freejs

January 21st, 2015 at 12:34 AM ^

Each team has control of the balls they use on offense - they are kept on their sidelines. There is absolutely an opportunity for a team to tamper with the balls used by their offense. 

This is not that fucking complicated. I can only imagine people don't want to understand how this works. Because otherwise, damn, some people are fucking thick. 

ghost

January 21st, 2015 at 4:05 AM ^

No its not all ESPN.  Its 11 of 12 balls.  That doesn't just randomly happen.  This is on NE.  Things like this can't just keep happening.  Its a pattern and no one outside of NE thing otherwise.

You don't see people accusing ths SF Giants or the LA Kings or the Spurs of doing things like this.

maizemama

January 21st, 2015 at 11:26 AM ^

because of conflicting information. Some reports say that the balls provided by the home team (12 game balls plus 12 back ups) are used first. Then if those aren't good, they go to the visitors balls and that the refs have to report every time they use one of the visitors balls. So, who is right? The people who yell the loudest?

freejs

January 21st, 2015 at 1:15 PM ^

the officials hand over 12 inspected balls to each team 2 hours plus before the game. 

Each team uses one of their twelve balls when they are on offense. 

The balls are under the respective teams' control between the moment the officials hand off the set of 12 and the moment they enter the game. 

There is no conflicting information here, only correct information. 

This is the correct information. 

Chitown Kev

January 21st, 2015 at 12:34 AM ^

having said that, if it was the refs job to check the weight of the balls, then they allowed the Patriots to get away with it (unintentionally or...not unintentionally).

BlowGoo

January 21st, 2015 at 12:42 AM ^

What's the average number of underinflated balls on any given gameday for the average team following identical methodology? Until I have that number, anecdotal 11/12 is meaningless.

jonvalk

January 21st, 2015 at 1:06 AM ^

There's always the minor chance that weather (differential in temp from inflation-game temp, atmospheric pressure changes, etc) could have impacted this. It's my understanding that the NFL uses 20*C (68*F) as their standard. So if the temp for game time was 50*F (10*C), that could account for .5-.75 PSI differential. Partner that with the fact that balls naturally lose PSI due to the nature of football (lots of compression from hits, etc) and I could easily see a drop in the 1 PSI range. If Belichick and the Pats skirted the minimum of 12.5 PSI, this could mean an eventual PSI of 11.5 or so, which is 2 PSI lower than normal max accepted PSI. Again, I'm sure I'm stretching things, but I just can't see 11/12 being deflated intentionally. Wy not all 12?



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

jonvalk

January 21st, 2015 at 8:06 AM ^

Ok, so 1) I said it's unlikely, but possible with science. 2) we haven't heard a damn thing about the Colts balls, so who's to say they didn't have a couple suffering the same way.

I'm not claiming it WASNT done on purpose, but I don't see how they got away with deflating 11 balls on the sideline without anyone seeing them. It's also suspicious that the "change" in balls according to various sources happened after the Brady INT and the NE ball was swapped out on their first possession of the 2nd half. At that point, the patriots only led by 10. Isn't it curious that from THAT point on the Patriots dominated 28-0? I think people are making this into a bigger issue because they hate the Patriots.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Its me Dave

January 21st, 2015 at 8:21 AM ^

A mis-calibrated air pressure gauge could would explain a consistently low pressure.  They're just $10-15 POS devices from China and it'd be pretty hard to find any two of them that would give the same reading.

Nothing necessarily sinister - except for the complete lack of SPC applied to a classic QC problem.

Blau

January 21st, 2015 at 1:51 AM ^

Umm... Why don't they just deflate the Colt's footballs too? If it's cold and rainy, make it the same for both teams. You could say the inverse with the Pats just not messing with the footballs in the first place but its obvious it helps the offenses feel more comfortable during shitty elements.

 

Or was that too easy?

CoachBP6

January 21st, 2015 at 2:25 AM ^

I would bet money that the one patriots ball that was properly inflated was the kicking ball. Deflation of a football increases grip. Grip matters big time when playing in shit weather. As a coach I understand wanting any advantage you can get, but don't cheat by tampering with shit, or film your opponents.

EZMIKEP

January 21st, 2015 at 3:16 AM ^

The balls were switched at halftime. Brady 11 for 21 in the first half. 1 TD and 1 INT for a 52% clip with the under inflated balls. Brady 12 for 14 in the second half. 2 TDs and 0 INTs for 86% with the refs regularly inflated balls. The Vikings and Aaron Rodgers have both Been proven to tamper with balls this season and they faced ZERO punishment. The Patriots out scored the Colts 28-0 in the second half. This is one of the dumbest controversial topics ever put on prime time television. The NFL is skating on thin ice for even pressing this with words like disappointing and upset. Ray Rice and AP have proved just how upset and trustworthy you really are.

ghost

January 21st, 2015 at 5:03 AM ^

That is one of the dumbest comments I have ever read.

When everyone but one team thinks this is a big deal it is very obvious that it is.

Only a complete Patriots homer would suggest otherwise.  

The Patriots argument is that it was a coincidence and that it didn't help anyway.  The argument of the guilty that no one including the NFL is buying.

Frequency

January 21st, 2015 at 7:36 AM ^

I don't know... I doubt this is some kind of cheating scheme planned in advance by the entire Pats organization. Probably just a couple of clever equipment managers who didn't even consider it "cheating" at the time.

74polSKA

January 21st, 2015 at 7:55 AM ^

This is a non issue to me. If deflating balls gave such a huge advantage, why wouldn't the NFL have the refs check pressure before and after the game? Why would they allow the teams to even have access to the balls? They could easily hire NFL ball boys or equipment managers or whatever. This is an issue because it is the Patriots, period. It's like when Michael Pineda was obviously using pine tar while pitching for the Yankees. Analysts and former players said that many pitchers do it, they just aren't so blatantly obvious about it. But it was the Yankees, so everyone was appalled. I hope New England pounds Seattle with properly inflated balls and puts this to rest.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

January 21st, 2015 at 8:46 AM ^

Yes, it's an issue because it's the Patriots.  Because the Patriots are known cheaters.  And the "wah wah woe is us" stuff for supposed marquee teams doesn't fly.  The Saints got hammered too, when they were caught in the bounty scandal, and nobody thinks the Saints are a marquee team.  The Tigers caught tons of flak for Kenny Rogers's pine tar, and nobody thinks it was because the Tigers get sooo much attention.