Unverified Voracity Needs A Madden-a-holic Comment Count

Brian

dscn4141[1]

FOR SCIENCE! Bakers And Best compiled 36 different combinations of cereal and gatorade into POWER RANKINGS:

1. Trix with Cool Blue - This was the second one we tried and unfortunately it was all downhill from there.  We had both assumed the ‘fruit’ flavored cereals would taste best and for the post part this was true.  I’m not going to start eating this for breakfast, but if you asked me to eat a bowl of it I wouldn’t protest.

36. Frosted Cheerios with Strawberry Lemonade - We kept notes as we tasted.  I ended up with 2.5 pages single spaced.  My notes for this were relatively short, because we wanted to forget it ever happened and move on.  They read, “NO. NOPE NOPE NOPE.”.  It so grotesquely intensified the taste of the strawberry lemonade, which yes, as you’ll notice according to the rankings is worse than rotten chocolate yogurt.

Now you know. Interestingly, the "Cool Blue" flavor—blue is not a flavor—scored three of the top four combinations but finished 33rd when paired with Cinnamon Toast Crunch. Anyone who wants to remain un-banned will agree Cinnamon Toast Crunch is the king of breakfast cereals.

Hey… uh… nevermind. Ace dutifully compiled a commitment post for three-star CA WR Deontay Burnette after various outlets reported he'd flipped his commitment to Michigan. That is apparently not happening.

WTF happened? Nobody really knows, but Sam Webb says that there was a "miscommunication"($) and that Michigan won't actually take a commit from him. If that sounds weird… yeah, it's weird. You'd think by this point anyone coming in with a pulse who wants to commit would be greenlit.

Hopefully that's a sign that Signing Day is going to be fruitful. Michigan does have an option in its back pocket in case things go south and they want to pick up a three-star-ish WR: Brother Rice's Grant Perry, an Alex Malzone teammate currently committed to Northwestern.

WHAT. So… the Super Bowl. I understand the nation is aghast at the decision to throw the ball from the one on second and goal when you have Beast Mode, but let's not forget that Bill Belichick—indisputably the greatest coach of his generation—had two timeouts in his pocket and was content to take them to the locker room if that's what it came to. He was bailed out by a terrific play, but it truly boggles that there is literally no football team in the universe that would not be improved by importing a 14-year-old who plays Madden 16 hours a day to work clock strategy.

That is no longer hypothesis, but fact. Yeesh.

Looked pretty good though. Can't really blame Wilson for the decision.

What was bad was the placement: Wilson put the ball a yard behind his guy instead of a yard in front, allowing the DB to make a play on the ball. If the ball is out front the DB has zero chance at an INT no matter how well he reads the play. At best he breaks it up. But that's why not everybody is Tom Brady.

Not many options? Harbaugh's first game is against Utah, which is a much more interesting opener than they usually are. Utah underwent a spasm of turmoil last month, losing both coordinators and almost their head coach. They've found a new DC: Brent Pease, who's exiting retirement for the second time to take the job.

Hello: Partridge family. Michigan hires former Paramus Catholic head coach Chris Partridge for that job a previous UV speculated was right up his alley. Partridge was apparently in Ann Arbor interviewing for four days before getting officially hired. NJ DT Rashan Gary, by some accounts the #1 kid in the 2016 class, is currently at Paramus:

Paramus Catholic features one of the top recruits in the country next year in junior defensive tackle Rashan Gary.

Not surprisingly, Gary recently received a scholarship offer from Michigan.

“Chris would never steer him to a school,” Russo said. “Rashan is going to go visit places in the spring. He has a lot of things set up. At the end of the day, if Rashan’s mom and him and his support staff here at Paramus Catholic feel like [Michigan] is the best place for him, then it is. He will do great wherever he goes.”

Hopefully that's in Ann Arbor.

