Herbstreit calls Brady Hoke criticism a 'witch hunt'

Submitted by Cold War on

Is this Hoke criticism about Morris' injury even a story if UM were 4-0 ranked in the top 10? #witchhunt

I'm not saying head injuries aren't VERY serious, just saying the reaction is over the top because of how badly UM is playing under Hoke.

 

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2014/9/29/6869843/kirk-herbstreit-calls-brady-hoke-criticism-a-witch-hunt

 

 

GoBLUinTX

October 2nd, 2014 at 2:41 PM ^

that Paul Schmidt knew that Morris had a concussion and he told Hoke and then Hoke disregarded that medical advice and sent Morris back on the field?  Then why the hell is Paul Schmidt not clarifying that?  Why has Paul Schmidt allowed the lie to stand that he didn't know about the concussion and that he cleared Morris to play?

UMfan21

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:33 AM ^

The Morris incident is just the latest/best example of this coaching staff's incompetence. I feel it should not be isolated from the rest of the picture. These coaches make poor decisions, are clueless at times, and oblivious to things around them. The Morris incident is part of the overarching issue.

Wolverine Devotee

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:41 AM ^

Who cares what this idiot thinks? Shouldn't Les Miles be Michigan's HC right now according to him? Shouldn't Michigan be 5-0 right now according to his prediction? 

Turn Texas Blue

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:37 AM ^

Over Hoke's tenure, this football program has stedily regressed. He had a year one outlier and quickly has regressed to his mean. He can't beat any team with a pulse, continues to underdevelop top level tallent and is too stuborn to change old habits (punting, etc.). So, not only does he find himself in a questionable situation stemming from what seems to be gross negligence, he is failling to meet what seem to be his job requirements. This is not a witch hunt, this is the last staw.

FreddieMercuryHayes

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:39 AM ^

Maybe I'm missing it, but most of the ire if the fanbase is directed at Brandon. People are unhappy with Hoke, but people are pissed at Brandon. There's not an 11,000 signature petition calling for Hoke. Why is the media missing this?


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Reader71

October 2nd, 2014 at 11:36 AM ^

I think the anger over Hoke's role in concussiongate has died down. Most people think he screwed up but its not the end of the world. Brandon has made it worse at every turn. BUT, the Fire Brandon rally did have "Harbaugh" chants. So one can see that while the majority of hate is focused on Brandon, at least some of the Brandon hate is due to Hoke.

Muttley

October 2nd, 2014 at 11:51 AM ^

Arguably, based on our play, we've been the worst team in the B1G East*.  Short of a major reversal, Hoke is gone at the end of the year.  I don't think three more games along the expected path is going to cause much additional intensity.  The debate of whether to fire Hoke now or to fire him at the end of the year would likely start taking up more time/space, but I don't think the disgust would be any more intense than what we have now.

*Haha -- I didn't recognize the pun until after I typed it.

MGlobules

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:40 AM ^

isn't part of the incompetence that went into the record--the deer in the headlights look again and again? The timing brainfarts against PSU?

I was re-reading Three And Out, and found myself wondering why Herbie didn't suffer more criticism after saying Les was on the way. . . 

Gustavo Fring

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:42 AM ^

People probably are not calling for Hoke's head if Michigan was 4-0.  I do think there would be a backlash, but he might not lose his job.

Why is that?  It is quite likely that if Michigan was 4-0 and not having trouble doing basic things like having 11 guys on the field, Hoke would be a competent head coach who would have avoided this (or at least avoided sending Shane back onto the field) and also had a better postgame response.  

The fact is, this is a symptom of the larger fact that Hoke has absolutely no idea what he's doing.  When that was losing Michigan football games, we were okay with waiting til the end of the season.  When that endangers a player...it's a different story.

If Hoke was 4-0, he would probably show competency as a coach.  We could trust that something like this wouldn't happen again.  Can you honestly tell me that his record would lead an objective person to believe that?

maize-blue

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:43 AM ^

I think this whole mess has been a little bit of piling on but it does fit right in with the clusterfu$#ness of a lot of the things this team displays. I'm ultimately judging Hoke on the perfomance of the team, which is not good and has been slowly declining since the end of the 2011 season. I'm sick of seeing a lethargic, lifeless, uninspired, unpassionate, physically dominated team.

