OT: Any other parents worried about young men struggling?

Submitted by chuck bass on

Noticed my son's honor section at school was overwhelmingly girls. Poked around on google and learned gender achievement gap is a modern phenom - gen Y and Z girls take tougher advanced courses, higher GPAs, majority of top 10% of their graduating class, complete undergrad on time (boys taking 5 and 6 years, if they finish), 60/40 girls to boys earning bachelors, masters, professional degrees, and young women are dominating a lot of industries.

Gen y and z boys seem to glorify immaturity and slacking, e.g. Barstool. Video game addiction has gone mainstream, even popular boys are obsessed, e.g. Fortnite. Don't read for leisure. Lots of apathy, disengagement, aren't as focused on academics and career – don't seem to be adapting to the demands to succeed in modern hyper-competitive economy.

What is going on?

StephenRKass

February 26th, 2018 at 6:51 PM ^

I love this post. Kudos to the OP . . . worthwhile discussion.

I would chime in that I definitely see this reality as well (challenges for males compared to females in academic settings.) I don't exactly know what the answers are. But I see the problem.

My anecdotal corroboration has to do with my own three children.

Our two youngest are twins, adopted, a boy and a girl. The girl has been an academic high achiever. She is driven, a member of various clubs and sports teams, great in the classroom, a straight arrow. Her twin brother has been much more of a slacker. Between sports, girls, video games, hanging out with friends, nefarious activities, and lack of motivation, he has definitely not done well. He is finally starting to turn things around, but in terms of admission to elite colleges like Michigan, that ship has long since sailed. He just is maturing at a different rate. At this point, his best bet might be something in trades, and not college. The point is, the academic system has been much more geared to our daughter's rather than our son's strengths.

My oldest, a girl, is just about 25, and is about 5 years into a 6 year stint in the Navy. She has been an Aegis Computer Network Technician, a very competitive and hard rating in the Navy, where you need brains, nerves of steel, and a pretty good STEM aptitude. The fact that the Navy will provide about 150k plus towards college costs was a big motivator for enlisting. Interestingly, she will leave it all behind, to pursue a degree in Nursing. In practical and financial terms, this doesn't make sense. But she has the freedom and ability to choose a field of greater interest to her.

Thanks again to the OP for putting this topic up for discussion.

CJW3

February 26th, 2018 at 6:57 PM ^

School is for idiots.  American schools aren't structured to instill independent critical thinking, they teach you how to sit at a desk for 8 hours + doing repetitive, menial tasks. The goal is to allow them to fill out a roster of middle managerial types that will take orders, tow the company line, and not ask for vacations, benefits etc. 

However, thanks to advances in computing and robotics, not only will traditional factory jobs continue to dissapear, many of those white collar jobs will also dissappear, or will be devalued to the point where they can no longer be called "middle class".  The capitalist class will have to decide whether they want to continue paying out white collar jobs as a form of social security, or they'll just let us toil on a dying rock under robot overlords.

TLDR: Did you see Blade Runner 2049? Learn to shoot good and start drinking

uncleFred

February 26th, 2018 at 6:58 PM ^

For four decades Michigan has adopted an admission policy that favored women over men and minorities over Caucasians and Asians. If you look at the stated goals of Michigan's admission policy for the Medical school or other of its graduate programs, the University seeks a majority of women in its enrollments.

So yes, we alumni should be concerned that merit is ever less important in the enrollment policies of our university.  

snarling wolverine

February 26th, 2018 at 7:40 PM ^

And what would that accomplish?

Our nation's schools are increasingly re-segregating and class mobility is more frozen than at any time in history.  To take zero account of someone's background is to deny the realities that kids face at the K-12 level.  (For the record, some aspects of U-M's admissions have favored white applicants, such as the geographic-diversity policies that favor students from places like the U.P.)

BTW, contrary to the claim above, universities increasingly favor boys over girls in admissions. Only the Ivies and a few other super-competitive institutions go the other way.

 

uncleFred

March 31st, 2018 at 9:57 PM ^

was solicited by Michigan's Medical school. She graduated in the top third or quarter of her class and missed honors by three one hundreds of a grade point. In the solicitation that was sent her, the medical school indicated that their goal was a 54% 46% female to male incoming class. 

The med school is quite open about this and you can go online and find that as a stated goal. You want to generalize about "universities" as if thats a rebuttal to my comment. Without regard to what "universities" may be doing, my alma mater, the University of Michigan is actively filtering their admissions in favor of women vs men.

