Job-doer. [David Wilcomes]

Neck Sharpies: Eleven Men Doing Their Jobs Comment Count

Seth November 8th, 2022 at 10:30 AM

GO VOTE! I'm out all day working the election. Vote.org has information if you're wondering where/if you're registered. Michigan accepts same-day registration at your Clerk's office. Also your absentee ballot can be turned in there at any time before 8PM today (if you got an absentee but want to vote in person, please bring that). Democracy forever!

-----------------------------

People have been getting the wrong idea about how we feel about Pro Football Focus. I get folks in my mentions wanting to make them out to be utter fools. Au contraire they are an extremely useful site for many things, and I am happy to keep subscribing. The problem we've been having lately is that their run blocking grades are uncanny. They have Michigan's run blocking about on par with Michigan States. These two running games however are not performing anything like each other. It doesn't pass the sniff test.

The problem, I've been led to believe, is that they mark a "0" for a "got the job done" block, with minuses if you mess it up or pluses if you do something extra.

The thing is that's now how blocking really works. If you're completing your assignment every play on the offensive line you are the most incredible offensive lineman who ever lived. The legends of our charting—Long, Lewan, Molk—were guys who were executing things that are hard to do. Offensive line is a HARD job, and that job can change on you so swiftly that you can't process most of it. And offensive line at Michigan is especially hard.

Let me show you an example.

[Hit THE JUMP for the breakdown.]

What Michigan is Running

This is a standard Pin & Pull, or Buck, with two guards pulling and the rest blocking down. The guys pulling varies not on the playcall (usually) but on how the defensive line set up. We've been over this before many times but a refresher: on power runs you…

  1. Block down on any defenders you have an angle for.
  2. Kick out the defender setting the edge (usually) to set one side of the gap.
  3. Pull a lead blocker around from the backside to hit the first defender who shows.

image

The rest is up to your back and the play design, and what the defense does to you. The next level of running this stuff is to adjust to all those things a defense does on the fly. This is when we start raising the difficulty level, which is bound to happen if you're running this as your base stuff. Some examples of things that could happen:

  • The DL slants to the direction of the play? Win the blockdowns you can, cut or zone block what you can't.
  • The Edge comes underneath the kickout? Turn him inside so he's now a blockdown and run out the open edge with the free blocker.
  • A Linebacker blitzes a backside gap? He's still the puller's responsibility. Pull up and cut him off, or if he gets across you kick him out.
  • A Linebacker blitzes a frontside gap? Kick him out and run inside.
  • The Safety blitzes the intended gap? He's probably replacing a linebacker. Treat him as such.

It's funny how this can all break down into a zone play after all, but that's what's really going on. The defense is going to come at you from weird angles, and it's up to you to make sure the ones who angled outside stay outside of the gap and the ones who angled inside stay there. Let the RB worry about finding the lane.

The more of these you get the greater the difficulty of the execution. Technically if the defense is 100% selling out against this play you should still be able to get it blocked up. That's what your coach claims at least. Easier said than done, coach.

image

What Did Rutgers Do?

They're bringing a run blitz that simulates a slant towards both edges (where Michigan loves to run), adds a blitzing linebacker to the middle to blaze into anything going through there, or across. Two defensive backs on that side are activated against the run, the strong safety replacing where the MLB was, and the cornerback, cornerback, who's got that TE in man coverage. If Michigan was running left they have the WLB doing the same thing.

image

Pin & Pull should be dead against this. And sure enough, things look bad at the beginning.

image

Michigan has an RPO on the backside (top) of the play that should rid them of the WLB when Loveland heads out into the flat. Yay, one less thing to worry about. However Rutgers is happy to take that since they should have lots of defenders in the right position against Pin & Pull:

  1. The guys who needed to get blocked down are slanting playside.
  2. If the first puller tries to kick any of those no-longer-blockdowns, the CB is a free extra defender on the edge.
  3. The MLB is blitzing the backside gap where there's no way to block him down to intercept the lead blocker.

Doing your job isn't going to be enough here. Let's get to the handoff.

image

We've got trouble. Barnhart has his guy inside of him but outside of the hash marks, IE where the run wanted to go. Schoonmaker released to find no linebackers to block down. Zinter is arriving on the edge to find the DE he expected to be the edge and another guy besides. Keegan has it the worst—he was supposed to get all play to get through the intended gap and keep a defender out of there, but now the blitzing MLB is going to be set up right where we don't want him to be: IN the gap, and deep in the backfield besides. In fact he's on a direct trajectory with Edwards. Also the safety is rolling down and nobody had him in their plans.

So What Did Michigan Do?

