Differences Between UM/Bama&Clemson

Submitted by DTOW on January 7th, 2019 at 8:53 PM

Yes, I know we have a game thread for the championship.  This isn't meant to be based on the play by play happenings of tonight but rather the obvious differences that we see between the quality of our team (and just about everyone else) and these two teams.

 

To me, I think we actually have the skill set at the receiver position that would be about on par with both of them.  I think our secondary from this year and Bush are obviously at this level.  That being said, I'm not sure we'd have a single offensive or defensive lineman (outside of Gary) touch the field for either of these teams.  The difference in size and athleticism jumps off the screen.  

Wolverine0007

January 7th, 2019 at 8:59 PM ^

Uhhh...both offenses don't run it up the gut on 1st, 2nd and 3rd down? 

Instead, they actually pass the ball?

And when they actually pass the ball, they don't do what we do which is pass to our big, slow clunky tight ends all the time but to actual 5 star recievers? 

Double-D

January 7th, 2019 at 9:00 PM ^

One of them had a scumbag traitor as a DL coach. 

Regardless of the his colleagues that piece of shit should never be able to look one of players in the eye. 

Perkis-Size Me

January 7th, 2019 at 9:02 PM ^

The difference? Everything. Absolutely everything. 

But if you want to summarize it, we have stallions that our coaches opt to keep held up in the stables. Clemson and Alabama let their stallions run wild and do what they do best. 

carolina blue

January 7th, 2019 at 9:04 PM ^

it’s pretty well known that Bama has a better “strength and conditioning” program than anyone else. They barely even try to hide it. I mean, yes, they’re all 4-5 stars out there but that doesn’t make you THAT much bigger and stronger. 

Guy Fawkes

January 7th, 2019 at 9:05 PM ^

Bama/Clemson each have about 6-8 more impact players. Their best players are 1st round draft picks who actually have the stats to back them up. They each have depth that's ready to contribute. 

Oh, and, they each call plays like they're living in the year 2019. 

stephenrjking

January 7th, 2019 at 9:06 PM ^

Our OL has not been as good. Wasn't even average in 2017, really just average or a bit above this year. Makes a huge difference--no time for the deep passing plays to develop, which allows the defensive backs to clamp down on short stuff. Affects everything.

Our DEs this year were terrific. Our DTs this season don't come close to either of these two teams.

Harbaugh's playcalling philosophy this year is obviously considerably different from what Bama and Clemson do. Perhaps a better OL and a decision to actually alter the philosophy can change that. Who knows?

Oh, and Shea is good. Perhaps underutilized. But we might be watching the #1 overall picks in the 2020 and 2021 drafts playing QB here. 

Justibro

January 7th, 2019 at 9:09 PM ^

Talent wise Clemson really doesn't look heads and tails above us at all. Our DE's, Cb's and LB group look better but they r significantly more talented at the DT spot and safeties are more athletic. Their O-line looks better than ours by a fair amount but coach W did a lot to close that gap and I would suspect being us even closer next year. Our WR group looks much more talented but their RB looks more dynamic. The largest difference is they let all of their talent run wild and make plays

Justibro

January 7th, 2019 at 9:37 PM ^

I watched Clemson against Syracuse and BC also. From those games and this, Clemson is not significantly more talented, but yes more talented. However, clemskn really doesn't have a weak spot, unlike us. And Bama being up 28-0 is as much a coaching philosophy issue as anything which I stated in a previous thread and is one of our largest deficiencies for this year when u compare the 2 teams