Borges Takes Some Blame For Denard's Passing Struggles

Submitted by Michael Scarn on

Nothing too ground-breaking, but at least Borges recognizes that play calling is part of the problem with our less than efficient passing game.  Here's hoping we get this all sorted out by the time we head up to Spartyland.

 

OC Al Borges took blame for QB Denard Robinson’s struggles. Robinson has completed 48.6% of his passes, and Borges said Tuesday he has to put his QB in better position to complete passes and to get into better rhythm. “He’s a capable passer, but as a play-caller, we have to consider everything we’re calling,” Borges said.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rapid-reports/team/MI

MichiganStudent

September 27th, 2011 at 8:42 PM ^

Big fan of this. If nothing else, it takes some pressure off of Denard. This is a tri-fold problem; OC, Denard, and receivers. 

I may be making a crazy statement, but I think Denard will improve over the year with his passing...aka we won't be ranked in the 100's in passing (I think more like 60's). 

M - Flightsci

September 27th, 2011 at 8:59 PM ^

Acknowledging the problem.

2. Correct

3. ???

4. Profit

 

We have some awesome coordinators.  I didn't know what to think of Gorgeous when he was hired.  I'm a huge fan now.  Mattison love is unecessary, all know the greatness by now

dennisblundon

September 27th, 2011 at 9:10 PM ^

Denard is sailing passes around ten yards and slightly under throwing passes over 30 yards. In my infinite wisdom I came up with the need to run 20 yard routes. Boom O-coordinated'

Bb011

September 27th, 2011 at 9:31 PM ^

Even if it wasn't his problem at all (which I'm not saying) I think this is something he should say. Its always good to take some of the pressure off of your players.

neoavatara

September 27th, 2011 at 9:40 PM ^

Is a smart man.  I hope he keeps going in the next game, but when we get to the heart of conference play, hope he shortens up the routes, makes less risky throws, etc.  If so, many here will have to apologize to the guy...he may be one step ahead of all of us.  Time will tell. 

goblue12

September 27th, 2011 at 9:50 PM ^

It needs to get sorted out before we head to spartyland... A lot of people I know are overlooking the Northwestern game which I think has the possibility to be a trap game... First away game of the season, night game, they get their QB back.. 

justingoblue

September 27th, 2011 at 10:04 PM ^

I thought NU was going to have a big season this summer. Persa comes back this week and maybe he's okay and they held him out of Army for other reasons, but I doubt he can just come back after nine months and be the same QB he was a year ago, especially missing all of the out of conference games and having one week back to prepare for us. They very well might end up being a good team later, but I think we take this early game.

Eye of the Tiger

September 27th, 2011 at 10:09 PM ^

More high-percentage passes that stretch the field horizontally, not just vertically: curls, hitches, bubble screens, outs. etc.  Then I want to see some inside throws: slants, drags, etc. This is a huge part of the WCO, and Borges--who wrote a book about it--knows this way better than I do.  Whereas the traditional pro-style attack runs to set up the pass, in the WCO you also pass to open space for the run game.  

Obviously we don't run a real WCO, but I have expected to see more WC sets and plays than we've seen so far.  I also don't think it would be too hard to integrate these routes into shotgun sets, e.g. 4 wide plus Smith in the backfield, pull Roundtree and Hemingway inside and Gallon and Dileo on short outs, then release Smith as a checkdown.  

If Denard can hit a bunch of passes early, he'll have more confidence on the deep ball. and we'll get some chances to break off more huge runs.  

My fear is, if we can't figure something like this out, then good defenses like MSU's and Iowa's will just stack the box with 8 guys and dare us to beat them with Denard's arm.  This backfired on ND in the 4th quarter, but it worked several times last year for our opponents, and Denard was passing better then.  

 

snoopblue

September 27th, 2011 at 10:12 PM ^

I almost want teams to think that Denard can't throw. That way, Big Ten play rolls around, teams crowd the box and Borges starts calling the passing plays we can run perfectly. Then the camera goes to Borges up in the box with a big grin on his face.

m1817

September 27th, 2011 at 10:41 PM ^

If we had a running back who finished second nationally in 2010 with 1,702 yards and was currently leading FBS with 160.6 yards per game, wouldn't he be a Heisman favorite? If you took that same player and said that he had thrown for six TDs out of the Wildcat in four games, would we be knocking his accuracy?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/cory_mccartney/heisman-watch/index.html?eref=sihp&sct=hp_bf3_a2

BigBlue02

September 27th, 2011 at 11:40 PM ^

But we don't. We have a QB who needs to make throws. And he needs to be more accurate.  If we just put 2 running backs in the backfield, I am pretty sure teams would have a pretty easy time getting ready for our offense

maquiladora

September 27th, 2011 at 10:48 PM ^

His plan all along was to test Denard's ability to hit timing routes, check to multiple recievers on any given pass play, and improvise when appropriate while working within the transitional offense. Outside of the ND game, Borges hasn't really been forced to throw the ball since you know who is jogging for 200. I think the more familiar passing routes will become a much more frequent aspect to the offense once we get later in the season and defenses are aggressively playing our run game.

