Herbstreit calls Brady Hoke criticism a 'witch hunt'
Is this Hoke criticism about Morris' injury even a story if UM were 4-0 ranked in the top 10? #witchhunt
I'm not saying head injuries aren't VERY serious, just saying the reaction is over the top because of how badly UM is playing under Hoke.
October 2nd, 2014 at 2:41 PM ^
that Paul Schmidt knew that Morris had a concussion and he told Hoke and then Hoke disregarded that medical advice and sent Morris back on the field? Then why the hell is Paul Schmidt not clarifying that? Why has Paul Schmidt allowed the lie to stand that he didn't know about the concussion and that he cleared Morris to play?
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:29 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:30 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:33 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:34 AM ^
Who would you rather have as coach on the other side of the field, Hoke or Harbaugh? Obviously they are supportive of Hoke.
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:34 AM ^
Herbstreit said Michigan would be 10-1 heading into Columbus?
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:12 AM ^
Are you saying Herbstreit is a witch?
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:39 AM ^
half witch
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:41 AM ^
Who cares what this idiot thinks? Shouldn't Les Miles be Michigan's HC right now according to him? Shouldn't Michigan be 5-0 right now according to his prediction?
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:37 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:40 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:37 AM ^
Over Hoke's tenure, this football program has stedily regressed. He had a year one outlier and quickly has regressed to his mean. He can't beat any team with a pulse, continues to underdevelop top level tallent and is too stuborn to change old habits (punting, etc.). So, not only does he find himself in a questionable situation stemming from what seems to be gross negligence, he is failling to meet what seem to be his job requirements. This is not a witch hunt, this is the last staw.
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:38 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:39 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:36 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:40 AM ^
But to me, he's right. If this team were 4-1 or 5-0 this would be a non-issue.
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:32 AM ^
2-4, 2-5 or 2-6? It is going to get real ugly then,
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:51 AM ^
Arguably, based on our play, we've been the worst team in the B1G East*. Short of a major reversal, Hoke is gone at the end of the year. I don't think three more games along the expected path is going to cause much additional intensity. The debate of whether to fire Hoke now or to fire him at the end of the year would likely start taking up more time/space, but I don't think the disgust would be any more intense than what we have now.
*Haha -- I didn't recognize the pun until after I typed it.
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:40 AM ^
isn't part of the incompetence that went into the record--the deer in the headlights look again and again? The timing brainfarts against PSU?
I was re-reading Three And Out, and found myself wondering why Herbie didn't suffer more criticism after saying Les was on the way. . .
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:42 AM ^
People probably are not calling for Hoke's head if Michigan was 4-0. I do think there would be a backlash, but he might not lose his job.
Why is that? It is quite likely that if Michigan was 4-0 and not having trouble doing basic things like having 11 guys on the field, Hoke would be a competent head coach who would have avoided this (or at least avoided sending Shane back onto the field) and also had a better postgame response.
The fact is, this is a symptom of the larger fact that Hoke has absolutely no idea what he's doing. When that was losing Michigan football games, we were okay with waiting til the end of the season. When that endangers a player...it's a different story.
If Hoke was 4-0, he would probably show competency as a coach. We could trust that something like this wouldn't happen again. Can you honestly tell me that his record would lead an objective person to believe that?
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:47 AM ^
Agree on all points.....also, if we were 4-0, that likely means Gardner is playing well enough that Shane never sees the field so this incident doesn't happen.
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:43 AM ^
I think this whole mess has been a little bit of piling on but it does fit right in with the clusterfu$#ness of a lot of the things this team displays. I'm ultimately judging Hoke on the perfomance of the team, which is not good and has been slowly declining since the end of the 2011 season. I'm sick of seeing a lethargic, lifeless, uninspired, unpassionate, physically dominated team.
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:48 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:52 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:58 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 10:59 AM ^
If the team wasn't playing so badly and the game management not so terrible, we would probably be inclined to think this was an unfortunate and correctable oversight.
However, this is another sign of incompetence and this one endangered a player. It was then followed up by indifference and obfuscation.
So yes, if this coaching staff wasn't doing such a poor job of managing the team we wouldn't be as angry about this. However, that is because the poor management has removed any doubt that the gentlemen in charge can fix the problems at hand, and are likely to allow them to get worse.
October 2nd, 2014 at 12:26 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:09 AM ^
Michigan hasn't been ranked since who knows when, so why even interject that? Those things only make it worse and more worthy of being drawn to the forefront.
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:10 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:12 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:13 AM ^
and shut up!
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:15 AM ^
He's somewhat right but he's still an assclown. There would be outrage over the concussion, sure, but that was just the flashpoint of 7 years (minus 2011) of terrible football.
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:20 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:23 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:30 AM ^
in hypotheticals.
It was just one more example of how this coaching staff doesn't have the details figured out and how the athletic department is run by an incompetent weasel.
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:34 AM ^
I'n not a fan of anyone on TMZSPN but I tend to agree with Herbstreit here. I put more of the onus on the medical staff for not having atleast a semblance of accountability. The head coach is in charge of a million things on the sideline, the medical staff is watching for and treating injuries, that's it...
