[LOCKED] SpaceX successfully launched the Super-Heavy Starship
In it’s third test flight, the rocket successfully completed stage separation and reached orbital velocity today.
“NASA watched with keen interest: The space agency needs Starship to succeed in order to land astronauts on the moon in the next two or so years. This new crop of moonwalkers — the first since last century’s Apollo program — will descend to the lunar surface in a Starship, at least the first couple times.”
Plenty of Twitters with videos, but alas, my embed skills are lacking.
Moon colony for the grandkids and Mars colony for the great grandkids?
EDIT - I locked this. I cleaned it up some, but in the end, I locked it. Anything Elon-related is bound to generate mixed feelings, but that's fine, because he is a very mixed-up person. - LSA
Carpetbagger
March 14th, 2024 at 10:33 AM ^
Pretty amazing what that team has accomplished in 3 launches. 2 or so years sounds like Tesla "35k" electric car talk, but stretch goals motivate organizations for certain.
Joined: 12/31/2010
MGoPoints: 6677
42-27
March 14th, 2024 at 10:34 AM ^
In before thread gets locked for people fighting about Elon.
Joined: 06/23/2022
MGoPoints: 9282
Bando Calrissian
March 14th, 2024 at 10:42 AM ^
Frankly, it would be great if this could have been done by anyone else but him.
Joined: 07/02/2008
MGoPoints: 68136
MeanJoe07
March 14th, 2024 at 10:44 AM ^
Johnly, it is what it is.
Joined: 09/15/2013
MGoPoints: 73336
drjaws
March 14th, 2024 at 10:50 AM ^
Thomasly, it do be like that sometimes
Joined: 02/26/2014
MGoPoints: 47413
lmgoblue1
March 14th, 2024 at 1:40 PM ^
But it can't and it won't. So take it for what it is, a bunch of really smart people doing more than sitting behind a computer keyboard and bitching about somebody's politics. I'm sick of it. Grow the fuck up and enjoy history.
Joined: 10/27/2012
MGoPoints: 12428
GoBlue96
March 14th, 2024 at 10:35 AM ^
Not a fan of Elon but I appreciate what he is doing to push our limits in spaceX. My friend and U of M aerospace grad at NASA for 25 years is definitely following closely.
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 56025
PopeLando
March 14th, 2024 at 11:01 AM ^
If it’s any consolation, SpaceX employs some of the smartest people in the field, because it’s the only company doing this kind of work.
Musk has almost zero to do with it, certainly none of the technical aspects, and, if internet stories are to be believed, almost none of the managerial aspects either. There are rumors of a team that follows him around un-firing people he fires and un-making decisions he makes.
This is a great achievement for science, and we can be happy about it even though the company is owned by an idiot. Lots of companies are owned by idiots lol.
Joined: 08/01/2015
MGoPoints: 69308
Lakeyale13
March 14th, 2024 at 11:43 AM ^
Rockets. I like Rockets.
Joined: 11/16/2014
MGoPoints: 27401
dcmaizeandblue
March 14th, 2024 at 11:49 AM ^
What a hilarious example. No, Jim probably doesn’t deserve as much credit as you’d give him. Hell he didn’t coach half the games!!!
and musk deserves even less.
Joined: 04/01/2010
MGoPoints: 6892
Spontaneous Co…
March 14th, 2024 at 11:45 AM ^
That is pretty funny. I would like to job shadow that team for a week just for shits and giggles.
Joined: 01/04/2011
MGoPoints: 927
yossarians tree
March 14th, 2024 at 12:29 PM ^
You want to know how you're an idiot? When you think that the guy who runs Tesla and SpaceX is an idiot. But, but..."if internet stories are to be believed." Sorry if he makes you feel smaller.
Joined: 08/19/2010
MGoPoints: 22308
NotAMichiganSpy
March 14th, 2024 at 2:55 PM ^
Your 2nd paragraph sounds completely made up. Like some Elon hater fiction. You're basically claiming Space X has shadow management and Elon is too stupid to notice them defying him.
Lemme guess, he fires the same person every Tuesday and still hasn't noticed because he's soooooo stupid?
Joined: 10/19/2023
MGoPoints: 1496
GoBlue96
March 14th, 2024 at 10:37 AM ^
uh oh
❖ SPACEX REPORTS LOSS OF COMMUNICATION WITH STARSHIP ROCKET DURING ATMOSPHERIC RE-ENTRY AT END OF TEST FLIGHT
❖ SPACEX COMMENTATOR SAYS 'WE MAY HAVE LOST STARSHIP'
Joined: 07/01/2008
MGoPoints: 56025
JohnnyBlue
March 14th, 2024 at 10:40 AM ^
Each test gets further and they get to test new things. This was a pretty solid success.
Joined: 01/18/2011
MGoPoints: 2978
MGoGrendel
March 14th, 2024 at 11:27 AM ^
It's like burning a pile of cash in hopes that some sort of Phoenix rises from the ashes.
