Vincent Gray Crystal Ball

Submitted by CincyBlue on
Allen Trieu just predicted in-state CB Vincent Gray to Michigan this morning. Gray is 6'2 and 180 pounds 3 Star CB out of Rochester. Seems he was heading to WVU before Michigan offered before the early signing period.

kaz

January 9th, 2018 at 12:40 PM ^

I've read on Michigan blogs that more specific departures are already known by the coaches in terms of why we're recruiting more spots than we seem to have available.

There are clearly people on the roster we could already point to that are probably never going to see the field.  It's another advantage that good recruiting teams have.   We can kick the tires on more players than other teams because once it becomes clear they won't play, a lot of our players transfer and open up spots because they will play at other schools.

And that's no loss for the players, they get a couple of years of Michigan coaching before they go

kaz

January 9th, 2018 at 11:50 AM ^

Winning at the CFP playoff level is a process, not a switch.

The more we win, the more 4/5 stars we attract.

And it's not like we aren't loaded with a bunch of them already.

MSU finished #15 with mostly 3 stars.  Wisconsin I think #7.  Are our coaches worse then theirs at identifying talent?  I doubt it

UMAmaizinBlue

January 9th, 2018 at 1:08 PM ^

Michigan to Michigan. I'm comparing Michigan to the likes of 3-star teams like Wissconsin and MSU. How about looking at the talent vs. finished product between us and them? It'll take time, I admit, and I have faith in them, but you're not going to get me to admit that JH&Co. have coached up their players better than teams like Wisconsin and MSU. 

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

January 9th, 2018 at 1:11 PM ^

Baker for UGA was a 3* and Wallace for a Bama was a ?* (walk on). The other 2 CBs were 4*. Gray's star rating isn't a perfect predictor of success but rather a likelihood of success. Multiply that probability across an entire roster and you get a much higher likelihood of success.

MJ14

January 9th, 2018 at 12:08 PM ^

Here's the star ratings of the top heisman candidates: 3* (ranked #1029 nationally) 4*(ranked 227 nationally) 4*(#119 nationally) 4*(#214 nationally) 3*(#371 nationally) 3*(#409 nationally) 4*(#305 nationally, barely a 4 star composite) 4*(#269 nationally) That's the list of heisman favorites for this past year. The top one is Baker Mayfield. The second worst one is Lamar Jackson. The last two heisman winners were 3*. Almost every single one of those players had at least one 3* rating at one of the 4 major sites as well. And this is the list of best college football players in the country. Recruiting matters but not every 3 star is a mediocre depth guy.

Maize and Blue…

January 9th, 2018 at 4:11 PM ^

that gives us 8 three stars that are composite 600+ when composite three stars start at 370 this year. I don't think any of them are Baker Mayfield and that leaves most of them 200 spots below evryone on that list except Baker.  If Doyle signs that would give us two more in the 500s and another in the 490s.  Hopefully they pan out, but that's counting on a high hit rate for mid to low three stars.

kaz

January 9th, 2018 at 2:51 PM ^

He was a low three star.  You're correct that he walked on.  He did have scholarship offers from lesser schools.  That happens at Michigan sometimes too that we get walk ons who have offers from lower tier schools

YaterSalad

January 9th, 2018 at 11:52 AM ^

Wanted to be comment 51 so I could make a 50 Replies of Gray reference ... The new mommy porn book for the football diehard. #ItsALotLamerThanItSoundedInMyHead

1VaBlue1

January 9th, 2018 at 11:55 AM ^

One thing to notice here is that there are really no 'true' safeties on the board, let alone the team.  Sure, there's JKP, Metellus, Kinnel, and a couple others.  But in the current croot group?  Don't think so.  Yet every DB is the same size - 6'2", 180-190.  They're all corners on the surface, because that's what they played in HS.  But most of them (more than half is my guess) will become safeties in Don Brown's defense.

The only weak spot (term used loosely) in the defense is safety, because they are asked to cover man in the slot and on deep/wheel routes just as often as the corners are expected to come up in tight run support.  There is a reason why so many versatile corners are being asked to come - they will be moved to safety.  The elite corners we get (Hill, Long, Thomas, St Juste, etc) will be corners, the best of the rest will be corners.  The others will be damn good man covering safeties.

kaz

January 9th, 2018 at 12:55 PM ^

We're still finalizing the class.

Also, he has two very differnet choices since GT is recruiting him at QB.  If he wants to be a QB, that's the type of offense he should be in.

I hope he decides if we do have the slot that being a swiss army knife for us is a better long term opportunity

S.G. Rice

January 9th, 2018 at 12:18 PM ^

1.  Recruit Vincent Gray, 3 star

2.  Change last name to Gary

3.  ???

4.  Upgraded to 5 star because last name Gary

 

Foolproof plan, once he dominates the B1G nobody will ever notice.

Jimmyisgod

January 9th, 2018 at 12:23 PM ^

Stars mean almost nothing for an individual recruit.  Stars are predictive though when you are talking about a class of recruits, or several classes of recruits.

