Was lack of pass rush the cause of this historic aberration?
If you're not interested in a rehash post please feel free to stop reading now and my apologies for cluttering the board.
I realize posting at this time when everyone is angry/frustrated is ill advised, but many of us are trying to process and understand how our #1 defense served up the worst performance in the history of the rivalry. We all want this categorized, understood and processed so we can move on mentally and emotionally.
A simple take that might provide such understanding is that this game was defined by the lack of pass rush, period. No pass rush exposed Michigan in 2 ways:
1. Brown's defense is unduly reliant on pass rush, without which it has glaring weaknesses.
2. Haskins is arguably the best passing QB in Big Ten history and the lack of pressure gave him time to follow Indiana's blue print and expose those weaknesses in a way only someone of his caliber could.
A talent or speed gap was not the cause. It was a defense over reliant on an element that was missing, coming face to face with the best QB arguably in generations to expose that missing element. Can anyone point to another game where the pass rush was this non-existent in the Don Brown era? Please elaborate on if I'm way off here but this is how I am processing this aberration of a game unless educated otherwise.
Thanks in advance for any input.
November 27th, 2018 at 1:40 PM ^
We may get to find out. Ohio State "turned on" like they did this past Saturday the same way in 2014 in what was also a pass heavy offense and won the whole damn thing. Part of me would like to see OSU roll NW to get a crack at Alabama just to see it. If they played like they did on Saturday I think it would be a close game. Contrary to your statement, Michigan is not terrible, not by a long shot. But I agree that OSU made them look that way. I think Ohio State may quite a bit better than you think they are when they are all on the same page.
November 27th, 2018 at 12:56 PM ^
I think there were several factors at play. Winovich and Gary were both dinged up and were playing at about 75%, our interior defensive line is relatively young and inexperienced and was not generating any pressure in the middle, OSU's offensive line is better than they have been playing and came to play against a hated rival, Watson and Gil were completely overmatched so Brown was hesitant to blitz anybody when we were getting toasted already.
I think after the first drive he was essentially forced to just hope we could generate pressure with our front four but we couldn't due to players not being 100% and an Ohio State offensive line that just played a really good game. I think that is what is getting lost in this. I don't really think the issue is really that much what Michigan did or didn't do. OSU just played a nearly impeccable football game.
November 27th, 2018 at 1:29 PM ^
Agree. Certainly Gary and Winovich were hurt/slowed down. Two players of that caliber being off their game is going to be huge every time. Also, Aubrey was out. The interior line w/o him (and maybe with) is not the Hurst level we saw last year.
What I don't quite understand is why Bush, Hudson or Safeties never got to Haskins either.
All in all, I agree the #1 reason we lost was not being able to get to Haskins or hardly disrupt him.
November 27th, 2018 at 9:11 PM ^
Like we always do in the biggest game of the year?
Oh, wait . . .