OT: Transgender athletes and fairness

Submitted by StephenRKass on January 11th, 2022 at 11:35 AM

I just read a fascinating column on fairness in female sports. Specifically, Lia Thomas is a swimmer for U Penn who is transitioning from male to female. She was an all-Ivy swimmer on the men's team before transitioning. Since the transition, she has

"basically obliterated the competition, smashing pool and meet records. Her times compare favorably not only with the best current female collegiate swimmers in the country but with the best American female swimmers ever."

The column is an interesting piece looking at the conflict between trans rights and women's rights. I will say upfront, I don't know the answers, but it appears to be troubling.

LINK:  Transgender rights and fair play

I am the picture of privilege: a successful white male. As such, anything I have an opinion on is automatically suspect. However, I'd love to hear from female athletes at Michigan as to their thoughts on this.

BlueMarrow

January 11th, 2022 at 12:00 PM ^

My suggestion would be for athletic competitive categories to be based on genome. XX, XY, and Other. 

One is free to identify as anything they wish. The genome is what it is. 

BlueMarrow

January 11th, 2022 at 8:27 PM ^

I did not mean to imply any rarity.

My point is that society in general, and athletics particular to this thread, have seemed to change/evolve/choose your word/ to a point where the male/female designation/limited designation is not only no longer appropriate but offensive to many. 

So let's just move on and agree the designation is obsolete, and no longer use the terms. Let's use genomic terms instead. Everyone is either XX, XY, or other. We could, as I'm sure would be demanded, extend sports/any categories for specific Trisomies, or any other non XX/XY variants. 

Why does one need to check into a Delta flight as male or female, as just one recent example? 

Civilization should evolve to a genomic system, if any identification is necessary at all, which it really is not. The current structure was developed because people once thought people should be differentiated based on male/female designation which is now not acceptable.

Why not let everyone compete, and accept the results??? 

Why have any categories?

Do the categories not perpetuate the false concept of male superiority? 

 

 

StephenRKass

January 11th, 2022 at 12:01 PM ^

FTR, I fully expected to be negbanged, and am perfectly fine with that. In fact, I expect any comments I make in the thread to also be negged. Which is also perfectly fine. Several comments.

  1. On a meta level, it would be wonderful if a forum made up substantially of Michigan alumni could have a reasonable discussion on this. Yes, it is off topic. However, this is something that will affect all women's sports, and it seems worthy of discussion.
  2. On a personal level, it has affected me, at least peripherally. I am a pastor, and I performed the wedding ceremony for a young couple a year and a half ago. Since that time, the male decided to come out and transition to female. So this wedding and the following changes have given me pause to work through some of these issues. I'm still learning.
  3. As given athletic performance, I should reveal my basic stance, which isn't set in stone. From my perspective, it does seem unfair for someone with a male assignment at birth to be able to transition to female and compete with females, even after testosterone suppression. In non-subjective sports (i.e., in sports largely dependent on athletic ability and strength, so especially track and field, swimming, cycling, skiing, skating, weight lifting, etc.) It seems intuitive that someone born male generally has an advantage. Note that there are always going to be exceptions to the rule. There may be a handful of women who transition to male, or who don't, who can compete with men. But I am 100% positive these are rare exceptions.
  4. These kind of issues extend beyond sports. I have seen a few things considering this in the realm of special forces. I believe certain baseline physical standards for men in special forces were changed so that women could also be in special forces. That is beyond the scope of this thread, and I'm not qualified to judge whether or not that is a good thing.

Nickel

January 11th, 2022 at 12:38 PM ^

It's a difficult question and I think many of us on the board can understand that and respect it.

On the meta level of the discussion however I don't think that even an online group like this is capable of doing so in a respectful way. One look at the 'University of Michigan Alumni' facebook page anytime it posts something even vaguely using the words Covid / climate-change / sexual-orientation / disadvantaged and it's clear that even a largely educated group pretty quickly reverts to a lowest common denominator level discussion of being jerks and hurling insults at each other online.

