Did anyone watch Army yesterday?

Submitted by UM Indy on December 23rd, 2018 at 9:38 AM

Surprised this hasn’t been mentioned. They’re on our schedule next season, they return 19 starters, they won 11 games and they absolutely destroyed Houston. They don’t throw crossing routes though so maybe we’ll be OK. 

bacon1431

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:03 AM ^

Scheduling a service academy is a lose lose situation. They run an offense that we will never see again throughout the year. Army is a legitimately solid team. I would not be surprised if we won or lost a close game, particularly because it’s early in the season and we replace a lot on defense. What we return on offense comforts me though as I don’t think their front 7 will be able to stand up against our OL

West Coast Struttin

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:05 AM ^

Watched last night. They are a damn good team. Defense attacks the football hard to cause fumbles. Wish our D did that.

Don

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:08 AM ^

AUTONATION CURE BOWL

RAYCOM MEDIA CAMELLIA BOWL

CHERIBUNDI BOCA RATON BOWL

DXL FRISCO BOWL

BAD BOY MOWERS GASPARILLA BOWL

MAKERS WANTED BAHAMAS BOWL

FAMOUS IDAHO POTATO BOWL

JARED BIRMINGHAM BOWL

DOLLAR GENERAL BOWL

SERVPRO FIRST RESPONDER BOWL

QUICK LANE BOWL

CHEEZ-IT BOWL

ACADEMY SPORTS + OUTDOORS TEXAS BOWL

CAMPING WORLD BOWL

NOVA HOME LOANS ARIZONA BOWL

BELK BOWL

 

If one of the side effects of playoff expansion is the death of some of these, that's a good thing.

spiff

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:27 AM ^

Why, exactly?  I don’t see how they hurt you in any way. And the teams playing in them get practice time, a free trip to a new (probably) place, another game to play. Oh, and the swag bags. 

Yes, they enrich some men in blazers. But I have to assume the players enjoy them. Bowl games have existed for decades. And most of those didn’t impact the nat’l title. So if there are 5 bowls or 50. What the f do you care? Just don’t watch them if they offend your sensibilities. 

BlueMan80

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:14 AM ^

For everyone wondering if Harbaugh will ever open up the offense, the Army game should answer that question.  You get up by 2 TDS early on a team like that and it’s a mountain for them to climb because it takes them so long to score grinding it out on the ground.

Bambi

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:15 AM ^

I've been meaning to make a post about this but I don't think they actually return 19 starters. If you go to this depth chart from Ourlads it says 19 returning starters, but if you go to their official depth chart there's a lot more seniors listed. I think Army does the same thing as us and doesn't list redshirts so it messes up depth charts in that sense.

For example, DT Raymond Wright for Army is listed as a junior on Ourlads and senior on the official depth chart. According to his Army bio he's played in at least 5 games in 4 seasons, so I don't know how he'd be a junior. Maybe I'm missing something with service academies or medical redshirts but it seems like he's clear cut done now.

I can find another 4 guys who fit the same criteria, all on defense, just with a quick look at Army's depth chart. I also know that their starting QB last year didn't officially graduate and leave the team until this past August and could have petitioned to play if they really wanted last year. So while they return a lot, it probably won't be 19 starters a lot.

 

Arb lover

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:46 AM ^

They only have 2 people without eligibility next year of those who start. Center and Fullback. 

Yes, they have a number of people who have been at west point for 4 years and redshirted (Both TE's for example). What you don't see from service academies (no surprise) is people leaving early for the NFL.

Absent the war years, and some teens/twenties stuff, this is the best Army has ever been. (At a minimum, the best in 60 years). If you think army brass wants to take those 5 RS seniors and send them to korea, afghanistan, OK, NC, TN NY and GA, to be junior officers when they have a chance at a maybe 1 loss season next year.... mkay. If you think those RS seniors want to forgo their final year (War college is a strong motivator for officers, i.e. military grad school), again, they all want to return if they can. 

They will be back. While I don't think we will lose, it will be more of a fight than many of you suspect (hopefully not). 

Unicycle Firefly

December 23rd, 2018 at 11:03 AM ^

There are no redshirts at the service academies. You're there for four years, and that's it (barring some type of medical/academic incident, but you wouldn't be playing in that case). The way they "redshirt" is to send a small amount of recruits to a separate, one-year military prep school to play against local community colleges. Since none of them leave early for the NFL, they spend years in the same system, have a good amount of depth and experience, and can reload pretty easily once they have the program established.

