a Williams-esque step forward and Hill gets most of the fullback work, Michigan's ability to generate yards off tackle will take a big step forward. Butt was an excellent player overall; he was average-at-best as a blocker.

WHAT'S ROD STEWART 2017

31272450610_5c33c73861_z (1)

Newsome's injury recover is critical [Bill Rapai]

Tackle. Hoke's OL recruiting was, in a word, disastrous. Michigan enters 2017 with exactly one Hoke-recruited OT: Bushell-Beatty. That means Michigan will have to do two of the following:

  • Get Grant Newsome back from a terrifying injury that kept him in the hospital for over a month. (FWIW, there's been some chatter that Newsome's injury doesn't have an unusually lengthy prognosis despite the hospital stay.)
  • Move Mason Cole back to the tackle spot he couldn't pass protect at.
  • Move Ben Bredeson out to tackle, where he might have the same issues Cole does.
  • Start Bushell-Beatty, who got beat up by Rutgers last year.
  • Start Nolan Ulizio, a low-rated redshirt sophomore.
  • Start a true freshman.

Two of those options might work out really well. But probably not.

 

 

WHAT'S HEISENBERG ROD STEWART UNCERTAINTY

30573791351_bbf19e31db_z

[Patrick Barron]

The guys on the end of Speight passes. Young receivers are usually bad. Of late, however, you're seeing a couple guys a year break through as true freshmen. Michigan has a couple of candidates in the 2017 class. Both Tarik Black and Donovan Peoples-Jones enrolled early, and both seem like sharp guys who will pick up the offense quickly. Add those guys to the McDoom/Crawford/Johnson troika that the coaching staff is high on and Drake Harris and it's not too hard to see Michigan being at least as good as they were this year.

Or they could be first-and-second year guys and run into each other on the regular. Ask again later.

Meanwhile, Michigan has a solid candidate to do Butt stuff in Ian Bunting. Still a difficult ask for anyone to live up to Butt's ability to reel in anything in his area.

The interior OL. At guard, a dropoff is unlikely from a true freshman and a guy who ended up –12 on the season per PFF. Michigan needs to do much more than tread water, though. Mike Onwenu is a unique prospect at one spot, and Bredeson will either be a lot better... or playing tackle, and then the other guard spot is a series of question marks. Cole stabilizes; whether or not these guys are any good is still very much an open question.

The Pep effect. Is Pep Hamilton an upgrade on Jedd Fisch? Does it even matter when Harbaugh's running things?

MANDATORY WILD ASS GUESS

Another mediocre season is in the offing unless Michigan gets a Christmas miracle an the offensive line that will probably feature one upperclassman and is 50/50 to sport another true freshman. That is a tough hill to climb for anyone. The skill positions should be good but are likely a year away from being able to offer win-games-on-our-own help—again Michigan is all but devoid of upperclassmen.

A projected Speight uptick is the main reason for optimism; it's asking a lot of him to be Andrew Luck in an environment where he's going to be running away an awful lot.

The good news is good news about 2018, when Michigan loses only a few projected contributors: Mason Cole, the fullbacks, Drake Johnson, and Ty Isaac. Whatever they find this year will enter 2018 just about unscathed.

Comments

Quailman

January 12th, 2017 at 3:10 PM ^

It's a lot easier to say a frosh WR or RB can get playing time and make some plays than to say an OL is going to be a factor.

For one, there is more rotation so more guys can play, and for two, they just need to make a big play every now and then to be impactful. Theres a bit more to that on the OL.

 

CalifExile

January 12th, 2017 at 3:25 PM ^

All true. I still think Filiaga is likely to prove a better option than JBB or Ulizio. Looking at the other options Brian set out reinforces my belief. I have great hope that Newsome will make a full recovery but I don't expect it to happen by September. Moving Cole to OT opens a different problem (I also suspect that Cole and Harbaugh have an agreement that everything possible will be done to get Cole experience on the interior line. That is the overwhelming impetus for his return after all.) FWIW, I suspect Bredeson will be the other OT, with Ruiz or Kugler at OG.

MI Expat NY

January 12th, 2017 at 2:26 PM ^

Far easier to project a true freshman WR getting time where reps can be split than projecting an OT is going to play every down as a true freshman.  Pure athleticism with a limited set of plays/responsibilities gets a stud WR on the field.  Nothing of the sort exists to get an OT on the field.  

UMQuadz05

January 12th, 2017 at 1:47 PM ^

Man, getting him back for the fall would be amazing; I hope your sources are correct.  The trickle-down effect from getting a #77-worthy LT back helps the whole line.

