Harbaugh hires Wayne Lyons' mom

Submitted by ypsituckyboy on

Per Mark Snyder at The Paper That Shall Not Be Named, Gwendolyn Bush, who is the mother of Stanford CB Wayne Lyons, has been hired as the director of player development. On Twitter, she referred to the position as "team mom". I think we can safely assume Lyons is coming.

Harbaugh must've gotten to know her while recruiting Lyons. Also, apparently Lyons is a great student and really good kid, so I'd assume the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

EDIT: So, it sounds like she was also the "team mom" for the South Florida Elite 7-on-7 team that featured, among others, Amari Cooper, Geno Smith, and Teddy Bridgewater. All those guys apparently loved her.

umumum

February 6th, 2015 at 11:19 AM ^

but I suspect other boards for other schools are suggesting that  Sr was hired to get Jr.  And if Sr had become a coach at UCLA and Jr followed, I am sure some here would have questioned it.  

And while Sr's bona fides are pretty easily confirmed, Lyons are not and might have an odor to those outside our program.

Magnus

February 6th, 2015 at 2:08 PM ^

What other jobs appear to be attempts to get recruits?

And good gosh, Wayne Lyons is a one-year guy who hasn't even been very good in college. If this is an attempt to bribe Wayne Lyons, then we'd better REALLY be on the lookout for some shady dealings for guys who are actually really good. I'm only half-joking. If you think this is dirty, then somebody better FOIA Zach Gentry's dad's bank account or see if Brian Cole's mom got a new yacht lately.

(I know a FOIA isn't possible, so don't be an idiot.)

pescadero

February 6th, 2015 at 6:01 PM ^

What other jobs appear to be attempts to get recruits?

Chris Partridge.

 

And good gosh, Wayne Lyons is a one-year guy who hasn't even been very good in college.

I'm pretty sure it's about the high school guys on the elite 7-on-7 team she's been a "team mom" for, not Wayne Lyons.

pescadero

February 7th, 2015 at 1:13 PM ^

Do I think a kid is solely going to choose a school because of the "team mom", or because his former high school coach is there, or because the guy who ran the football academy he attended is a recruiter there, or because they're a Nike/Adidas school?

 

No.

 

Do I think those things are a FACTOR in these kids choices? You better bet. There is a reason most of these "recruiting" coordinator types often have previous relationships with or entry into the world of desired recruits after all.

 

GoWings2008

February 6th, 2015 at 10:14 AM ^

If Lyon's mom wasn't qualified, which she clearly appears to be, then it would be unethical...its wrong to give someone a job who isn't qualified.  Your assertion regarding the ethics of this situation would have changed if Lyons was a stud athlete are completely immaterial.  The ethics in this situation deal squarely with her qualifications. 

Reader71

February 6th, 2015 at 9:48 AM ^

While I understand all of your points and agree with them to one degree or another, I would still prefer that the position be filled by someone who is not the mother of a potential transfer or a recruit or even a current player. Not because something is actually untoward, but because it allows such an appearance. I'd like Michigan to be totally beyond reproach.

CompleteLunacy

February 6th, 2015 at 10:10 AM ^

Personally, I don't want MIchigan bending over backwards to appease everyone and "look" like they're doing the right thing. That's what happened when Hoke apologized for "stakegate", and frankly it made Michigan look ridiculous and weak. 

Here it "looks" bad on the surface, only if you're unfamiiliar with the history, but I don't give two shits what it looks like. If Harbaugh wanted her for the job, believe she was the most qualified, then damnit he should hire her. I obviously want Michigan to be beyond reproach too, but it's not a possible ideal to attain no matter how hard they will assuredly try, and I most definitely don't want Michigan to sacrifice something that they think makes them better in order to simply give the appearance of being beyond reproach.

To me, and here's the kicker, MIchigan is going to get negative press no matter what, because we're an easy target. Just look at the whole Weber thing. Or that one recruit whose dad "threw Mattison out of his house" for GREATLY offending them and going to the radio to tell everyone about it. I have doubts they did anything wrong in either case, and yet there they are, just taking it on the chin for doing nothing wrong. So much for being beyond reproach.

 

Reader71

February 6th, 2015 at 2:11 PM ^

I'm not worried about the press, to be honest. I'm worried about my own perception as a proud alum. I want to believe that Michigan is above this sort of thing, and all of my knowledge says they are and have been. But this is fishy at best and perhaps worse. I just don't like it. Hire someone else. Or hire her and dont go after her son. Regarding Stakegate: That wasn't press-driven either. Hoke is just a nice guy who respects opposing coaches. I also disagree on it making M look weak. If Hoke said the same thing after a win, it would have been seen by all as a classy move. We looked weak because we played weakly, not because of the apology. At any rate, the whole thing could have gone uncommented upon just like this job could have been filled by someone else.