KC Wolve

January 11th, 2022 at 12:03 PM ^

I don't know the answer, but I am sure the old mostly white male politicians that seem to be really worked up about this will provide an adequate response.

sdogg1m

January 11th, 2022 at 12:03 PM ^

What is the update on Harbaugh?

There is little interest in a board dominated by men fighting over who can be the biggest beta.

sdogg1m

January 11th, 2022 at 12:22 PM ^

Realized while I have a conclusion on this subject that no one really cares and I dont need to divulge information.

I will say this that many of those who appear to support changes in sports like biological males competing against females lack self-control and refuse to tolerate any difference in opinion. This subject has become a mine field that most people try to stay away from.

My first statement was that unless you are apart of a certain group think here at mgoblog your post will get downvoted into obvilion.

Jmer

January 11th, 2022 at 12:07 PM ^

I'm all for equal rights. I'm also all for common sense and common sense says that biologically, men and woman are not created the same. Men typically have some advantages, like strength, that a woman doesn't. Which leads to biological men typically being bigger, stronger, and faster. The playing field isn't even. And it should be ok to say men and women are different.

My girlfriends was a division one softball player at DePaul. She is now an AAU softball coach and has done some scouting for various D1 schools. So this is actually a topic we have discussed a bit. Her fear is this is going to ruin women's sports at the NCAA level if something isn't done. It's not to hard to see individual sports like swimming, track, and tennis all have their records crushed in the coming years. 

Even a sport like basketball. Imagine putting a really talented biologically male all conference basketball player on a women's team. They could go for 45pts and 20 boards a night and if the rest of the team is serviceable, that team would become heavy favorites to dominate and make a run to the championship.

If one wants to transition for male to female, more power to them. Best of luck and I hope they live a life that makes them happier. To go through that transition, sacrifices are made. One of those sacrifices should be sports at the high school and NCAA level. 

Those are my feelings but I'm open to a thoughtful discussion.  

yossarians tree

January 11th, 2022 at 1:16 PM ^

This is as near to a correct answer I've seen on this discussion. The world simply cannot be 100% fair for every person. All we can do is try to make it as fair and inclusive for as many as possible. Biological-male born people who have gone through puberty are simply not able to compete fairly with females in competitive sports. The Penn swimmer in question is coming close to breaking Katie Ledecky's world record in the 1500. Not fair at all.

Maximinus Thrax

January 11th, 2022 at 12:09 PM ^

I expect this topic to generate as much informed and measured debate as the public comment period at my local school board meeting did last night as they prepared to discuss their mask mandate.  

Maximinus Thrax

January 11th, 2022 at 12:56 PM ^

TCAPS in Traverse City.  The same collection of idiots quoting anybody and everybody (usually out of context), making claims about Vitamin D, and one or two reminding us that only God can save us.  

 

Interestingly, these people seem to have forgotten how to use a calendar.  Lately we hear about how we are about to enter the "third year" of COVID-19.  So last night we saw one, then another, then eventually most of the commenters refer to having been dealing with this for three years. It was like watching a lie be born and grow up in real time. Um....no

Mgoeffoff

January 11th, 2022 at 12:09 PM ^

I have a lot of thoughts on this, however I am not at all confident that the board is capable of having this discussion.  I think this is a worthy topic of debate.  It probably won't end well here though.

TeslaRedVictorBlue

January 11th, 2022 at 12:20 PM ^

I think this is a challenging question that neither "side" is willing to have non-emotionally. I've thought about this for some time, and the answer doesn't seem to readily present itself. Which means, its a difficult conversation or argument to have - one with merit. One that we on this board, and in this country, and in this time, are completely unable to have.

I think we should cut the bike in half!

WindyCityBlue

January 11th, 2022 at 12:23 PM ^

StephenRKass.  I see from your profile that you've been a member for 13 years and have over 20k points.  You really think this is an appropriate post for MgoBlog?

