Former players planning show of support

Submitted by carlos spicywiener on

http://michigan.247sports.com/Bolt/Former-Michigan-players-planning-wee…

Former @umichfootball players are planning a weekend of support for the current players starting tomorrow by going to practice.

— Desmond Howard (@DesmondHoward) October 9, 2014

Former @umichfootball players told me that the "current players need to know we are here for them even if nobody else is."

— Desmond Howard (@DesmondHoward) October 9, 2014

 

Yeah, ok Desmond.

Reader71

October 10th, 2014 at 8:53 AM ^

And the chants went from Fire Brandon! to Harbaugh! to Protect Our Players! to whatever else. There's such a mixed message that there is no message. It just looks like a bunch of people upset about losing. Which is fine. But most fanbases dont march on the President's house because a football team is losing. The boycott and the movement need a clear message and probably a mouthpiece. Otherwise it just looks like angry fans. And it looks like DB might see out his contract. Schlissel probably doesn't want to buy him out when he can just try to force him to give the fans some concessions. Which puts the fans in a tough spot: do we want Brandon out at all costs, or do we want him to listen to our demands? What if he listens? No more rock, no more noodles, lower ticket prices -- is that enough, or do we still want him fired because he used to not listen to us?

westwardwolverine

October 10th, 2014 at 9:12 AM ^

See, to me its not even about that stuff anymore. Its about Dave Brandon being a piece of shit. 

I said Brady Hoke was an idiot. I think I said it twice. I feel bad about that. I was just mad and I know in general he's a good guy whose just in over his head. 

But Dave Brandon? No. Dave Brandon is a piece of shit. And I don't feel bad about that because its true. This is the guy stirring up all kinds of "Us against the World" crap while writing open letters disregarding RR's players. The guy trying to cover up a player's concussion. The guy who threw his own, hand-picked, head coach under the bus. 

So I don't care if he suddenly changes. It shouldn't be that hard to get a replacement who can do a better job. He should be gone no matter and it shouldn't be with any dignity. He's terrible at his job and he's a true douchebag, just as his initials suggest. 

Reader71

October 10th, 2014 at 9:36 AM ^

To me, that's weird. I get it, but I think it's weird. Dave Brandon, to me, is just a suit. But that's easy for me to say; I've never met him and he's never done anything that I find egregious (I don't like the music, but the skywriting and the noodle are not a big deal to me, and I haven't been able to afford season tickets before or after Brandon).

And I agree about a replacement being better. I'm just asking, in the event that the President doesn't want to pay for that replacement, if the changes would be enough.

Reader71

October 10th, 2014 at 11:44 AM ^

Because if the actions don't really matter, then why are you upset about them? It seems to be about getting revenge on a guy, and that is weird to me. You seem upset about Brandon covering up about a concussion, as you should be. But that's an action. Presumably, a person can change his actions. And all you're left with is a guy who once fucked up. This is getting farther and farther from the issue at hand, so I'll drop the subject if you want, but this is more of a philosophical debate about second chances/revenge/what is really important/whatever. I don't really care what Dave Brandon's subjective desires are so long as his objective actions are in line with mine. No music, no noodles, no Coke giveaways, better scheduling, cheaper tickets, and a better team. That's why I want out of an AD. I don't care what kind of guy he is, so long as he is not an embarrassment to the school.

AMazinBlue

October 10th, 2014 at 1:08 PM ^

Brandon didn't "fuck up" just one.  You mentioned what you want: "No music, no noodles, no Coke Giveaways, better scheduling, cheaper tickets and a better team."  Guess what, Brandon has his dirty slimy fingers on all those things.  The better team part is slightly removed, but he hired this coach.  Brady Hoke is a nice guy and cares greatly about the "115 sons".  But he and his staff are not developing these top-10 recruiting classes into great team, heck not even good one.  There are many programs around where the talent pool is much smaller, yet they are much more succssful over the last four years.      My biggest problem is no top tier coach will ever come here as long as Brandon is running things.  That alone is reason enough to do whatever is necessary to get him out.   This season will probably end up being 4-8 or so and in the fourth year of a head coach, that is unacceptable.  I support the players and the program.  I root for Michigan every time they take the field and I defend the university against those theat attempt to tear it down.  But there is no defending Brandon's actions and words and I gave up my season tickets because I couldn't afford the prices and can't justify the expense based on the product on the field and the "experience" inside the stadium.