Roy G. Biv

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:48 AM ^

There is some truth to Herbstreit's comment. However, the majority of the fan base wanted Hoke gone prior to Minnesota due to the steady year over year on-field regression. What the Morris incident did is unite the fanbase in the drive to get rid of Brandon.

Ty Butterfield

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:52 AM ^

I am sure there is some truth to that. However, I wouldn't call it a witch hunt. Hoke has done enough to make most of the fan base fed up before this happened. No ND fans seem to care about the latest academic scandal. Of course, since they seemed happy to bury their heads in the sand over 2 dead kids then I doubt they care about anything Brian Kelly does at this point.

BradP

October 2nd, 2014 at 10:59 AM ^

If the team wasn't playing so badly and the game management not so terrible, we would probably be inclined to think this was an unfortunate and correctable oversight.

However, this is another sign of incompetence and this one endangered a player.  It was then followed up by indifference and obfuscation.

So yes, if this coaching staff wasn't doing such a poor job of managing the team we wouldn't be as angry about this.  However, that is because the poor management has removed any doubt that the gentlemen in charge can fix the problems at hand, and are likely to allow them to get worse.

Marley Nowell

October 2nd, 2014 at 11:12 AM ^

I still don't understand why he and others think the losing and what happened on Sat. are mutually exclusive. They both show a complete lack of competence in simple game and sideline management.

Soulfire21

October 2nd, 2014 at 11:15 AM ^

He's somewhat right but he's still an assclown.  There would be outrage over the concussion, sure, but that was just the flashpoint of 7 years (minus 2011) of terrible football.

RJMAC

October 2nd, 2014 at 11:20 AM ^

Let's get this straight. The Neurologist is on the 'other end of the field' (sideline around 10 or 20 yrd. line?) and sees Morris wobbly and starts walking towards him. Morris plays one more down and comes off the field. The head trainer is by Morris when he comes off the field and asks him questions about his leg only since he didn't see him woozy on the field. About 90 seconds go by before Morris goes back in the game. The Neurologist that actually saw Morris woozy never gets to him. WHAT TOOK SO LONG TO GET TO MORRIS? It's roughly a 20 second walk to get to him. Did the neurologist just assume the head trainer saw Morris woozy and just let him handle it without communicating to him what he saw?

BlueinLansing

October 2nd, 2014 at 11:30 AM ^

in hypotheticals. 

 

It was just one more example of how this coaching staff doesn't have the details figured out and how the athletic department is run by an incompetent weasel.

RIP Tractor T

October 2nd, 2014 at 11:34 AM ^

I'n not a fan of anyone on TMZSPN but I tend to agree with Herbstreit here. I put more of the onus on the medical staff for not having atleast a semblance of accountability. The head coach is in charge of a million things on the sideline, the medical staff is watching for and treating injuries, that's it...

I was convinced that a change was needed in South Bend, when we had to walk out in shame following that final pick-6 that didn't count. This is Michigan for God's sake.

Tuebor

October 2nd, 2014 at 12:05 PM ^

If Michigan is 5-0 or 4-1 and we just crushed Minnesota then this wouldn't be national news IMO.  Head injuries are still serious regardless of wins and losses but this doesn't get picked up by ABC if we weren't getting blown out by Minnesota a week after getting embarassed by Utah. If Hoke had accepted responsibility on Sunday or even Monday by saying that yes he messed up and is reviewing it and will make sure it never happens again.  Instead we have a HC and an AD who are trying like hell to find a scapegoat. 

 

Wins/Losses, player safety mismanagement, and deception are all apart of larger body of work we are using to judge those at the helm of this program.

 

Reader71

October 2nd, 2014 at 11:51 AM ^

The concussion is the straw that broke the camel's back for many. But a lot of people were looking for straws because the results are bad. And some people are pretending that the straw is a Sword of Damocles. Insta-fire! Baloney, unless you really think that this would have been handled differently at other programs, a point I would disagree with you on.

