FreddieMercuryHayes

October 28th, 2014 at 10:49 AM ^

So not firing arguably the best coach in America qualifies him as doing a great job? I didn't stab any of my patients in the neck yesterday withy pen either; does that mean I'm doing a great job? I'm not saying everything Brandon has done is bad, and he does deserve his share of credit for upgrading facilities and upgrading assistant pay. But that stuff was the lowest of low hanging fruit for an AD. And facility upgrades were already being talked about before Brandon walked in the door. I'm sorry, but you can't say he deserves to keep his job because he doesn't fuck up the easiest 50% while ignoring the clusterfuck he's made of the 50% that needs actual leadership and brain power.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

howmuch

October 28th, 2014 at 11:56 AM ^

I personally am hoping for Brandon to go. But, I think it doesn't really matter how you feel about Brandon he still needs to go. The rest of the sporting world precieves him as being on thin ice. He could be fired at any time, so what reasonable head coach would want to come to Michigan and most likely get swept away with the AD within a year?

snoopblue

October 28th, 2014 at 6:56 AM ^

They could definitely negotiate a resignation scenario where Hoke gets the 2015 buyout money now at the benefit of the program. Could probably make a package to pay Brandon a little less too to part ways now. They won't take it, and it is a lot of money to just leave on the table, but based on all their talk about their love for Michigan, etc. you'd think they would. They don't care about anything but the money at this point. 

The way Hoke has apologized to Dantonio for this stupid stake incident shows me a level of weakness that you never want out of a leader. It's almost like he's trying to show everyone that even though he is a terrible coach, he is still a "good man" so that he can get hired doing something after he's done @ Michigan.

Whatever happens, that money they save by keeping this circus going should definitely be put RIGHT back in to the new coaching staffs salary. BEST AVAILABLE coaching staff with experience winning/developing players in the NFL or top tier of college football (BCS). Knowledge of the Michigan tradition? Former Player? Those two things are great, but not necessary. No point in getting all excited for Harbaugh or Miles when realistically neither of them are coming.

LSAClassOf2000

October 28th, 2014 at 6:57 AM ^

It's because the job requires more strength and savvy than Hoke can muster, and being a good guy who cares deeply about the program isn't enough.

What I find morbidly amusing about this passage is that it is essentially the same conclusion that large segments of this board have had as well. I personally agree myself - this year in particular has shown me at least that Hoke simply seems like someone out of his element at this level of the game, as it were. 

GoBlueSimon

October 28th, 2014 at 6:59 AM ^

Assuming they don't screw up the next hire, and the new guy can develop talent, Michigan should be successful NEXT YEAR.  There's so much talent on this team and all of it's being wasted by Hoke.

Njia

October 28th, 2014 at 7:22 AM ^

For the players, I'm sure this is a terrible realization. They haven't played well - for whatever reason - and their coaches will be held accountable. I'm sure most would rather take the bullet than see their coaches get fired. It sucks, but that's life.

None of them signed up for this, but Gerry Rafferty perhaps said it best:

Life is a liar, yeah life is a cheat
It'll lead you on and pull the ground from underneath your feet.

 

TSimpson77

October 28th, 2014 at 7:32 AM ^

If Brady loves Michigan like he says he does and would have walked to Michigan, he will walk away. He has to realize that the players deserve better, maybe not a better person/people but better coaching, development and utilization of their skills. I like that Hoke has graduated players and brought in good quality kids, but it's just time for him to go.

Hannibal.

October 28th, 2014 at 8:07 AM ^

Might have had a chance at a bowl game if we had fired Hoke after week 3 like USC fired Kiffin last year and ended up winning 10 games.  But we didn't, so here we are once again, for the fifth time in seven years, going into November completely hopeless, with Spartans and Buckeyes pissing in their pants, laughing their ass off at us. 

Magnum P.I.

October 28th, 2014 at 8:50 AM ^

I agree. Too late now, but I think we would've been better off in the long term handing things over to an interim after Minnesota. Ending the season with a tiny bit of momentum (a big assumption given an interim, but one I think is fair) would be better than ending it in a big crater, which is where we're likely to end up on the present course. 

SysMark

October 28th, 2014 at 8:29 AM ^

I know it's awkward, and unusual for a terminated head coach, but in his case it might work having him remain in some capacity.  If nothing else he could be an effective recruiter, and it would look less like a typical, total regime change.

