SIAP: CFP Chairman calls last week's loss 'impressive,' explains why we have a shot
November 30th, 2016 at 9:09 AM ^
to have cheer for Colorado. I was pretty mad about that stupid Hail Mary for a long time. And how they showed it over and over again...
November 30th, 2016 at 9:26 AM ^
November 30th, 2016 at 10:20 AM ^
^^^^^This. So much this.
November 30th, 2016 at 12:25 PM ^
Or pile it on by throwing the Pac12 Campionship game for the 'greater good' of the Pac12. /tinfoil hat
November 30th, 2016 at 2:26 PM ^
it is weird to want to win your conference, to then knock your conference out of the playoff, otherwise said to want to win your conference to know you have no shot to advance.
Maybe the cfp should be quiet and say nothing until all the champs are done with to avoid the inevitable shell game if this, then that.
That said, I will be disappointed if Sefo Liufau isn't playing in the NFL in a few years. That guy is one of the best QBs I've seen in awhile.
November 30th, 2016 at 6:14 PM ^
November 30th, 2016 at 11:20 AM ^
Steeler fans were mad at him for a few years too.
November 30th, 2016 at 12:10 PM ^
And as a Steelers / Michigan fan (my dad grew up in Pittsburgh), it was torturous. Since Stewart never really did anything that impressive in a Pittsburgh uniform, especially as a quarterback, whenever the TV network wanted to show his potential, they had one go-to clip. And somehow, all of the times I saw that stupid play, Westbrook never dropped the damned ball...
November 30th, 2016 at 8:53 AM ^
I don't care about National Championships, I don't care about final rankings, I don't care about record or bowl prestige. I want Ohio State, neutal field, neutral officiating.
November 30th, 2016 at 8:55 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 30th, 2016 at 9:04 AM ^
November 30th, 2016 at 9:42 AM ^
but I will take a national title over vengeance on OSU every day of the week and twice on Sunday
November 30th, 2016 at 12:27 PM ^
What about vengance over OSU on a neutral site with neutral refs to win the national championship?
November 30th, 2016 at 9:33 AM ^
My father and step-mom are HUGE Ohio State fans. Every year for the past decade (except 2011) I have had to listed to their cackles right after the Ohio State game-- good natured, but salt in the wound. After that game, after the BS calls throughout the game, all I got were a few texts saying that the refs made some calls because "they wouldn't have been able to leave Columbus" otherwise. There was no gloating, not phone call, no annoying facebook posts. Even my step-mom's Dad, who may be in a OSU-themed cult, hasn't said a word about it.
When the most biased people I know-- who would be motivated to poke me in the ribs about this if anyone was-- don't want to talk about this game because the officiating was such crap, then yeah: I want revenge. Most of the time, I'd probably trade an OSU loss for a National Championship (probably), but not this year. Not. This. Year.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:35 AM ^
Uh, yes, I would.
I don't know how the national title evolved into the be-all and end-all of college football, but it only really became that in the '90s or so. Now there's this idea that everything else is subserviant to it.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:49 AM ^
YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME!
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 30th, 2016 at 10:10 AM ^
like myself. We lived much of our life in a time where beating OSU and winning the big ten and being invited to the Rose Bowl was the pinnacle of achievement. The bowl game outcome was secondary. National Championship? That was something maybe those cheaters in the south talked about.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:47 AM ^
November 30th, 2016 at 10:43 AM ^
November 30th, 2016 at 10:45 AM ^
We get in and beat Alabama. OSU loses to Clemson. We beat Clemson and win a NC, which would be awesome. And yet still unsatisfying because we didn't beat OSU this year.
/off my lawn.
November 30th, 2016 at 10:57 AM ^
I agree. If we make it in w/ the skin of our teeth, it'll be as the #4 seed, not the #3 seed. It'll be like the CFP committee saying, "OK, you think you're hot shit? Prove it. Take down Alabama. Then if OSU takes care of business you can rematch them for the NC."
Gladly. And as unlikely as that scenario is, I can't help but wonder if in THAT narrow circumstance, having a potential OSU rematch standing behind Alabama wouldn't be the ultimate motivator to beat Alabama. I know "looking beyond the immediate game" is something a team should never do. But in this case, it's extra motivation.
"If you scale over or bust through the brick wall in front of you, the prize at the end is the sweetest you've ever had."
November 30th, 2016 at 11:44 AM ^
November 30th, 2016 at 1:00 PM ^
November 30th, 2016 at 9:07 AM ^
I actually partially agree.
I want to win B1G championships and go to the Rose Bowl most years.
That's really all I care about.
All this bullshit, fake, phony deciding of teams by some garbage committee who look at BULLSHIT pre-season rankings based on nothing.
Fuck all that.
Play the games. Beat who you play. Beat OSU. Go to Pasadena.
That's my Michigan.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:24 AM ^
Sadly, is just another bowl game. Winning the whole thing is what matters in 2016. Winning your conference, getting to the playoff, winning it all.