BroadneckBlue21

February 26th, 2018 at 7:27 PM ^

As a college professor for thirteen years counting, yes, you sum up the differences quite well. Who dislikes the truth so much? I had students fill out a weekly schedule to plan their study time, and a few boys marked “Xbox” or “video games” for 30 plus hours in their weeks. Zero girls put video games. That’s all anecdotal, but young men are definitely falling behind with regard to academics at the different colleges my wife and I teach at. Here are also higher rates of depression showing up. With two boys of my own, I hope having two professors in the house doesn’t drown out academics. My older boy loves to learn, right now, so we shall see if he wins out over peer pressure to act cool.

BroadneckBlue21

February 26th, 2018 at 7:27 PM ^

As a college professor for thirteen years counting, yes, you sum up the differences quite well. Who dislikes the truth so much? I had students fill out a weekly schedule to plan their study time, and a few boys marked “Xbox” or “video games” for 30 plus hours in their weeks. Zero girls put video games. That’s all anecdotal, but young men are definitely falling behind with regard to academics at the different colleges my wife and I teach at. Here are also higher rates of depression showing up. With two boys of my own, I hope having two professors in the house doesn’t drown out academics. My older boy loves to learn, right now, so we shall see if he wins out over peer pressure to act cool.

JamieH

February 26th, 2018 at 7:40 PM ^

But my friends and I spent pretty much the entire time we were in college at Michigan either playing video games or at the gym playing basketball.  And that was 25 years ago.  So have things really changed that much?  I still remember staying up all night on Friday nights playing Madden & NHL on Sega Genesis. 

Sopwith

February 26th, 2018 at 7:47 PM ^

To what extent should we, as Michigan fans, consider blaming the social factors such as the video game industry for limiting the pipeline of effective male offensive tackles in this generation? As male underachievement goes, this one hits home particularly hard.

SalvatoreQuattro

February 26th, 2018 at 8:09 PM ^

Women are advancing so much because starting in the 60's they have incrementally experienced more and more freedom from societal strictures to pursue careers and  they do so with great intensity. Women have a drive  that many men nowadays lack.

This has only continued apace in more recent times as feminism has become more mainstream and thus placed more emphasis on women's rights and interests than ever before.

The decline in boys achievement should worry us all. Not just for reasons of equity, but the potential of marginalized males to develop into a force of malevolence and destruction.

The mass shootings we see being committed by angry and socially isolated young,mostly white, men may be the first signs of the development of a cadre of young men bent on destroying a system they see as inimical to their interests.

The rise of white nationalism is in part an outgrowth of this. Many of them fit the description above. Video games, porn, drug and alcohol abuse,aimlessness, fascinated with violence, etc. 

Very clearly there needs to be more of an effort made to study and understand this issue because male rage and violent expressions thereof is a public health problem.

Magnus

February 26th, 2018 at 7:54 PM ^

Books and books could be written on this topic. Some of the conclusions would probably get deleted.

I see this stuff on a daily basis, as do many of you. I didn't read all of the comments, so someone may have addressed this. But I think the advancement of women has made men somewhat more replaceable. Men used to have to compete for good jobs in order to support women and their family.

Now that many women are making equal to or more than their significant others, men are no longer feeling the pressure to compete and succeed at such a higher level. Men have become more financially dependent on the opposite sex.

As for athletics, there have been positive and negative studies on their effect. For example, some studies have shown that grades take a bit of a hit during sports seasons. Personally, my grades were higher - and so were those of many people I know - during sports seasons. But that's anecdotal.

On the plus side, people who participate in athletics are more likely to graduate high school. There are also lessons about leadership, hard work, teamwork, etc. learned during sports that are not learned in the classroom. Some of those characteristics are not taught/learned in the classroom. 

I do believe we put too much emphasis on sports in this country. I think practice hours should be shortened, and dead periods should be lengthened. The problem is that if your rival school is practicing for 3 hours a day, you need to practice for 3 or 3.5 or 4. If they start their weight program 2 weeks after the season ends, then you want to start 1 week after the season to get ahead. More restrictions need to be placed on those types of things to allow young men (and women) to concentrate more on studies, family, community service, etc.

I guess I'll leave it there for now.