Joined: 01/21/2013
MGoPoints: 70499
Clarence Boddicker
March 14th, 2024 at 12:08 PM ^
X (formerly known as Twitter) says, "Hold my beer."
Joined: 05/27/2011
MGoPoints: 72091
S.D. Jones
March 14th, 2024 at 5:04 PM ^
Don't worry, they're probably still touring.
Joined: 01/28/2011
MGoPoints: 15453
Broken Brilliance
March 14th, 2024 at 10:44 AM ^
Popcorn for me. Tissues for many others that are sure to post here.
Joined: 09/07/2010
MGoPoints: 7717
Kapitan Howard
March 14th, 2024 at 12:20 PM ^
My first impulse was not to jack off to a rocket launch, but it does have a big phallic object going up...
Joined: 07/30/2009
MGoPoints: 6749
Broken Brilliance
March 14th, 2024 at 2:01 PM ^
Don't kink shame
Joined: 09/07/2010
MGoPoints: 7717
drjaws
March 14th, 2024 at 10:45 AM ^
Elon, Gwynne, and the SpaceX team have done some incredible stuff in the last 18 years or so.
I even used one of his rockets to send an experiment I was working on to the Space Station so astronauts could work on it in zero gravity. Sitting in the VIP area with SpaceX employees to watch the launch was cool.
Joined: 02/26/2014
MGoPoints: 47413
Wendyk5
March 14th, 2024 at 10:47 AM ^
We're in Arizona and saw a Tesla Cybertruck yesterday. Not nearly as successful as the SpaceX launch.
Joined: 11/20/2008
MGoPoints: 68418
42-27
March 14th, 2024 at 10:59 AM ^
The Cybertruck is what happens when engineers get together and ask, "How can we make a Pontiac Aztec even uglier?"
Joined: 06/23/2022
MGoPoints: 9282
Clarence Boddicker
March 14th, 2024 at 12:10 PM ^
And also, maybe, spontaneously blow up.
Joined: 05/27/2011
MGoPoints: 72091
DelGriffith
March 14th, 2024 at 12:25 PM ^
And also, let's have it get stuck when it sees 3" of snow!
Joined: 11/01/2023
MGoPoints: 2686
blueheron
March 14th, 2024 at 12:45 PM ^
I get that the Cybertruck might be an acquired taste, but I like several aspects of its design.
Joined: 03/26/2009
MGoPoints: 31716
getsome
March 14th, 2024 at 10:56 AM ^
9 million pounds total or something like that, with the fuel and all.
impressive engineering
Joined: 09/07/2013
MGoPoints: 7386
Amazinblu
March 14th, 2024 at 11:08 AM ^
I wonder how much of the Saturn V booster technology was re-used.
It seems the focus on the Space Shuttle (for decades) may have resulted in large single / multiple stage launch vehicles being lost.
Most science successes are good (in the long run) for humanity.
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 42358
1VaBlue1
March 14th, 2024 at 12:59 PM ^
"I wonder how much of the Saturn V booster technology was re-used."
None. Super Heavy (the booster) and Starship (the orbital vehicle) are brand new designs using the latest technology (and innovating technology where needed) - including the 9m wide rolled stainless steel body. The Raptor methane engines are a new design, also, and cost ~$10M/each to provide as much boost as the Shuttle hydrogen engines. (Which, BTW, are what is being used on the Space Launch System (SLS) boosters that NASA made and cost ~$75M/ea to refurbish, or ~$120-150M each to build new.) Also, there is no way in hell that Shuttle technology (any of it) can be turned into a reusable thing by re-lighting engines in flight for a controlled, powered landing.
To summarize, SpaceX has built the largest, most powerful rocket the world has ever seen without re-using technology from 50-some years ago. (The RS-25 engines were originally designed in the 70's).
Joined: 01/31/2016
MGoPoints: 127670
Amazinblu
March 14th, 2024 at 2:58 PM ^
Thanks - I appreciate the detail.
I'm familar that Apollo and earlier platforms were liquid fuel - as compared to solid fuel for STS (Space Shuttle) - but, obviously am not familiar with the technologies available and being deployed by SpaceX. The one reference point I think of is - the technology used on Apollo and the early STS launches had less "compute power" than the average smart phone people use daily.
There are other details regarding STS that I'm aware of - but, SpaceX is definitely a new age in exploration.
Joined: 01/22/2010
MGoPoints: 42358
maizenblue87
March 14th, 2024 at 11:05 AM ^
My son just texted me about this. He’s finishing his MSE in Space Systems at Michigan. He said he cried when the vehicle reached orbit.
Joined: 06/22/2011
MGoPoints: 6669
TeslaRedVictorBlue
March 14th, 2024 at 11:36 AM ^
we landed on the moon in 1969. So, in 2024, we're ... landing on the moon again, but via private enterprise? Here's my uneducated meh...
What i thought was really cool was this program (forget the name) I saw in a commercial on BTN (go figure) last night about Penn State sending a small vehicle (Dragonfly?) to Titan. Will take 8 years to get there!
