Utah 24, Michigan 17 Comment Count

Ace


Bryan Fuller/MGoBlog

A coaching change can only do so much.

Michigan flashed their potential to turn the corner. De'Veon Smith had some punishing runs. Jake Butt couldn't be covered. Amara Darboh and Jehu Chesson consistently got open. The alignment of Chris Wormley and Willie Henry looked like a stroke of genius at times. Jourdan Lewis locked down one side of the field. After an up-and-down first half, Jabrill Peppers looked like a five-star talent in the second. Blake O'Neill had that punt.

But the mistakes were numerous. Jake Rudock's first interception looked to be the fault of freshman slot receiver Grant Perry, who hitched when Rudock expected him to cut outside. The next two Rudock picks, both thrown in Perry's direction, looked to be the fault of the quarterback; the third proved especially costly when Utah's Justin Thomas jumped a throw to the flat and took it back 55 yards for a score, giving the Utes a late 24-10 lead. Rudock also missed a few open deep throws that could've changed the outcome of the game; he finished with an underwhelming 279 yards on 43 attempts and didn't tally his second touchdown until desperation time.

The errors weren't limited to Rudock. Michigan's second cornerback spot is far from settled; neither Channing Stribling nor Jeremy Clark stood out there. Joe Bolden missed a handful of tackles on slippery Utah running back Devontae Booker. The offensive line got manhandled in the run game, losing leverage and missing assignments. Smith offset many of his broken tackles by failing to hit the correct hole. Kenny Allen pushed a 44-yard field goal wide right, after which Jim Harbaugh could clearly be seen muttering "I should've gone for that."

There were flashes, chief among them Peppers' second-half TFLs and Jake Butt's spectacular third-quarter touchdown catch to briefly pull Michigan within seven.

But on the road against a decent team, Michigan simply made too many mistakes, big and small, to expect to come away with a victory. They'll be better than they looked tonight, there's little doubt of that. There'll also be rough patches. Home games against lesser teams lie ahead until BYU comes to the Big House, by which time the Wolverines should look more impressive.

At least there was Harbaugh, a sensible gameplan, and a solid outing from the defense. That's something to build on. If this turns out to be an anomalous performance from Rudock, this squad still could be very good. After all the offseason excitement, it's painful to wait through the development process, but even tonight it wasn't hard to see that the process is underway. It just might take a little longer than we had hoped.

Comments

blueblueblue

September 4th, 2015 at 8:07 AM ^

Not a chicken little. I think we will be a great program again under Harbaugh, but its going to take time. And I think the start of the era is going to be a bit painful. 

And in terms of your numbers, you just dont seem to get what Utah tried to do last night. Their offense is designed for 6.3 per attempt. And that's just what they did. The defense had some stops and some TFLs. But Utah mostly went for, and complteted, short passes and run plays all night, and mostly converted when needed. 

Ghost of Fritz…

September 4th, 2015 at 10:48 AM ^

...that Michigan is much closer to being a much better team (and specifically better offense) than the pessimists want to believe. 

Michigan lost to a good team on week one on the road.   Even with Travis Wilson playing a great game and Ruddock playing his worst ever game, just two key plays were the difference.

Compare the Michigan-Utah game last year in Ann Arbor.  Last year Michigan looked utterly incompetent and very far from being a decent team against Utah.  It was totally one-sided.

Last night the game came down to two key plays.  So despite the loss, it is already evident that Michigan is a much better football team than it was at this time last year.  

That should translate into 3 or 4 more wins this year than last, which means that Harbuagh is already rigting the ship.

That is the logic of pointing out that the game came down to two key plays.  O.k.?

 

CAwolverine

September 4th, 2015 at 9:55 AM ^

while I agree with you Rudock (2 of those 3 Ints were his fault and 3 missed deep balls all would have been TDs) and our running game looked terrible our OL looked significantly improved (0 sacks allowed & very good pass protection).