I was convinced that a change was needed in South Bend, when we had to walk out in shame following that final pick-6 that didn't count. This is Michigan for God's sake.
October 2nd, 2014 at 12:05 PM ^
If Michigan is 5-0 or 4-1 and we just crushed Minnesota then this wouldn't be national news IMO. Head injuries are still serious regardless of wins and losses but this doesn't get picked up by ABC if we weren't getting blown out by Minnesota a week after getting embarassed by Utah. If Hoke had accepted responsibility on Sunday or even Monday by saying that yes he messed up and is reviewing it and will make sure it never happens again. Instead we have a HC and an AD who are trying like hell to find a scapegoat.
Wins/Losses, player safety mismanagement, and deception are all apart of larger body of work we are using to judge those at the helm of this program.
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:51 AM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:53 AM ^
It was handled differently at this program in 2010 when Denard Robinson left the game and didn't return after a possible concussion.
October 2nd, 2014 at 12:52 PM ^
I hear you. But isn't this situation different? This one seems different than every other concussion I've seen, in that there was no timeout between plays. Most times, the concussed player is on the turf for a bit and you get a timeout and he is evaluated.
Like I've said elsewhere, our program and every other is prepared for that type of scenario. The neurologist, for example, would have ample time to get down the field to diagnose.
As for Denard, I don't remember the circumstances. Was he laid out? Did the defense go on the field, giving the trainers time to look at him? Did Coach Rod pull him out or did Schmidt? I'm not trying to absolve anyone, I just don't think anyone else would have handled this differently, provided they didn't see the hit. That's where the coaches are at fault, in my opinion. Schmidt has no excuse. Even if he didn't see the hit, he should have been able to see it in Shane's eyes or demeanor when he looked at him on the sideline.
EDIT: We can also be sure that there are concussions that go unnoticed every week. No one notices when a lineman gets his bell rung because its usually not an open-field hit, the camera is not on him, and so on. The only way that gets diagnosed is if his position coach sees something is wrong and alerts a trainer. This is a systemic failure, and i think this would have happened everywhere. Still our fault, but it is foreseeable.
October 2nd, 2014 at 2:21 PM ^
unless you really think that this would have been handled differently at other programs, a point I would disagree with you on.
I'll tell you the same thing I tell my children - "Two wrongs don't make a right"
October 2nd, 2014 at 11:57 AM ^
You know, for people who claim to champion statistics, data, and objective analyses, this community sure does have a heavily irrational mob mentality to it.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 2nd, 2014 at 12:35 PM ^
Because no matter how many statistics you cite, data you provide or analysis you do, we still have emotions.
October 2nd, 2014 at 12:10 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 2nd, 2014 at 12:11 PM ^
Ps-if you've read any of my other posts you will know that you will not get anywhere by using youth as an excuse for Hokes failures.
October 2nd, 2014 at 12:17 PM ^
Has to say what he has to say, but I am starting to think that all these Ohio guys and southern guys that talk good about Hoke, just want to see M flounder. I've heard Brando and Packer say prior to the Minnesota game that Brady Hoke is a good guy, and that they hope he gets a chance to turn things around at M. I realize this was before last weeks BS, but I sometimes wonder if these southerners quietly enjoy the floundering of the B10. We all know that the main reason the B10 is weak, and perception is that we can't even play football in the midwest, is because M has been mediocre at best for 8 years. If M was strong, the conference would be strong.
October 2nd, 2014 at 12:21 PM ^
Well, Herbstreit is wrong and applying the same falacious argument that others on the board have made by saying, "If X were true, then Y would be happening". Jesus, there's a thread two above this one taking a poll using that every same, flawed logic. Hoke isn't under fire because of the Shane Morris thing. Hoke is under fire due to the cumulative effect of 2.5 seasons of ineffective football management which has come to a head with the latest variable, Shane Morris playing while concussed, being the final straw.
If Brady Hoke was 5-0, then half a dozen things that have happened during the seaosn thusfar that lead to Shane Morris starting and getting hurt wouldn't have happened.
I guess expecting sound logic would be too much to expect from an OSU graduate.
October 2nd, 2014 at 1:08 PM ^
October 2nd, 2014 at 12:20 PM ^
The response "This event wouldn't be a big deal if Hoke was winning" seems to be to be an ad hominem attack that should not be relevant. From Hoke's perspective the relevant facts are that Shane Morris suffered a blow to the head that could have resulted in a concussion. Hoke was unaware of the hit. Due to his position of authority, it is reasonable to expect him to be aware of the condition of his central offensive player, particularly one who is already hurt/injured. He let Shane continue to play without ensuring it was safe for him to do so. Yes, the medical staff should be held accountable for not making the proper diagnosis quickly enough. Yes, Dave Brandon should be held accountable for obfuscating the truth. But to disregard Hoke's actions and dismiss those who would like him to be held accountable for his actions (or inaction) because he is losing would be intellectually dishonest. Attacking people who are angry, because they are angry, is disracting from the above argument.
October 2nd, 2014 at 12:21 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad