Durkin: Lots of room for improvement on defense

Submitted by The Mad Hatter on

Apparently Durkin won't be satisfied until we figure out a way to hold teams to negative points.

http://www.mlive.com/wolverines/index.ssf/2015/09/dj_durkin_michigans_no_2-ranke.html#incart_river

 

"People can get caught up in statistics and obviously there were some good stats coming out of that last game, and the last couple, but we can make a lot of improvement," 

UMCoconut

September 29th, 2015 at 10:33 AM ^

I would be surprised if he left for anything other than a HC gig at this point.  He already turned down A&M (and maybe other DC gigs) to come coach under Harbaugh here at Michigan.  I assume he loves the guy and wants to work with him as much as possible before venturing out as a HC.

As a broader point, I'd be surprised to see Michigan lose assistants to equivalent jobs.  I think a lot of coaches want to coach under Harbaugh and learn, and I think Michigan is finally willing to pay assistants whatever is necessary.

orangeda

September 29th, 2015 at 1:38 PM ^

that he was coming back to the college game and UM, he loves working with and for Harbaugh because he knew he'd be on a team that had a chance to win a National Title, he isn't going to leave for another coordinator job. 

He will, however, eventually be a very hot head coaching prospect if he keeps doing what he's been doing, and so I expect him to be gone within the next 3 or 4 yrs.  But luckily, Harbaugh has shown to be extremely good at identifying good young coaching talent, so I think when that time comes he'll find a worthy replacement, still, it will suck to see Durkin go, as he appears to be a great D-Coordinator, and he also appears to be a phenominal recruiter.

trustBlue

September 29th, 2015 at 2:18 PM ^

I agree on all points but the last one. I'm not sure we've seen phenomenal recruiting out of Durkin yet.  

Out all of our commitments in the 2016, we have exactly one 4 star recruit on the defensive side of the ball (DE Ron Johnson).  All the other defensive remaining commits are 2 or 3 stars. I'm no stargazer, but that does not sound like an elite-level defensive haul.  I do expect that to change as recruits take notice of the product on the field, but its a little early to claim Durkin is a recruiting whiz.

M Squared

September 29th, 2015 at 7:15 PM ^

Personally, I wouldn't be so quick to give all of the credit to Durkin.  I think Mattison is an amazing coach and our D-Line has looked phenomenal - more so than our LBs if I had to nitpick.  Our anemic offense put our defense in very tough spots repeatedly last year and our defense nonetheless performed amazing prior to Durkin joining the crew.  

LSAClassOf2000

September 29th, 2015 at 11:03 AM ^

The implications are tremendous - we rough the Terrapins up so bad that they are indeed knocked back to the previous week, only to lose to West Virginia again. Now, does West Virginia knock them back again to relive their triumph over South Florida or do we want to create a "Loop Of Misery" for Maryland somehow? 

johnthesavage

September 29th, 2015 at 9:30 AM ^

There was at least one dropped interception..

But in general, of course he's right. It's only a few games into the season and this defense, like the rest of the team, can still improve a lot. Remember these are ~20 year olds in a brand-new system.

rob f

September 29th, 2015 at 9:35 AM ^

that nobody on our defense got B1G Defensive Player of the Week after the performance vs. BYU. Instead, it went to someone with pretty good numbers on a defensive team that has struggled a lot so far. Have we had any individuals win that honor yet this fall?

hunterjoe

September 29th, 2015 at 9:58 AM ^

How could they have?  We didn't have many PBUs, and our leading tackler was a CB with 5 if I remember correctly?  BYU ran like 20 plays all game, didn't leave much time for anyone to do anything worthy of an award.  Of course, I'm a bit sarcastic here, but that's the reality. 

wahooverine

September 29th, 2015 at 10:23 AM ^

PBUs and ints were hard to come by mainly because Mangums throws were largely innaccurate, or he never threw the ball in the first place cause the coverage was so tight.  He was running for his life or fumbling the entire time. The mistakes to clean up were whatever couple of plays led to the 100 yds they had.

hunterjoe

September 29th, 2015 at 10:42 AM ^

I'm almost thinking the inaccuracies were a product of 2 things, pressure and extremely tight coverage.  So unless they give points for either of those (which they won't) then we won't win anything.  The teams that give up 50 points but have a couple INTs have a better chance of winning an award.  Crazy to think of it that way but they look at stats more than the actual film.  

marti221

September 29th, 2015 at 1:10 PM ^

That's definitely a huge contributing factor. Just look at the last three years, it seemed like every QB we faced was having the most accurate throwing day of his career. We were never really able to make the opposing QBs uncomfortable, with pressure on the QBs themselves or the receivers. Just basic "bend don't break" defense. The problem is, while that can look good on the stat sheet, it also allows a QB to establish a rhythm. This is probably why we witnessed so many back breaking drives against us.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Wolverine In Exile

September 29th, 2015 at 9:46 AM ^

and Michigan continues its trajectory up this year with a surprising 9-3 or 10-2 season including a big win against OSU or MSU, my prediction is Jerry Jones is going to throw some T. Boone Pickens like cash at Durkin to come to Arkansas.