Ashgeauxbleaux

January 11th, 2022 at 12:23 PM ^

What if old washed up LeBron begins to "identify " as a woman and moves on to the WNBA how fair is that.If you truly support women's rights you cannot support trans athletes not competing in their birth gender.

tomer

January 11th, 2022 at 12:27 PM ^

People keep saying "Oh, this won't end well." So far though, it seems like most people are engaging with this in good faith. I'm proud of you all.

crg

January 11th, 2022 at 12:29 PM ^

I believe there will likely be a fundamental re-examination of sporting divisions, primarily with sex/gender being replaced by something akin to weight class (or some other physical metrics).  This need was obvious long before the transgender issue further clouded the subject: we had seen for decades instances of women/girls wanting to compete in the men/boys divisions of their respective sports (and some of the converse), with varying degrees of success.

Blue Middle

January 11th, 2022 at 12:31 PM ^

I'll attempt to add something to the conversation.

Biology is real.  Men have certain athletic advantages.  It is not fair for a biological male to be competing with a biological female in athletics.

When we reach the point where transitioning actually bridges the biological divide, then competition will be more fair.

For now, the idea that you get to compete with whichever gender you identify diminishes women's rights and discourages biological females from honest competition.  It may even encourage biological females to use performance enhancing drugs in an effort to compete.

I'll go a step further.  Does this diminish the rights of the transgender athlete?  I'm not sure it does.  Competing on an unfair playing field is not really competing.  I don't get excited when I beat my six-year-old at checkers.  

Until we determine how to fix the biological challenges, perhaps the solution is to scrap gender in "male" athletics.  Let anyone compete at the "male" level and restrict "female" competition to biological females.  So no more "men's" basketball, just "basketball" and "women's basketball."  It feels clunky, but I don't see a better temporary fix.

EDIT: The only other alternative I can think of is to have "men," "women," and "other" in sports.  That feels tough, too.

Njia

January 11th, 2022 at 12:31 PM ^

One idea I've heard (though only once, which means it was likely reasonable but TOTALLY UNACCPTABLE TO THE ALL CAPS CROWD) is to have binary and non-binary gender sports and teams. We are already at the point where a binary woman can try out and - in some cases - get a spot on a football team. That would also probably work for team sports like soccer and, perhaps, hockey and field hockey. In those cases, the binary vs non-binary debate may not be as compelling.

In a sport that requires individual performance and in which an athlete clearly benefits from biological advantages associated with a X or Y chromosome, then fielding both binary (men's, women's) and non-binary teams may be preferable. Swimming is one example, but there are obviously others, such as gymnastics.

Mpfnfu Ford

January 11th, 2022 at 12:36 PM ^

I don't have every answer. I think it's fair for the olympics and the highest level of competition to have different rules than local high school districts. I'm open to changing my view on this, but everything lower than college is about teaching kids the value of teamwork and being apart of something bigger than themselves, and it's outrageous to bar trans kids from things like that when they already often have uphill battles and deal with stigmas that often isolate them and cut them off from community and team work. 

If a trans kid ends up being awesome on the HS softball team or local wrestling team, I don't think that's the earth shattering unfair thing people make it out to be.

4godkingandwol…

January 11th, 2022 at 12:36 PM ^

My take is that we talk about recognizing the rights of one class of citizen, which I’m totally for, but in this case it impacts a larger number of citizens unfairly. I don’t know a solution that will appease everybody, so in these cases I would choose the one that minimizes negative consequences. In my opinion (just mine), I’d optimize for fairness for the athletes born female. I would acknowledge that this sucks for trans athletes, acknowledge their right to self identify, and try to find a solution that allows them to participate but without direct competition. That will likely leave a group screaming bloody murder, but I think it is the right path. 

KRK

January 11th, 2022 at 12:37 PM ^

Hey Kass, nice job on the post and presenting this in a non-inflammatory way.  Half the comments are people predicting the implosion of this thread and the other half seem to be some reasoned responses.  Maybe don't come here just to say a thread is going to get nuked and offer something worthwhile?