Our defense looked to be much improved as well, giving up only up 17 points and just 7 in the 2nd half. Booker is an outstanding RB & last year was 1st team all PAC 12 while rushing for 1,512 yards. He is on this year's Heisman watch list. We rendered him very average holding him to 69 yards. Utah is going to win a lot of games this year and I believe will end up ranked in the top 25 at the end of the regular season.

Had Rudock shown up tonight, I believe we win this game. I am optimistic about our chances to win 8+ games. Hopefully the faith Harbaugh has in Jake proves to be warranted.

armybucknut

September 4th, 2015 at 7:58 AM ^

I think this may be my 3rd time commenting here, as much as I cannot stand your guys team I will say that the team overall looked much more like a TEAM then the Hoke shit show that rolled out those last few years. I expect a lot of improvement over the course of the next few games and would love another war (sans injury) in November. For those of you who don't hate my guts for my College football alignment, please keep my family in your thoughts as I am hitting the 20 year retirement mark from the Army in seven weeks and we transition back to civilian life. Take care everyone! Have to say it though Go Bucks!

JFW

September 4th, 2015 at 8:49 AM ^

Good luck in the transition. I hope things work out for you as well as another guy I knew: he got his 20 in then started a second career as a teacher and got another 25 in there. Both careers were satisfying and it set him and his wife up nicely in retirement.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

armybucknut

September 4th, 2015 at 9:20 AM ^

Hahaha I am sure there was a longing for a return of old poop scoop Coop after the Tressel debacle hahaha. Thank you very much for the well wishes. I may end up banned at the 11w site for this friendly banter but its nice not having to deal with arrogant Buckeye brethren all the time. I have built some good online friendships there but some of the other posters need a firm reeducation in what "How firm thy friendship" means.

wolberine

September 4th, 2015 at 8:02 AM ^

Mr. Rudock, As the team leader, the one who touches the ball every play, you disappointed me last night. You didn't lead our team to victory and you and your wide receiver were responsible for 3 turnovers - one of which put our chances for winning the game out of reach. Or did it? Right after the pick 6, You commanded the team down the field in a beautiful under-2-minute drill. Your squad gave us hope that at the end of the game, after all these mistakes we could indeed play with and, dare we say it, beat Utah. Did you feel it? The flow, the zone, whatever people call good juju. That fighter's mentality when nothing is left to be nervous about and all you can feel is how to attack your opponent's weaknesses? Because while constantly refreshing my phone for updates on a cross-country flight at 40,000 feet, I felt that you felt it. On that final drive, you put a freaking spigot onto the well that is Michigan pride. That spigot was so close to being pumped. You had the hopes and dreams of victory of millions of M fans on your shoulders. Just keep up that fighter's mentality and you'll feel the euphoria when Michigan's faithful begin to carry you on our shoulders. Just ask Tom Brady.

Schweabs

September 4th, 2015 at 8:07 AM ^

It was sweet actually watching a real game last night. This came down to quarter back play and Rudock just couldn't make it happen. He had a really great last drive, and he spread the ball around which I liked, but the overthrown passes and interceptions were just to much to overcome.

BayWolves

September 4th, 2015 at 8:40 AM ^

This team will become quite good this year. Not bad for a first game on the road under a new system. Ruddock did not play the best and I wondered why Morris's didn't get a shot but I believe in Harbaugh as we all do. This team will show dramatic improvement by B1G time and I think we will win 9 games. QB and OL running game need substantial improvement.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

StraightDave

September 4th, 2015 at 8:56 AM ^

There's more to playing WR than just catching the ball.  2 of the INTs were on Perry.   

And the difference between UM receivers and OSU receivers, other than obvious talent, is the OSU receivers would lay out for some of those overthrown balls.  

Kevbro

September 4th, 2015 at 9:06 AM ^

I don't understand the praise for Smith.  He ran hard but ineffectively and has dead feet.  He can't break a tackle and missed about 5 chances to bounce a run outside for big yards.  If he had any vision I am confident he could have broken a 20+ yarder on at least one of those chances.  Although we barely saw Isaac, I thought he looked better every single time and actually fell forward when tackled.  I really hope that Smith does not start all year or it's going to be more of the same each week.  

