njvictor

July 21st, 2022 at 12:35 PM ^

This is such a bad idea. If they do this, they need to also bring back the sit one year if you transfer. If they do this without bringing that back, get ready for super teams and top heavy sports to a level that no one has ever seen

jmblue

July 21st, 2022 at 10:52 PM ^

Yeah, I don't understand what he's suggesting. 

It's always been possible to transfer, as many times as you could fit in your window of eligibility.  But until recently you had to sit a year whenever you did.  Then they made the first transfer a free one.  Now they're proposing that second (and third...) transfers also be free.

NotADuck

July 21st, 2022 at 5:17 PM ^

Exactly.  I took this to mean the NCAA doesn't want to do anything other than sit in a chair in an office and play minesweeper on the computer until its time to clock out.  They don't do anything.  Like, anything.  Ever.

Laziest fucking institution I've ever seen...

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

July 21st, 2022 at 5:57 PM ^

Bingo. Not even sure about any relevance for the NCAA other than conducting year-end tournaments/playoffs, and that role could be displaced by a new group. Two cases in point: 1) NIT was previously the tournament to declare the de facto national champ and displaced by the NCAA, and 2) LIV threatening to displace the PGA as the premier pro circuit.

Amateurism? Gone. Enforcement of rule violations? Gone. Equal competitive standards like scholarship limits? Gone. Equal eligibility standards? Gone. 

CarrIsMyHomeboy

July 21st, 2022 at 5:01 PM ^

If they were going to move away from the one freebie statute, I really expected it to go in the direction of zero, rather than ... infinite. I suppose those are equally extreme numerical values, but, damn, this seems dumb.

To be clear, from the NCAA's perspective, it seemed like they only embraced the one-freebie rule to improve their positioning in court after losing the Bannon case. At this point, haven't they lost it all, rendering this positioning futile?

And then from the perspective of those who actually enjoy the game, I was fully cool with the one-freebie move in the pre-NIL environment. It was a form of power for the athletes and therefore a modicum of justice. But in the NIL environment, it feels problematic, like a potential corruption multiplier.

rockydude

July 21st, 2022 at 12:47 PM ^

Don’t get me wrong, I want players to get to have autonomy in their own lives. However, it just seems as though limitless transfers would  transform the collegiate landscape in such a way that academia would be an afterthought. Sports are meant to be an addition to scholastics, not a substitute. 

ShadowStorm33

July 21st, 2022 at 1:20 PM ^

Don’t get me wrong, I want players to get to have autonomy in their own lives.

There's nothing that prevents players from transferring as many times, and as frequently, as they want. The rules only restrict their eligibility to play for new teams, which I think is perfectly reasonable.