Reader71

October 2nd, 2014 at 12:52 PM ^

I hear you. But isn't this situation different? This one seems different than every other concussion I've seen, in that there was no timeout between plays. Most times, the concussed player is on the turf for a bit and you get a timeout and he is evaluated.

Like I've said elsewhere, our program and every other is prepared for that type of scenario. The neurologist, for example, would have ample time to get down the field to diagnose.

As for Denard, I don't remember the circumstances. Was he laid out? Did the defense go on the field, giving the trainers time to look at him? Did Coach Rod pull him out or did Schmidt? I'm not trying to absolve anyone, I just don't think anyone else would have handled this differently, provided they didn't see the hit. That's where the coaches are at fault, in my opinion. Schmidt has no excuse. Even if he didn't see the hit, he should have been able to see it in Shane's eyes or demeanor when he looked at him on the sideline.

EDIT: We can also be sure that there are concussions that go unnoticed every week. No one notices when a lineman gets his bell rung because its usually not an open-field hit, the camera is not on him, and so on. The only way that gets diagnosed is if his position coach sees something is wrong and alerts a trainer. This is a systemic failure, and i think this would have happened everywhere. Still our fault, but it is foreseeable.

glewe

October 2nd, 2014 at 11:57 AM ^

Jesus. I was saying all of this on Sunday. Where were all these reasonable posts then? Down voted to oblivion in the passion of irrationality and loss.

You know, for people who claim to champion statistics, data, and objective analyses, this community sure does have a heavily irrational mob mentality to it.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

KC Wolve

October 2nd, 2014 at 12:11 PM ^

But get back to me when you see a reasonable possibility that a team Coached by this staff would be 4 and 0. I'm pissed about the handling of Shane, but I'm more pissed that they get worse every year with legit talent all over the field.

Ps-if you've read any of my other posts you will know that you will not get anywhere by using youth as an excuse for Hokes failures.

Trobdcso

October 2nd, 2014 at 12:17 PM ^

Has to say what he has to say, but I am starting to think that all these Ohio guys and southern guys that talk good about Hoke, just want to see M flounder. I've heard Brando and Packer say prior to the Minnesota game that Brady Hoke is a good guy, and that they hope he gets a chance to turn things around at M. I realize this was before last weeks BS, but I sometimes wonder if these southerners quietly enjoy the floundering of the B10. We all know that the main reason the B10 is weak, and perception is that we can't even play football in the midwest, is because M has been mediocre at best for 8 years. If M was strong, the conference would be strong.

saveferris

October 2nd, 2014 at 12:21 PM ^

Well, Herbstreit is wrong and applying the same falacious argument that others on the board have made by saying, "If X were true, then Y would be happening".  Jesus, there's a thread two above this one taking a poll using that every same, flawed logic.  Hoke isn't under fire because of the Shane Morris thing.  Hoke is under fire due to the cumulative effect of 2.5 seasons of ineffective football management which has come to a head with the latest variable, Shane Morris playing while concussed, being the final straw.

If Brady Hoke was 5-0, then half a dozen things that have happened during the seaosn thusfar that lead to Shane Morris starting and getting hurt wouldn't have happened.

I guess expecting sound logic would be too much to expect from an OSU graduate.

Heteroskedastic

October 2nd, 2014 at 12:20 PM ^

The response "This event wouldn't be a big deal if Hoke was winning" seems to be to be an ad hominem attack that should not be relevant.  From Hoke's perspective the relevant facts are that Shane Morris suffered a blow to the head that could have resulted in a concussion.  Hoke was unaware of the hit.  Due to his position of authority, it is reasonable to expect him to be aware of the condition of his central offensive player, particularly one who is already hurt/injured.  He let Shane continue to play without ensuring it was safe for him to do so.  Yes, the medical staff should be held accountable for not making the proper diagnosis quickly enough.  Yes, Dave Brandon should be held accountable for obfuscating the truth.  But to disregard Hoke's actions and dismiss those who would like him to be held accountable for his actions (or inaction) because he is losing would be intellectually dishonest.  Attacking people who are angry, because they are angry, is disracting from the above argument.