Tuebor

September 4th, 2015 at 10:00 AM ^

I don't know what game you saw but Smith broke 1 tackle on every other run and required 2 guys to bring him down.  His issue is vision.  He doesn't see cut back lanes very well and tends to only run to where the hole should be, even if it isn't there.

SuperAaron34

September 4th, 2015 at 9:06 AM ^

There was a play in the second half where Rudock hit a Michigan receiver who started thinking about where he was going to run before he caught the ball and he dropped it.  Immediately after that play it looked to me like Whittingham said:  "Are these guys idiots?"...but it was unclear to me whether he was talking about his defensive players, who it looked like he had been trying to shuffle...or Michigan.  Did anyone else see this?

MichiganUte

September 4th, 2015 at 9:06 AM ^

As many have mentioned, the difference in the game was the QB play for the two teams and this is absolutely true. In a 24-17 game, one QB threw 3 INT's and the other QB had 1 INT and guess which one won?

Here are some observations that show me that Harbaugh is making a difference and will continue to make a difference.

1. Devontae Booker was 1st team all Pac 12 last year with over 1500 yards rushing. Michigan did a nice job against him, holding Booker under 70 yards rushing. While Booker had 55 yards receiving, which was a nice wrinkle Utah added, he was not the dominant factor that I saw during October and November of last season (ask UCLA, USC, and Oregon State about Booker). 

2. Utah's top receiver, Kenneth Scott, was a non-factor. Utah got a nice night from their FR waterbug slot receiver Britain Covey, an all-state HS QB here in UT last year, but as a team only averaged 8.7 yards per catch.

3. Utah led the nation in sacks last year but went sackless last night.

4. Utah had a dominant special teams unit last year (#1 nationally in Phil Steele rankings) but Michigan compared favorably last night (not the case last year).

5. Much like Michigan traditionally, the Kyle Whittingham Utah defenses are based on stopping the run with very big and strong tackles and relentless, physical linebackers and ends. Michigan tried to soften this up by running up the middle but this is where Utah is the strongest and Michigan has struggled with their running game for the last couple of years. So, while somewhat disappointing, it was not a major surprise that Michigan struggled to run the ball.

Daleppard

September 4th, 2015 at 9:21 AM ^

Can he dive for a ball? A few of those passes were overthrown but a few were just out of reach and if he dives he might make the catch.

As far as the play calling I felt like I was watching Debord again and I pray I am not. But with it being the 1st game and these kids learning on the fly I will need to see some more before I can say if it was play calling or decision making on the field. But we must find some other receivers because you can't throw to really 2 guys all game for the most part.

Go Blue!!

Wolv27

September 4th, 2015 at 9:44 AM ^

While we had mistakes, I think they can be improved this year or maybe next year.

My biggest issue with that game was Smith. He had a lot of work to be done. There was one play where there was a wide-open gap that he completely missed (which could have been a huge play of 20+ yards).

Our wide recievers need to run their routes correctly, our quarterback needs to stop throwing interceptions and our offensive line is mediocre. It's hard to win when we have a mediocre quarterback who threw three interceptions and wide recievers who don't dive for balls/run their routes wrong.

We made progress. Our turnover margin in that game was -2 instead of -3, we scored 17 instead of 14, we held them to 24 rather than 26 and we could move the ball and not go three-and-out every drive.

Hopefully games like this in the future go 24-17 than 17-24. Go Blue.

Hannibal.

September 4th, 2015 at 9:52 AM ^

Rudock was clearly at fault for two of the INTs, and I am not convinced that it wasn't three.  On the first one, Perry finds an open spot in the zone just past the sticks for the first down and he runs to it.    At full speed, it looked like a good route to me.  Everyone's assumption that the first INT was Perry's fault seems to rest on the fact that Perry is a freshman and Rudock is a fifth year senior, and therefore it must be Perry's fault. 

