Was it as bad as we think?

Submitted by TK on

I was at the game and it felt like a train wreck. However, watching it live you don’t see as much as you do when you watch the tape. I finally got a chance to watch the game. I came away thinking it wasn’t quite as bad as I thought at first. There were so many plays here or there that could’ve made a huge difference. I don’t feel like Notre Dame outclassed us at all, it certainly wasn’t like 2014. The problem is, every single big game we have feels like the same thing. One play or two plays or a handful of plays here or there that the other team makes and we don’t make. Does anyone feel any better about this game after letting it brew for a couple days? Or is the sky still falling? I’m not really sure what to think at this point. 

LabattsBleu

September 4th, 2018 at 1:34 PM ^

its dangerous playing the 'what if' game... it lullabies you into complacency and ignoring the fact this isn't a very well coached team at the moment...

ALL games turn on a few plays... that's not a revelation... the problem is that it's not Michigan making those plays of late, its the opponent

while the QB play is reason for optimism, this is the second game in a row where the D has given up big chunk plays deep and leads me to think that this is something teams will deploy to attack the defense on a more regular basis going forward.

at the end of the day, the numbers don't lie: 8-8 and the trend arrow is pointing downwards. 0-17 versus ranked opponents on the road.

these are reasons for concern... the Utah game is mentioned for good reason, as there does feel like some similarities... the difference is that the uneven play was easily attributed to the very first game under this staff...you can't say that anymore, not in Year 4, not with the 4th most returning starters in CFB

 

trueblue262

September 4th, 2018 at 1:42 PM ^

I feel like we really won't know how bad this loss will sting for a few weeks. I mean, what if ND is really that good? We really won't know until their level of competition goes up over the next few weeks (much like out own situation) But, I am holding out hope that we just came within 7 points of a VERY good team on the road. This is the only thing that I have come up with to "soothe" the pain over what transpired Saturday night.

Go Blue still

Wolverine91

September 4th, 2018 at 1:52 PM ^

Probably. Our offensive coaching staff is just incompetent and stuck in the 90s. Harbaugh thinks he can coach college players an NFL offense which clearly does not work. Either he's too stubborn to change or doesn't know how to change. Both are bad

MaineGoBlue

September 4th, 2018 at 1:56 PM ^

If it weren’t for our atrocious pass protection the sky would not be falling.  I was there as well and we had guys with separation downfield all night but not enough time to find them.  Until we can keep a quarterback upright we will not win games against good opponents.

Matte Kudasai

September 4th, 2018 at 2:00 PM ^

What was bad, were all the mistakes and penalties.  It wasn’t like ND was kicking our ass up and down the field.

Yes, we can still have a great season, even with this brutal schedule. 

If we don’t I fear we will have a hard time bringing this program back.

JTrain

September 4th, 2018 at 2:10 PM ^

I think the “a play or two here and there” applies to the defense. We were really close to a couple pics. To getting home with pressure on 3rd down.  

The baffling part is the offense.  We have so far to go and apparently no personnel to do it with   And it fucks us in so many ways (moving forward, recruiting quality olayers).  For the last 10 years it seems like the perfect storm for mediocrity.  We are always two years away.   when the D is great the offense is bad.  

Sadly...I still drink the kool-aid and feel like we can turn this around this season   Wishful thinking?!

 

NDP1075

September 4th, 2018 at 2:13 PM ^

No.  99% fanatical overreaction as usual.  Shannon Sharpe lambasted Harbaugh this morning for the game; said ohio st would hang 50 on them but immediately backed down Bayless called him on it.  Stat lines don't win games but the stats were competitive in a game where the score indicated they should not have been.  Were there mistakes and some big miscues that need to be corrected, absolutely.  I think the offense in particular is very young and needs time to come together.  Give the staff time to work and develop them.  As for the people ready to see Harbaugh run out of town, I don't really think you have a firm grasp on reality.  In other news App State was one good coaching decision away from stealing one in happy valley on Saturday.  Folks sure seem to be giving Franklin a pass on that one and I'm willing to say that was a bit more glaring than what we experience Saturday given the level of competition.  Fire away.

uofmchris

September 4th, 2018 at 2:14 PM ^

Please allow me to quickly vent about something that has been driving me crazy throughout the Harbaugh era. 

FOR THE LOVE OF FUCKING GOD. EITHER GET MORE CREATIVE WITH THE GOD DAMN PLAY CALLING OR JUST RUN A TWO MINUTE OFFENSE THE ENTIRE GAME.

Our play calling has been atrocious and I blame every bit of that on Jim. 

 

socalwolverine1

September 4th, 2018 at 8:23 PM ^

My buddy at work (also a Michigan grad) and I have a running joke that goes back forty years about how Michigan has got to be the worst defensive team in college football history at handling third and long situations! Stuff the run, get a sack, now it's third and fifteen, and then the other team shreds us for a first down with ease! Just like what happened several times in Saturday's game...seriously, it was deja vu all over again!

Perkis-Size Me

September 4th, 2018 at 2:37 PM ^

On defense, I don't think so. Just some really badly timed penalties. They settled in pretty well in the second half and forced a turnover and lots of three and outs. 