HailHail47

February 26th, 2018 at 8:20 PM ^

Your comment that men are replaceable is very true today. Imagine how true it was when the military draft was ongoing? That feeling of replaceability can lead to low self esteem in men. Further, men often feel like they can’t express their frustration because “man rules” force you to look inward. Men commit about 80% of suicides, it’s truly tragic how little attention this gets. The sexes are complementary, not opposite or equal biologically. Both have strengths and weaknesses and it’s important for people to have a balanced discussion on the topic, because what is bad for men will ultimately be bad for women, and vice versa.

SalvatoreQuattro

February 26th, 2018 at 8:28 PM ^

A basic grasp of human reproduction tells us that. Thus, the willingness to sacrifice men in wars and the strong hesitance to risk woman in conflict as evidenced by women being refused admittance to the combat portions of militaries.

If you want to destroy a group of people you go after the women  and children first. That is an exceptionally cruel statement to make, but it's true. As Americans we are so insulated from the terrors of war here in the US that it is hard for us to appreciate the stark realities of violent conflict.

chuck bass

February 27th, 2018 at 8:27 PM ^

What I think I teased out is you believe young men are rattled they have to [now] compete with female peers in school and for career advancement? But how would gen Y and Z boys know any different? It's not like young boys recall how it was in the good ole days (decades before they were born) when unlettered men could coast into an $80,000 factory gig or into mid-level management after loafing through college with gentleman C's.

Unless you mean gen Y and Z's parents haven't adapted to the new landscape, i.e. failing to hold their sons to a higher, modern, academic-focused and more competitive standard? If that's your point, I agree 100%. And the issue is if you don't have lofty standards for boys very early, it's really, really tough to make up that lost ground. The defined advanced tracks begin in late elementary school – and wedded to those tracks are the foundation of their academic confidence and influential peer groups.

Wendyk5

February 26th, 2018 at 8:07 PM ^

My limited experience (two kids, boy is three years older than girl) is that boys take longer to bake. I don't know why, and I know not all boys and girls can be categorized this way. I think boys need strong and supportive male figures in their lives. Not necessarily dads; it could be a coach or a teacher. They need structure of some kind -- assuming it's all those crazy hormones that need to be wrangled. My daughter is way more on top of things than my son, who is a senior in high school. My daughter, a freshman, is almost completely self-sufficient, while my son barely knows how to boil water, and isn't interested in learning. He's too into video games. One thing he's completely committed to is playing baseball. When it comes to working out, practices, etc...he's self-sufficient and needs no prodding. 

My brother and I had the same age difference, and were exactly the same way. We both turned out fine. 

butuka21

February 26th, 2018 at 8:17 PM ^

What’s going on is good parenting vs. bad parenting. To many video games, and no imagination. Less playing outside, more looking at iPads, and a culture where everybody wins and gets a pat on the back for a good ole try. I also noticed in my own child’s school children are being placed in higher level courses very early based on state/national testing. For example my child gets straight A’s but was not invited to the discovery program because of the percentage she fell in based on state testing, so I had to write a letter with the teachers recommendation to get her in. That to me is ridiculous. Everything is so ass backwards now in schools. I’m not sure what they are trying to accomplish with kids anymore. It’s more just get them through the system and if based on this test they took in 4th grade this is where they should be long term

MeanJoe07

February 26th, 2018 at 8:21 PM ^

About 75 percent of teachers are women. Our education strategy sucks. It's basically become a worthless barrier to entry for getting a job. Females do better likely bc they're being taught by females and are higher in conscientiousness on average which is the greatest predictor of success in school aka "can you sit there and listen and grind away at task after task and be organized". Very few boys want to do that. Men take more risks and existvat the extremes. If they can survive the sludgefart education they will have more success but also more disastrous failures than women on average. Also the need for men to provide is being replaced as more women work and view being a mom has having less value. Men are also being replaced by the state causing more singlemotherhood which in turn hurts the growth and development of the fatherless boys. but at least we get to feel progressive for progressiveness's sake. a nice balanced society with equal opportunity for all and less govt interference would be nice.

kgh10

February 26th, 2018 at 9:26 PM ^

You blame single motherhood on "men being replaced by the state"? Genuinely interested in how you came to that conclusion. Just because the state has maybe made being a single-mother less shitty, doesn't mean women prefer that over a traditional nuclear family. Men who value fatherhood often become great fathers, and there are a ton of them right here in this thread. And from my small vantage point, men are way more present as fathers now than they used to be.

