Let's go again! [Patrick Barron]

Neck Sharpies: I Can Do This All Day Comment Count

Seth September 14th, 2021 at 3:18 PM

Throwing a quick one up to highlight something that got too long in the UFR. You already know the gameplan against Washington: Run. You probably figured out why they stuck to the gameplan too: Washington was hyperfocused on stopping everything but the run.

Specifically, Michigan was finding ways to get their big burly linemen involved in run blocking the cadre of Husky OLB/DEs they were rotating through, and the main way of doing that was to bring multiple dudes across the formation.

Their base plays this game were Split Zone and various forms of Counter. Here’s the 2nd play of the game (after the false start):

If you caught everything going on here in the first viewing, please apply to Jim Harbaugh immediately because you were born a coaching savant. For the rest of you, here’s what I saw:

image

Basically it’s Counter Trey except they shifted everything a gap inwards. Here’s how:

  1. Kickouts of the overhang CB and the SAM with the F-back (All) and pulling center (Vastardis).
  2. A zone block of the frontside Tackle with the Y (Schoonmaker)—block him down if he wants to go that way or kick him out if he tries to go to Schoonmaker’s left shoulder.
  3. The biggest lead blocker the can find (RT Andrew Stueber) pulling around to remove the free MLB from whichever gap the T didn’t choose.
  4. Downblocks on the other two DL and WLB with the guards (Keegan and Zinter) and frontside tackle (Hayes).
  5. An RPO snag concept going on with the backside to keep the Jack from crashing on a long-developing run play.

I wanted to highlight the player matchups because those are important.

[After THE JUMP: Across the formation]

If you remember your Counter Trey rules you should remember all the ways a defense tends to blow it up. A refresher:

image

The zone block on the frontside is an interesting wrinkle. You look at that as THE key block. It’s not even on the Counter Trey rules above, which just say, basically, don’t lose to that DT. That DT in this case is two-gapping Tuli Letuligasenoa, and the scouting on him (pre-Montana, when Michigan was building their game plan) was Tuli’s going to be a problem for more than stadium announcers and podcasters. You really want to send your iffiest blocking TE against that guy?

Well yeah, that’s the whole point. The trick here is by making it a zone block of a player who *ISN’T* lined up over the guy blocking him, you’ve actually put Schoonmaker in a decent position. Chances are that guy is going in the gap he lined up in, in which case it’s a simple downblock, and Schoonmaker should be able to lock him inside far enough to create a right side for the gap. If that tackle decides to try to get to the other side of Schoonmaker, that’s a fight that the tight end can let him win. That’s what happens here.

Watch again and pay attention to Schoonmaker:

TE#86, the tight end on the line of scrimmage at the bottom

Congratulations, Tuli, you two-gapped yourself.

The offense also gamed up matchups they wanted for the other two blocks that have to go right for the gap to be created. The kickout of the edge defender here went to Andrew Vastardis, the center. Normally with counter that’s a backside guard but if Michigan is going to execute that zone block on the frontside, they need the kickout to happen as far out there as possible. Rather than wait for a guard, you can get a gap of a head start by sending Vastardis, who’s faster than Zinter even if he doesn’t pack quite as much wallop (either will do in this case). Watch the OLB/DE standing up at the bottom of the line, and which way his shoulders go when Vastardis impacts him. That guy has no recourse but to spin off the block, and by then the RB is gone.

The downblocks of the NT and WLB are also very important if you’re running this a gap further inside than usual. For that they’re having their best lineman (this week) Ryan Hayes and big Trevor Keegan block down.

image

A thunk from Hayes in addition to Keegan was enough to put that NG, Sam “Taki” Taimani, the other Problem, where he will not be one.

image

Taki isn’t the helmet you see between them, he’s that third knee and flash of jersey, because Keegan and Hayes wiped this guy right into the next block. Also the WLB is still watching the backside instead of hauling after the pulling RT because they’re playing extreme “don’t get edged” defense. The ease with which Taki was displaced by a short double was an eye-opening moment, but also part of the plan all along.

That’s the 2nd play of the game. Here’s the penultimate:

What does it look like?

image

Michigan clearly put together a game plan expecting to mess with Washington’s front. This play looks for all the world like another Counter run to the right, after a day of tight ends and receivers and guards sliding from the backside to blast edge defenders and running between that and blocked down interior linemen. This play punished the hell out of a defense reacting to that. As soon as Keegan stands up the LBs are thinking he might pull. Schoonmaker and Henning going out there sell the action further. I think Michigan was also expecting the CB to rotate high so the FS could come down on the Henning end-around (Hend-around?) (Workshopping this.)