Arb lover

December 23rd, 2018 at 9:12 PM ^

Army absolutely holds on to some guys for a 5th year(extra semester) if it works out for them and the cadet. 

Of the two "starting seniors" on the team, one started his first year (FB Darnell Woolfolk). He's graduating in 4 as a true senior.

OT/Center Bryce Holland has been on the roster for 5 years, since 2014, and redshirted as a freshman. Do they call it a redshirt? Not necessarily, but they hold guys from going in that first year if it works out to do so. There's a QB from AA Huron a while back who that happened to as well. 

Go Blue Eyes

December 23rd, 2018 at 11:12 AM ^

Do any of the service academies even have fifth year seniors?  They are all four year institutions whose primary purpose is to graduate military officers in four years. 

Edit: Arb Lover has the answer above.  I did find an interesting article on Army and how their numbers are assigned.  Quite interesting reading:

https://goarmywestpoint.com/news/2012/10/18/Numbers_Count.aspx

Mpfnfu Ford

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:20 AM ^

I'm just happy that the people who run Illinois or Rutgers or whatever are too stupid to hire Jeff Monken. Heaven forbid Illinois or Rutgers hire a coach who "can't recruit NFL level talent." I just don't know how they'd get on.

The Fugitive

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:24 AM ^

I'm sure they're going to score against our young defense. It would be foolish to think we will keep them below 20 points. 

I don't like the #BodyBlows offense but it will be key to keeping the defense fresh and wearing down their smaller players. It is imperative to score touchdowns early and often in an effort to make it a 2 touchdown game ASAP. 

Remember_the_G…

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:27 AM ^

Not super excited to play them but here’s a little tidbit you’ll probably hear next year: Two FBS teams that have played Michigan more than 4 times have a winning record against them. 

USC is 6-4 (a lot of Rose Bowl losses)

Army is 5-4

Cornell is the only other team of any classification at 6-12 which will probably stick. 

Perkis-Size Me

December 23rd, 2018 at 10:29 AM ^

Taken a long time, but Army finally has a great coach and a great team. They’re not going to be intimidated by Michigan (hell, if I was going through the grind of being a cadet at West Point, I wouldn’t be intimidated by anything Michigan does, either), and they will come in expecting to win.

That game is going to be a grind. Why in the hell would you ever schedule a service academy? Why? 

micheal honcho

December 23rd, 2018 at 1:50 PM ^

This game was more support for my belief that if a team could get even a nice handful of 4* and majority 3* athletes to commit to a system offense like Army, they would win championships. Army was simply abusing Houston’s superior athletes with discipline and strategy. Army’s lineman could have told Houston’s front where the play was going and they still wouldn’t have stopped it. 

clarkiefromcanada

December 23rd, 2018 at 3:09 PM ^

This post is bad OP. You should feel bad.

Houston has no quality wins against anybody. They scored a lot of points against the worst of the American and a bunch of other poor non-conference opponents. They are awful and gave up a lot of points to any team with a pulse. 

Michigan will have to exercise gap discipline but will otherwise offer way too much in the way of defensive speed and offensive mauling.

Man, the concern troll is high of late.

MichiganStan

December 23rd, 2018 at 3:24 PM ^

I don't even care about next years schedule. Look at what happened with this years schedule. We thought Wisconsin, PSU, and MSU were going to be a gauntlet yet they were all relatively easy wins

arrowhead

December 23rd, 2018 at 3:27 PM ^

I noted a while ago that the Army offense is JH-ball with the pass attack.. Army took Okie to overtime before losing the road game. So why was everyone bashing JH for a ball control offense yet praising Army for the same?

M-Dog

December 23rd, 2018 at 6:24 PM ^

Because their's actually scores.

We don't hate ball-control offenses.  We hate ball-control offenses that don't score points.

If JH wants an offense that has 15 play 10 minute drives and finishes with TD's, we're all for it. 

But fergodsake, don't have an offense that produces just 2 field goals for the entire first half against anybody good.

 

 

dipshit moron

December 23rd, 2018 at 3:39 PM ^

surprised? let's see. a peach bowl, spring practice, summer conditioning, fall practice, a game against middle tenn. state, and 256 days until the army game. but we should be thinking about that game, why?