The INTs weren't Rudock's only mistakes.  He stared down receivers like crazy, John Navarre 2001 style.  He had some other bad passes that aren't as memorable because they wouldn't have gone for first downs, but were still bad nonetheless.  Like the third down pass on Michigan's first field goal, which was too inaccurate to give the receiver a chance for YAC.  He overthrew Chesson on two easy TDs, and he overthrew Darboh on a long pass where he had a step on the defender.  He overthrew Deveon Smith on a desperation heave on a screen pass.  The TD throw to Butt was an attrocious pass into triple coverage where Butt bailed him out because Butt is possibly the best TE in the history of the program.  His receivers got lots of YAC on passes parallel to the LOS, and not necessarily because he led them perfectly.  It was usually terrible tackling by an unblocked DB in position to make a play.  Rudock's unimpresive stat line doesn't reflect how poorly he played.  His accuracy was disappointing and his game management was abysmal.

The "worst case" in the season preview was apparently not "worst case" enough for both the offensive line and Jake Rudock.  We didn't have a single run over 7 yeards.  It's the most pathetic performance since the 2013 Nebraska game.  The offensive line was "as bad as Darrell Funk on a bad day" and Rudock was "2014 Devin Gardner without legs". 8-4 is out of the question if last night's game was even remotely representative of what this year is going to offer for the QB and the OL.  8-4 assumed that the offensive line would be no worse than last year and that Rudock would be a 7.5 ypa game manager, and not the Godawful <7 ypa mistake machine that he was last night.  I thought that the linebacker play came in below expectations too.  Especially Bolden.  A few guys exceeded my expectations -- Wormley, Butt (which is saying a lot because expectations were already pretty high -- he made Jerame Tuman and Bennie Joppru look like bums last night), Darboh (despite the one drop), Chesson (finally showed some ability to get open deep), and Smith (despite that one awful missed cut, I loved that he needed three guys to bring him down every time).

If I had been emotionally invested in last night's game, then I would have found it pretty discouraging.  The inevitable calls for "patience" have started, but there's not much time for it.  Rudock is a senior and the 2012 and 2013 recruiting classes are rapidly aging.  Butt is probably a first round draft pick.  2015 is a transition year, but not a rebuilding year.  The 2014 and 2015 recruiting classes were very underwhelming outfits that left huge holes, and the 2016 is trending that way too.  Time is a luxury that we don't have. 

dragonchild

September 4th, 2015 at 10:18 AM ^

To be fair, I don't think Perry derped.  He bailed out Malzone in HS constantly by getting open in similar ways.  He was trying to help Rudock.  He saw where the CB was sitting down and took a good position in front of him.  The problem is, it was an out route, not an option route; Rudock was throwing to a spot so that wasn't the time to improvise.  This isn't really a case of a freshman not knowing what he's doing, but probably trying to be too clever.  You can't change the script on your own and expect the QB to read your mind.  There's a reason Harbaugh publicly blamed Perry for the first pick.

So on the third INT (the second was a bad throw) now Perry's where he should be and stays there, even though the ball's coming too slowly which allows the CB to jump the route.  That was when he should've freelanced and moved in or at least batted the pass down, but as a freshman whatever tut-tut he got for improvising on the first INT was probably still on his mind.

Everyone's trying to find out who's at fault, but "fault" is a favorite word for those who don't know the meaning of responsibility.  Both Rudock and Perry were trying to get completions.  I'm interested in, can we get this fixed, and the Rudock-Perry miscommunications look very fixable.  Rudock's inaccuracy is more troubling, as mechanics aren't something you can fix quickly in a senior with the season already underway.

SalvatoreQuattro

September 4th, 2015 at 10:49 AM ^

Firstly, the OL actually pass blocked really well. Secondly, the 16' class is top ten. How the hell is that "underwhelming? 

Thirdly, Rudock did have some poor throws, but it also is possible that a true freshman did make some mistakes. 

It astounds me that one game has caused you to jump off te cliff. Not only do you not see the improvement, but you think UM is going to suck inot the future because the recruiting is(inaccurately) underwhelming and going to leave huge holes.(again, inaccurate)

 

You win the  award Worst Post of the Play for your overreaction and hyper negativity. You make my Lions posts look positively glowing.