Ali G Bomaye

January 12th, 2017 at 1:47 PM ^

I don't like the idea of moving Mason Cole again. He's our only guy with significant positive experience, and a center can stabilize the entire line like no other position.

I hope we get Newsome back, of course, but aside from that question mark, I'd be in favor of rolling with youth. Something like Newsome-Bredeson-Cole-Onwenu-Filiaga (if Newsome returns) or Bredeson-Ruiz-Cole-Onwenu-Filiaga (if he doesn't). Unless Ulizio is the real deal, I don't see the point to playing him or JBB rather than a guy who has a chance to be a stud in 2018.

TrueBlue2003

January 12th, 2017 at 1:56 PM ^

Yes, he played well in the first two games and the few games after the bye, but those were also against terrible defenses.  That probably had more do to with the "good Speight" than anything else.  Here's hoping for a healthy OSU Speight without the "oh-no's".  If he is that, he'll be amazing.

Excellent summary.  And scary.  Never want to read that the fourth best returner was "flat out bad most of the year", but it's true.  It'll take a Herculean coaching effort to get this team to 9 wins.

Picking nits: Did you butcher the last paragraph? Should it be, "the bad news is good news about 2018"? With 2018 as the year in the last sentence? I'm thouroughly confused by everything going on there.

 

schreibee

January 12th, 2017 at 4:08 PM ^

Well no, Brian owns this blog and derives his living from covering, and opining about, Michigan athletics.

Which part of your living is derived from lurking here and criticizing Brian?

I'd go so far as to hazard a guess that you're actually consuming and commenting on the contents of this blog while purportedly "working" at your actual job?

yes or no?

The Oracle

January 12th, 2017 at 1:54 PM ^

I don't share the Speight enthusiasm. They played three close games, which all ended up as losses. In all three, he played poorly, and his play was the biggest factor in each loss. Yes, I know the O line was shredded against FSU, but there were still quite a few throws that were there that he couldn't complete. He did play well at times during the season, but I think he's operating with a very low ceiling. They need to get better at QB. Hopefully, either Peters or McCaffrey will be the guy, and sooner rather than later.

I Like Burgers

January 12th, 2017 at 3:25 PM ^

Michigan lost all three of those games because they couldn't run the ball or pass protect for shit.  In both the Iowa and Ohio State game, all Michigan needed to do was grind out some first downs, chew some clock, and salt the game away.  They couldn't come close to doing that.

And against FSU, they not only couldn't run the ball, they couldn't give Speight any time to throw.  A lot of his throws had to go early because of pressure.  Same thing happened against Ohio State too.  The pick six was a result of a dude running unimpeded forcing an early throw.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

January 12th, 2017 at 1:57 PM ^

I'm almost completely convinced Speight's shoulder was the reason for his dropoff at the end of the season.  Heal that thing up and our quarterback choices are between a returning starter with a year of really good experience, or a guy who managed to beat that guy out.  Not bad.

Magnus

January 12th, 2017 at 2:04 PM ^

I don't think that's a great conclusion. He hurt his shoulder at the end of the Iowa game. He was also ineffective for the first 95% of that game, as well as against the other good teams we faced this year. His play at the end of the year was basically on par with what he did all year against quality defenses.

schreibee

January 12th, 2017 at 3:06 PM ^

I will agree with this only to the extent that QB is unlikely to get worse next season, no matter who's playing, unlike several other parts of the team.

But I also do not have confidence that we haven't seen Speight's ceiling either, or close to it. He doesn't have any physical attributes to raise his game to the "star" level - not his arm, or his feet, and likely not his mind either. I base this on his reaction to pressure from the better defenses he faced.

I'll get tired of posting this eventually, but not yet:

After watching that Rose Bowl (and I can add the CFP title game now) I saw what great QB play can do for a team. Man, can it raise the level of everyone on offense. Release the ball more quickly, with more velocity, more accurately. Suddenly the OL seems better, the receivers look better, the RBs get holes as the D drops away from the line.

I want "star" play from QB, not game management.

Game Managment -that's the style that puts pressure on the other players on O to do their jobs perfectly...

Blue In NC

January 12th, 2017 at 3:40 PM ^

Agree that Speight is not likely to be a superstar but I don't see why he can't reach "end of the year Ruddock" status which is plenty to run a good offense and win a bunch of games.  Yes, likely not good enough to win the national championship but does anyone think next year's team is going to the playoffs?  Seems unlikely.

schreibee

January 12th, 2017 at 4:24 PM ^

This is a joint reply to NC & NY -

I think many have forgotten how many huge runs Rudock had towards the end of '15 & Bowl game. Not just escaping the pocket under pressure which Speight does well for a man of his gifts, but actual 15+ yard gains, 3rd down conversions, etc. And I still would take Sam Darnold in the Rose over even Rudock's Bowl game performance.