Tom Brady, 2000. Via Dr. Sap:

Etc.: Left Shark is today's internet fave-rave. Michigan was unlucky at acquiring TOs last year, so that should help Harbaugh unless it doesn't. Chris Webber interviewed about his film projects. Josh Gordon writes a reply to his critics. Werenski 8, Connor 13 in TSN's mock draft.

The Seahawks pulled no punches talking about the NCAA.

Comments

snarling wolverine

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:06 PM ^

He was 41-55 before Brady arrived.  I don't know what people in New England thought of him at that time but they surely didn't expect to suddenly win 75% of their games over the next 14 years.

Even in 2008 it could be argued that he was benefitting from Brady's presence, despite the injury - Brady was still around to provide leadership on the sidelines, and by that time Belichick had established himself enough for the locker room to buy in.

To be clear, I'm mostly playing the devil's advocate here.  

 

 

 

Yostbound and Down

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:07 PM ^

That's fine, but then what's Pete Carroll without the LOB and/or Reggie Bush (pick your team). Another sport, what's Greg Popovich without Tim Duncan? Topical to us, what's Harbaugh without Andrew Luck (at Stanford)? Part of being a great coach is finding and bringing in great talent and developing it, whether it's a top draft pick (Duncan), a 4 star QB (Luck) or lowly drafted players that become stars (Sherman and obviously Brady). 

The arguments then become so repetitive because most great teams with coaches considered great also happen to at least have some good players on them.

snarling wolverine

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:26 PM ^

Yeah, but with Harbaugh you can point to his record at San Diego, the 49ers and even his first year at Stanford when he upset Carroll.  Carroll meanwhile has won a lot without Bush (obviously, he doesn't have him in the NFL).  Pop isn't that reliant on Duncan anymore.

Belichick's success has been very closely tied to Brady.  Even factoring in 2008, he's 52-60 in non-Brady seasons and 159-49 with him around.  

Again, devil's advocate.  

reshp1

February 2nd, 2015 at 12:27 PM ^

Saw an interesting post on Reddit about Belichick "baiting" the throw that got INT'ed. If he had called time out right away, the Seahawks would have run, run, run all the downs to kill clock. By letting the clock run and probably surprising the Seahawks, they had to have at least one throwing play, probably two since they themselves only had on time out. They saw the goal line stand package and decided to run on 2nd down and the rest is history.

Not sure I totally buy it that Belichick had all that planned, but it's an interesting idea nonetheless.

Muttley

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:05 PM ^

with one timeout, provided that one of the runs came on 4th down. 

While the Seahawks had three downs left (2nd, 3rd, and 4th), they only faced two intervals between downs (between 2nd-and-3rd & between 3rd-and-4th).  One timeout and one incompletion would have stopped the clock for both.  What happens to the clock after 4th down doesn't matter--you've either scored or turned the ball over.

And the Seahawks could have safely run three times--Marshawn, Marshawn, Marshawn--had they not used most of the playclock before snapping the ball on 2nd down.

reshp1

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:11 PM ^

had they not used most of the playclock before snapping the ball on 2nd down.

 

I think that's the key point. Belichick not calling his TO might have screwed with Seahawks enough that they A) let the clock run more than they wanted, and B) made a boneheaded playcall in a time-crunched situation.

Like I said, not sure if it was pre-meditated by Belichick, but it certainly is possible that it did mess up how the Seahawks handled those next few plays.

snarling wolverine

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:16 PM ^

Maybe.  But still, letting the clock run there basically eliminates any chance of your offense answering a score, and when they're at the one their odds of scoring are quite good.  That's a big gamble.  

They were fortunate that Seattle called for a throw in traffic - and of course that Butler made a fantastic play jumping the route.

 

 

 

Don

February 2nd, 2015 at 12:36 PM ^

the Burnett clusterfuck occurred because Burnett's HS coach jumped to the conclusion that Deontay had committed and told the media that's what happened.

After that blew up (while Burnett was en route back to CA) Burnett, the Serra coaches, and UM talked, and that "everything is fine" now.