 

Get a grip, dude.

schreibee

September 4th, 2015 at 2:10 PM ^

"Time is a luxury that we don't have." Hannibal.

I wonder what you consider the alternatives to patience?

Replace Harbaugh after one game? (Laughable obviously)

Replace Rudock after one game? (Possible, but unlikely. We've seen the only alternative with any experience... not an improvement based on prior results)

You praise D. Smith, but there's the #1 person I'd replace, along with both starting guards. But that's a lot of pieces to move around based on a 7 pt loss in a night road game vs a pretty tough team (beat USC & Stanford last year - did we beat a comparable opponent?)

My suggestion Hannibal:

Patience is ALL we DO have. Some other poster got soundly negged for suggesting the Michigan football community (team, coaches & fans) recalibrate our expectations about being able to compete with ohio sate. "Woody had titles, Urbz has titles, whadda we got??!! Get used to it" etc etc...

So again, I wonder just what you think our alternatives to patience are? Go along with that other poster? Just tune out and work in the garden on Saturday? Replace Mgoblog as our home page with MSNBC or Fox and start focussing on that 2016 Presidential race?

I mean, I'd love to hear it?

 

 

cbrad

September 4th, 2015 at 9:59 AM ^

Not just a coincidence that Perry was involved in all 3 picks. This is a case where we miss Norfleet, Justice and Canteen who was in street clothes. Perry is essentially the 4th string slot who should be redshirting. No idea why Rudock trusted the freshman so much. Must be lack of familiarity with the players.

Tuebor

September 4th, 2015 at 10:03 AM ^

Yeah.  That and he threw at AJ Williams on a critical 3rd down play that got broken up by the middle linebacker.  Rudock needs to know who is a reliable reciever and who isn't

Wolverine In Iowa

September 4th, 2015 at 10:05 AM ^

Positives I took from the game:

1) Butt was outstanding.

2) Darboh had a great game.

3) Wormley was awesome in the first half; Peppers in the second half.

4) OL was great in pass pro.

5) No noticeable coaching problems other than being RPS'd on the draw by the Utah QB for a TD.

Negatives:

1) No rush threat at all (OL/RB's)

2) Some buffoonery by the LB's.

3) Synch problems with Rudock and WR's - these were actually less than I expected.

kzoomgr

September 4th, 2015 at 10:09 AM ^

If every spot on the team is an open competition from week to week, shouldn't Coach give Morris a run-out against Oregon St?  His mobility could help loosen up the run game, and given Rudock's inability to protect the football (albeit uncharacteristically), why not?  Given Coach's willingness to switch QB's in the past, I'll be a bit confused if he doesn't at least give Morris 2 quarters next week. 

late night BTB

September 4th, 2015 at 10:21 AM ^

games aren't the place for tryouts.  Shane has had/has an opportunity every time they practice.

Some of you have a soft spot for Shane and think that he 'deserves' to play a couple games.  This is big time college football, and coaches feed their families based on how these kids play.  Keep your Pop Warner rules and feelings with your 3rd grader.

schreibee

September 4th, 2015 at 2:21 PM ^

Well as of this moment, isn't Rudock someone who has performed poorly at Michigan? Cost us a game in fact, just as surely as Morris cost us the Minny game (before the hit & ensuing buffoonery).

I have no doubt that when given the chance to assess both in a game situation, Rudock will prevail. But he hasn't done anything to be handed a job at this point, I'd be curious to see the differences. Might come down to how good Ore St looks tonight in their first game under Anderson. If they look better than competent maybe Shane has to wait for UNLV?

 

Buddy the Wolverine

September 4th, 2015 at 10:33 AM ^

If Rudock is the "safe play" lets get dangerous. Shane would have made that first touchdown pass with his RIGHT arm. My dead parapalegic grandmother would have been a better conservative play. Sure the first pick was probably on Perry but Rudock showed me NOTHING. Receivers were open. He sucks. Bench him. Transfer him back to Iowa.