Arb lover

December 12th, 2018 at 10:04 PM ^

I did a mostly hit piece on the toxic culture at OSU to start the season in a diary here. 

In short, even the media down there covers things up. Surprised, right? It probably got reported in the Cleveland papers, or will tomorrow, but that's as close as Columbus that is willing to mention anything of possible negative influence to thee ohio state college. 

UMDWolve

December 12th, 2018 at 8:01 PM ^

The detail I'm having a hard time understanding is the part where Zach Smith allegedly texted "I will kill that bitch" to her and there wasn't an immediate criminal investigation.  During the investigation, Zach Smith should have been suspended from his job at OSU pending the results of the criminal investigation.  This isn't a matter of differing viewpoints, politics or opinion.  This is an allegation of a crime (material threat) that should result in a very specific set of things happening (Zach Smith being immediately suspended).

 

So what happened?  Did she not report it to the police?  The alleged threat also included more targets, which makes it even worse if she didn't report it to the police.

NRK

December 12th, 2018 at 8:45 PM ^

It is not nearly as common as you would think that employers would suspend someone pending an investigation on something that is not related to the job. Yes, some employer would, but plenty don't.

While it seems like a domestic violence threat should lead to a suspension, EEOC guidance on use of arrests states:

 

The fact of an arrest does not establish that criminal conduct has occurred. Arrests are not proof of criminal conduct. Many arrests do not result in criminal charges, or the charges are dismissed. Even if an individual is charged and subsequently prosecuted, he is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

An arrest, however, may in some circumstances trigger an inquiry into whether the conduct underlying the arrest justifies an adverse employment action. Title VII calls for a fact-based analysis to determine if an exclusionary policy or practice is job related and consistent with business necessity. Therefore, an exclusion based on an arrest, in itself, is not job related and consistent with business necessity.

Another reason for employers not to rely on arrest records is that they may not report the final disposition of the arrest (e.g., not prosecuted, convicted, or acquitted).

Link.  The EEOC says it needs to be job-related and consistent with a business necessity to avoid some of the discrimination issues. The Guidance is just that - guidance (and not the law) - but they were pretty aggressively suing on in for a while, and most employer's policies have shifted to avoid a lawsuit on this.

Even if you were going to consider the arrest you'd also have to find out. Many employers simply don't know an employee was arrested unless they are told by the employee - there is not a report that would go out to the employer.

So yes, this was a possible outcome, but it's not a slam dunk at all and definitely not a foregone conclusion that he'd be suspended.

 

 

 

 

Arb lover

December 13th, 2018 at 11:27 AM ^

The EEOC guidelines on this topic are the most relaxed of any labor related government organization, just to point that out there. Since he was a younger white guy, he really doesn't have much of an EEOC claim for this to be relevant. 

Since this guy did have relationship issues with a subordinate (maybe not his subordinate, but still) at work, not a single government agency would have tried to second guess if he had been let go. 

NRK

December 13th, 2018 at 12:18 PM ^

Not to get too off topic here, but the EEOC spent quite a few years taking these type of innocuous complaints and turning them into pattern and practice claims once they got your policies, race of  an individual claimant be damned. I'm speaking from experience on that (as I'm sure you are as well). It obviously has shifted more recently.

I do agree that I doubt it would be an issue if they suspended him. My point was more that that many employers aren't nearly as quick in their responses after a decade of overzealous aggressiveness from the EEOC.

And truthfully, I've seen way too much crazy stuff from gov't agencies in the past decade to say that no agency would touch it... :)

 

 

 

FauxMo

December 12th, 2018 at 8:05 PM ^

OK, I am still trying to wrap my mind around two things:

-First, did that TV station or whoever produced that article hire a mentally challenged 13 year old to write it?

-Second, WHERE IN THE FUCK WAS THIS INFORMATION IN JULY OR AUGUST? Are these people for real with a massive data dump a few days after the scumbag retires? You have got to be kidding me with that backward fucking state. Can you imagine anyone anywhere trying this bull fucking shit? Seriously, if there is any justice in this universe, that fucking football team and the entire school fall off the face of the Earth. 

Perkis-Size Me

December 12th, 2018 at 8:09 PM ^

Whole state did what it needed to to protect Meyer.