Gitback

October 28th, 2014 at 9:29 AM ^

This article was spot on, at least he captures the sentiment from my perspective perfectly.  Some folks want to bash Hoke, but he doesn't deserve that.  A critique, however, is fine, and it is legitmiate to say that this is simply too big of a stage for him; especially when things start to spiral out of control.  It's easy for things to go bad fast at a place like Michigan, much more so than a Ball State or SDSU, because the expections are so much higher and demands are so much greater.  While in some respects you have more margin for error here given the "cache" of the school, which brings in more talent and resources; but on the flip side of that, once the negativity gets rolling and the downhill momentum starts picking up speed, it takes some serious know-how to reverse things.  This was the first time in his career that Brady was faced with a series of problems hitting him all at once at a place that doesn't "let things ride" for very long.  He wasn't up to the task.  Gotta call it for what it is.   

However, I reject the notion that Hoke can't be a "great guy" if he doesn't show some occassional "dickishness," a-la Dantonio or Kelly.  Hoke is who he is.  "Dickishness" just isn't something that's in his DNA.  We can debate all day about whether or not having a bit of "prick" in your personality is required to be successful at the highest levels (Bo certainly had it, so did Lloyd), but "great guys" don't have to also be surly on occassion, and they can be appreciated for being fundamentally decent, even if that means they don't have what it takes to win at the "big time" schools.

I was a student manager during Hoke's first year back in '95.  Mattison had been the "boss" of the student managers until he was promoted to DC after Coach Mo was shown the door.  Hoke was awesome to us.  Unlike Mattison, who gave us our orders (through the senior manager) and sent us on our way, Hoke actually "talked" to us as a group... asked us how we were doing, whether we needed anything to make our jobs easier.  Mattison was a nice enough guy, but he, like so many other coaches, was so laser focused on his own responsibilities, that the managers were generally treated as a set of tools to keep things running.  We knew we we're doing okay if we weren't getting noticed (kind of like O-lineman).  Hoke, though, approached it differently.  He took the time to make us feel important, and when we did our jobs effectively, he let us know.  The only other coach that really took the time to connect with us was Lloyd.  All of the coaches were decent to us (save maybe Bobby Morrison, although he grew on you after a while).  Freddy J and Les Miles, especially, would joke with us, chat with us, but only Brady and Lloyd actually told us that we really "mattered" to the team and reminded us that how well we "executed" made a difference.  

To tell you the truth, I cringed when Coach Hoke was hired.  I genuinely like Brady.  You can't help but like him.  He's not just a great guy, he's an AWESOME guy.  But, I never felt like he possessed the mental accuity, that "CEO" quality, that was required to be a HC at the highest level.  (Whether or not he could be enough of a "dick" on occassion wasn't something I thought of.)  Back in the day, I figured he'd eventually find a defensive coordinator gig and live out his life flying under the radar at some school like Washington State or Rutgers.  But then had some success as a head coach, said all the right things at his initial press conference here, pooped gold his first season, and I became hopeful.  If he could hire the right coordinators and get Michigan rolling enough that they we could basically just stay the course and "maintain," maybe we'd be alright.

Well, it started unraveling in multiple ways and, unfortunately, he wasn't able to stop it.  Now, my biggest fears have been realized.  I feel bad for the players, I feel bad for us fans (GOD it sucks living in the Lansing area right now) but I also feel VERY, VERY bad for him.  This was his dream job and he desperately wanted to come in here and reestablish this program.  Not for "him," but for us, for MICHIGAN.  

What sucks about all of this the most, for me personally, is that I'm passionately in love with a sport where, more times than not, the pricks survive and the good, decent guys get eaten alive, usually by their own fan base.  Based upon his decency as a human being, alone, Brady Hoke deserves to be considered the next Bill Snyder while guys like Urban Meyer should be sitting between Lou Holtz and Mark May on Saturdays pontificating on what Jimbo Fisher should be doing with Jameis Winston.  

Unfortunately, being a good, decent person, alone doesn't make one a great head coach at this level.  Brady probably never should have been hired.  But we can't blame him for taking the job (although we can blame Dave Brandon for extending the offer) and we can't blame him for being what we always knew he was.  His game management and ability to develop players is fine when everything goes like its supposed to... unfortunately when things start going south he doesn't quite have the accumen to staunch the bleeding, at least not at this level.  I'm as dissappointed as anyone that he isn't "better" at this, and Brandon probably shouldn't have hired someone who didn't have a track record of not just building up a program, but managing one through tough times and high expectations.  Again, though, that's on DB.  But one thing I think we can all agree on is that it was nice knowing that he wanted to be here and genuinely loves our school.  He's no Lane Kiffin.  

So, let's wish him well, send him off, and hope that this athletic department has learned something.  