But on the offensive line, yeah, it was as bad as it looked. I'm not at all giving up on Warriner's coaching ability. Remember his OL looked like a train wreck against a very mediocre Virginia Tech team, and at home no less. We all know what happened from there. But it was an awful start. Even if ND turns out to be really good, it was as bad as it looked on that aspect of the game. You might as well have put up a parking cone at the the tackle spots. You probably would've gotten similar results. 

I have no personal quarrel whatsoever with Jon Runyan Jr. I have no doubt he busts his ass in practice every day and does what the coaches tell him to do. But he did not look like he could play LT at the D1 level on Saturday night. Much less at a Michigan level where you've had a history of great LTs. If he's Michigan's best option, that is a terrifying thought if he happens to go down at any point in the season. 

 

Sideline

September 4th, 2018 at 2:47 PM ^

I actually could see them flipping the Tackles for the WMU/SMU games just to "experiment". The Offensive line was not good, however the interior (G-C-G) started to look a little more competent in the 3rd and 4th Q's. We definitely need to improve/replace both LT and RT, but while we have the next 2-game stretch, figure that part out as best we can.

I also would not give up on Warriner, as the O-line for Ohio State was BRUTAL against that VT team in 2014-- WITH a mobile QB.  

Shea was a SIGNIFICANT upgrade at the QB position from last season and, aside from the 0-14 hole, the Defense looked promising. 

MGoStrength

September 4th, 2018 at 2:42 PM ^

The #14 team lost to the #12 team in a close game on the road.  Sounds about right.  We are what they thought we are...slightly worse than ND.  The rest remains speculative.

Ty Butterfield

September 4th, 2018 at 2:54 PM ^

Yes it was bad. Mostly because the same issues from the last two staffs are still present: team looks unprepared and plays flat, commits dumb penalties and looks undisciplined, and no one can make a play to swing the game. Michigan always finds a way to lose. Michigan keeps replacing coaches but the same problems still persist. There is some sort of fundamental issue with the program that may never be fixed. I swear to God they better not play that James Earl Jones video before home games. 

RLARCADIACA

September 4th, 2018 at 2:55 PM ^

So there I am in the Rosebowl, first row 10 yard line watching UCLA vs Cincinnati, Speight goes out (he walks by us looks like a concussion but its not) and I am checking the M score on my cell phone, down 21-0 quick.    Not again I say, watch the D adjust and hold them, what will the M offense do.   I get slightly excited back and forth M driving, then stopping, then D adjusting at Half (as usual) and holding ND to just 3 in 2nd half.    But phone says M offense back and forth, a kickoff return (good) but wheres the Offense, seems sporatic (seem to remember watching phone last year at Rosebowl a number of times same scenario, same result) and then a sack ball stripped, same to remember something similar last year.   M Go Blog and social and other media go crazy, M O looked sloppy, line can't block (when haven't we heard that before), D gets burned early but eventually adjusts at half (when haven't we heard that before), the sky is falling (when haven't we heard that before).      Then again, I watch a fairly good UCLA D (very good DBs and Safeties) and a Freshman QB filling in for a stable QB go a bit nervous and leave the Rosebowl with another loss.   But at least I was not watching the M vs ND game on NBC and getting personally in the face disappointed.    Now the questions here and there, the O line looked bad, what to do?    The D got juiced early but recovered, how to get them adjusted quicker?   The Coaching was inconsistent, what to do?    Back to the sky is falling and I just don't know.     

NelzQ

September 4th, 2018 at 3:19 PM ^

They were not competitive. That is as bad as it gets. They were beaten by halftime. The trend is showing that this team really, really misses Jedd Fisch.

 

I am in observation mode at this point. Primarily waiting to see how long it takes to adequately replace Jedd Fisch.

This season or next?

chunkums

September 4th, 2018 at 7:29 PM ^

Not competitive is such an odd way to describe a game in which we were driving to tie with a minute to go. We got punched in the mouth immediately and I think most fans couldn't get over the taste of blood in their mouths. The first quarter was brutal, but we gradually battled back and were in position to tie it up at the very end. Seriously, Notre Dame did absolutely nothing in the second half. 

Regarding Jedd Fisch, he had a line full of highly-regarded redshirt juniors and seniors who were solid at pass-blocking and quarterbacks throwing to redshirt juniors and seniors. Maybe Fisch was better, but I'm personally giving it an incomplete until we see a few more games where the young pass-catchers get used to the new quarterback. 

NelzQ

September 5th, 2018 at 12:42 PM ^

Fair enough.

I fell asleep at halftime (at the cabin on the lake). 21-3.

I awakened after the game. My wife did not bother to wake me and I am eternally grateful.

Game was over. period. Notre Dame did not have to take chances after halftime. Michigan was in the bag.

To say we were driving to tie the score late is pure rationalization. Rationalize that shit if you wish.

Pitiful; My take.

chatster

September 4th, 2018 at 3:22 PM ^

There’s always been something unfair about reviewing plays after the fact because we can’t really know what play was called, whether blocks were made and routes were run as diagrammed and practiced, AND whether the quarterback on a pass play considered more than one option before the pass was made.  As an example, there’s a play on the final drive that I might quickly, but unfairly criticize.