But the CB didn’t. He hung out on the edge. And both safeties were dropping deep. At this point—in case the scouting on Michigan wasn’t enough—the Wolverines had run on 29/34 standard downs, and every single first down. AND YET:

image

The running back has the ball, in the 4th quarter, of a game Michigan is salting away by running up the gut all night long, and still Washington had their safeties in a two-deep shell, still moving backwards, and extra defenders on the edge or where they can get to it in a hurry. We DARE you to pass! No.

From the first play to the end of the game, this was the relationship between Michigan’s offense and Washington’s defense. Michigan kept moving around which gaps they wanted to attack inside with plays that sent one to three players across the formation for kicks, often in opposite directions of each other to keep the linebackers frozen in place.

But where were the RPOs?

Washington was also hyper-vigilant about not getting edged. When we got to the end of the game I was wondering what happened to all the #SpeedinSpace RPOs, but as I charted I found a few of them. They were just very covered up. Let’s go back to the 2nd play of the game:

image

There were a bunch of positive reads for McNamara in this game despite Michigan being as QB givey as ever, simply because Washington kept making the handoff the correct decision.

The story of this game is Washington dared Michigan to beat them up the gut until their RBs were worn to nubs, their OL were gassed from trying to move Tuli and Taki out of the way, and various former receivers were chirping about “Never go to Michigan.” Then Michigan dared, succeeded, and the Huskies just dared them again.

Jimmy Lake: I can do this all day.

And no safeties came to help, so we ran some more.

safeties: you know you can join in any time.

The end.

Comments

AlbanyBlue

September 14th, 2021 at 4:43 PM ^

Nope, you can't be mad at what worked. That's insane.

I am upset that when we did throw, it didn't go great for various reasons. But to be upset than we stuck with the run -- which was obilterating the UW D -- after seeing that is ridiculous. There has been much hand-wringing about Michigan finding a workable play and not using it. Well, we used what worked. And it was glorious.

S.G. Rice

September 14th, 2021 at 3:29 PM ^

And they ran some more and lo, it was good.

-- Harbaugh 3:16

If they have a game plan that good every week, this could be a fun season after all.  I mean with the obvious exception. 

JHumich

September 14th, 2021 at 3:31 PM ^

GREAT to know the RPOs are there.

GREAT to know that we ran smart, not just beefy OL and twitchy/powerful RB (not that either of those are bad things themselves).

Thankful to have keen eyes on it, putting forth the effort so that we can see it too.

1VaBlue1

September 15th, 2021 at 8:29 AM ^

GREAT points!  That manball thread that questioned whether a power running game and a pass game could be merged was based on a dumb question.  I stated that anything can get a read attached to it, but I didn't think any reads were being used.  Good to see here that they are attached, appear to be getting used, and will probably result in different reads against less stubborn defenses.  I remember Cade keeping on one play late in the 4th, and he got 5-10 yards on it.  But it was just that one read, and he bounced it outside.

Using reads to bounce the QB outside or flip a pass over the top, with these RBs, can be deadly.  Even if only used a few times each game.

Wallaby Court

September 14th, 2021 at 3:32 PM ^

I find this heartening on two fronts. First, Michigan had variations ready for Washington's adjustments in the run game. Second, Michigan appears to have had a response, as indicated by the RPO tags, available when Washington started rolling down extra defenders into the box to squash the run. Washington refused to do that, to Michigan just left that in the garage.

readyourguard

September 14th, 2021 at 4:00 PM ^

Another excellent break down Seth.  

I'm fascinated by this and wonder, how did the Michigan coaches decide AND AGREE* that this was the right plan for Washington?  Gattis wants #speedinspace but the scouting film indicated running the ball was the way to start the game.  And as the game progressed, the coaches noticed the Washington safeties never adjusted to the run, and have to have agreed, "welp, keep running it."  (It makes me think of Ocean's 13 where they used that boring machine to create an earthquake under The Bank.  The gamblers didn't respond the initial tremors, so Danny Ocean tells Virgil and Turk to "hit em again." )

*the game plan is drawn up during the week.  The analysts and coaches all scouted Washington film and saw something they felt they could exploit.  We all *know* Gattis' preference is to spread the opposition out, but - to his credit - he didn't force that issue.  

And it's not just running.  It's that they adapted their gap responsibilities as you pointed out.  That to me is next level stuff. 

If my hunch is correct, this was a big step forward for the coaching staff, especially JG.  It's an excellent collaborative effort that paid off in spades. 

 

LDNfan

September 14th, 2021 at 4:54 PM ^

Sounds like a lot of trust across the coaching staff. That would make decision making, even hard  decisions, not so hard and much faster. I read somewhere over this off-season that there may have been some tension between Warriner and others (Gattis?)...if that was the case then the change to Moore could play a significant role in this. 

As with any organization, If the leadership is aligned so much more can be accomplished. 

