January 20th, 2016 at 2:16 PM ^
that seems fair
January 20th, 2016 at 2:41 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 20th, 2016 at 2:55 PM ^
January 20th, 2016 at 3:28 PM ^
January 20th, 2016 at 6:07 PM ^
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
January 20th, 2016 at 3:51 PM ^
if that includes me.. im in
January 20th, 2016 at 4:24 PM ^
Well played.
January 20th, 2016 at 2:17 PM ^
January 20th, 2016 at 2:17 PM ^
are politics still okay?
January 20th, 2016 at 2:31 PM ^
January 20th, 2016 at 2:35 PM ^
there isn't a specific prohibition on religion in the MGoFaq. It's more of an informal thing. Sort of how it's legal for me to walk around my neighborhood wearing a thong and pasties, but since the neighbors might be offended I only do that in my backyard.
January 20th, 2016 at 2:50 PM ^
You're in luck! I live in a neighborhood that does not frown upon that sort of thing. However, the association has banned any college football discussions among neighbors.
January 20th, 2016 at 3:25 PM ^
In that case I am going to pray that my mortgage payment gets sent this month and see what happens.
Wooo! God will pay my bills!
January 20th, 2016 at 6:56 PM ^
January 20th, 2016 at 2:46 PM ^
Especially for 2016. Brian says these will get extra points through the elections in November.
January 20th, 2016 at 3:59 PM ^
sexy-bits ? Don't we all miss those !!!! /s
Go Blue!
January 20th, 2016 at 2:18 PM ^
on days like today. May tomorrow be better for us all!
January 20th, 2016 at 2:27 PM ^
Damn, I was just going to ask if anyone knew anything about Jordan Elliott. Not sure if this would be considered useless or not...
Here's a good topic: Joe Bolden is getting oohs and ahhs at the Shrine practices. Check the board for my new thread in three... two... one...
January 20th, 2016 at 2:29 PM ^
Same thig here about Joe Bolden's Shrine game practices. Curious to find out how he's doing from a coach's perspective....
January 20th, 2016 at 2:41 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 20th, 2016 at 2:20 PM ^
Geez, who put you in charge?
Wait, what's that....?
Oh.
January 20th, 2016 at 2:21 PM ^
Brian layin' down the law.
January 20th, 2016 at 2:33 PM ^
Damnit, my cheeks are not that big!
January 20th, 2016 at 3:06 PM ^
we're looking at.
BTW...FUCK penn state.
January 20th, 2016 at 3:07 PM ^
...what?
January 20th, 2016 at 3:19 PM ^
OK, honestly. Are you really a judge? If so, why are most judges such smug pricks?
January 20th, 2016 at 2:21 PM ^
how will I know a topic is useless before losing all of my points?
January 20th, 2016 at 2:38 PM ^
Dave well first Brian will make your computer disappear, then you call out to your wife Linda....
January 20th, 2016 at 2:44 PM ^
have a couple of seconds warning that's comforting.
January 20th, 2016 at 3:28 PM ^
January 20th, 2016 at 4:48 PM ^
be right
January 20th, 2016 at 3:00 PM ^
It is totally subjective. Example, is posting anything related to JH useless? Let's say I post he wears jockey shorts instead of briefs. Is that useless or is their an audience for it? How about if I posted that the Michigan Football Team does not like asparagus served for team dinners. Useless?
The best way to handle this is for the moderators to remove outliers they feel are not worthy of comment. The point obliteration is an extreme response to an issue easily handled by the blog. If a particular postor continues to post threads deemed useless he/she should get a warning and if no reponse then removal.
January 20th, 2016 at 3:20 PM ^
thinking about the kind of underwear other men wear, do ya?
/nttawwt
January 20th, 2016 at 3:44 PM ^
but I sort of think, well, maybe they're silk panties, or maybe it's a thong. Maybe it's something really cool I don't even know about. You know I started feeling....
What? What, I thought we were in the trust tree in the nest, were we not?
January 20th, 2016 at 6:07 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 20th, 2016 at 6:33 PM ^
Useless topics are only 1/3rd of the problem, a bigger issue is that so many replies are just the verbal equivalent of an underarm fart noise. I rarely even read most threads because about half of the responses are so off topic and juvenile that it is a waste of time. After the first 25 response to any topic are unrelated lame jokes, goofy pix and tired gifs I have learned to just check out more disciplined sites.
Whatever happened to in thread moderation around here?
January 20th, 2016 at 11:41 PM ^
Fart noise...fart noise...hee hee
Damn it Beavis, shut up!
January 20th, 2016 at 3:47 PM ^
All kidding aside, it might be helpful to have a new set of guidelines for what is "useless." It was obvious that all of the satirical DC posts, for example, were utterly useless. I know this suggestion leaves itself open for "RTFM," or "use common sense," but it would be nice to see some ad hoc guidelines relevant to the new rule.
As for me, I don't create new topics and don't have a "dog in the fight." I just think a bit of clarity may be helpful for those who do and prevent someone from thinking his or her topic is relevant and useful, only to find out that he or she is starting at "0" again.
January 20th, 2016 at 4:27 PM ^
January 20th, 2016 at 2:21 PM ^
There goes my "Chocolate Vs. Vanilla Vs. Strawberry" debate I was going to start.
January 20th, 2016 at 2:22 PM ^
Neopolitan my man, Neopolitan.
January 20th, 2016 at 2:23 PM ^
/s
January 20th, 2016 at 2:25 PM ^
God damn that ice cream is so good. I'm buying some later.
January 20th, 2016 at 2:28 PM ^
January 20th, 2016 at 4:05 PM ^
....thanks to the fine folks at Saugatuck Brewing.
January 20th, 2016 at 4:15 PM ^
How do others eat that? One flavor at a time? Or randomly sampling them? I always save the chocolate for last.
January 20th, 2016 at 2:25 PM ^
January 20th, 2016 at 3:36 PM ^
Chocolate. And it's not even close
January 20th, 2016 at 2:22 PM ^
January 20th, 2016 at 2:28 PM ^
I would like to have a rule called "The Scruffy Rule" that outlaws lenghty discussions and/or visual representations of merkins. It's a meager legacy, but one that is mine to bear.