TESOE

February 12th, 2015 at 5:19 AM ^

Harbaugh can  address this in a presser - not that I think he will.  Appearance shouldn't interfere with the correct call if it was made.  If she is qualified I don't care who her son is.  The position is not high profile enough that we will ever know probably.  In an organization like this there is quite a bit of wash for this type of hire.  If something unethical occurs so that Harbaugh is impugned that changes things. That is not the case for the time being.

I'm tired of infighting in the Fort.  Harbaugh is innocent until proven guilty in my mind and gets a pass until something is intercepted.  A position like this doesn't need more than 20 mins of the coach's time to complete.  You don't need to open the job to the public and vet it.  Get it done... next.  

 

EastUGoBlue

February 6th, 2015 at 8:56 AM ^

I'm in complete agreement. I initially have no issue with this, but let us all remember this when an SEC team or Ohio State hires the guardian of a future 5-star recruit. I have a sneaking suspicion that we would be crying bloody murder if Ohio State did this to a recruit both us and them were in on - even if the person is qualified, which I have no reason to believe this woman is not.

pescadero

February 6th, 2015 at 2:04 PM ^

Hiring the mom of a former 4-star (who has played like a 3-star) with one year of eligibility remaining... who also happens to be the "team mom" for a nationally acclaimed 7-on-7 football team full of players we'd like to recruit - isn't so different of a story.

 

Mr Miggle

February 6th, 2015 at 10:50 AM ^

last month that should generate a lot of controversy. If Harbaugh was looking to bolster the roster by hiring relatives, this wouldn't be the way to do it. If recruiting had gone a little differently, we might not even take her son as a grad transfer. This announcement may have come out today, but she was in the school directory at the beginning of the semester.

WolverineinSB

February 6th, 2015 at 10:43 AM ^

I don't have a problem with it because she seems at least on the surface qualified. My issue would be where a family gets jobs at a local business to get a kid to come here and be close to family or if like a parent was hired as a coach and has only coached at the high school level or something.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

jblaze

February 6th, 2015 at 8:47 AM ^

cam's dad went to the highest bidder and was paid cash money for no reason. Wayne's mom has a job at Michigan that is (apparently) allowed by the NCAA.

Also, since Michigan is a public school, they probably had to post the job, and she would have to be qualified (on paper at least)

AZBlue

February 6th, 2015 at 11:57 AM ^

As Magnus has pointed out (repeatedly) either you are making a huge assumption/jump to get that conclusion from M's actions -- OR -- if that is indeed what Michigan is trying to do, they are doing it extremely poorly given the potential return (1-yr of PT for an ok player) on their investment/"bribe".

jmdblue

February 6th, 2015 at 9:35 AM ^

I was underinformed.... didn't realize we were trying to get the kid to play for us for his 5th year.  Assuming both mom and child wind up in A2 I guess I'm all for it if she continues her duties for a few years.  If it's 1 and done for both of them it's pretty sketchy IMO.

CompleteLunacy

February 6th, 2015 at 9:45 AM ^

The difference is that she is getting paid to work a job. Cam Newton's dad just got a bunch of money for doing nothing. That's not like, just some small difference. That's a pretty fuckin hige difference. Not to mention, this is a very public announcement, whereas Cam Newton and his father would never publicly admit to the deal that was made.

CompleteLunacy

February 6th, 2015 at 10:41 AM ^

The short answer is "no", the long answer is "yes, but only if the NCAA allows a football program to hire someone position of Team Pastor to be on a coaching staff".

It's apples and oranges. You're comparing something that is blatantly against the letter of the law (I cannot emphasize the word "blatant" enough) to something that is clearly legal, albeit potentially (but unlikely, to me) unethical, or at least giving the appearance of being unethical. 

tolmichfan

February 6th, 2015 at 10:56 AM ^

Well it is against NCAA bylaws to create a position for a potential player. It's posted somewhere in this thread. Michigan has never had a "team mom" before and now we just hired a potential player's parent for this job that never existed before. So to me it's not so apples to oranges, we just created a job that just about anyone who is a parent could be qualified for. Just like auburn could have created a team pastor position for mr newton and paid him 400,000 grand to perform those duties.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

jblaze

February 6th, 2015 at 8:45 AM ^

Why didn't Hoke and RR have all of these extra positions? Is it just that Brandon wanted to save a buck?

It's shocking that Michigan wasn't using all of the resources available to us over the last few (~10) years.

ST3

February 6th, 2015 at 11:15 AM ^

There was a loooonggg list of people on MGoBlue.com that had positions with the football team before Hoke was fired. They've removed that list from the website. Once Harbaugh gets his people in place, I would expect that to go back up.