They might be "fine" for Burnett, but Webb confirmed that Michigan is not part of the picture any more. Sam was being cryptic, and obviously knows much more than he's saying. Whether UM extended a "non-commitable offer" that was contingent on other recruit decisions, or if it's entirely a screwup by Burnett's HS coach and there was no actual offer, Sam didn't say.

The Burnett saga starts about 9:00 on the podcast:

http://www.stationcaster.com/player_skinned.php?s=901&c=4701&f=3939703

Also, one of the measures of our culture's regression and perverted degradation is the failure to recognize that Wheaties are infinitely superior to all these Commie pinko cereals you all are eating today.

Space Coyote

February 2nd, 2015 at 12:33 PM ^

As I've aged and my metabolism isn't what it used to be (and I'm not playing sports multiple hours out of every day), I've had to cut down on cereal intake. But I'm a bit of a cereal connoisseur. Along with Beef, Milk, and potatos, it's an essential "food group" if you will for me (don't get me wrong, I really like chicken, and fruits and veggies, but we're talking go-to foods now). As a growing lad, I'd eat three bowls of cereal for breakfast on weekdays, and sometimes finish of a box on the weekends, meaning I'm very happy I participated in a lot of sports or those carbs would have turned me into an overweight child very quickly.

Regardless, cereal is very important to me. I do really enjoy Cinnamon Toast Crunch. Top 5 cereal. As I've grown up though, as an every day cereal, I go Frosted Mini-Wheats. It really just serves as a great combination of taste with the fiber needed to be filling and helping in other areas of every day life. So while it may not be my favorite, I think it scores highly in other categories.

Regardless, my top 5 has to include Cinnamon Toast Crunch, Frosted Flakes, Frosted Mini-Wheats, and Lucky Charms. Wheaties, Honey Nut Cheerios, Apple Jacks, Fruit Loops, Count Chocula, Crispix, Chex (Wheat, Corn, and Rice) all deserve recognition as well. Lots of other good cereals, but those are the tops in my opinon. I could eat Cereal for every meal really.

PitchAndCatch

February 2nd, 2015 at 12:34 PM ^

Belichick flubbed the end of the first half too. Isn't the best decision to have all your defenders purposely tackle/hold the receivers on the play with 6 seconds left? If that happens, SEA gets one more play with 1 second left and will undoubtedly take the field goal.

Not that hard!

Space Coyote

February 2nd, 2015 at 12:47 PM ^

The Pats should have never been in that situation. Seattle was trying to go to the locker room. But a poor first play followed by a terrible job forcing Wilson upfield on the read option were then compounded by a facemask on the next competion.

But they could have done a few things. They could have done what you advocate (concern there is if it's called PI then they place the ball at the spot of the foul; do you want them to get a shot at the 1 yard line or 2 yard line, even if it means risk the TD/FG? Probably not). They could have thrown 13 guys on the field, the old "Polish defense". But really, it was just a mess up in match-up and CB play. Sit his feet on the goal line and tell him he isn't allowed to move backward. The hard back shoulder throw and the slant were the only two threats there. You have to be in a position where you are breaking forward on the ball no matter what (similar to the last INT), any other throw runs out the clock probably. So just bad execution and bad match up given the situation.

Lou MacAdoo

February 2nd, 2015 at 12:35 PM ^

The Josh Gordon price is great. It will teach some a simple life lesson that they probably won't follow. Do not judge and ridicule people that you don't know. We're all a certain way for a reason and assuming you understand someone when you don't is foolish. They've all had their share of controversy and should understand this but I guess it's their job to say controversial things.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Wolverine In Exile

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:25 PM ^

Count me in the Crispix Nation. Corn on one side, Rice on the other side, and the gaps in the cereal matrix are scientifically optimized to trap just the right amount of milk so that the cereal doesn't get soggy right away. Add in some plain Cheerios to act as a base layer and prevent oversaturation and BINGO! You have your perfect bowl of cereal.

 

Please don't send me to Bolivia. They don't have Crispix there. 