CompleteLunacy

October 10th, 2014 at 9:24 AM ^

#2 HAS ALREADY HAPPENED. The diag rally was an embarassment to the administration, for sure. Not many athletic directors have ever had rallies to be fired like that. I live in Oklahoma, and they generally don't give a shit about Michigan, especially when they're not good...but even the local sports radio talked about it for 5 minutes!  And by the way, they were uniformly against the students' response...so the protests you may think are just and right, but without a clear concise message it looks to outsiders like a bunch of bitter students rallying becuase they don't like losing and they just don't like their AD. Obviously that's not true (or not the whole story), but since views are already mixed I don't think a boycott helps accomplish much of anything that the rally couldn't have, and there's no consideration being made for a backlash.. And I think many are vastly overlooking the effect it has on the players. Yes, they should know it's not directed at them. So? You don't think they'll take it a little personally? Wouldn't you? You don't think an empty student section sends a very mixed message? I mean, shit, if I were a player I might think "Damn, they care more about firing DB for some reason than they do supporting us for the biggest home game of the year." .

 

AMazinBlue

October 9th, 2014 at 11:11 PM ^

Change will not happen with PC letters and calm gatherings of 500-1000 people.  In this day age the two things that seem to make a difference and affect change is media exposure and $$$.  Using the biggest stadium in the country for a 15 minute quiet display of dissatifaction seems very effective, peaceful and not hurtful to the players.

I am so sick and tired of the rallying support for the players like the fans don't care about them.  If they didn't care they would all find something else to do on Saturday and the stadium would look like it did after the rain delay.

The fans care about the players, they want them to succeed and we all know the only that can truly happen is to get a topr tier coach here and to do that BRANDON HAS TO GO.

Miles was right

October 9th, 2014 at 11:21 PM ^

IRONIC. as it was the former players who hosed RR. Fuck you Braylon... On monday night football, says "braylon Edwards, Lloyd's Carrs university of michigan" while RR coaching. Doesnt anyone realize that this is a bad thing? The are a MOB


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

uminks

October 9th, 2014 at 11:30 PM ^

support from former players. RR was not a Michigan Man! This scares me the most about Brandon and the fact that if he stays, Hoke may be given one more season, no matter his record. Remember Hoke is a Michigan Man!

atom evolootion

October 10th, 2014 at 12:42 AM ^

This whole shit's starting to feel like playing Skyrim... When Rich Rod and his Stormcloaks were in town, the Imperials wanted them out. Now that Dave Brandon and the Imperials have taken control again, the Stormcloaks are setting up camp right outside of Solitude, and the god-damned Forsworn reindeer-people are hiding inside the city limits, undetected. Nobody's coming out of this without getting dirty in some capacity, whether you're involved in the protests or not, for the Athletic Department or against it, for the coaches or against them, or for the players or not against them, but not quite with them. If you post on this board with a sentiment that goes one way or another, or even a variety of ways, somebody'll contact the Dark Brotherhood on you. However it goes, eventually, a member of one faction or another is going to tell you, "I should bash your face in for all you've done."

BlueRibbon

October 10th, 2014 at 1:07 AM ^

I really don't understand the specifics of how the boycott would hurt the players.  The way I see it, it could play out in one of two ways.

A: The players realize that the boycott is aimed at Brandon, and they know that the students, alumni, and other fans still support them, so although they probably won't be overjoyed about all the empty seats at kickoff, they still understand the big picture.