Getting a Rose Bowl victory mattered in the 80s and 90s. That luster is all but gone.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:46 AM ^
I understand hating several aspects of the committee's deliberations, but don't you think their delay in releasing initial rankings (after week 8 or so, I think) directly alleviates the concern about BS pre-season rankings?
I thought that was an odd choice of a topic to be angry about.
November 30th, 2016 at 10:54 AM ^
They screw over someone every year.
It's subjective.
When subjective data determines outcomes is when I stop caring for a sport.
I hate any sport with judges. Almost all do, but the less the better.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:29 AM ^
I would take a national championship.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:46 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 30th, 2016 at 10:45 AM ^
Thank you, men. Let's not go all Sparty. Take the NC and our overall success over any individual game/team.
November 30th, 2016 at 8:53 AM ^
Clemson or Washington losing, and probably Penn State winning.
Still think Washington's the whole gatekeeper here. A loss by them just might be enough. I do fear that Wisconsin would jump Michigan with a BTC.
November 30th, 2016 at 8:57 AM ^
Yup... need Colorado to win the Pac 12 and then probably need Penn State to beat Wisconsin. I could see Wisconsin possibly jumping us with a B1G championship because they'll have added a win over the #7 team. But how sweet would it be to sneak into the playoffs and have Harbaugh exact his revenge.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:12 AM ^
I don't think the B1G Championship will have much to do with our chances either way it goes.
Colorado or Clemson loss, and we're in.
If both lose, we rematch. And we win this time......BIG!
November 30th, 2016 at 10:49 AM ^
I keep thinking of Florida vs. Florida State in 97 Sugar Bowl. Two good teams and Florida State squeezes one out in the final regular season game at home. They rematch in the title game and the Gators absolutely embarrass them. I'll never forget that. The Seminoles were my second favorite team as a little lad.
Edit: It was said that Florida State played a dirty ass game and the refs let it go over and over in Tallahassee. I don't remember because I was too young, dumb and was rooting for them.
November 30th, 2016 at 11:31 AM ^
That's because all talk last night was based on games played to date. WI does of course get a boost if they win Saturday. With a Wisky win, it may come down to how decisively they win.
November 30th, 2016 at 12:22 PM ^
For all of the crap that the committee has taken, it's clear to me that they're treating this responsibility more seriously than the poll voters ever did.
When Michigan got passed by Florida in the final 2006 regular season AP, Harris, and Coaches polls, it was unusual -- although not unprecedented. Typically, people would just take their previous ballot and drop down teams who lost. Barring an absolute beatdown against a top opponent -- e.g., 34-8 over PSU in 1997 -- you generally couldn't jump up much with a win; you just slid past some number of the teams ahead of you who lost.
The committee does not seem to be taking that approach. While I think OSU's spot is secure, and Alabama is in provided they don't lose by 90 with season-ending injuries to 12 starters, I think they will re-evaluate things this week, and there is a real shot that the Big Ten champion could pass Michigan with an impressive victory.
I'll be (holding my nose and) cheering for PSU, because 49-10. As I posted in another thread, Michigan hasn't lost by 39+ points since 1935. It's very much not an "it happens" kind of event. It's not reasonable to compare those two teams and conclude that PSU is better, even if they do end up with an extra win. I think a decisive Wisconsin victory is likely enough to elevate them past Michigan.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:34 AM ^
Wisconsin would have a conference championship but we would have the head to head win. Those things are used if the teams are close. They would be obviously, but we would still have as good a resume or better than Wisconsin. So even if that is all viewed as a wash, then it would come down to who the committee thinks is the better team. Wisconsin is not jumping us unless they beat Penn State by more than we did. It is Washington or us, period. Unless Clemson loses and we're in anyway.
November 30th, 2016 at 8:56 AM ^
That is all!!
November 30th, 2016 at 9:08 AM ^
The only thing that can make last saturday better for us, is a rematch!
Therefore, go Hokies too!!!
November 30th, 2016 at 8:56 AM ^
I don't want to get my hopes up. I'm gradually coming to grips with the Orange Bowl. If a pleasant surprise happens, great.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:00 AM ^
Darn right it was impressive. In spite of the hostile crowd our own bone head mishaps and happy slappy refs we still almost won that game. I am officially a big colorado fan, well at least until they beat washington. Go Buffs!
November 30th, 2016 at 9:00 AM ^
I hear a lot of chatter on these boards that Washington isn't that good, etc. I guess we'll find out soon enough but they look like a damn good team to me.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:18 AM ^
The Trojans weren't impressed.
November 30th, 2016 at 11:13 AM ^
November 30th, 2016 at 9:35 AM ^
They're good. They are not as good as Michigan. Or Colorado in my opinion.
November 30th, 2016 at 10:40 AM ^
I think they kill Colorado. Colorado has not looked sharp against other quality opponents. I don't think they can keep up.
November 30th, 2016 at 9:03 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 30th, 2016 at 9:07 AM ^
November 30th, 2016 at 9:31 AM ^
It was because they destroyed Wisconsin in the BIG Championship game.