DCGrad

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:40 PM ^

Belichick's mind but he tried to let the NYG score to give the offense time to score but it didn't work. Mixing up his calls may have been the better strategy especially because everyone thought the TO was coming.

westwardwolverine

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:53 PM ^

I think this was probably in his mind a little bit, but also that he just froze up as well. Probably because he was thinking, "I can't believe we're going to fucking lose on another horseshoe catch". 

westwardwolverine

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:50 PM ^

I was listening to a Bill Simmons podcast a few weeks ago where he and his guest (a Cowboys fan) were talking about how you know a coach is blowing a decision when he does exactly what the opposing team's fanbase would want him to do. 

So for example: Cowboys fans were relieved when Detroit chose to punt on 4th and 1 around midfield rather than go for it in the wildcard round. Seahawks fans were relieved when Mike McCarthy decided to kick field goals rather than go for it at the goal line during the NFC championship. 

I was thinking back to certain decisions by Michigan over the years and went back to 2011 vs. MSU. When Michigan went for it on 4th and 1 deep in MSU territory, I'm guessing that most Spartan fans would have told you that they would have wanted to see anything other than Denard run the ball from the shotgun (actually its not really a guess, I watched the game with a 80-20 Sparty crowd and they were in disbelief at the playcall). And Borges obliged. 

Last night, from everything I saw on twitter to the people talking at the party I was at, seemed to indicate that the game was over so long as Marshawn Lynch got the ball. And in hindsight, its probably true: Seattle was the second best short yardage team in the league on offense, New England was the worst and he had been a sledgehammer all night. So of course Crazy Pete decided to do exactly what New England fans hoped he would do and got the absolute worst result from it. 

 

Blue Balls Afire

February 2nd, 2015 at 1:55 PM ^

The only way Butler makes that INT is if he saw what was about to happen, baited the QB for a fraction of an instant, and then broke on the ball earlier than usual.  For an undrafted rookie to make that play is incredible.  It really is one of the best plays ever.

RockinLoud

February 2nd, 2015 at 2:04 PM ^

Sorry Brian, I'm a third generation Kellogg's man (though I've since moved on to a different company, Kellogg's isn't what it used to be), thus I cannot ever endorse a General Mills cereal even if it is delicious.

kb

February 2nd, 2015 at 2:07 PM ^

with Cap'n Crunch and Fruity Pebbles close seconds. Brian, your cereal goes soggy in 4.4 seconds (zero fakes out of five).

joeyb

February 2nd, 2015 at 2:16 PM ^

I was screaming at the TV last night for them to take the TO, but I just thought of something. If you take the TO, you essentially give them 3 more running plays, which everyone agrees is Seattle's strength. By letting the clock run, Seattle could get at most 2 more running plays and doing so might cause them to accidentally run the clock out. Then, they come out in Cover 0 and dared them to pass. I think running into a box with 8 guys in it with 24 seconds left is about as likely to get you criticized when it doesn't work as calling a high-percentage pass against man coverage that ends up getting picked because of the perfect play by the safety.

Again, I'd have called the TO, but I just don't think it's as black and white as everyone else is making it out to be and maybe forcing Seattle to do something stupid was Belichick's plan the whole time.

Mich OC

February 2nd, 2015 at 2:16 PM ^

That throw was already too far out in front of the receiver.  He should have put it low and insidde, that way you either get a completion or a PI call.  

If that throw is another yard out in front its even more likely to be picked off cleanly

MosherJordan

February 2nd, 2015 at 2:34 PM ^

You forget that the Seahawks had 1 TO left with just under a minute to play. If they run and get stuffed, they have to call TO and then are forced to pass the last two downs. That was why Pete Carrol called the pass play. If Belichick calls TO, he gives the Seahawks a free TO and an option to stuff the run twice.

Not taking a TO only is a bad move if you assume the odds of the Seahawks scoring are greater than the odds of you getting the ball back and getting enough yards to get into FG range. This only works if you let them score. The Giants showed that teams aren't always so dumb as to grant you a quick score.