JohnnyBlue

September 28th, 2011 at 10:45 AM ^

Exactly, I think the struggles in the 3rd quarter of the SDSU game were because we had a great first half, and Borges felt ok have some breathing room against a quality oponent time to give denard some reps with the hard stuff.  

I think he relizes now if he didn't before this will be a growing process for him and denard, him learning to call a good spread option while denard learns WCO style passing, Next year i think it all comes together and dispite the hard schedule we make a legit run at the big ten, and if we do well in our OOC darkhorse NC contender.

The main difference between RR and Borges is that RR tried to coach around Denards flaws, Borges is trying to when possible coach thru them and coach him up, which is causing some big growing pains as were seeing.

Roachgoblue

September 27th, 2011 at 11:19 PM ^

Shit Sherlock! See last years passing plays that worked well. Fix the D... the offense did ok passing and fire up the run. It is football, and not rocket science. P.s. I am drunk, so yes I know my sentence structure sucks, and punctuation and or spelling bloz ballz. My bad. I am out like rich rod (who was a shitball and coached in the f'n big east)

Wisconsin Wolverine

September 28th, 2011 at 4:40 PM ^

A good dog brings me the newspaper.  Given that Ruckus is a dog, & observing that Ruckus brings me the newspaper, Ruckus is a good dog.


This logic is sound under the condition that fetching the paper is the only criterion in determining good-doggedness.  Realistically, however, there are probably other things to consider.


If Ruckus brings me the newspaper & poops in my bed, Ruckus is not a good dog.  He's ... only ok.

Wolfman

September 28th, 2011 at 12:20 AM ^

Borgess, if he didn't realize during spring and fall practice, when DR was completing at about a 70% clip, realizes it's going to take awhile for DR to transform into the type of passer who is able to hit at the necessary rate in this type of offense.

He has admitted same, and all we have to do as fans is look back at what our passing game conisted of during the first year with DR at qb. The defense was so afraid of Denard running, all it took was Roundtree to slip past his cover man, turn wave his hands until Denard spotted him, catch the ball, do a 180 and head for the end zone. This is not unusual when you have a qb with such gifted running ability. Pat White threw for over 70% completion rate when all his receveirs had to do was go downfield and the defense would create separation for them by coming up to stop White. So much easier to complete a pass when it's nothing more difficult than warming up on the sidelines. 

Roundtree, although owning certainly our biggest reception of this year, has maybe two pass completions all year and Jr., probably our most dangerous receiver has received the majority of his passes through a bit of luck, i.e., jump balls and compete defensive breakdowns not unlike last year when dbs were forced to leave their position because Denard was breaking containment.

This is a work in progress, but Al is as aware as all of us that these receivers were recruited more for working in space - much like Dan's receivers at WVU, than our prototypical receivers that we're now listing as priorties to fit into our new offensive system. When you have both qb and receivers trying to learn actual pass routes it is bound to take awhile.

Nice thing is we will have had five games to work on this and with each week that passes, even if it appears like we've regressed at times, we'll have practiced more and more and suddenly it will come together, more likely than not this season. 

Expect a upturn in short routes to forgotten men like Tree, Odoms and Gallon and Smith coming out of the backfield, just to give Denard the confidence he and receivers both will need to become more proficient in the more compex routes needed to run this offense at it's optimum level.  Al, and I know he's preaching it, will probably tell Denard when he's moving forward in the pocket and sees nothing but thirty yards of grass in front of him that it is now time to forget about downfield receivers and simply tuck and run. His reluctance to do this has cost us two turnovers that I can think of, so I think this type of mistake will become a non issue also as we move forward.

Al is a very smart man as we al know so he will more than likely do those things that allow Denard to have success now, even if it means learning his offense at a slower than ideal pace. He is aware that winning each game and instilingl the confidence in Denard that will be needed in bigger games is of paramount importance right now. Hence, allowing him to be Denard of last year in second half of ND game and increased running plays for him from that point on. He is also aware this will be the last time he'll have a qb with such freakish athletic ability, so I imagine his playcalling and teaching for the next year and a half will be predicated on this moreso than on making him the perfect w.c. qb.

This has to be one of the most difficult coaching jobs imaginable, trying to teach a once in thirty year athlete how to play football according to your system and at the same time realizing to miminize his natural abilities - something akin to being far superior to the system - might be a huge mistake. Something tells me Mr. Borges, or anyone that's been in football as long as him for that matter, realizes exactly what he has and is going to do just fine with him even if those passing stats end up closer to 50% than 70%.

Thinking those red zone trips of ours tells us all he has a pretty good grip of what's going on and to expect like results once conference play starts. The whole team seems to be feeling it right now and our RBs suddenly seem to be running with a sense of purpose, like "Hey we have a job too,"something we haven't seen since the days of Mike Hart. I'm liking it.