That's also very presumptious to think females do better simply because their teachers are women. A lot of knowledge-building education DOES require you to sit, perform repetitive tasks, and focus. As you said, now boys don't want to do that. Generations of boys around the world did plenty of this, but now somehow they don't anymore and the system is to blame? There isn't always a way around that (although trust me, I wish there were).

Most of my physician mentors are men, and being a female doesn't mean I don't value their influence on my life and career. Yes it's nice to get advice from female physicians esp. on how to balance being a mother and having a career, but I owe so much of my success to the male physicians who have taken me under their wings. It's hard to believe a boy can't value his education because a man isn't providing it. If true, maybe that's the problem?

In your dialogue, you forget that much of the leadership of most industries are run almost exclusively by men. Somehow their female teachers didn't hinder their success. 

MeanJoe07

February 26th, 2018 at 9:54 PM ^

Accorsing to the US Census Bureau 1 in 4 children under the age of 18 or 17 million kids are being raised without a father. This is MUCH higher than prior decades and is the result of many nuanced factors that you could fill several books. Single moms work more than married moms, but make much less and cant be there as often for their child. They also recieve more benefits feom the state which increase with more kids. A woman working 3 jobs with several kids is going to have a hard time getting a successful high earning male to commit to her. The state is stepping in where the men aren't. I didnt say you cant value an education if its provided by the opposite sex. Its probably best to be taught by both. The female teachers make up 98% of elementary teachers. It decreases at higher grades but female teachers are the majority. They excelled in environment that rewarded female traits and are going to teach using the same system that helped them get to where they are.

MeanJoe07

February 26th, 2018 at 10:01 PM ^

Additionally there were not generations of men sitting in classrooms. This is relatively knew within the past few decades. prior to that men could work in a factory or do other high risk jobs and be very very successful without acquiring a bachelors and then a masters and so on. . . recently this is becoming the barrier to entry into the corporate world and the blue collar jobs are being replaced by cheaper labor. Men have yet to adapt to this change. idk if it will be good or bad, but i suspect it will be bad. We need to combine the best aspects of men and women across the spectrum and celebrate and value differences where do exist.

kgh10

February 26th, 2018 at 11:07 PM ^

That makes much more sense to me than the conclusions noted in your initial post. A lot of blue collar jobs still do provide a great income. There seems to be a growing movement to promote the trades and increasing availabliity of trades programs. Those jobs still exist and they still don't require a university degree, but they do offer a liveable wage.

I grew up with a father in a blue collar industry (carpentry), and he says young American-raised men just don't want to do the work despite the opportunity to do so. I've also heard this echoed by many other business owners in related blue-collar industries, despite their ideological preference of hiring American workers and providing a competitive wage. It seems the lack of prestige or status keeps a lot of guys away from it, rather than it not being lucrative enough. And they ask for way more and produce way less, hence leaving the door open for "cheap labor." 

Pre-high school education has been dominated by female educators since the 60s. Those men went on to enter university at much higher rates than women until recently. They did the work and they still dominate almost every high-earning industry. Ultimately, there's only so many ways we can cater to individuals who aren't willing. There are opportunities out there and as you alluded to, it requires adaptation to obtain them. 

throckman

February 26th, 2018 at 10:07 PM ^

The hypothesis that a higher proportion of single mother households produces more violent societies is easily falsified: https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/10/single-parents-around-the…; Relatively violent societies fall all along the spectrum of single mother household frequency, and so do relatively peaceful societies.

I agree with kgh10; the notion that females benefit more from female teachers is preposterous.  Most economically developed nations have very similar demographics of K-12 teachers: females dominate elementary school teaching positions, but by high school, nearly half of teachers are males.  Most economically developed nations don't have these problems we do in the USA.

In reading this thread, nearly every poster has used college admission and a college degree as their primary marker of 'success.'  I find this curious, and disappointing.  You don't need to go to college or finish it to be successful. 

 

MeanJoe07

February 26th, 2018 at 10:27 PM ^

Not sure if your responding to me, but to be clear, I never said anything about single motherhood and how it relates to violence let alone violence in other countries.   Not sure you can easily compare a single mother in the US and Japan and start drawing conclusions. I'm not an expert but I think you just brought in about 10 billion additional factors into the discussion that was already pretty nuanced.  Since most economically devloped countries have mostly femail teachers tells us what?  do undeveloped countures have more males?  are those developed countties better off or experiencing similar problems?  Are there cultures different or the same?  Increasing in the U.S you do have to have a degree to be successful or at least of the chance.  Of ocurse you don't need to, but your odds increase.