ClassOf14

September 29th, 2015 at 10:12 AM ^

If Arkansas does have a lot to spend, I don't see them going after a DC as their first option as head coach. Most coordinators seem like they have to take over a smaller program first and do well before they get a big Power 5 job (see: Malzahn, McElwain, Dantonio, Paul Chryst, Narduzzi, Brian Kelly, etc.)



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Bambi

September 29th, 2015 at 10:15 AM ^

I doubt it. Arkansas may not be a blue blood program, but they can attract some decent head coaching options. They just pulled Beilema from Wisconsin and before the got Petrino. They can probably do better than a guy who's never been a head coach.

Also look at Tom Herman, the OSU OC last year. He was arguably the best coordinator in the country last year and only got a HC job from Houston. If Durkin leaves, I think it will be for a smaller school than Arkansas.

McSomething

September 29th, 2015 at 9:52 AM ^

What is quite possibly my favorite part about his approach to coaching the defense is his wanting the players to stamp their own personalities onto the way they play their position. He doesn't want to make them into cookie cutter defensive players. I don't know, it seems like so simple yet so revolutionary an idea.

Space Coyote

September 29th, 2015 at 9:54 AM ^

I have never, in my entire life, seen a single play perfectly executed from all accounts, let alone a series, or a quarter, or a half, or a game, or a season, or a career. You can always be more disruptive, you can always get off blocks better, you can always have guys in better positions to make a play on the ball, you can always finish tackles better, you can always do better staying in your rush lanes, you can always read/react quicker. I mean, those are issues Michigan had repeatedly on Saturday and throughout the year, that they them give up yards, and possibly more yards against better teams. Those are areas where Michigan can still improve significantly between where they are relative to perfect.

This is a very good defense. I've never seen a unit that didn't have tons of room for improvement. Satisfaction is the saddest fiction; you are getting better or you're setting yourself up for failure down the road. I expect nothing less to come out of the mouth of one of our coordinators.

Year of Revenge II

September 29th, 2015 at 10:09 AM ^

Could not agree more, and very well said.  

There will come a time when, in order to win, the defense will have to step up to a higher level of play, whether for a  play, a series, or an entire game.  Not only do the coaches strive for continued improvement, when they mouth it, they inspire confidence in their conviction and ability to tackle the job.

Reader71

September 29th, 2015 at 10:44 AM ^

An anecdote. One of our great OL just destroyed a guy on a down block. The technique is nearly flawless. First step is fast and short and right on target. Head comes across, right on the numbers. Arched back, neck up, hands follow through explosively. The defender is literally taken off his feet and ends up flat on his back, with our great OL falling on top of him. The back reads the block, attacks the hole, and runs for a 40 yard gain. He's eventually brought down by a safety. We get in the film room and our great OL can't wait to get to the play so he can get his well-deserved pat on the back. But he looks at the grade sheet, and there's a minus mark on that play. Coach goes over the other 4 guys and how the play went, who did well, who messed up, and how to fix it. Finally gets to our great OL. Coach explodes -- this is horseshit! God damn it, you don't get a vacation for making a block! So you pancaked him, the play isn't over, you can't just lay down! Look at the next level! That safety makes the tackle! Go block his ass! Long, probably boring story short, you can never get complacent. There is always something you can fix, even when you have seemingly done a perfect job.

Rabbit21

September 29th, 2015 at 11:26 AM ^

While there is always room to improve, this is the kind of thing that can easily wear down a team, especially if they hit a rough patch.  Motivation is a tough thing, but if all you're ever getting is the stick and not the carrot it's pretty easy to start to check out.  

I think the message is awesome, I just think that sometimes people get caught up in that always be improving, never be happy mentality so much that it can be counterproductive.

Reader71

September 29th, 2015 at 11:55 AM ^

Well, yeah. We were very good, and this lineman was an All-Conference guy, maybe ended up All-American. That he was made an example of isn't a coincidence. As an aside, I think you're exactly right, which is why I think all the people who keep hammering Hoke for, "We had a great week of practice" are missing this aspect. We sucked last year, and my boy looked like he was losing the team, and the team was losing its confidence. So, he was trying to keep them together. Like the Old Man said, when things are going good, you have to ride them so they don't get complacent. But when things are going bad, you have to lighten up a bit. It's a funny meme, and even I laugh at it now that Hoke is gone, but it totally overlooks some important dynamics between a coach and a struggling team, or a coach and the way he uses the media to talk to his team.

riverrat

September 29th, 2015 at 9:57 AM ^

The comments by Peppers, in concert with the remarks posted elsewhere here by the BYU player, show the difference in coaching staffs...we can go on and on about execution, but this staff has figured out ways to prepare their players for what they'll face. The level of surprise that the players have in the ways that HARBAUGH and his staff prepare show that they didn't have this last year.

No wonder this team had no confidence last year. They were getting out-coached every week. 

It's good to be on the other side of the out-coached...

 

gwkrlghl

September 29th, 2015 at 9:58 AM ^

Durkin is smart and I'm sure he probably realized that some of the domination is due to a true freshman QB. OTOH, I bet many would be hard pressed to find too many mistakes