sharklover

November 8th, 2022 at 7:01 PM ^

Because old folks are generally pretty short sighted in political decisions. When death is staring you in the face and you have made all the money you're ever going to make, your world view tends to get extremely narrow and self centered. Young people may not be universally more open minded than their elder peers, but their economic incentives are very different. If they don't vote to favor their interests, they'll inevitably get screwed over by others who are voting to support theirs.

PopeLando

November 8th, 2022 at 4:17 PM ^

The original intent was that Black people would continue to be property too.

Sure, the Establishment Clause, very literally, says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." The Founding Fathers' arguments revolved around the issue of taxation: basically, "it's not ok for citizens, through taxation, to support a faith they did not follow."

[Interestingly enough, this appears to be the result of an Anglican vs. Baptist vs. Presbyterian vs. Quaker conflict. Proving that once again, the most common conversation between Christians in history is: "Hi, I'm a Christian!"; "Hi! Actually I'm a Christian and you're not!"; "Can't we both be Christian?"; "No!"]

But...ever since, it sure as shit has been like the "Church" is INVITING the government in. And as of this year, state governments MUST support religious institutions via taxpayer/government money.

Church is as much poisonous to Government as Government is poisonous to Church. Fuck these theocrats. 

Beat Rutgerland

November 8th, 2022 at 2:32 PM ^

Praise people who wait in line, but don't praise long lines, because a long line means not enough resources were devoted to a polling place, or too many people were jammed into it.

Wendyk5

November 8th, 2022 at 4:30 PM ^

I voted yesterday in person at our civic center. It took me an hour from start to finish, 40 minutes of that waiting in line. One of the election workers said Sunday was the same. Then my husband voted today at our regular polling place and he was in and out in 10 minutes. So maybe everyone though today would be a zoo and showed up yesterday, which was just a miscalculation. 

jmstranger

November 8th, 2022 at 5:23 PM ^

I live in Washington where everyone votes via mail or drop off at ballot boxes (technically each county has a couple of in person spots you could vote) and they send you a voter pamphlet alongside your ballot with every candidate and initiative, etc inside. It’s incredibly civilized and I have no idea why any state would choose to do it any other way. 

Kermits Blue Key

November 8th, 2022 at 2:33 PM ^

Voting is fucked in this country. In Australia everyone gets mailed a ballot, and you get fined if you don’t vote. Here, we have groups/officials spending absurd resources to prevent people from voting.

WindyCityBlue

November 8th, 2022 at 2:40 PM ^

OK, until the USPS can figure shit out, anything through our mail system is complete shite.  I got 2 ballots through our mail for the previous tenants of our house last week.  My BIL (a Hispanic immigrant who cannot vote), got a ballot for the previous tenant of his apartment. 

I don't give a shit who you voted for, but if we let people exclusively use the mail system for voting, there will never be validated election in the US.

HateSparty

November 8th, 2022 at 4:21 PM ^

Fixed it for you:

OK, until the USPS can figure shit out, anything through our mail system is complete shite.  I got 2 absentee ballot applications (that will not inherently imply I can vote as someone else) through our mail for the previous tenants of our house last week.  My BIL (a Hispanic immigrant who cannot vote), got a absentee ballot applications (that will not inherently imply he can vote as someone else) for the previous tenant of his apartment. 

Many states and countries use mail in balloting with no evidence of any form of fraudulent voting.

WindyCityBlue

November 9th, 2022 at 7:58 AM ^

The widespread use of the mail system for voting outside absentee ballots is very new here. The USPS itself says that sending mail via the blue box is not very reliable and say for any mail that is of value to drop it off at a USPS location. 

https://bestlifeonline.com/usps-mail-size-mailbox-news/

We’ve had two elections in a row where one side did not trust the results of the election. Whether that’s real or perceived doesn’t matter. We have to shore this up and letting people have more widespread use of the mail system is not the way to go about it. 
 

I’ll say it again, I don’t care who wins an election, but if it’s done so with widespread use of the mail system, I will likely never trust the results of that election. 

Trebor

November 9th, 2022 at 5:58 PM ^

I live in Oregon, where vote-by-mail has been exclusively used since 1995; you can vote in person, but very few people actually do this. Washington, Hawaii, Utah, Nevada, and Colorado also do this. Not one of these states has ever had any substantive finding of election fraud with the vote-by-mail system. Is it perfect? Maybe not for everyone, but until Election Day is a federal holiday with guaranteed poll access for everyone, it's significantly better than only being allowed to vote in person on one day in early November.

People who do not trust the results of elections are effectively claiming that there is election fraud happening. Distrust in the results is not a reason to think there's mail ballot fraud (or any other form of election fraud). We do not, in any way, have to shore up elections to appease people who do not trust the system; people who do not trust the outcome of elections only do so when their candidate loses.

Again, if you have actual verifiable sources of any type of election fraud happening, I'm all ears. At least 63 court cases from the 2020 election found nothing.

ex dx dy

November 8th, 2022 at 3:02 PM ^

The system of identity verification and the system of ballot distribution/collection don't have to be the same thing. The fundamental infrastructure of data distribution over the internet, for example, is incredibly insecure and unreliable (packets get dropped or misdelivered all the time, basically anyone can view your traffic), and yet we've developed systems that produce enough trust within that infrastructure to facilitate online banking and other secure applications. There's no reason an insecure USPS can't be used to distribute ballots securely validated by another protocol. A well designed protocol, such as the HTTPS that carries your online banking transactions, can even be more or less invisible to the user. It's possible that such systems are already in use.