B: The players have fully bought into an "us against the world" mentality, and are determined to band together and prove the haters wrong, in which case the empty seats should reinforce that mentality and add fuel to their fire.

Either way, we're talking about some of the most talented young football players in the country, as evidenced by the fact that most of them received scholarship offers from multiple top-25 programs.  Therefore, I have a hard time believing that a boycott would have any meaningful impact on their overall performance, and if it does, I think that says far more about the coaching staff's ability to prepare them than it does about how fans should behave.

blueblueblue

October 10th, 2014 at 9:34 AM ^

". . . chant fire Brandon if the game is getting out of hand."

Your post resonated with me until that last contingency, which negated all I read before that. Why would fans only chant "Fire Brandon" only if the game is getting out of hand? That just relegates that desire to a knee-jerk reaction, when the unhappiness with Brandon has been evolving for years. 

Michigan Arrogance

October 10th, 2014 at 6:46 AM ^

weren't most of these former players they guys who 1)shat on RR and didn't support the program at times under him, and 2) reccommended Hoke to begin with?

their voices should be ignored regarding M football for the foreseeable future

michgoblue

October 10th, 2014 at 8:06 AM ^

Just because their view of RR does not coincide with your view does not mean that their view should be ignored. They are entitled to their views, and the fact that so many former players were anti-RR shouldn't be ignored. Indeed, having dedicated years of their lives to the program, their views are certainly more valid than those of a bunch of us fans posting on message boards.

Not directed at you, but I really do find the number of posters in this thread basically saying "f*ck all of there former players because they didn't Rupert RichRod and now support hoke" to be ridiculous. I am a fan of Michigan, including its former players. I rooted for RichRod when he was here (despite having serious reservations), flew out to attend games, cheered and never bood him or the team under him and generally hope he does well now, but my allegiance remains with Michigan and not him. Maybe we should rename this blog MGoRichRod.

westwardwolverine

October 10th, 2014 at 8:54 AM ^

Actually it should. 

The point all these guys are making is that "YOU SUPPORT THE TEAM NO MATTER WHAT, MICHIGAN IS A BROTHERHOOD" blah blah blah. 

So what, the guys during the RR years weren't part of that brotherhood? I mean, that's what Dave Brandon thinks. That's why in his open letter letter last year he didn't mention a single guy RR recruited, including the one who basically gave Hoke this 4th year. 

The guys who are speaking up now are full of shit. They support Hoke because he was either their coach or they like Lloyd who in turn likes Hoke. They wanted Rodriguez out and then they got their man, who is failing miserably. They aren't doing it for Michigan. 

 

saveferris

October 10th, 2014 at 10:18 AM ^

Your loyalty to the University of Michigan, whether you're a former player, alumnus, or just a fan, should be above which person is at the head of the program.  Calling out all these players who are now lining up to support the team when they were conspicuously absent durnig the Rodriguez firestorm is more than reasonable because they aren't really here to support Michigan, they're here to support "Lloyd Carr's Michigan" and that is the problem.  That hypocracy is what has contributed to the toxic environment around this Athletic Department since Bo passed away and if we need to move past it if we're ever going to get back to being elite again.

SysMark

October 10th, 2014 at 8:52 AM ^

As a point of interest I'd like to see a list of the players participating in this and what their respective public positions were re: RR.  If it's the same ones just digging in their heels further it rings kind of hollow.

You Only Live Twice

October 10th, 2014 at 9:20 AM ^

What I was trying to get across last night is that there are so many different reasons for doing things.  I don't presume to tell others what time they should show up or if they show up.  I only said what my family was going to do.  It was amazing how that attracted hatred.  It's getting a little crazy in here.   We support EVERY Michigan team and always have.

Sam Webb, John Wangler and other former players  are discussing this right now.

