OT - Sources: Texas eyes UCLA's Mora

Submitted by MJ14 on

The University of Texas has expressed strong interest in UCLA coach Jim Mora as a possible replacement for Mack Brown, and the school and representatives of Mora have had conversations as recently as Thursday, sources told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter.

A source close to Mora denies there has been contact.

 

Link: http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10233431/sources-texas-l…

This would be a very good hire for Texas in my opinion. 

goblue16

January 2nd, 2014 at 7:59 PM ^

Would it b a good hire? Mora can recruit but he hasn't wowed me as a coach the past 2 years have been ok and until he beats Stanford or Oregon he hasn't proven anything

MJ14

January 2nd, 2014 at 8:08 PM ^

UCLA last five seasons without Mora:

6-7

4-8

7-6

4-8

6-8

UCLA with Jim Mora:

9-5

10-3 with a huge bowl win 42-14 over Virginia Tech.

Exactly what more does he need to do to impress you? A lot of his best playmakers are guys he just recruited. He also has NFL head coaching experience, which is something players look for. He runs a good program and as far as I know he is clean. So what isn't impressive?

Edit: UCLA also dominated Nebraska this season. One of only two Big Ten teams with a bowl win. They also lost by 3 last year in the Pac-12 Championship to Stanford.

Creedence Tapes

January 2nd, 2014 at 11:46 PM ^

I'm really sick of the whole the PAC 12 is significantly bettern than the BIG meme. The pac 12 has 92 wins this year, while the BIG has 88 wins, with a possible 89th win coming up, hardly "significanlty" better. Head to head the pac 12 has 3 wins and 3 lossess against the BIG, and The BIG champ just knocked off the pac 12 champ. How is this "significantly better"? 

LSAClassOf2000

January 2nd, 2014 at 8:06 PM ^

Didn't Mora sign an extension as rumors regarding the Washington opening were swirling last month? I wonder if he would jump so soon, and after he was rather explicit in December that he was quite happy at UCLA. That being said, he also seems like a pretty good evaluator of talent, which is something I am sure Texas wants with its home-grown pool of resources. 

Steve in PA

January 3rd, 2014 at 9:00 AM ^

 

The UC school system doesn't throw cash around like the non-sate schools.  Assistants don't make crap in comparison to other schools.  Even if he does love it there if Texas calls a coach has to listen.  IIt's one of the very few schools that is almost guaranteed to get their 1st choice.

erald01

January 2nd, 2014 at 8:50 PM ^

I dont understand why a school as big as Texas is waisting time with wanna be's like Mora, he is good but i dont think he is Texas worthy good...if I was Texas and want to win quick I would either pay up for Saban or Harbough since his contract is over this year with 49ers. I dont think DB has the balls to go and snatch Harbough so Texas should..IMO these are the only two coaches that can win quick

BlueinLansing

January 2nd, 2014 at 9:34 PM ^

if he left UCLA for Texas.  But if Hundley opts for the NFL he may feel his stock will never be higher a bigger program with Texas's cash isn't really out there.

alum96

January 2nd, 2014 at 9:54 PM ^

LOLing at the comments earlier in the thread disparing Mora JR.  UCLA started 3 true freshman on the OL.  He was 9-5 and 10-3 his first 2 seasons.  Again this season with 3 true freshman starting - they destroyed Nebraska WITH Martinez by 20 in Nebraska.   The 3 losses were all to the top teams in the Pac 12 - Az St, Oregon,  Stanford.  The latter 2 on the road.  ASU by 5 at home.  With 3 freshmen starters on the OL.  Did I mention he made UCLA a functional team with a high powered offense most games with 3 freshman on the OL?  And had his team inspired in a bowl game to run all over VA Tech?  Unlike the disaster that happened here.

I assume he goes back to the NFL at some point but I'd like to see him in AA if Hoke does not work out ...

alum96

January 2nd, 2014 at 10:03 PM ^

#1 I think the pool of excellent coaching candidates is small.  Even guys like Sumlin you wonder if he is a Manziel creation.

#2 Of those guys most are at schools with way less pressure but the pay is not far behnd.  Urban is an obvious 2nd choice to Saban but has less pressure at OSU than he would at Texas.  Dantonio at this point I am putting as one of the top 5 coaches in the country (name me 3 guys after Saban and Meyer you'd take over Dantonio) and is now the Bear Bryant of East Lansing and will have statues built for him.  Just got a big pay raise that sounds like $4Mish.  If he goes 9-3 next year he goes 9-3; they wont ask for him to be fired in 2 years if he doesnt have a NC like they will in Texas.   So who else do you have left out there that is elite - its not a big pool.

#3 - The latter part of my point #2.  A lot of coaches can do something similar to what they could do at Texas without the intense pressure.   I know Mack Brown got a long time but he was riding the Vince Young era wave here lately.  The next guy I'd imagine if he is not competing for a NC in 3-4 years will be canned.  So you are asking elite or near elite coaches who are only considered because they have their own programs in a good place to trade that for the intense scrutiny of Texas.  Maybe that fits a guy like Charlie Strong as Louisville is ...well Louisville but most of the other candidates have their programs in a better spot than Texas right now, without the intenses pressure.  And most are paid pretty well.  So is an extra $800K a year or $1.2M a year worth a short half life at Texas?

Don

January 2nd, 2014 at 11:32 PM ^

According to Scout:

LSU's past two classes in 2012 and 2013: #6 and #9

FSU's past two classes in 2012 and 2013: #11 and #16

Auburn's past two classes in 2012 and 2013: #8 and #14

UCLA's past two classes in 2012 and 2013: #12 and #3

 

 

funkywolve

January 3rd, 2014 at 12:03 AM ^

Elite coaches in college at top BCS programs almost never leave to take another college job.  With the exception of Meyer and Saban most of the top college coaches worked their way up the chain, either by being HC's at smaller schools or as coordinators at big time programs.  (Both Meyer and Saban worked their way up the chain initially but Meyer took a year off and Saban was in the pros for a couple years)

bighouse22

January 2nd, 2014 at 10:07 PM ^

I am starting to wonder if Texas actually has a deal with Saban and they are waiting until the Sugar Bowl ends to announce it.  I have seen a lot of names bandied about, but the search seems oddly slow.  A lot of names, but no real action happening.

bighouse22

January 2nd, 2014 at 10:07 PM ^

I am starting to wonder if Texas actually has a deal with Saban and they are waiting until the Sugar Bowl ends to announce it.  I have seen a lot of names bandied about, but the search seems oddly slow.  A lot of names, but no real action happening.

Fifth-Stringer

January 2nd, 2014 at 11:40 PM ^

At Texas not only are you at one of the premier jobs in the country, you are the MAN in Austin. At UCLA no matter how well you do you'll always be second fiddle to the basketball squad.