I never thought about it much until my home state made a ban on trans-athletes competing in their new gender's group.  I was a little upset at first, but also realized it wouldn't have been fair for my sister to compete against me in track, and that is kind of what can happen.  The other comment on here about the steroid use is another thing I've never thought of.  This is so layered and complicated I really don't think there's a current solution anyone will find that can be equitable, at least not any time soon.  Almost feels like one group is going to get screwed and that's how it will be and my guess is it will be trans-athletes.  Really unfortunate situation for times we never predicted.

GoodLuckVarsity

January 11th, 2022 at 12:41 PM ^

So many comments to the tune of “this won’t end well” or “why did you post this?” yet all discussion so far has been thoughtful and respectful. In my opinion this is a topic that needs to be discussed. 
 

I’m a male who works full-time in sports as a coach and DOC.  I’ve coached at the college, high school and youth levels, and in recent years I’ve worked almost exclusively with female athletes. I have only had one trans athlete so far, but the case was extremely difficult to navigate. The athlete was a high school student who was in the process of transitioning from female to male. However, he chose to try out for the women’s team while still asking to be referred to with male pronouns, a male first name and presenting as male. As you can imagine, that created a lot of confusion as to how to handle the situation as the MHSAA’s stance is basically “do what you want.” I simply followed the guidance of the school counselor and AD. 
 

I will add that many of my players’ parents on the youth side of things seem VERY concerned about this issue despite never actually encountering a trans opponent player (that I know of). It seems like it’s in our nature to want to have policies in place to handle all contingencies, present or future. My personal opinion is that each case should be handled on a case-by-case basis, but as a society we really don’t like that. We want clear rules that we can all either agree or disagree with (and cite when we feel like someone else has broken them). Applying hard and fast rules to a very nuanced issue is probably going to lead to a lot of pissed off people in the future.

One final note - I do think it’s lame that raising any questions around fairness in this particular conversation can immediately earn you the “transphobic” label in some circles. Hard to make progress without conversation.  

KRK

January 11th, 2022 at 1:03 PM ^

I agree with your point about wanting to get policies in place ahead of things, and sometimes that makes things more messy and unfair in the long run. A lot of laws, legislation, and policies are put in place because of one or a few instances of something occurring, but as time passes and we learn more and gather more data we realize the initial policy is outdated or not effective.  But unwinding those is almost as impossible as find the actual proper solution.  I fear that could happen here with trans athletes whether at a local, state or federal level.  And the science behind all of this seems so new and unknown it makes the liklihood of finding the right solution even less likely to be the outcome.

4th phase

January 11th, 2022 at 5:52 PM ^

I agree with your point that people are VERY concerned about something that doesn't affect them or anyone they know. The percentage of trans women competing in women's sports is vanishingly small. And we never hear about all the athletes who are doing poorly to average after transitioning. We always get sensationalized headlines about the handful of times it was an issue. 

samsoccer7

January 11th, 2022 at 12:46 PM ^

I have not read all the comments.  As a physician my science brain wonders if there is a series of hormonal tests that could determine where the person should compete.  Maybe a physician/scientist panel that reviews the tests and makes a ruling.  I imagine males transitioning to females take medications to suppress some and enhance other hormones, so at some point maybe they transition from male to female sports as well.  Same goes for females transitioning to males, hormones one season may qualify for female sports and the next could push him into male sports.  Just a thought without knowing enough of the hormonal changes these people endure.

DenardmanX

January 11th, 2022 at 12:52 PM ^

I do not think its fair that a man can essentially step into a woman's sport and break all their records and dominate. 

 

Pretty straight forward and simple, but thats not the world anymore. We should make everything co-ed. All sports, all year, for the rest of time. That would be the best compromise. 

WindyCityBlue

January 11th, 2022 at 12:54 PM ^

Forthcoming topics I'll take the lead on creating:

1. The hipocrisy of monothesistic religions and how atheism is the answer

2. Pedophilia is a real sexuality and should be protected

3. Why Donald Trump deserves to be sainted and knighted

4. So lucky: how women have it so easy in the US

5. The bigger hoax: climate change or vaccine efficacy?

6. Change my mind: AOC is a hot piece of ass and I love the way her boobs bounce when she types.