Reminds me of the Carl Sagan demonstration on how big the galaxy is, and how that's a drop in the bucket of the entire universe. cool video
Joined: 09/02/2021
MGoPoints: 35399
WindyCityBlue
March 14th, 2024 at 12:26 PM ^
Along those lines, its worth noting that the moon is farther away from earth than what people think. To put it in perspective, you can fit about 30 earths between us and the moon. It's extremely difficult to get to the moon and the legacy shuttle program couldn't do it.
Joined: 07/23/2008
MGoPoints: 41447
1VaBlue1
March 14th, 2024 at 1:18 PM ^
"...landing on the moon again, but via private enterprise?"
No. The Gov't is funding the Artemis program. However, the Lunar Lander part of that program is a contract from NASA to SpaceX to build the lander, which will be a version of the Starship that just made orbit today. NASA is throwing ~$3B at SpaceX to build a human rated spaceship that can land on the moon. SpaceX is privately funding the SH booster and the base Starship design, and have spent somewhere in the neighborhood of $10-15B on the program to date.
FWIW, the money SpaceX has spent on SH/Starship so far, has also built the manufacturing, testing, and launch facilities. Along with all of the tooling and SW required by all of it. Compare that to the ~$25B NASA has spent on SLS to date - which features engine, booster tankage, and solid fuel rocket re-use from the Shuttle program to push a 1970's style capsule.
Joined: 01/31/2016
MGoPoints: 127670
RGard
March 14th, 2024 at 4:41 PM ^
They plan to rename 'Titan' to 'Paterno Moon'.
Joined: 10/20/2014
MGoPoints: 57391
waittilnextyear
March 14th, 2024 at 5:16 PM ^
That's pretty far just to find someone that can teach James Franklin how to coach.
Joined: 09/11/2021
MGoPoints: 16304
NittanyFan
March 14th, 2024 at 11:37 AM ^
It's fascinating seeing the rocket launches (everything about this is fascinating). I was driving through Santa Clarita, CA Sunday evening and could see the rocket launch from Vandenberg ~125 miles away. It gets up in a hurry!!!
Joined: 12/04/2012
MGoPoints: 43802
bronxblue
March 14th, 2024 at 11:43 AM ^
It does sound like they don't know where the rocket wound up when it broke up above the Indian Ocean, in the sense they don't know if it landed in the ocean or somewhere else, which isn't optimal. And I'm somewhat certain we'll find out this launch led to some protected marshland or people's homes being destroyed because they yet again didn't do the math/lied about the resource usage and resulting energy dispersed from this launch, but I guess if NASA is going to hitch their wagon to SpaceX that's sort of the deal.
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 172039
JohnnyBlue
March 14th, 2024 at 11:57 AM ^
It was a Ballistic Trajectory, the landing area is a very empty area. Also there were tracking planes in there area to capture additional data because they expected to lose communication with Starship at reentry.
Joined: 01/18/2011
MGoPoints: 2978
Alton
March 14th, 2024 at 12:00 PM ^
Yeah, it's basically the same empty expanse of ocean where NASA dumped all of the Space Shuttle External Tanks. Even if the trajectory got messed up somehow, it isn't landing on anything but deep ocean.
Joined: 07/05/2008
MGoPoints: 13321
bronxblue
March 14th, 2024 at 12:34 PM ^
That's good to know. Honestly, I didn't think it landed on someone's house or anything but from what I read yesterday they had hoped to track it farther than it wound up happening today.
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 172039
goblu330
March 14th, 2024 at 11:55 AM ^
In my mind, Lawrence Fishburne is on every one of these crews.
Joined: 01/07/2022
MGoPoints: 32215
Clarence Boddicker
March 14th, 2024 at 12:28 PM ^
Let's make it weird and send Sam Neill up there too.
Joined: 05/27/2011
MGoPoints: 72091
goblu330
March 14th, 2024 at 12:29 PM ^
Love it.
Joined: 01/07/2022
MGoPoints: 32215
RGard
March 14th, 2024 at 4:44 PM ^
Joined: 10/20/2014
MGoPoints: 57391
Bluetotheday
March 14th, 2024 at 12:01 PM ^
Incredible. What an accomplishment for Space X
Joined: 02/27/2013
MGoPoints: 9867
tpilews
March 14th, 2024 at 12:14 PM ^
Rocket launches are one of those things that TV gives zero justice to. We saw a launch maybe 10 or 15 years ago in Titusville. Insane the brightness and how loud and how much you could feel the launch, even from 15ish miles away.
Joined: 10/17/2008
MGoPoints: 3125
Maizinator
March 14th, 2024 at 12:38 PM ^
Now that it has experienced slightly lower gravity, all the Teslas' clocks are off by a fraction of a second.
Joined: 12/11/2013
MGoPoints: 99947
Swayze Howell Sheen
March 14th, 2024 at 12:42 PM ^
Despite everything weird about Musk, I hope for their success (generally).
Joined: 10/05/2008
MGoPoints: 47359