December 24th, 2017 at 6:59 PM ^
makes it easier.
December 24th, 2017 at 7:19 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 6:55 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 6:58 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 7:08 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 7:14 PM ^
Sure thing.... just like they fired...
Rick Forzano
Tommy Husped
Monte Clark
Daryl Rogers
Wayne
Bobby Ross
Gary Moeller
The guy who took the wind on the coin toss in overtime
Mooch
Dick Jauron
Rod Marinelli
and Jim Schwartz...
Meanwhile the Steelers have had 3 head coaches total and a hand full of rings....
The problems start at the top of the food chain: The Fords
December 24th, 2017 at 8:29 PM ^
Joe Schmidt and Don McCafferty!
(sorry, I just figured I'd complete the list of Lions HCs since the Steelers hired Chuck Noll in '69)
December 24th, 2017 at 9:49 PM ^
December 25th, 2017 at 3:32 PM ^
Don't forget... LONG before Matt Millen there was Russ Thomas.
December 24th, 2017 at 7:18 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 7:47 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 7:57 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 8:02 PM ^
Because there is no coaching search. Martha will let Caldwell coach out his contract, and then Hotel Putingrad can suggest Jeff Fisher, whom Martha will hire.
#SOL
December 24th, 2017 at 8:07 PM ^
Is Jeff Fisher.
Doesnt matter what kind of talent you give them they will go 7-9 - 9-7. In real good years they will get you to 10 wins but theyll never win big games. Can't win big games in the NFL playing not to lose.
December 24th, 2017 at 7:27 PM ^
Not reviewing the Tate catch is inexcusable.
December 24th, 2017 at 7:38 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 7:43 PM ^
accomplishes unless they have an absolue upgrade available and ready. Otherwise its just perpetuating the culture of Detroit Lions football by replacing a coach after 3 or 4 years and hoping the next guy is the answer.
Lions need more and better players.
December 24th, 2017 at 10:32 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 11:24 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 8:00 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 8:10 PM ^
I like the guy. He's not that bad of a coach.
HOWEVER....the NFL is a results-oriented business. This team did not get it done. So if you want to burn everything, go ahead. I do not object.
December 24th, 2017 at 8:43 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 9:14 PM ^
We have a team full of third down backs and zero O-line depth.
Once Ngata went down, we had no one on the Dline that could stop the run.
Paul Worrilow was one of our starting LBs.
Whoeover starts opposite Darius Slay is a PI machine.
The only way this team can win games is with Stafford's arm. Trying to "establish the run" is a foolish strategy with a patchwork O-line. Why pay a QB $40mil a season if you won't tell him to win the game with his arm, starting in the 1st quarter.
December 24th, 2017 at 9:20 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 9:34 PM ^
This was Caldwell's 2nd to last game as a Lions head coach. I'm 95% sure. Fact that Lions made it public that he only had one more year to the extension was more than a sign he was on the hot seat. He's not good but coaches can be changed quickly. I'd contend that historically coaching isn't what's held them back the most. What's held them back ranks in the following order:
- Owner
- GM
- QB
- Coach
The top 3 will all be back. Stafford is a good QB but his play isn't equal to his contract. For all the credit we've given Bob, the 3 guys who've carried the team most this year were 1) Stafford 2) Prater and 3) Slay. When those 3 weren't great, Lions usually lost. Without those 3, Lions win between 0-2 games. Since Bob isn't responsible for those 3, how great a job is he really doing?
Owner pushed for Caldwell so Bob's clock never started. He'll be here 3 to 4 years regardless of how bad it goes because his first two years will be a wash under Martha since she kept her guy.
This franchise is a mess. I'd contend they're further from a Championship than an expansion team because they can't build to elite status around their current core contracts. No Lions fan wants to hear it but they need to tear this thing down and start by building in the trenches.
December 24th, 2017 at 10:14 PM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 10:39 PM ^
Huh? Stafford is the least of the Lions concerns. Theres about 25 teams in the league that would love for him to be their starter. The Lions primary issues are an underperfoming offensive line and abysmal running backs play.
December 29th, 2017 at 1:57 AM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 11:02 PM ^
December 29th, 2017 at 1:58 AM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 11:54 PM ^
December 25th, 2017 at 8:23 AM ^
December 25th, 2017 at 3:46 PM ^
The Lions O-line is garbage. FACT.
The Lions are DEAD FUCKING LAST in the league in rushing offense.
The Lions are tied for 27th in sacks allowed.
December 29th, 2017 at 1:59 AM ^
December 25th, 2017 at 3:29 PM ^
Dumbest thing on the internet today.
If Stafford was on a halfway competent organization, we'd be talking about him in the same breath as Manning or Brady.
Stafford is one of the best QBs in the league, has been for a while, and the morons in Detroit want to do nothing but tear him down.
December 29th, 2017 at 2:03 AM ^
December 24th, 2017 at 11:25 PM ^
December 25th, 2017 at 2:15 AM ^
December 25th, 2017 at 3:41 AM ^
December 25th, 2017 at 8:19 AM ^
December 25th, 2017 at 8:21 AM ^
December 26th, 2017 at 8:44 AM ^
When the William Clay Ford originally acquired the team, it was just another way for a rich guy to waste his money. It didn't cost much (relative to today), the players all worked off season jobs, some even sold cars, and it was more a rich guy diversion, like how some of these people buy yachts today.
But things changed. Now, it is a serious big money business. The Fords won't sell cheaply because a franchise now is worth close to a $1 billion - some teams are less but some are right at that mark. Sure, there are still some supraplutocrat owners where this is just an expensive way to pass time but for many it is becoming a major item in their business holdings. Don't know all the details, but the team may actually be the single most valuable holding the family has. The preferred stock in Ford automative has to be divvied up among the various cousins and relatives so their individual benefit is much smaller now than back in the days of Henry Ford II.
So long as the Lions print money, nothing dramatic will change. Some owners desperately want a winning team, that is a life goal for them, but others just want a money making one. For owners like the latter, they can often get good football people who are looking for a low pressure place where the goals are low (field a good team, keep attendance up, get into the playoffs now and then) Don't forget even some arguably bad owners often want a championship team - they are just jerks and idiots, so can't get good football people to work for them, but they do want to a great team.
December 25th, 2017 at 5:49 PM ^
December 25th, 2017 at 7:04 AM ^
December 25th, 2017 at 12:07 PM ^
Why do people keep saying this? His defenses have been medicore to bad. Bottom three in the league this year. If he were a DC for anybody else he wouldn't get a look. New England keeps winning despite him, with the best offense in the NFL.
December 25th, 2017 at 8:02 AM ^
will trade you a Hue Jackson for Jim Caldwell
"perspective"
December 25th, 2017 at 10:44 AM ^
No former Lions head coach has received another head coach position after coaching the Lions. It is the black hole for head coaches.
I'm not sure Bill Belichick could win at Detroit.
December 25th, 2017 at 11:30 AM ^
Time for Wayne Fontes triumphant return !!!
December 25th, 2017 at 3:26 PM ^
Ridiculous thread.
The Lions are a 6-10/7-9 team which overachieved this year. Look at the numbers and deny that.
Fine. Fire Caldwell. WHo do you hire then? And how is that coach going to be any difference since Monte Clark?
The common denominator is the Fords. NOT the coach.