Like everyone else watching, I thought, there's no way the Seahawks don't score, so in the moment agreed with my neighbor screaming for a TO. After the fact, it is clear the Pats weren't getting the ball with more than 10 seconds no matter what, and odds of a goalie stand may have been better than a hail marry, and Belicheck made the right call.

Mich OC

February 2nd, 2015 at 4:24 PM ^

How do you figure 10 seconds? After the first down play, there was 1:02 left on the clock. If NE calls timeout here and lets them score the next play, they almost have a full minute to work with and 1 timeout. If they don't score on the 2nd down play, assuming its a run, NE would call another timeout. This makes it 3rd down with about 55 seconds on the clock. Either seattle scores on third down and leaves NE about 50 seconds, or they don't score on 3rd down and go into a 4th and goal situation, which is what NE would want anyways. The TO would have probably been the right call.

MosherJordan

February 2nd, 2015 at 9:32 PM ^

Think in terms of wanting to stuff them 3 more times. Bellichick said after the game that he knew they were going to run a pass play from their personnel package. If he thought that they could stuff that, then he could use his last two TOs to react/adjust to what the Seahawks were showing on the field. Using your TOs to preserve your shot at getting the ball back ups your odds of getting scored on.

Guy is a coaching robot. I'm sure he's thought about this. If opposing team is inside my X with under Y to play, and I have TOs, do I let them score and get the ball back, or try to stop them 4 times? My guess is you can't play for both, so you pick one and optimize game management for that. He clearly choose to put all his chips on stopping them. I don't think it's all that clear cut which has better chance, as they are both low probability events.

Jonesy

February 2nd, 2015 at 3:37 PM ^

Ice cream cones cereal was the best of all time, and not just because their spokesman was 'ice cream cones jones,' I was sad when it got discontinued.

ca_prophet

February 2nd, 2015 at 4:20 PM ^

But there are good things to be said about Crackling Oat Bran and various almond-cluster cereals as well. As far as the Super Bowl, as others have noted the Seahawks had time for one run and two passes, or an incomplete pass, a run and timeout, and one last play. This play pretty much has to be a pass, but calling the inside play rather than the fade (maybe to the guy covered by Arrington giving up a foot?) seems like overthinking it. The Pats DB made possibly the play of his career to burn them, but not calling a Lynch run doesn't seem like a hideous mistake. Calling a play that means you never get to the Lynch run seems like the mistake.

Mich OC

February 2nd, 2015 at 6:24 PM ^

It was 2nd and goal from the 1 yard line with 1 minute remaining, and the Seahawks had 1 timeout.  By the time they got to the line after the 1st down play, they would have about 50 seconds to work with.  Time really wasn't a factor.  

They could have run on second down, called timeout, and then called two plays in the huddle and had over 40 seconds to run them.  

Even after they let the clock get to 30 seconds, they could have run the ball, called timeout if they didn't score, and called 2 plays in the huddle and had 24 seconds to run them.  This gives you the option to run any two plays you want.

WineAndSpirits

February 2nd, 2015 at 5:44 PM ^

Sherman NCAA comments

As a student athlete, who majored in engineering, I can't agree more with Sherman's comments. There I said it, I actually agree with him on something.

Attending class, AND Labs, which he didn't even touch on, while playing soccer, was difficult. Wish I would have majored in business, like most of the rest of the team.

gwkrlghl

February 2nd, 2015 at 6:41 PM ^

Marshmallow Alpha Bits is the greatest cereal ever. I still consider it a war crime that they were discontinued well over a decade ago. Someone else please tell me they feel my pain

WolverineRage

February 2nd, 2015 at 11:13 PM ^

sorry, I stand up for what I believe in: Golden Grahams are #1. Cinnamon Toast Crunch leaves a grit in the milk that is just annoying. It beats out a lot of the fruity cereals, but falls behind GG and most of the chocolate ones.