And he was very very accurate in those last few games (barring osu where he was knocked out of the game), including on deep balls. Speight never came all that close to late-stage Rudock, nor does he have the skillset to I believe, as I stated above.

And he has two more years of eligibility left - if Peters doesn't beat him out in '17, what's the odds someone will in '18? We should aim higher than game manager is my point, Think "superstar" QB. Hope we've recruited one or two already.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Magnus

January 12th, 2017 at 2:01 PM ^

I don't really buy the idea that De'Veon Smith got all the short yardage runs, so it dragged down his YPC. He had 13 runs on 3rd and 1-3 yards or 4th down out of 181 carries. That's 13/181. Ty Isaac had 7 such runs on 74 carries. That's 7/74. Also, Khalid Hill had 11/25 carries in those situations. Of course, Hill was only going to be a short yardage guy, but I just mention him to point out that he sucked up almost as many short yardage carries as Smith.

Anyway, Isaac had almost 1/10 of his carries in short yardage situations, and Smith had about 1/15. But Isaac averaged 5.6 YPC and Smith averaged 4.7.

stephenrjking

January 12th, 2017 at 2:03 PM ^

The offensive line is the component of the formula that is absolutely killer. It feels like it has been forever since it has been solid, and even in relatively "good" years like 2011 Michigan had trouble running straight forward when it needed to. 

I expect Speight to improve. He has already demonstrated a good understanding of the offense and a good sense for where to go with the ball; he just doesn't always get it there. That should tighten up, at least incrementally. 

Combine Speight improvement with a cadre of pass-catchers that I am optimistic about, and I think our passing game looks fine next season. We have three guys lined up ready to replace Butt that I think will be ok at it, and while we lost both outside receivers, Darboh was good but not great, and Chesson was a disappointment this past season. My guess is that at least one guy emerges as a reliable receiver and other guys show enough flashes to keep moving the team.

The pass-catching loss that may hurt us the most, if this winds up happening, is Grant Perry. His route-running skills would be valuable. But he might never play for us again.

I will say that while I like our RB choices, Evans and Higdon and Isaac all seem to go down too easily on contact. I would like to think Higdon can replace Smith's grinding runs, but he needs to be able to push through tackles first. Maybe Walker can be that guy?

It might not matter if our OL is as bad as I fear it may be.

stephenrjking

January 12th, 2017 at 4:10 PM ^

Speight, if anything, makes the line look good with his elusiveness in the pocket. But, as others said, pass protection wasn't the biggest issue (though it's hard to do much if, as in the FSU game, pass rushers are running straight up the gut unblocked). Speight generally knows where to go with his hot reads, too, even if he's not always accurate. 

Where the line hurts us is the inability to consistently run block. Great teams can line up, needing first downs to win, against a team that knows they are going to run, and run for first downs.

If Michigan does that against MSU in 15 or Iowa and OSU in 16 they win those games. Michigan could not do it. That's the playoff right there.

FWIW I don't think we've been up to snuff with elite receivers compared with the glory days of the mid and late Carr years, but Devin Gardner-Jeremy Gallon was statistically one of the best combinations Michigan has ever produced. 

markusr2007

January 12th, 2017 at 2:07 PM ^

Michigan took three (3) OL in 2015: Newsome, Ulizio and Runyan

Michigan took three (3) OL in 2016:  Bredeson, Onwenu, Spanellis

Michigan is taking six (6!!!) OL in 2017: Ruiz, Filiaga, Herbert, Hall, Steuber, Honigford,

OL still seems really thin - 15 guys even when we include returning Cole, Kugler and Beatty.

Why didn't Michigan make OL more of a priority in the 2016 class?

Another year (2018) of solid OL recruits should bolster things up nicely though for Michigan.

Also, won't 2017 also include WR 4-star recruit Brad Hawkins (2016, back from prep school)?

 

 

JWG Wolverine

January 12th, 2017 at 2:10 PM ^

A lot of shoes filled for the amount of players gone (especially when considering the significance of those leaving players). Shows the strength of Harbaugh's coaching and recruiting. This would be a rebuilding year for most teams, but because of the quality that he has brought to this program we might be as good as we were this year or better.

g_reaper3

January 12th, 2017 at 2:13 PM ^

At least Harbaugh has raised the bar to where Brian considers 10-3 a mediocre season...

Definitely not elite, but I think we finished ranked #10 and #12 the last two seasons. 

Personally, I think the young talent combined with good coaching and a somewhat favorable schedule (Florida, at PSU, at Wisconsin, OSU plus a bowl opponent are the likely tough games) probably puts us around 10-3 again.