The big lesson?  I guess it's hire a coach who isn't "quite right" in the head.  Outside of Bill Snyder, they seem to be the only ones capable of thriving in these elite jobs.

Mabel Pines

October 28th, 2014 at 11:56 AM ^

if some of the "lack of development" would be HS seniors who wanted to play for a "nice" guy for a change, but when they got here, they realize that he will always "love" them, so there's no real motivation.  Not that our players aren't trying, but there could be some psychological component to playing for a guy who's a jerk that motivates college athletes more???

GoBLUinTX

October 28th, 2014 at 5:17 PM ^

He needs to not be their fathers.  He needs to treat them like men and hold them responsible for ever higher expectations.  I'll take him at his word, he has 115 sons, some better players than others no doubt, but with none of whom he wants to be completely honest.

What somebody else has said is that Hoke has been coaching a team of pole vaulters and he's set the bar at 15 feet.  Great job, he tells his squad as they clear 15 feet in practice, some of whom even clear 16 feet in intrasquad competition.  The problem is the rest of the world has set the bar higher and is clearing 19 feet.

NoVaWolverine

October 28th, 2014 at 12:02 PM ^

Thanks for the firsthand insights on Coach Hoke. Great perspective here from someone who actually knows Hoke better than 99% of the people reading/posting on this board. Wish one of the mods would front-page it or bump it up to a diary.

The consensus seems to be that Brady Hoke is a great guy who just isn't cut out to be a successful coach at a power/blueblood program like Michigan. The interesting question -- one that can help guide the search for his successor -- is "Why?" What quality, exactly, is Hoke missing? Is it some quality (Gitback mentions a CEO quality of "mental acuity") that is independent of whether he's a nice guy? And if so, how do you define it, and determine whether a potential coach has it? (Success as a coordinator? Reputation for X-and-O's mastery? Demonstrated ability to turn around broken units/programs? Proven ability to make halftime adjustments?)

Or is it that Hoke doesn't have some Type-A "jerk" quality that's unfortunately necessary to succeed at this level, and thus his "niceness" is part of the problem? (The Beilein example would seem to  disprove the "we need an asshole to have a successful head football coach" argument...)

 

Gitback

October 28th, 2014 at 4:00 PM ^

therein lies the rub.  There are so many variables to being at the top of any profession.  Read "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell.  It really touches on how much success and failure comes down to variables that we simply can't control.  The movie industry goes through CEO's at an alarming rate, and, on the average, none seem to be much better, or worse, than any others... but the industry is still convinced that there are people who can predict the relative success or failure of a movie 3 years before its even made.  

Top line coaches come in all shapes and styles.  Some "nice guys" have made it, like Bill Snyder or Dick Vermeil.  Some are successful because of, or in spite of, their total dickishness.  Some are a genius on one side of the ball and are smart enough to surround themselves with top notch assistants.  Some are big picture guys.  There is no one "tell" when it comes to identifying a guy who can captain the ship of a big time college football program.  Some say Nick Saban would be successful no matter where he is, he's just that good, but recall that he left MSU because he didn't believe he could compete nationally there.  He knows it has to ALL COME TOGETHER.  The school, the coach, the circumstances, the situation... it all has to align if you want to have a string of success and not be a school that rises and falls every few years, or worse, never rises at all.  Bo+Michigan+Canham = SUCCESS.  But that was far from guaranteed at the time.

The most you can do is reduce the variables, find candidates with qualities that appear to replicate other successful coaches, pick the one who strikes you as the best fit, and roll the dice.

MinWhisky

October 28th, 2014 at 9:25 AM ^

...it should be a factor in any decision re his fate. 

I disliked many of his decisions, especially the one to hire Brady Hoke.  At the time, however,  in hiring a "Michigan Man" with roots on Lloyd Carr's staff, didn't Brandon satisfy the desires of a large part of the UofM fan base, alumni, and former players?  Wasn't Brandon being responsive to them and their desires?

I also disliked how little support Brandon (and that same segment of the fan base) gave to RR and I was also disappointed  that, in large part, it was because they didn't "like" him, his style, his grammer, his offense, etc.  I felt he never really have a chance, given the roster he was left with and the internal BS he had to endure from day one.

Longer term, Brandon will end up doing fine, thank you.  RR certainly has.  I think Hoke will likely end up following in the footsteps of Carr's last OC and DC. 

MinWhisky

October 28th, 2014 at 7:12 PM ^

I never said Brandon was a "good guy" or a "nice guy".  I said it didn't really matter.  What mattered were the results of his decisions. 