What everyone does is their jobs, modified for what they got. Schoonmaker found the safety and made him his downblock. Barnhart couldn't get his downblock sealed after all so he adjusts by starting to zone block that guy outside where he wants to be. Zinter is doing the same with the DE.

image

Keegan IDs the MLB in the backfield, and has nowhere else to put him, so he starts shoving the guy outside in hopes that Edwards can find a lane in there. And you know what? He does.

image

Things

This is what a well-trained, good offense does. Just about nobody ended up running the play "Pin & Pull" as it was put on paper. Two of the downblocks become kickouts as Barnhart adjusted to his slanting DT and Keegan had to find somewhere to put the blitzing MLB. Zinter had to choose between two edge defenders and managed to get a full kick on the most dangerous one. Schoonmaker didn't panic when he stepped down to an empty second level and found the guy replacing the missing linebacker, removing a safety. Meanwhile that cornerback took himself out of the play because he didn't believe Edwards had the vision nor the agility to hop back inside of all of those blocks. Who could blame him, when most backs just end up eating that MLB blitz.

Ultimately everybody did their jobs, even if it wasn't the original assignment. That would be a "pass" if you're grading on a pass/fail of execution, and a zero if you're starting with the expectation that everyone does his job. Executing at this level when the defense has called the play to beat the play you're running is additive, not neutral, for the simple reason that run plays are designed to get everyone blocked to the secondary.

Michigan's running game isn't just doing their jobs. They're giving every other running game coach in America evidence that it's okay to ask this of their players.

Heh. Good luck.

Comments

AC1997

November 8th, 2022 at 10:43 AM ^

Fantastic explanation and why I will never be a coach and never quite appreciate all that goes into what they and the players train for.  

One suggestion - breaking down an example of a play that might get an OL like MSU those extra "points" even if it is a basic execution.  Clearly PFF isn't including the "outcome" of the play in their calculations and instead looking at the individual execution of the assignments.  That makes sense for something like this, but it means you're overlooking that we got 10 yards on this play instead of the -4 yards that it could have been.  

mwolverine1

November 8th, 2022 at 11:03 AM ^

Disagree. I think PFF is taking that into account. However if you look at this play, none of the OL puts a guy on the ground. None of the OL is blocking a guy way downfield. That's no points for the OL. Instead, Edwards makes a nice cut to create yards. Points for Edwards. PFF is very high on Corum and Edwards as a result. They are two of the highest graded players in the country.

B-Nut-GoBlue

November 8th, 2022 at 11:55 AM ^

So if a DL guy got pancaked and a corner back got blocked downfield a couple of our guys maybe would've registered "points" but the play loses a yard or maybe gains 2 a at most, to PFF that would make for better "scoring".  Even though those things don't matter to the success of the play?

Yea I'm going to go with Seth and Brian's OL scoring.

1VaBlue1

November 8th, 2022 at 12:25 PM ^

This is correct.  On this play, MSU would have been stuck at -4, when the MLB hits the back just after the handoff.  Yet, the OL still gets graded as a '0' because they 'did their job' as OL by blocking the guy the play was designed to block, in the manner it was meant.  Michigan's execution also gets a '0' because they also made blocks.

This is how MSU's OL is as good as Michigan's, according to PFF.  LOL!!

Great explanation, Seth!  And thank you for showing and explaining it all so easily!

mwolverine1

November 8th, 2022 at 12:29 PM ^

For that particular OL? Sure. But the overall possible grade would be lower, and PFF would grade down whoever caused that result.

I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Corum and Edwards are clearly great, but the OL is underrated by PFF due to scheme. I'm just trying to explain why they grade the way they do. 

For a better sense of what PFF is trying to say, try to visualize what Derrick Green would get on a particular play. I think you'll see that our system asks the back to make a play in a way not every back can. PFF is rewarding the backs for that (they did the same thing last year) and punishing the OL.

David F

November 8th, 2022 at 10:21 PM ^

This is not the right way to think about any type of scoring system. The purpose of such systems is to provide predictive information for a given outcome. In medical research (which I do), this means predicting a clinical event like a heart attack. In college football, this means predicting when plays will have net positive benefits (i.e. yards gained which is itself predictive of scoring points which is predictive of winning games). MGoBlog's scoring is clearly a better tool than PFF at predicting the relevant outcome.

dragonchild

November 8th, 2022 at 10:54 AM ^

I would call this RPS-1?  And it still went for ten yards.  They made it look easy.

P.S. You know the Rutgers safety repped this blitz at least three times because he made it all the way to the fanatical devotion part.

stephenrjking

November 8th, 2022 at 11:09 AM ^

It's 2018 and Michigan is raining body blows and pulling away in second halves. And Michigan is using pin and pull.