 

1VaBlue1

September 15th, 2021 at 8:39 AM ^

I've said many times that this running game has Harbaugh stamped all over it.  If Gattis is all in and learning new tricks by combining some beefy Harbaugh tricks with his reads and ability to spread players around, that is only good news.

Maybe there is something to the rumors of bad blood with Warriner.  Maybe Moore just works better Gattis?  As said later in the thread, better communication begets better preparation, which brings better results.  So far this season, we've seen a LOT of better results across the board.

trueblueintexas

September 14th, 2021 at 5:11 PM ^

Spending less time arguing who's ideas are right and more time building the plan based on an agreed upon idea works wonders for a coaching staff. It also translates to the players execution. Even if the idea proves wrong (see Washington's defensive game plan) at least you are aligned and executing properly come game time. 

Don

September 14th, 2021 at 5:18 PM ^

"how did the Michigan coaches decide AND AGREE* that this was the right plan for Washington?"

That's the $64,000 question. MGoBlog has been filled for months with claims that Harbaugh has taken over play-calling, or Gattis is being forced against his will to devise a game plan that he hates, etc etc., in spite of there being no concrete evidence for any of that stuff.

If the program was really interested in putting all that speculation to bed, Gattis would hold a presser where he directly addresses the issue, in as much detail as possible. He wouldn't have to give anything away to our opponents, since it would address decision-making process as opposed to game strategy.

Unless and until this happens, speculation, rumor-mongering, and conspiratorial theorizing will continue to fill the information vacuum. I realize it's never been the Michigan Football Way to let the unwashed sporting public into its private deliberations, so I don't expect it to happen.

Don

September 14th, 2021 at 7:22 PM ^

He indicated that he wanted a more physical team, but I don't think he addressed the decision-making process.

I'm not suggesting that Michigan fans deserve or are entitled to any explanation of how the staff makes decisions—that's entirely Harbaugh's call and I bet he thinks it's nobody's business outside of Schembechler Hall. From a purely functional football standpoint, he'd be right in that view.

I would think a HC wouldn't want endless speculation that his OC doesn't have actual play-calling responsibility and/or that he is second-guessing or hamstringing his OC, but that's from the standpoint of program PR.

mikegros

September 14th, 2021 at 4:01 PM ^

Watching those safeties really hammers the point home. Having both safeties 12 yards off the ball on 1st and 10 from the 15 after having been steamrolled for 3 quarters just seems like negligent defense. 

And in the last gif, both safeties start 2-3 yards deep in the end zone and aren't firing downhill.

 

Both those situations are in the red zone, so the threat of getting beat over the top for a big play is gone. It was the right move to just keep taking what Washington gave.

At some point you think you have to force Michigan to throw at your good corners, but I guess not. 

97 Over Jimmys

September 15th, 2021 at 3:49 AM ^

That caught my eye also. The safeties line up deep and stay there. One safety gets to the RB at the 1-yard-line, and the other as he crosses the goal line(!). If that's what they were coached to do, that is indeed negligent. 

It's like the reciprocal of the Brian Kelly philosophy where yards count for more if they're through the air so he refuses to run as much as he should. The UW DC seems to think that the TD will count for fewer than 6 points if it's via a running play.

Spitfire

September 14th, 2021 at 4:01 PM ^

Great stuff. I was wondering about the RPOs and it was good to know McNamara was making the right reads all night. I feel better about what went down Saturday. I'm betting most of the teams going forward play us a little differently

Merlin.64

September 14th, 2021 at 4:10 PM ^

Thanks for the explanation. It certainly rebuffs those who complain the offence was too one-dimensional. The coaches were astute enough to take what the defense gave them, something we lamented in the game against MSU last year. Also the O-line performed above pre-season expectations against a good defense.

Very promising developments, and a great help while we work on improving the relationship between QB and receivers after the loss of Ronnie Bell. 

I wonder what the Washington fan blogs are saying about their team's game plan?

rice4114

September 14th, 2021 at 4:21 PM ^

Just like politics there are two camps here with zero nuance or subtlety. To be honest nobody thinks like this but that wont stop people who need their strawman.

1. They didnt pass enough I hated our win with every fiber of my being.

2. We won the day with the run but also this will always work because no way MSU launches 9 guys between our tackles. We will be a well oiled passing machine the minute we need it and not a second earlier.

Meanwhile to me it seems the Washington defensive coaching gave us no choice. Take an easy win at 6 yards per run or go with what is behind door number 2. I still have concerns about 4 teams on our schedule that will take that middle run away. Lets be honest a decade+ of tipped passes, dropped passes, balls sailing over heads (taco pants?) and a host of other shenanigans have most of us spooked. Then when Mcnamara also looks spooked that feeling creeps back in.

In a season of hoping for 8 wins this offense will do just fine. In a season of tearing the roof of expectations our passing game will need to be sharp.