Same with Hoke.  Nice guy or not is really not important.  He hasn't performed, so he should be out.

I did offer the caveat that, contrary to what some say about Brandon being out of touch with the fans & students, he was very responsive to a large segment of the fanbase clamoring for a "Michigan Man" by hiring Hoke. 

Gitback

October 28th, 2014 at 10:45 AM ^

Not sure who this is directed at... if you're referring to my post (maybe you're not), all I can say is I've never had any personal interaction with Dave Brandon, so I don't know if he is, or isn't, a nice guy.  Word is that he's not, at least not always, but I'm not speaking from personal experience there.  I know Hoke is, from personal experience.

DB may be a "nice guy," I don't really know.  Both he and Hoke have "bungled" things.  Hoke, bungles beacuse he's in over his head, DB bungles out of hubris.  Brady makes mistakes when he has to come to decisions on the fly, DB and his group have the time to THINK about the moves they make, and then bungle them any way... and then lie about them... then ignore the fallout... then offer up lame half hearted explanations which usually involve placing some of the blame elsewhere.

Say this about Hoke; we may not think he's being candid enough at press conferences, but the first words out of his mouth are always "I take full responsibility for that."  He never pretends that someone *else* paid the sky writers, or someone *else* miscommunicated with the corporate partner, or says "nu uuh, we never banned seat cushions... oh wait, I mean, we never MEANT to ban them..."

Monocle Smile

October 28th, 2014 at 11:02 AM ^

didn't Brandon satisfy the desires of a large part of the UofM fan base, alumni, and former players?

Maybe initially, but the past year has shown a massive deviation. Have you not been paying attention? Furthermore, I think that "large part" of the UofM fan base was wrong about what was best for the future. Furthermore, although this is anecdotal, every single firsthand account of anyone who has ever interacted with Dave Brandon that I've read describes him as an arrogant douche. He is not a "nice guy."

RoxyMtnHiM

October 28th, 2014 at 9:50 AM ^

When Wojo calls for your firing, it's over.

We've still got the stadium, the helmets, and the great fight song, and there are 114,000 willing to come to the games, if they are worth paying to watch in person. But pretty much nothing of the Bo-Mo-Llo era remains. The next hire is a big one. We're coming up on a decade of being a really lousy football program. There's a good football team on the roster but the next guy is going to have to build his own thing.

Evil Empire

October 28th, 2014 at 9:56 AM ^

If all Hoke had to do was hobnob with alumni and recruits and clap encouragingly on the sidelines, he'd be a champion. Unfortunately for him, head coaches are expected to set strategy and direction, motivate their players and staff to develop their skills and field a team that wins games.

At my company we have employee scorecards that serve as the basis for evaluating performance. The accountabilities on the scorecard are in descending order of importance. He's doing okay at some of the items further down the list, but bombing at the top three or four. There are also competencies that show what knowledge, skills, and abilities someone needs to succeed in the job. In this case, things like intelligence, ability to think on one's feet, adaptability, spoken and written communication, etc. He would have been lucky to get an interview for the job based on qualifications, and Brandon pretended that he was an ace hire.

We're paying for filet mignon and getting low-end hot dogs. That's some great value right there.

maize-blue

October 28th, 2014 at 10:10 AM ^

Brady Hoke is an excellent recruiter but basically a babysitter. If anything, he's probably too close to his players. UM has become a football club rather than a competitive team.

Princetonwolverine

October 28th, 2014 at 11:40 AM ^

Resigning at the end of the season for the "good of the program" is a whole lot different than quitting in the middle of a season.

I would lose even more respect for Hoke, as a person, if he were to quit now. What message would that be sending to the players? 

Getting "fired" now is a different story.

Sione's Flow

October 28th, 2014 at 11:50 AM ^

It's essentially over for Hoke. He's a good man and genuinely cares for his players, but he doesn't possess that little something extra that coaches like Harbaugh, Saban, etc. do.

Perkis-Size Me

October 28th, 2014 at 12:08 PM ^

Sorry, Hoke. I really wanted you to be our guy. Really, I did. I can see how much you love this place, you love your players, and you want to run it the right way. But this game, whether we like it or not, is a business. Building character and good men are important, but so are wins and losses. So is beating your rivals, developing your players into the best football players they can be, fielding competitive teams, and everything else in between. Your measurement of success is Big Ten titles, and in that regard, you've failed for 4 straight years.

I hope you find success wherever you go next. Hell, if the next coach wants a recruiting coordinator, I hope he hires you. But this just isn't the place for you.