But wait, it's not 2018. Michigan is undefeated. Michigan has proven it can beat Ohio State.

And pin and pull is NOT Michigan's go-to running play. We have way more stuff that we can use than in 2018, and it all works much better than it did in 2018. 

And yet... they're running pin and pull and teams are calling good defenses against it and Michigan's still doing stuff like this with its second-string running back.

That's good stuff.

**

Pursuant to Seth's plug for voting, I will suggest that people looking to get the best, most accurate, and fastest results check out Decision Desk HQ (twitter account, which includes key race calls, is @decisiondeskhq). DDHQ is an independent, non-partisan election reporting service that competes with and beats AP and Edison (which feeds most TV network numbers) and also provides the best, fastest, and most accurate race calls. (Note: I work for them. And yes, we are the best). 

 

Sam1863

November 8th, 2022 at 11:10 AM ^

This was extremely informative. Reading it, I was reminded of a quote from President Eisenhower about the U.S. military training for war in Europe prior to WWI (bold type mine):

"Plans are worthless, but planning is everything. There is a very great distinction because when you are planning for an emergency you must start with this one thing: the very definition of “emergency” is that it is unexpected, therefore it is not going to happen the way you are planning."

I have the feeling that Eisenhower, who of course played football at West Point, would have made a damn good OL coach.

BananaRepublic

November 8th, 2022 at 1:06 PM ^

Nahhh, the democratic part of our system was small at the outset for a reason. Democracy is rarely mentioned in the federalist papers, and when it is, it's typically not in a very positive light. We ended up expanding the democracy factor of our system quite a bit in some ways and constraining it arguably much much more in other ways. Almost the entire population is now allowed to vote, but the politicians themselves are much less important to the functioning of the system.

rob f

November 8th, 2022 at 1:57 PM ^

But please note my wording, "based largely upon...", "largely" being the particular key word, as opposed to using the word "entirely" or even omitting that particular word.

Bottom line is that the founding fathers wanted American citizens to have representation, to have a say in the government (even though at the time, this essentially meant white males only).

Blue Middle

November 8th, 2022 at 11:45 AM ^

Great job explaining and showing how we're having so much success on the ground.

PFF needs to adjust their system.  Between Mike Hart coaching patient running and improving the vision of our RBs and Sherrone Moore getting our OL to execute regardless of the look the defense gives, we are turning into an unstoppable rushing attack.

How PFF can grade this as a zero is beyond me...

readyourguard

November 8th, 2022 at 11:58 AM ^

Excellent breakdown of the play, and the adjustments required on the fly to execute.

That's great work by a bunch of upperclassmen.  This is why experience is more important than recruiting ranking.  No "insider" or any other recruiting "expert" can evaluate headiness and football IQ that translates to executing blocks like this.

 

ShadowStorm33

November 8th, 2022 at 12:25 PM ^

The problem, I've been led to believe, is that they mark a "0" for a "got the job done" block, with minuses if you mess it up or pluses if you do something extra.

Do you know this for sure/how do you know it? I think the big mystery with PFF, which I've never seen an answer for, is how they logistically do their grading. Because it takes you guys, what, a day (multiple days?) to do UFR for one side of the ball? PFF seemingly grades something like 50+ games per week between college and NFL. Even if they're probably not being as thorough/going into as much detail as you guys, the logistics of watching all of those games to be able to grade every player on every play just don't add up, unless they have a veritable army working for them (in which case, how are they paying them?). From a feasibility standpoint, it seems more like the kind of thing that inputs the ESPN play-by-play summary and spits out a grade, but then how would they grade individual players? I think the attitude towards PFF largely stems from the fact that it just doesn't add up...

buckley

November 8th, 2022 at 12:35 PM ^

Fantastic analysis, and stuff like this is why this is the best sports blog, period. Humor and whimsy all whilst educating the readers. 

Man, it's gotta be tough to be an OL.

HarmonHowardWoodson

November 8th, 2022 at 12:43 PM ^

I wonder if PFF grades the way it does because of the number of games that need to be graded in a very short amount of time to get grades out quickly every week. It's one thing for one person to grade these complicated runs for one team, but do they have the staff to do it for 50+ games every week?

I have to believe MGB puts more time into grading Michigan's offensive line than PFF does for any singular line every week.

dragonchild

November 8th, 2022 at 1:01 PM ^

My problem with this is that while it's fair to say it's impossible to grade all OL everywhere on the level of detail of MGoBlog, PFF is publishing data as if they are.

That's dishonest to me.  If you don't have the resources to do something, fine, but then you're not actually doing it, so stop pretending. It’s fraud.