Mongo

January 20th, 2020 at 8:59 PM ^

Friends this matters shit.  We are so far behind Alabama, Clemson, LSU, Georgia, Oklahoma and OSU ... who cares?

Bodogblog

January 21st, 2020 at 9:41 AM ^

Mattison is also an excellent recruiter.  As is Brown their DL coach.  They have an excellent recruiting team now with Coombs.  

I think Mattison was brought in as a recruiter first and foremost, because this probably isn't Day's strong suit (rather he's an unbelievable play caller).  

FL_Blue_

January 21st, 2020 at 1:49 PM ^

Mattison the the DC. He calls the formations. Halfley was the co DC but it's Mattison's D

 

Coombs has never been a DC and pretty sure he will be similar to Halfley, role wise. He get a huge raise (I wasn't aware NFL position coaches got paid so little relative to college coaches) and he's from Ohio. If Fickell leaves at UC, I wouldn't be surprised to see him at UC 

Mr Miggle

January 21st, 2020 at 3:50 PM ^

OSU already has one of the top DL coaches and recruiters in the country in Larry Johnson. Their need was for a DC.

They aren't taking a redundant coach and paying him $1M a year to hurt Michigan. That kind of move would potentially hurt them more.

Zach Harrison was gone as soon as The Game was over and he signed with OSU 3 weeks before Mattison left.

Couzen Rick's

January 21st, 2020 at 12:54 PM ^

The ONLY reason they hired Mattison, is because he, along with Al Washington, were our main recruiters for Ohio. By hiring both of them, they cut off any pipeline we have left in that state especially with Mattison, who had been recruiting that state for Michigan since 2011 under Hoke.

Bodogblog

January 21st, 2020 at 10:14 AM ^

Michigan almost certainly would have made the playoff in 2016 and 2018 had it played in the Big 12 in Oklahoma's place. 

Per S&P, the highest ranked B12 teams in 2016 after Oklahoma were Okl St at #13 (10-3), Baylor #32 (7-6), West Va #33 (10-3), and TCU #34 (6-7).  Contrast that to the B1G highest rated excluding Michigan: #10 OSU (11-2), #11 PSU (11-3), #16 Wisconsin (11-3), and #24 Minnesota (9-4).  

In 2018 this was Okl St at #22 (7-6), West Va #24 (8-4), Texas #32 (10-4), and Texas Tech #37 (5-7).  Contrast that to #6 OSU (13-1), #15 PSU (9-4), #19 Wisconsin (8-5), and #23 Iowa (9-4).  

 

JPC

January 20th, 2020 at 11:13 PM ^

Ah, so they beat them three years ago, haven’t played them since, and now it doesn’t matter? Did you actually think about what you wrote before hitting “save”? 
 

This is the internet so I don’t expect much, yet you still manage to disappoint. Oklahoma isn’t the 6th or worst team in the B1G and it’s beyond stupid to suggest it. 

Blue in Paradise

January 20th, 2020 at 11:28 PM ^

Wut?  How many starters from those 2017 teams are still playing CFB?  How many coaches from those staffs are even around?

So you think that game from 3 years ago is more important than what happened in 2019 (or 2018 for that matter)?

The biggest OOC win by a Big 12 team in 2019 was Texas beating Louisiana Tech - impressive stuff.  And no Texas beating a Utah team that DGAF in some toilet bowl game wasn’t a better win than beating LT.

Remember_the_G…

January 20th, 2020 at 9:56 PM ^

I’ve come to the sad sad pitiful realization that I need to stop caring about OSU. Because I’ve cared so much the last two pretty good seasons have been ruined (bowl games didn’t help). Hope we go 11-0 next year. Maybe by the time OSU is a game away from tying up the all time series something will have changed in the NCAA to give us an advantage or maybe a meteor will wipe their program from the face of the earth. Either equally likely. 

Michigan4Life

January 20th, 2020 at 11:21 PM ^

Recruiting rankings may be the same but Clemson churn out more high draft picks than Michigan like Watkins, Nuk, Watson, Wilkins, Lawrence, Ferrell, etc.

Clemson had 8 1st round draft picks while Michigan had 4 1st round picks in Harbaugh's tenure. Clemson had 30 draft picks while Michigan had 25. Clemson was able to develop more elite talents that can compete with Bama, OSU, etc. Michigan gets blown out by OSU and Bama.

tpilews

January 21st, 2020 at 12:41 AM ^

It's been fairly close. Clemson has averaged 0.9063 over its last 5 classes (105 signees), which would be about the 250th ranked kid in the class. 

Michigan averaged 0.8997 over the same period with 116 signees. 0.8997 would be about the 285th ranked player. 

OSU averaged 0.9249 w/ 116 signees. Roughly 183rd ranked player. 

ak47

January 21st, 2020 at 9:52 AM ^

The difference is a lack of elite players, mostly at QB. Clemson takes more three star guys than Michigan but gets more top 50 and top 10 guys while Michigan gets a lot of guys ranked 100-200. This is also why you see a lot more Clemson guys at the top of the NFL draft than Michigan despite them not getting a ton more guys into the NFL overall. And those elite guys are the difference in the big games, especially at QB where we've had a parade of mediocre.

Bluedream

January 21st, 2020 at 12:36 AM ^

An elite QB would be nice but the so-called QB whisperer has been mute since he got here. Shea was a 5* #1 in his class and that’s the best Harbaugh could do? You think Harbaugh develops Burrow as well as Brady did or as well as Day did with a first year starter two years in a row? Starting to think Luck was a transcendent college QB and Harbaugh just managed not to screw him up. 
 

I’d add an elite RB, considerably better OL and a much deeper DL. But yeah, those 4 things + a better game day coach and we might be a playoff team. 

TruBluMich

January 20th, 2020 at 9:01 PM ^

"... but I also like that he knows Ohio State and he knows how to recruit to Ohio State."

Anyone can be a hell of a recruiter if they "know how to recruit to Ohio State".