Blake Forum

August 15th, 2022 at 12:10 PM ^

Seems about right. I could justify us being a little bit higher, as a playoff team returning a lot of dudes, but tbh I'd rather be underestimated than overhyped

BTB grad

August 15th, 2022 at 2:57 PM ^

I think the level of the step back will be like the one from the 2016 defense to 2017 (not saying the 2021 or 2022 defenses were/will be as good, just the size of the gap from one year to next). Everyone was worried about the defensive side of the ball going into 2017 after losing Peppers, Lewis, Charlton, Worley, Hill, Gedeon, Glasgow, Stribling but it turned out the 2017 defense more or so reloaded even if it was a step back from the 2016 D. It was the offensive side of the ball that was the issue that year.

JHumich

August 15th, 2022 at 11:18 PM ^

I think our D will be best in the B1G. I think our offense has a chance to be too.

I guess I'm saying, that I'd be ok slotting us in at #1 in the nation.

You think I'm crazy, but last year before the season, I predicted B1G champs and CFP berth, while others were saying 8-4 and "hoping" for 9-3. So, gotta go up from there!

Frankly, in the AP poll #s 5–9 are bunched together close enough that without any games so far, they are on equal footing, for all practical purposes. So, we could pretty quickly be top 4 or 5.

TrueBlue2003

August 15th, 2022 at 5:03 PM ^

Right, I agree, hence just a step back.  Not a leap, not a cratering, just a step. 

It should still be a very solid unit.  I like the players remaining. 

But you don't lose the #2 pick all-everything edge, another first round edge talent, two five stars and your senior LB without taking a likely step back.

To the point others are making, I agree that it will likely be similar to the step back from 2016 to 2017 or from 2018 to 2019.  Modest step back.

I haven't heard anyway talk about a major step back, but I feel optimistic that's not going to happen.

michengin87

August 15th, 2022 at 5:00 PM ^

Of particular note is Nathan Baird of cleveland.com slotting us at #18.  Nathan might still be a little butt hurt, and that makes my day!

So many have the Buckeyes #2 despite coming off a season with a defense that ranked No. 59 nationally in total defense and No. 38 in scoring defense.  On top of that, the Buckeyes slotted 96th in pass defense (244.8 ypg) and 100th in opponent third down conversion percentage allowed (42.1%). 

We pushed them around all day long, and the world is completely ignoring this due to an outstanding offense.  Anyone that can slow them down and score consistently is capable of beating this team like Oregon and Michigan did last year.

Amazinblu

August 15th, 2022 at 1:43 PM ^

Texan, remember the SEC plays 8 conference games.  And, the usual OOC schedule is four auto wins in their OOC.  So, an SEC team only needs to play .500 ball to have an 8-4 record at season’s end.  
 

This year, LSU’s four OOC opponents are: 1) Florida State, 2) Southern University, 3) New Mexico, and 4) UAB.  So, they should be 4-0 with their talent - and the “Fah-mah-Lee” culture that Kelly has been instilling.

A&M from unranked to Top 7… no SEC bias there.  Clemson - yeah, let’s see whether “a little Dabo’ll  do ya” - aka Brylcreem - circa 50’s and 70’s…

I’m fine with Michigan’s ranking.  Post it in the locker room…

ak47

August 15th, 2022 at 12:41 PM ^

The defensive talent, especially on the defensive line is unreal so all it takes is that offense getting to competent and they will likely go undefeated. Utah being over Michigan isn't any kind of slight, that is going to be a really good team this year. ND over Michigan doesn't make a ton of sense but its a big enough gap to really get upset over flipping two spots.

TrueBlue2003

August 15th, 2022 at 2:09 PM ^

Is 10-3 that bad?

They lost by 7 to Georgia (much better than we did), they lost a 2OT on the road against a solid NC State team and they lost by ten to a good Pitt team.

The predictive metrics all had them top 10 last year.  Not a stretch to think they'll be a little bit better, precisely because their QB play was so bad.  If that position improves even to mediocre, they could be very good with that defense.

TrueBlue2003

August 15th, 2022 at 6:58 PM ^

Not according to the data.  They were slightly unlucky per the data.

An easy measure of this is comparing ESPN's FPI which is a pure "quality" metric to their Strength of Record which only takes into account how impressive their W/L record is given the schedule, ie there is no margin of victory component in SOR.

Their strength of record was 13th.  Their FPI was 8th.  Meaning they were slightly better than their record would indicate.

As a sanity check their sagarin predictor had them ranked 10th.  That's purely a predictive metric based only on scores as well.

But pretty much any way you look at it, they were a borderline top 10 team.

gronostaj

August 15th, 2022 at 12:12 PM ^

I like where we’re at in the poll, but as a designer, it hurts my feelings when the aspect ratio of the M is off (as it is in the poll - stretched vertically). 

smitty1983

August 15th, 2022 at 12:15 PM ^

I wish they dropped all rankings until week 8/9 when you have a sample size. I know they are for tv ratings but they are pointless until midseason. 

Vasav

August 15th, 2022 at 4:25 PM ^

I actually can see ND winning this game. A) It's week 1. B) ND's defense is pretty good. maybe not good enough to stop OSU, but slow them down? C) OSU's defense hasn't proved anything to me yet. They stomped Sparty, but otherwise were torched by every ranked team they faced. As well as Minnesota.

I'm still expecting Ohio wins - but I definitely can see ND pulling it off.