People still can't seem to wrap their heads around that.  Gray's 3 star says very little about him, a class full of Grays though is pretty predictive.  You need a bigger sample size than 1 for stars to be predictive.

GoBLUE_SemperFi

January 9th, 2018 at 1:13 PM ^

...but Michigan isn't going to truly compete with Alabama, OSU or Georgia, until they have a really good season. 10-3 is a good start, but getting over that hump and the end of the season is a requirement for getting those next level recruits. I don't think anyone is saying that they wouldn't rather have 4 & 5-star recruits, but you do have to be reasonable regarding how that is going to get done and realistically, Coach Harbaugh will have to develop a few 3-stars in order to get there.

Don

January 9th, 2018 at 1:18 PM ^

When I hit the link on both phone and computer, all I get is the OP's post for about 1 second and then a big blue blank screen without any content, not even ads. On Chrome and FF too.

yooper2001

January 9th, 2018 at 1:33 PM ^

We are really going after those 3 star players. Maybe someday Harbaugh can compete with MSU. When we hired Harbaugh, I really thought we would compete with OSU and Alabama. I will go on record saying that you will NEVER beat teams that sign 5 star players with 3 star players consistantly. Move over Harbaugh, You are not the answer to beating Meyer or Saban. Best for you is trying to beat Dantonio

kaz

January 9th, 2018 at 1:41 PM ^

Half our team are 4 and 5 stars, right?

Also, you compete with OSU and Alabama by winning and building a rep and continuing to sign better players as you win.  It's not an instantaneous process

Supa Hot Fire

January 9th, 2018 at 1:38 PM ^

Lets just hope this year's weak class is because of the limited spots from last years loaded class. We will struggle to compete for championships with classes like this one

kaz

January 9th, 2018 at 2:44 PM ^

It's alreay way ahead of any Harbaugh class at Michigan at this point.

It's probably more about playing time than positions available for 3/4 stars.  With two mega classes in a row and few upper classmen, we only lose a few players in 2017 and 2018.  That means they'd be competing with starters and multi-year starters for the next few years.

With 5 stars, it's probably a combination of luck as well as wanting to see the results on the field.  2019 players may feel by the time they sign that's less of an issue because they will have the chance to see results before they actually sign.

Remember what happened to Hoke's 2015 class.  It was spectacular, then we lost all the top players when we tanked that year and it was increasingly obvious he'd be canned.  Of course they didn't know Harbaugh would end up coming

 

OneBadMutha

January 9th, 2018 at 5:21 PM ^

The problem with Michigan is their 4* and 5* lineman, WRs and QB were aweful. There’s enough 3* and below football players that go Pro to field many football teams. It’s about identifying and developing talent that compliments each other and whatever scheme a team is running. 5* means the talent is more obvious and exposed to the masses. Michigan beats Ohio States 5* loaded teams the past 2 years with average QB play. Ironically QB is one area Michigan has recruited great.

reddogrjw

January 10th, 2018 at 8:37 AM ^

obviously the more stars, the higher probability of success

I am sure the staff would love a class of nothing but 5-stars - who wouldn't

but since that isn't realistic, let's look at how Michigan is building a roster

2016 - 13 247 composite 3-stars

4 - solid players - K. Hudson, Nordin, McKeon, Metellus

4 - role players - McDoom, Spanellis, Dwumfour, Eubanks

2 - TBD - Uche, Gil

3 - no longer with the program - K. Davis, N. Johnson, Mbem-Bosse

 

the TBD and role players can still move up in the pecking order, but we needed depth so badly and one can't be too unhappy with the 2016 3-star class - those that fell behind are no longer here

 

2017 - 9 3-stars

solid players - B Mason

role players - Robbins, Woods, Paye, Hawkins, 

TBD - K. Taylor, Stueber, Honigford, Paea

 

a little early to evaluate, but those that have played have filled a need

 

let's look at some of the 2018 3-stars

Gemon Green, Sammy Faustin and German Green - Gemon has flipped back and forth from low 4-star to high 3-star - all 3 fit the 6'2" narrative for DB's - and given 5 defensive backs in 2017 and 4 in 2016 being able to red-shirt a couple defensive backs isn't a bad thing

RB's Turner and Haskins - a power back and a smaller back - both highly productive, both likely to red-shirt

TE Schoonmaker - looks like a Gentry replacement - Muhammed comes in and plays year one while Luke red-shirts - former QB

SDE Upshaw and Welschof - raw talent with not a ton of experience -seem likely to red-shirt

WR Bell - with the WR depth and missing on others grabbing a WR likely to red-shirt that was committed to play basketball isn't the worst thing - given that we turned down other, higher rated WR's (the guy who went to WV Spalding I think) the staff obviously likes him

it seems like more and more of the 3-star guys are likely to red-shirt - like we're building depth in the roster

the major needs are OT and DT which makes grabbing at least one more OT as well as Friday the key to a nice class

 

as far as the 3-star situation, the staff has done a nice job of finding ones that fit what they want, and those that don't move on so more guys can come in - i like that plan