I’ve said this over and over and I still stand by it. If this had happened under Cooper’s watch, these documents would’ve been released within 24 hours of being written up, and Cooper would’ve been unanimously fired by the BoT and run out of town by the whole fanbase.

jbrandimore

December 12th, 2018 at 8:18 PM ^

In all seriousness, I do think most of us are not interpreting this timeline correctly.

They didn’t just decide to release this stuff a week after Urbz retired.

He retired because he knew this stuff was coming out this week.

Considering how shitty the state of Ohio was on this sordid mess, I wouldn’t be surprised if a deal had been cut to delay this document dump until after the CFP lineup had been set.

Yooper

December 12th, 2018 at 8:20 PM ^

If you don’t consider such things as the consequences to a victim of domestic violence, lying to the public and investigators, immorality, etc., etc., when all said and done OSU played getting rid of Meyer unbelievably well. Makes me sick that they get to move on without consequence. 

jbrandimore

December 12th, 2018 at 8:52 PM ^

Be thankful they didn’t get the “punishment” the NCAA gave OSU in 2011 after Tressel was fired.

Back then, OSU was allowed to hire Meyer as a coach in waiting - going above staffing limits- and allowed him to recruit all that fall making sure OSU didn’t have that typical crappy transitional recruiting class.

If the NCAA had followed that precedent, we might have had Bob Stoops recruiting all fall in anticipation of taking over next year.

iMBlue2

December 13th, 2018 at 10:33 AM ^

 Not to get too preachy but this is a microcosm of what North American society has become...it’s all about appearances and perceptions if you project as a high class personable entity regardless of fact that is what people will believe...marketing has taken over and most folks lack the ability to be critical thinkers as there is no reward for doing so

Northfielder

December 12th, 2018 at 9:28 PM ^

What a monumental surprise. Who would have thought that Urban Meyer was a lying, cheating piece of shit? 

But hey, the dude was 7 and 0 against Michigan.

Where is Heywood to tell us all we were wrong? Urban is a saint and poor Zachie was just misunderstood?

Fuck the whole state of Ohio. Cooler pooping, enabling, mouth breathing, sister marrying dregs. 

I've hated those assholes since I was 8 years old. This kind of stuff just makes my hate justified. (In my warped old mind anyway).

NotADuck

December 12th, 2018 at 9:42 PM ^

As of right now, there is nothing on ESPN's website about this.  Not even a headline stating that documents have been released.  Hope they're just waiting for one of their writers to pen something instead of trying to avoid the subject.

evenyoubrutus

December 12th, 2018 at 10:00 PM ^

They must have only released this to the public OUTSIDE of Columbus because 11 Warriors doesn't have a single article on it. But they had ten articles on Daxton Hill decommitting so they must have been kept in the dark.

Durham Blue

December 12th, 2018 at 10:28 PM ^

Nothing, I mean NOTHING (besides my family's health and world peace), would make me happier on January 1 than Urban leaving OSU as a loser in the Rose Bowl.  Fuck, I want that real bad.  Go U-DUB!

bdneely4

December 12th, 2018 at 10:37 PM ^

It is really odd that the OSU troll slappies that are on every other Urban Meyer/Zach Smith threads that have showed up the past 3 months are nowhere to be seen on this one. 

You Only Live Twice

December 12th, 2018 at 10:49 PM ^

BTW, OSU, if you want to learn how it is done... read the just released report, a true independent report (the law firm doing the report does not represent any of the parties being investigated) that details how institutions and people enabled Larry Nassar.

Yeah I have a link and such and meant to post a thread today, got busy and will try to do so tomorrow. 

waliwiz1

December 13th, 2018 at 8:57 AM ^

Who gives a fart about Smith? Nothing that comes out now is going to change anything. All this does is give more fuel to those who want to point fingers. It has nothing to do with winning ball games.

Smith beat his wife, Meyer is gone, meh.

Does that change anything about the total humiliation of this years game? Ha! Ohhhh we lost because Smith beat his wife, yeah right. Or, ohh we lost because Meyer did, or didn't know about it. Don't make me laugh.

Everyone knows why the game was lost and every facet has already been discussed ad nauseum.

 So get over it. They are not going to replay the game because of Smith.