On first and ten at the Michigan 45 with a 1:10 left to play and Michigan not managing the clock well, Patterson made what seemed like a smart throw to Gentry who was moving from left to right and had no defender closer than four yards away.  Gentry dropped a ball he might’ve caught 99 times out of 100 in practice.

Looking at the play again and pausing the video, it appears that Patterson already turned his body to the right and was throwing to the spot where he expected Gentry to be. Had Patterson not turned his body to the right, he might’ve spotted Grant Perry running from left to right and away from his defender in the middle of the field.  If Patterson could’ve led Perry on a throw down the middle, the outcome might’ve been different.

Maybe that pass to Perry wasn’t the play that was called.  Maybe Perry only got free because his defender saw Patterson turn and start to throw to his right.  Maybe Patterson didn’t have a clear view of Perry or enough to make that throw.  Maybe Patterson would’ve overthrown or under thrown Perry. Maybe the usually reliable Perry would’ve dropped the ball.

https://youtu.be/vXQ0WguuQfs?t=8m23s

markusr2007

September 4th, 2018 at 3:46 PM ^

The answer is no.

Michigan is going to demolish Western Michigan this coming weekend. And annihilate SMU the week after that.  Nebraska is going to put up a fight in Ann Arbor, but will lose to Michigan also.

The main question for me is how long will the offensive tackles of Michigan allow us to enjoy the play of Shea Patterson at quarterback before he gets annihilated?

I'm thinking at least until the MSU game in East Lansing.  But I could be wrong.

 

BlueinOK

September 4th, 2018 at 5:03 PM ^

It was bad. The second half seemed to be better, but it was already a big whole at that point. I think the OL can improve with the next few weeks. ND has an elite defense so it's really hard to know what this offense can be like. 

BBQJeff

September 4th, 2018 at 9:27 PM ^

The only difference between the 1st half and 2nd half defensively was Wimbush quit making huge pass plays just before being hit in the second half.    Other than that, had they executed a handful more plays that game might have been a blowout.   

I apologize for all of my negativity.   A 4-game losing streak with what UM is paying this coaching staff (plus all of the money sunk into the facilities) is really starting to anger me.  

plamonge

September 4th, 2018 at 5:25 PM ^

No, it wasn't as bad as we think. I watched the first three offensive drivers today and saw a lot that I liked. WAY better QB play than last year. Penalties killed the defensive side. 

4th phase

September 4th, 2018 at 5:53 PM ^

I hate to pile on with all the hot takes out there about play calling, but I do think one area we could improve is in the first 1-2 drives of the game. That is supposed to be the part that is scripted and has plays that have been repped all week. I don't remember the last time we scored on our first possession. Im not sure what exactly to point to as the problem, but when ND came out with those 2 TDs it was clear they had a great plan to start the game. 

Kevin13

September 4th, 2018 at 6:06 PM ^

Now that things ha e settled down a little I don’t think it was as bad as originally thought either. Hell our holder drops a perfect snap which probably would’ve been a sure FG if that happens we loose 24-20 on the road to a very good team. One or two other plays go our way we probably win the game. Also felt we didn’t get a single call from the officials during the game which didn’t help 

TheCool

September 4th, 2018 at 6:29 PM ^

Man, if Hawkins could've extended his arms a bit the game's very different. If Gentry used his body to ward off the DB the game's different.

There are coaching issues and you could blame player mistakes on coaching and recruiting, but there have been so many plays the past two seasons where a player is in position and they don't make the play. 

I don't think the game was as bad as it seemed though it was frustrating. Their strength lined up perfectly with Michigan's weakness.

Go for two

September 4th, 2018 at 7:32 PM ^

I believe Michigan rebounds this weekend 42-7. This sure looked like my childhood memory of many Rose Bowls. We would get too far behind by halftime, then play a strong second half but come up short. I have never understood the slow starts but it happened many times after a layoff. Why did we look so sluggish and the other team sharp?

I still think we have a chance for Indy, but need to find offensive playmakers

jgoblue11

September 4th, 2018 at 9:03 PM ^

Bottom line. 

The reason most of us Michigan fans are upset, is because after Carr retired, we went from 9-10 win seasons annually, to Rich Rod and Brady Hoke. 

Then we get Harbaugh! Our dream coach. The one who will beat Meyer, Dantonio, and even Saban. 

Our University pays him what, 7-8 million dollars a year? That's insane money.

Michigan is not Northwestern. Michigan is not Michigan State. We are not Nebraska. And we certainly are not fucking Penn State.

We are Michigan. So why are we playing to these teams levels? What gives? Are we cursed? 

Myself and fans expect to be the best team on the field every single Saturday. I expect Michigan to win every game they play because we are such a rich program, and because we have the talent.

I thought we were going to beat Notre dame and at least score 30 pts. But that didn't happen. So yes, I think it was as bad as it seemed. But I will always cheer for my university. No matter what. It's just so darn depressing to not be a powerhouse football program anymore. Especially with the money we are throwing at Harbaugh.