 

CC_MFan

October 10th, 2014 at 8:21 PM ^

I don't recall any posters ripping you for saying that you were attending the game.  I do remember how you kept injecting yourself in other posts though.  Could you show an example of the "hatred" you experienced from that post?

 

blueblueblue

October 10th, 2014 at 9:34 AM ^

These former players are coming back to show their suppport for Hoke and the institutionalized closed-minded old boy's club that he represents. They are closing their ranks, digging into the priviledged, self-important frozen ground that is the 'Michigan Man.' Hoke's intriductory statement, "This is Michigan forgodsakes" represented that mindset well, we just didnt see it then. It was portentous. At Michigan, we live on our past achievements, and should be given deference by all. The present and future are the past, and all who dont know that are against us. 

go16blue

October 10th, 2014 at 9:39 AM ^

Players see the coaches as a part of the team, and when you attack the coaches the players feel attacked as well. A lot of what I've heard from people close to the team right now supports this - they feel attacked. Not to mention that a lot of the time the players are the ones who are the targets of abuse, its happened a lot this year from alumni and even some current students.

Fact is, yes they cannot separate attacks on the coaches from attacks on them, but why should they? They're a team! If you can't get that it's your own fault, not theirs.

Seth

October 10th, 2014 at 10:12 AM ^

I talked to some of the players organizing this a few weeks ago when they got the idea. Many of them played for Hoke when he was an assistant here, and a good many were here when he became head coach, so don't hold it against them that they're 100% behind Brady.

Most of their purpose is to resell the team on Michigan. During times like these as they damn well know, there's reason to coast to the end of the season and transfer after it. With a bowl game unlikely now, the players do need to find motivation, and the former players can do that. Maybe this was organized by dudes who were here for the national championship or were recruited shortly after, but those organizers have been contacting the hell out of guys who stuck through the Rich Rod and Hoke transitions to talk to the players about keeping the team together, keeping their faith in their coaches, and keeping their focus on that week's opponent and Ohio State and graduating.

Also understand: public displays against Brandon come with consequences from the athletic office. When you have special access, you can also have it taken away. So don't expect a "we are for the players but not the guys in charge!" rally to come from them, and certainly don't discount the possibility that they feel that way because they're not chanting.

If you want to do some digging it's not hard to find that sentiment anyway. You know someone was emailing some Pittsburgh radio dufus a vitriolic list of Brandon crimes, and you've seen a certain name come up in this effort. I'm skirting the edge of a promise here, but connect the dots, yo!

They're not doing this to support the status quo; they're doing it to keep the team together, and because they think it's the best thing they can do for Michigan.

westwardwolverine

October 10th, 2014 at 10:57 AM ^

Maybe those players who are against Brandon need to sack up and be the Michigan Men they claim to be and make those public stands. If former players started revolting against Brandon, this would probably be over a lot quicker. 

 

readyourguard

October 10th, 2014 at 10:23 AM ^

This event coordinates with the Football Alumni weekend that we've been doing for a lot of years.  There's a M Club Letterwinners tailgate at 3 on the golf course.  Prior to the game, former players and managers can go onto the field, watch some pre-game, form the human tunnel, then take our seats.  This has been going on for years, usually during the MSU or OSU game, INCLUDING RichRod's years.

 

fungusamongus

October 10th, 2014 at 10:25 AM ^

and Des was also the guy that after seeing 1 practice in 2008 said to the public that Michigan would not make a bowl. He was right, but way to support those players Des.

jblaze

October 10th, 2014 at 11:21 AM ^

How does saying a team won't make a bowl game not show support? A few weeks ago, didn't Desmond say that the only guy working his a** off in practice was Jabril?

You have to seperate the reporter from the former player/ fan.

Big_H

October 10th, 2014 at 2:48 PM ^

I think this is great for the players, and really shows that the former players want them to do get a victory. Anyone who is a Michigan fan should want to cheep these players on, when we all know what they are going through. This isn't the time to abandon them.